I'm using Java. So I have a comma separated list of strings in this form:
aa,aab,aac
aab,aa,aac
aab,aac,aa
I want to use regex to remove aa and the trailing ',' if it is not the last string in the list. I need to end up with the following result in all 3 cases:
aab,aac
Currently I am using the following pattern:
"aa[,]?"
However it is returning:
b,c
If lookarounds are available, you can write:
,aa(?![^,])|(?<![^,])aa,
with an empty string as replacement.
demo
Otherwise, with a POSIX ERE syntax you can do it with a capture:
^(aa(,|$))+|(,aa)+(,|$)
with the 4th group as replacement (so $4 or \4)
demo
Without knowing your flavor, I propose this solution for the case that it does know the \b.
I use perl as demo environment and do a replace with "_" for demonstration.
perl -pe "s/\baa,|,aa\b/_/"
\b is the "word border" anchor. I.e. any start or end of something looking like a word. It allows to handle line end, line start, blank, comma.
Using it, two alternatives suffice to cover all the cases in your sample input.
Output (with interleaved input, with both, line ending in newline and line ending in blank):
aa,aab,aac
_aab,aac
aab,aa,aac
aab_,aac
aab,aac,aa
aab,aac_
aa,aab,aac
_aab,aac
aab,aa,aac
aab_,aac
aab,aac,aa
aab,aac_
If the \b is unknown in your regex engine, then please state which one you are using, i.e. which tool (e.g. perl, awk, notepad++, sed, ...). Also in that case it might be necessary to do replacing instead of deleting, i.e. to fine tune a "," or "" as replacement. For supporting that, please show the context of your regex, i.e. the replacing mechanism you are using. If you are deleting, then please switch to replacing beforehand.
(I picked up an input from comment by gisek, that the cpaturing groups are not needed. I usually use () generously, including in other syntaxes. In my opinion not having to think or look up evaluation orders is a benefit in total time and risks taken. But after testing, I use this terser/eleganter way.)
If your regex engine supports positive lookaheads and positive lookbehinds, this should work:
,aa(?=,)|(?<=,)aa,|(,|^)aa(,|$)
You could probably use the following and replace it by nothing :
(aa,|,aa$)
Either aa, when it's in the begin or the middle of a string
,aa$ when it's at the end of the string
Demo
As you want to delete aa followed by a coma or the end of the line, this should do the trick: ,aa(?=,|$)|^aa,
see online demo
Related
This regex:
"REGION\\((.*?)\\)(.*?)END_REGION\\((.*?)\\)"
currently finds this info:
REGION(Test) my user typed this
END_REGION(Test)
I need it to instead find this info:
#region REGION my user typed this
#endregion END_REGION
I have tried:
"#region\\ (.*?)\\\n(.*?)#endregion\\ (.*?)\\\n"
It tells me that the pattern assignment has failed. Can someone please explain what I am doing wrong? I am new to Regex.
It seems the issue lies in the multiline \n. My recommendation is to use the modifier s to avoid multiline complexities like:
/#region\ \(.*?\)(.*?)\s#endregion\s\(.*?\)/s
Online Demo
s modifier "single line" makes the . to match all characters, including line breaks.
Try this:
#region(.*)?\n(.*)?#endregion(.*)?
This works for me when testing here: http://regexpal.com/
When using your original text and regex, the only thing that threw it off is that I did not have a new line at the end because your sample text didn't have one.
Constructing this regex doesn't fail using boost, even if you use the expanded modifier.
Your string to the compiler:
"#region\\ (.*?)\\\n(.*?)#endregion\\ (.*?)\\\n"
After parsed by compiler:
#region\ (.*?)\\n(.*?)#endregion\ (.*?)\\n
It looks like you have one too many escapes on the newline.
if you present the regex as expanded to boost, an un-escaped pound sign # is interpreted as a comment.
In that case, you need to escape the pound sign.
\#region\ (.*?)\\n(.*?)\#endregion\ (.*?)\\n
If you don't use the expanded modifier, then you don't need to escape the space characters.
Taking that tack, you can remove the escape on the space's, and fixing up the newline escapes, it looks like this raw (what gets passed to regex engine):
#region (.*?)\n(.*?)#endregion (.*?)\n
And like this as a source code string:
"#region (.*?)\\n(.*?)#endregion (.*?)\\n"
Your regular expression has an extra backslash when escaping the newline sequence \\\n, use \\s* instead. Also for the last capturing group you can use a greedy quantifier instead and remove the newline sequence.
