I'm trying to put my event handler function in a file called app.lambda.js because the app.js should contain only generic stuff not related to AWS Lambda.
But specifying "app.lambda.handler" as a handler yields Bad handler app.lambda.handler.
Is it simply impossible to use dots in the file name of the handler module?
Yes, You should give app.handler. Only one dot will allow you in handler name.
Try by giving your filename.handler. It will work for you.
Related
I am using a ServiceBusTrigger to execute code when receiving a message. I would like to use the Singleton attribute to limit which messages can be executed in parallel. This attribute allows specifying a scope bound to properties on the incoming message, such that messages with different values can be executed in parallel but ones with the same value must be done serially.
This works when using top level properties on the incoming message object like CorrelationId.
Example
[Singleton("{CorrelationId}", SingletonScope.Function, Mode = SingletonMode.Function)]
public async Task HandleMessage(
[ServiceBusTrigger("my-topic-name", "my-subscription-name"), ServiceBusAccount("my-account-name")]
Message message,
CancellationToken cancellationToken
)
{
await Task.Yield();
}
What I am struggling to figure out is how to achieve the same behavior with user properties on the message. These are stored in the UserProperties dictionary on the Message object. I'm not seeing a way to refer to these with the binding statement in the Singleton attribute, but it seems like this would be a very common use case when combining Singleton with ServiceBusTrigger
The Service Bus Bindings exposes Message Metadata in binding expressions. So, userProperties.<key> should do the trick.
I want to use executable file within AWS lambda handler function.
Here is my handler function where I want to use executable
func handler(){
cmd := exec.Command("./balance", "GetBalance", id)
cmd.Dir = "/Users/xxxx/go/src/getBalance"
output, err := cmd.Output()
}
I want to use the output of the above command in this handler. Is it possible to use? If possible, do I need to zip both executables? Or is there any other way where I can use executable within the handler?
Sadly, you will not be able to write to /Users/xxxx/go/src/getBalance. In lambda, you have access only to /tmp.
Also, if you bundle the balance file with your deployment package it will be stored in /var/task alongside your function code.
EDIT:
Based on the new comments, to complete solution also required removal of cmd.Dir and recompilation of balance for linux.
I have a CloudWatch scheduled event invoking a Lambda function.
The event is currently passing a JSON with some parameters. One of which contains the event name, handwritten, which isn't very elegant and can lead to typos.
I cannot choose to pass the Matched event, as I am also passing some other parameters as JSON.
So I would somehow need to pass the event as a parameter in that JSON object, but I couldn't find any docs about that.
How can I get the invoking event name inside the Lambda function?
You can use input transformer which can be used to add your own stuff plus something from the meta data available. In your case
Input path will be
{"ruleName":"$.resources[0]"}
While the Input template will be
{"yourKey": "yourValue", "ruleName": <ruleName>}
The screenshot is here
And this is how it will be available in your lambda function
{
yourKey: 'yourValue',
ruleName: 'arn:aws:events:someregion:someaccountId:rule/testevent'
}
Hope this helps.
I have a application with a Django backend and an AngularJS front-end.
I use the angular-gettext plugin along with Grunt to handle translations.
The thing is, I sometimes received dynamic strings from my backend through the API. For instance a MySQL error about a foreign key constraint or duplicate key entry.
How can I add this strings to the .pot file or non harcoded string in general ?
I've tried to following but of course it cannot work :
angular.module('app').factory('HttpInterceptor', ['$q', '$injector', '$rootScope', '$cookieStore', 'gettext', function ($q, $injector, $rootScope, $cookieStore, gettext) {
responseError: function (rejection) {
gettext('static string'); //it works
gettext(rejection.data.error); //does not work
$rootScope.$emit('errorModal', rejection.data);
}
// Return the promise rejection.
return $q.reject(rejection);
}
};
}]);
})();
One solution I could think of would be to write every dynamic strings into a JSON object. Send this json to server and from there, write a static file containing these strings so gettext can extract them.
What do you suggest ?
I also use angular-gettext and have strings returned from the server that need to be translated. We did not like the idea of having a separate translation system for those messages so we send them over in the default language like normal.
To allow this to work we did two things. We created a function in our backend which we can call to retrieve all the possible strings to translate. In our case it's mainly static data that only changes once in a while. Ideally this would be automated but it's fine for now.
That list is formatted properly through code into html with the translate tag. This file is not deployed, it is just there to allow the extraction task to find the strings.
Secondly we created a filter to do the translation on the interpolated value, so instead of translating {{foo}} it will translate the word bar if that's was the value of foo. We called this postTranslate and it's a simple:
angular
.module('app')
.filter('postTranslate', ['gettextCatalog', function (gettextCatalog) {
return function (s) {
return gettextCatalog.getString(s);
};
}]);
As for things that are not in the database we have another file for those where we manually put them in. So your error messages may go here.
If errors are all you are worried about though, you may rather consider not showing all the error messages directly and instead determine what user friendly error message to show. That user friendly error message is in the front end and therefore circumvents all of this other headache :)
I would like to increase the deploy time, in a stack layer that hosts many apps (AWS Opsworks).
Currenlty I get the following error:
Eror
[2014-05-05T22:27:51+00:00] ERROR: Running exception handlers
[2014-05-05T22:27:51+00:00] ERROR: Exception handlers complete
[2014-05-05T22:27:51+00:00] FATAL: Stacktrace dumped to /var/lib/aws/opsworks/cache/chef-stacktrace.out
[2014-05-05T22:27:51+00:00] ERROR: deploy[/srv/www/lakers_test] (opsworks_delayed_job::deploy line 65) had an error: Mixlib::ShellOut::CommandTimeout: Command timed out after 600s:
Thanks in advance.
First of all, as mentioned in this ticket reporting a similar issue, the Opsworks guys recommend trying to speed up the call first (there's always room for optimization).
If that doesn't work, we can go down the rabbit hole: this gets called, which in turn calls Mixlib::ShellOut.new, which happens to have a timeout option that you can pass in the initializer!
Now you can use an Opsworks custom cookbook to overwrite the initial method, and pass the corresponding timeout option. Opsworks merges the contents of its base cookbooks with the contents of your custom cookbook - therefore you only need to add & edit one single file to your custom cookbook: opsworks_commons/libraries/shellout.rb:
module OpsWorks
module ShellOut
extend self
# This would be your new default timeout.
DEFAULT_OPTIONS = { timeout: 900 }
def shellout(command, options = {})
cmd = Mixlib::ShellOut.new(command, DEFAULT_OPTIONS.merge(options))
cmd.run_command
cmd.error!
[cmd.stderr, cmd.stdout].join("\n")
end
end
end
Notice how the only additions are just DEFAULT_OPTIONS and merging these options in the Mixlib::ShellOut.new call.
An improvement to this method would be changing this timeout option via a chef attribute, that you could in turn update via your custom JSON in the Opsworks interface. This means passing the timeout attribute in the initial Opsworks::ShellOut.shellout call - not in the method definition. But this depends on how the shellout method actually gets called...