I build the LLVM from source in release edtion.Now get the loop or cycle information is what i need.But it just can't work.
$opt -passes=print<cycles> input.ll -o /dev/null
zsh: no such file or directory: cycles
The unix command opt -passes=print<cycles> input.ll means to run the command opt -passes=print while reading from the file named cycles and writing to the file named input.ll.
Have a look at the answers to this question for more about this shell syntax.
You may want to use opt -passes='print<cycles>', that will at least not be interpreted by the shell, but I fear that won't work either. I've no idea what print<cycles> is supposed to achieve.
I have a C++ project setup with CMake, running on Mac. Recently I am looking into adding Fortify to do auto code analyzation. I am using Fortify version 22.1.
After set up the CMake and shell scripts, I found that if I compile with more than one CPU (using -j), the compiler (c++ or g++) will have issues generating the libs. Sometimes it will pass and successfully generate the Fortify output, but others it will just error out. Multi CPUs compile fine for this project without running Fortify.
I also see this error when I compile with Fortify (no matter it success or not):
[error]: Translator execution failed. Please consult the Troubleshooting section of the User Manual.
Translator returned status 1:
error: unable to handle compilation, expected exactly one compiler job in ''
This error always happens after a "Linking CXX xxxxx xxxx". I can't find any documentation about them.
Does anyone know how to solve this? Thank you.
Update more details about my setup:
I use shell files to wrap the sourceanalyzer like this:
#!/bin/bash
exec sourceanalyzer -b MyApp /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/c++ "$#"
And my CMake setup like this:
if (${ENABLE_FORTIFY} EQUAL 1)
set(CMAKE_CC_COMPILER ${AVSxAppDALDefaultImplementation_SOURCE_DIR}/scripts/fortify-build-cc.sh)
set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER ${AVSxAppDALDefaultImplementation_SOURCE_DIR}/scripts/fortify-build-cxx.sh)
endif()
My shell script to run CMake and then to the scan:
cmake $PACKAGEPATH \
...
-DENABLE_FORTIFY="${ENABLE_FORTIFY}"
echo "---BUILDING---"
make release
if [[ $ENABLE_FORTIFY == 1 ]]; then
echo "---RUNNING FORTIFY SCAN---"
sourceanalyzer -b ${CURRENT_PROJECT_NAME} -scan -f fortify_scan_result_${CURRENT_PROJECT_NAME}.txt
fi
I am currently trying to install NIST's sclite, which is part of SCTK 2.4.0 (github or newer version). I am attempting the install on Cygwin in bash. The installation is done using make.
I have gotten past the make configure and make all parts of the installation. This didn't come without some effort (See the SO posts on the first (file not recognized) and second (template/scoping) problems). When I get to the make check part of the install, a lot of the checks/tests pass, but then I get the following error.
Testing acomp.pl
No tests defined for acomp.pl
make[2]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/acomp'
(cd def_art; make check)
make[2]: Entering directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/def_art'
Testing def_art.pl
def_art.pl passed without tests
make[2]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/def_art'
(cd hubscr; make check)
make[2]: Entering directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/hubscr'
Testing hubscr.pl
./RunTests.pl
Running test 'test1-sastt', operation 'test', options '-G -f rttm -F rttm -a', directory 'test1-sastt.test'
Executing command
Error: unable to get the version for program def_art.pl with the command 'def_art.pl' at ../hubscr.pl line 419.
Error: Execution failed at ./RunTests.pl line 30.
make[2]: *** [makefile:20: check] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/hubscr'
make[1]: *** [makefile:68: checkFast] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src'
make: *** [makefile:52: check] Error 2
I've done some research (described below), and I've been able to get past this problem. However, this involved including some outdated perl modules (Perl4).
My first question was how to fix this error or how to skip that part of the test. I've been able to fix the error, and if people think that it's safe, I'll put it as an answer. Note that there is one more problem with make check after this problem is fixed, but I mention how to get past that at the end.
I'm wondering if using the old Perl (Perl4::CoreLibs) is safe and/or good programming practice. Would it be better to change the source code to use Perl5 stuff?
Is there a better way altogether?