#region\\ (.*?)\\s*(.*?)#endregion\\ (.*)
Compiled Demo
I am processing a CSV file and want to search and replace strings as long as it is an exact match in the column. For example:
xxx,Apple,Green Apple,xxx,xxx
Apple,xxx,xxx,Apple,xxx
xxx,xxx,Fruit/Apple,xxx,Apple
I want to replace 'Apple' if it is the EXACT value in the column (if it is contained in text within another column, I do not want to replace). I cannot see how to do this with a single expression (maybe not possible?).
The desired output is:
xxx,GRAPE,Green Apple,xxx,xxx
GRAPE,xxx,xxx,GRAPE,xxx
xxx,xxx,Fruit/Apple,xxx,GRAPE
So the expression I want is: match the beginning of input OR a comma, followed by desired string, followed by a comma OR the end of input.
You cannot put ^ or $ in character classes, so I tried \A and \Z but that didn't work.
([\A,])Apple([\Z,])
This didn't work, sadly. Can I do this with one regular expression? Seems like this would be a common enough problem.
It will depend on your language, but if the one you use supports lookarounds, then you would use something like this:
(?<=,|^)Apple(?=,|$)
Replace with GRAPE.
Otherwise, you will have to put back the commas:
(^|,)Apple(,|$)
Or
(\A|,)Apple(,|\Z)
And replace with:
\1GRAPE\2
Or
$1GRAPE$2
Depending on what's supported.
The above are raw regex (and replacement) strings. Escape as necessary.
Note: The disadvatage with the latter solution is that it will not work on strings like:
xxx,Apple,Apple,xxx,xxx
Since the comma after the first Apple got consumed. You'd have to call the regex replacement at most twice if you have such cases.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, you can have some 'hybrids' since some language have different levels of support for lookbehinds (in all the below ^ and \A, $ and \Z, \1 and $1 are interchangeable, just so I don't make it longer than it already is):
(?:(?<=,)|(?<=^))Apple(?=,|$)
For those where lookbehinds cannot be of variable width, replace with GRAPE.
(^|,)Apple(?=,|$)
And the above one for where lookaheads are supported but not lookbehinds. Replace with \1Apple.
This does as you wish:
Find what: (^|,)(?:Apple)(,|$)
Replace with: $1GRAPE$2
This works on regex101, in all flavors.
http://regex101.com/r/iP6dZ8
I wanted to share my original work-around (before the other answers), though it feels like more of a hack.
I simply prepend and append a comma on the string before doing the simpler:
/,Apple,/,GRAPE,/g
then cut off the first and last character.
PHP looks like:
$line = substr(preg_replace($search, $replace, ','.$line.','), 1, -1);
This still suffers from the problem of consecutive columns (e.g. ",Apple,Apple,").
From the following text...
Acme Inc.<SPACE>12345<SPACE or TAB>bla bla<CRLF>
... I need to extract company name + zip code + rest of the line.
Since either a TAB or a SPACE character can separate the second from the third tokens, I tried using the following regex:
FIND:^(.+) (\d{5})(\t| )(.+)$
REPLACE:\1\t\2\t\3
However, the contents of the alternative part is put in the \3 part, so the result is this:
Acme Inc.<TAB>12345<TAB><TAB or SPACE here>$
How can I tell the (Perl) regex engine that (\t| ) is an alternative instead of a token to be saved in RAM?
Thank you.
You want:
^(.+?) (\d{5})[\t ](.+)$
Since you are matching one character or the other, you can use a character class instead. Also, I made your first quantifier non-greedy (+? instead of +) to reduce the amount of backtracking the engine has to do to find the match.
In general, if you want to make capture groups not capture anything, you can add ?: to it, like:
^(.+?) (\d{5})(?:\t| )(.+)$
Use non-capturing parentheses:
^(.+) (\d{5})(?:\t| )(.+)$
One way is to use \s instead of ( |\t) which will match any whitespace char.
See Backslash-sequences for how Perl defines "whitespace".
Is there a simple way to ignore the white space in a target string when searching for matches using a regular expression pattern? For example, if my search is for "cats", I would want "c ats" or "ca ts" to match. I can't strip out the whitespace beforehand because I need to find the begin and end index of the match (including any whitespace) in order to highlight that match and any whitespace needs to be there for formatting purposes.
You can stick optional whitespace characters \s* in between every other character in your regex. Although granted, it will get a bit lengthy.
/cats/ -> /c\s*a\s*t\s*s/
While the accepted answer is technically correct, a more practical approach, if possible, is to just strip whitespace out of both the regular expression and the search string.
If you want to search for "my cats", instead of:
myString.match(/m\s*y\s*c\s*a\*st\s*s\s*/g)
Just do:
myString.replace(/\s*/g,"").match(/mycats/g)
Warning: You can't automate this on the regular expression by just replacing all spaces with empty strings because they may occur in a negation or otherwise make your regular expression invalid.
