Are there any ways to pass recaptcha response token through API request as header value using Insomnia or Postman clients?
I know that response token is generated after recaptcha widget is loaded and user
interacted with it. And response token is being refreshed after each time module is loaded.
Maybe there are some addons for these REST clients which can generate response token based on public recaptcha key? Or other REST clients which have these feature.
P. S. Now I have to comment block of code which is responsible about server-side recaptcha validation.
Update: are there any other ways to test such API endpoint?
Related
We have a django project that uses the Graphene-Django library to implement a GraphQL API in our project. This backend is accessed by our mobile apps. For the authentication of the apps, we use the django-graphql-jwt library, which is a JSON Web Token library in Django with GraphQL approach.
Now we want to implement the Facebook Login in our system and with it the authentication happens in Facebook. After authentication, what will be sent to our backend from the mobile app is only the email of the user. How can I register and authenticate the user in django-graphql-jwt without the password? Or is there a better workflow for this?
After authentication, what will be sent to our backend from the mobile app is only the email of the user.
Hey Al Ryan, this seems like a faulty implementation of OAuth, what you get back from facebook is a token you send that token to your server, and it will send it back to facebook to verify it's not faked, then only user can be logged in.
Otherwise anyone can call the server with a email and act as that user.
This is a library with social auth and JWT support, see if this helps.
I'm also sharing solution from my project
Create a facebookAuth named graphql mutation
Above mutation will take two params access_token and access_verifier
Send a GET request to this url f"https://graph.facebook.com/me?fields=name,email&access_token={access_token}"
If json response has a key errors, stop user from logging in.
Otherwise above response will contain email, use it to create/get a User object.
Now you simply need to return the JWT token from your mutate function.
To generate access and refresh tokens call this function jwt_encode, imported as from dj_rest_auth.utils import jwt_encode
above will return tuple access_token, refresh_token
Note I have used dj_rest_auth instead of django-graphql-jwt, but it's pretty equivalent you just need a function to sign the JWT, rest all is custom logic so better write yourself.
PS: OAuth is a sensitive entry-point for attackers so implement is securely, you can contact at atul7555[at]gmail.com for any assistance.
When using Postman to fetch an access token via Authorization Code, one of the fields I need to enter is for the Callback URL, aka the redirect URI query param when it's making the request to the authorization endpoint. I understand this URL needs to be registered/whitelisted within the OAuth provider, but my question is how does postman actually handle/intercept that request/redirect back when it's localhost-based? For example, if I already had a local server running on http://locahost:8090, and I told postman to use http://localhost:8090 for that callback, how does Postman end up seeing that request/redirect back (to exchange the auth code for an access token) instead of my local web server handling that request?
TL;DR: Postman basically ignores the callback URL when processing the response.
The Long Story
It does need it, but only for the request. As you say, it needs to be correct - exactly matching the IdP client application config - but that's it.
Postman is just helping you acquire the token, it doesn't need to provide it to the consuming application, which is the whole point of the redirect URL - a static path known by the client app and the OAuth client application that makes sure an evil website / intermediary doesn't steal tokens by abusing the redirection flows.
Since it's not meant to work on a browser on the internet, Postman can ignore the redirect. Once the IdP responds with the token then, as far as Postman is concerned, it's good to go. It can save the token in the local token store and use it to make API requests.
Implicit Flow
This is set up to get a token from an Okta endpoint:
When I click "Request token", Postman makes a request like this:
GET https://exampleendpoint.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/authorize?nonce=heythere&response_type=token&state=state&client_id={the_client_id}&scope=profile%20openid&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8080%2Fimplicit%2Fcallback
Postman pops a browser to make this request to the /authorize endpoint, at which the IdP then either creates the token (if the browser already has a cookie), or performs various redirects to authenticate the user and then create the token.
At the end of this flow, Postman will receive the 302 from the IdP that contains the token (on the location header). The target of that redirect is the redirect URL configured in the IdP:
302
Location: http://localhost:8080/implicit/callback#access_token=eyJraWQiOiJxOGRmTGczTERCX3BEVmk4YVBrd3JBc3AtMFU1cjB6cXRUMFJveFZRUVVjIiwiYWxnIjoiUlMyNTYifQ.{the_rest_of_the_token}&token_type=Bearer&expires_in=3600&scope=profile+openid&state=state
At this point Postman grabs the token from the #access_token parameter and it's good to go.
Auth Code Flow
Auth Code flow comes in 2 flavours:
Auth Code (Classic)
Auth Code + PKCE
Auth Code flow has been seen as "better" than the implicit flow because it requires a 2nd step in the process to get an access token. You hit authorize which gives the client a code and the code is then exchanged for the tokens. This code for token gives more chances for the server side components to do more stuff - extra checks, enrich tokens and various other things.
Q: Why are there 2 Auth Code flows?
A: The problem with this was that it required a server side component, which many SPA's and/or mobile apps didn't want to host. The endpoint that receives the code and gets the token(s) had to maintain credentials - a client id and client secret - which are required by the IdP when creating the token. PKCE is an extension that removes the requirement for a trusted server. It's adds computed hash to the /authorize call, which the IdP remembers, and then on the subsequent call to /token the client provides the source value of the hash. The server does the same computation, checks it's the same as that on the original request and is then satisfied that it's not handing out tokens to a bad guy.