Addressing Steven's comment to Sam Dufel's answer
Thanks, sounds like that's the way to go. But I just realized that I only want the optional whitespace characters if they follow a newline. So for example, "c\n ats" or "ca\n ts" should match. But wouldn't want "c ats" to match if there is no newline. Any ideas on how that might be done?
This should do the trick:
/c(?:\n\s*)?a(?:\n\s*)?t(?:\n\s*)?s/
See this page for all the different variations of 'cats' that this matches.
You can also solve this using conditionals, but they are not supported in the javascript flavor of regex.
You could put \s* inbetween every character in your search string so if you were looking for cat you would use c\s*a\s*t\s*s\s*s
It's long but you could build the string dynamically of course.
You can see it working here: http://www.rubular.com/r/zzWwvppSpE
If you only want to allow spaces, then
\bc *a *t *s\b
should do it. To also allow tabs, use
\bc[ \t]*a[ \t]*t[ \t]*s\b
Remove the \b anchors if you also want to find cats within words like bobcats or catsup.
This approach can be used to automate this
(the following exemplary solution is in python, although obviously it can be ported to any language):
you can strip the whitespace beforehand AND save the positions of non-whitespace characters so you can use them later to find out the matched string boundary positions in the original string like the following:
def regex_search_ignore_space(regex, string):
no_spaces = ''
char_positions = []
for pos, char in enumerate(string):
if re.match(r'\S', char): # upper \S matches non-whitespace chars
no_spaces += char
char_positions.append(pos)
match = re.search(regex, no_spaces)
if not match:
return match
# match.start() and match.end() are indices of start and end
# of the found string in the spaceless string
# (as we have searched in it).
start = char_positions[match.start()] # in the original string
end = char_positions[match.end()] # in the original string
matched_string = string[start:end] # see
# the match WITH spaces is returned.
return matched_string
with_spaces = 'a li on and a cat'
print(regex_search_ignore_space('lion', with_spaces))
# prints 'li on'
If you want to go further you can construct the match object and return it instead, so the use of this helper will be more handy.
And the performance of this function can of course also be optimized, this example is just to show the path to a solution.
The accepted answer will not work if and when you are passing a dynamic value (such as "current value" in an array loop) as the regex test value. You would not be able to input the optional white spaces without getting some really ugly regex.
Konrad Hoffner's solution is therefore better in such cases as it will strip both the regest and test string of whitespace. The test will be conducted as though both have no whitespace.
<![Apple]!>some garbage text may be here<![Banana]!>some garbage text may be here<![Orange]!><![Pear]!><![Pineapple]!>
In the above string, I would like to have a regex that matches all <![FruitName]!>, between these <![FruitName]!>, there may be some garbage text, my first attempt is like this:
<!\[[^\]!>]+\]!>
It works, but as you can see I've used this part:
[^\]!>]+
This kills some innocents. If the fruit name contains any one of these characters: ] ! > It'd be discarded and we love eating fruit so much that this should not happen.
How do we construct a regex that disallows exactly this string ]!> in the FruitName while all these can still be obtained?
The above example is just made up by me, I just want to know what the regex would look like if it has to be done in regex.
The simplest way would be <!\[.+?]!> - just don't care about what is matched between the two delimiters at all. Only make sure that it always matches the closing delimiter at the earliest possible opportunity - therefore the ? to make the quantifier lazy.
(Also, no need to escape the ])
About the specification that the sequence ]!> should be "disallowed" within the fruit name - well that's implicit since it is the closing delimiter.
To match a fruit name, you could use:
<!\[(.*?)]!>
After the opening <![, this matches the least amount of text that's followed by ]!>. By using .*? instead of .*, the least possible amount of text is matched.
Here's a full regex to match each fruit with the following text:
<!\[(.*?)]!>(.*?)(?=(<!\[)|$)
This uses positive lookahead (?=xxx) to match the beginning of the next tag or end-of-string. Positive lookahead matches but does not consume, so the next fruit can be matched by another application of the same regex.
depending on what language you are using, you can use the string methods your language provide by doing simple splitting (and simple regex that is more understandable). Split your string using "!>" as separator. Go through each field, check for <!. If found, replace all characters from front till <!. This will give you all the fruits. I use gawk to demonstrate, but the algorithm can be implemented in your language
eg gawk
# set field separator as !>
awk -F'!>' '
{
# for each field
for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){
# check if there is <!
if($i ~ /<!/){
# if <! is found, substitute from front till <!
gsub(/.*<!/,"",$i)
}
# print result
print $i
}
}
' file
output
# ./run.sh
[Apple]
[Banana]
[Orange]
[Pear]
[Pineapple]
No complicated regex needed.