Auth Code with PKCE
In terms of redirects, this is exactly the same as implicit. But for requests, it needs to make the second request to exchange the code for the tokens. The main differences here are
the access token URL, which is where to send the code and get tokens in response.
the code challenge and verifier, which are PKCE requirements for generating and computing the hash
The requests are now as follows:
The GET to /authorize
GET https://exampleendpoint.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/authorize?nonce=heythere&response_type=code&state=state&client_id={client_id}&scope=profile%20openid&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8080%2Fimplicit%2Fcallback&code_challenge=E7YtiHqJRuALiNL_Oc5MAtk5cesNh_mFkyaOge86KXg&code_challenge_method=S256
Postman will pop the browser (and the IdP will redirect it through login if required)
The eventual code response is also 302, however the location header contains the code rather than tokens:
location: http://localhost:8080/implicit/callback?code=J3RlQqW122Bnnfm6W7uK&state=state
So now the client needs to call the endpoint defined in the "Access Token URL" field to get tokens:
POST https://exampleendpoint.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/token
Body:
grant_type: "authorization_code"
code: "J3RlQqW122Bnnfm6W7uK"
redirect_uri: "http://localhost:8080/implicit/callback"
code_verifier: "Fqu4tQwH6bBh_oLKE2zr0ijArUT1pfm1YwmKpg_MYqc"
client_id: "{client_id}"
client_secret: ""
And the response is a good old 200 that doesn't redirect - the authorize call sends the client back to the final redirect landing page, and the POST is just a normal request with the tokens on the the response
{"token_type":"Bearer","expires_in":3600,"access_token":"eyJraWQiOiJxOGRmTGczTERCX3BEVmk4YVBrd3JBc3AtMFU1cjB6cXRUMFJveFZRUVVjIiwiYWxnIjoiUlMyNTYifQ.*******","scope":"profile openid","id_token":"eyJraWQiOiJxOGRmTGczTERCX3BEVmk4YVBrd3JBc3AtMFU1cjB6cXRUMFJveFZRUVVjIiwiYWxnIjoiUlMyNTYifQ.********"}
I want to secure my API with Multi-factor-Authentication on top of Auth Token/JWT. I have been searching but couldn't find any package that can work with drf. I am thinking to write my own django app. Any comments on what should be the architecture ?
One solution that comes to my mind is to introduce the token base architecture.If a user is accessing the mfa secured api then the request instance should be saved alongside a token and a sms should be sent to his mobile (In case of mobile as mfa) and response should be a that token. Then another request should be made to a mfa endpoint with token and mfa-code. Once verified, We would take his previous request object and complete the request.
Been reading and watching quite a bit, and asking a lot of questions regarding ReactJS and Django.
This particularly helped me to understand the the flow of data from Django REST Framework to ReactJS and from ReactJS to Django REST Framework.
Django Forms and Authentication with Front-end Framework (AngularJS/ReactJS)
However, the one thing I am trying to understand is authentication to the Django REST Framework. I understand from the documentation that it has built in authentication. Since this is sensitive data, I would obviously want it protected people retrieving it just by going to http://www.my_site.com/info/api.
I would need to setup ReactJS to be the only thing that can request data from the API whether that is through a key or username/password credentials. I am just curious how this is handled? Obviously I don't want that hard coded in ReactJS because it will compile with the rest of ReactJS.
Here's how I'd approach it: I'd use a JSON Web Token (JWT) for authentication and authorization.
You'd use your back-end to protect ALL API requests from invalid JWT's except for routes where a user won't have a token (ie, registration/log-in pages).
Here's how the flow of the application will go:
A new user registers to your app with standard credentials such as email and password.
Your back-end will create a new user, sign a new JWT token (usually with the user's ID). You'll probably use a third-party library to sign/verify tokens (I don't have experience in the Django community but I am sure a quick Google search will give you answers). Your back-end will send back this token. This is the only time the back-end will receive email, passwords or any other sensitive information on registration.
From this point on React will only use this token for authorization. React will save this token somewhere (ie, localStorage) and send this token along with the other parts of a request to the API routes you created with your back-end. You'll send this token in the authorization headers in the request.
Your back-end will validate this token using a third-party library. If it's invalid the request stops and an unauthorized error is returned. If it's valid the request continues.
This achieves the following:
Your API routes are protected against unauthenticated users
Each request to your API is verified for authorized users which protects anyone from requesting any part of your API.
You can further solidify this by only allowing requests for users to modify their own data. For example, protect Suzy's profile from being modified by people other than herself by only allowing her token with her ID to modify her account/data.
Important Note- Your backend will never save these tokens in storage. It will verify the token on each request. Read more about JSON Web Tokens (JWT) and how it works.
Django Rest Framework has built-in token authentication and a third party package for JWT Token Auth.
If you the standard token auth would work for you, then it could be pretty simple with drf-redux-auth. If you need JWT for some reason, as suggested by Keith above, you could easily fork the above...
After reading a lot about Oauth2.0, I am still confused regarding following points:
When to create access token? When a user tries to log in or when a user tries to register? Is this token to be sent in HTTP response after logging in?
The client has to store access token somewhere so that it can be sent in every HTTP request by the client. Where should it store it?
Note: I am not doing any third party authentication, just authentication for my own app. I am using Django as the web framework, Django-tastypie for REST API and Django-oauth-provider for Oauth. I followed this excellent tutorial but still have certain doubts. It will be appreciated if the answer is given in the context of these frameworks.