One thing I want to be sure of is that there are no critical tests further down the make check line which might fail.
System Details
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 CAP-D-ENG-INT3 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64 Cygwin
$ bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.4.12(3)-release (x86_64-unknown-cygwin) ...
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.4.0 ...
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 6.4.0 ...
$ make --version
GNU Make 4.2.1
Built for x86_64-unknown-cygwin ...
$ systeminfo | sed -n 's/^OS\ *//p'
Name: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise
Version: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
Configuration: Member Workstation
Build Type: Multiprocessor Free
My Attempts/Research
From the output above, we have def_art.pl passing the check because there are no checks - "def_art.pl passed without tests". However, the next thing checked, hubscr.pl, failed. The error comes from def_art.pl.
The obvious thing to do seemed to be to run def_art.pl, which I did.
$ ./src/def_art/def_art.pl
Can't locate getopts.pl in #INC
(#INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.26/x86_64-cygwin-threads /usr/local/share/perl5/site_perl/5.26 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26/x86_64-cygwin-threads /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26 /usr/lib/perl5/5.26/x86_64-cygwin-threads /usr/share/perl5/5.26)
at ./src/def_art/def_art.pl line 40.
So it seems to me that this is a deprecated perl file (or module, or whatever).
I dug a little further and found this discussion on a kaldi discussion from 2014. (kaldi is a speech-recognition toolkit that uses the SCTK scoring system). There are 3 sections of the discussion that I think are especially relevant, which I will link (first, second, third). I'll insert parts here:
def_art.pl is looking for getopts.pl which I coudn't find on my machine!
... [T]hese are legacy packages that are no longer supported in recent versions
of Perl 5. I don't think we should accept a dependency on them. They have
been deprecated since the beginning of Perl 5.
Instead of 'require "getopt.pl"', we should be doing
use Getopt::Std
(note: modern perl code should not call "require" for system packages).
There is a similar issue with "flush.pl" in the Perl scripts. I don't know
what the Perl 5 package name is.
... There are several places where this occurs.
I finally found that both getopts.pl and flush.pl are available from Perl4::CoreLibs. The URL that I use for wget was referenced at this site. Apparently, in other *NIX distros, the package manager can be used, e.g.
apt-get install libperl4-corelibs-perl
or
yum install perl-Perl4-CoreLibs
but I could not find an install via apt-cyg. I was able to install them from a tarball, as described in the What I'm Doing section.
One again, I'll state my main question: Is this safe/good programming practice? Is there a better solution?
If there is a better solution (using Perl 5), it seems that this link might lead the way to it.
Some other links that are possibly related: link_{n} and link{n+1} about flush.pl, link_{n+2} & link_{n+3} about getopts.pl and Perl4::CoreLibs.
What I'm Doing
$ mkdir perl_added
$ cd perl_added
$ wget http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/Z/ZE/ZEFRAM/Perl4-CoreLibs-0.004.tar.gz
$ tar -xzf Perl4-CoreLibs-0.004.tar.gz
$ cd Perl4-CoreLibs-0.004
Rather than adding this directory's lib subdirectory to the PERLLIB environment variable with a one-time command-line, environment-variable-addition thing, I did the following.
Make a new directory in the /usr/lib directory, move the files there
$ stat /usr/lib/libperl4-corelibs-perl
stat: cannot stat '/usr/lib/libperl4-corelibs-perl': No such file or directory
# Checked that the directory didn't already exist. It didn't exist.
$ mkdir /usr/lib/libperl4-corelibs-perl
# Make each file executable, then move it into the new directory
# I'd like to come back and explain this.
$ find ./lib -type f -name "*.pl" -print0 | xargs -I'{}' -0 \
bash -c 'new_dir=/usr/lib/libperl4-corelibs-perl/; chmod +x {}; \
mv {} ${new_dir}'
Finally, I made it so that this directory will become part of the perl search path every time I use a terminal by adding the following line to my ~/.bashrc
This command adds the path to the PERLLIB environment variable. Different flavors of Linux have different syntax for adding to environment variables, make sure to find out what yours is!
export PERLLIB="/usr/bin/libperl4-corelibs-perl:$PERLLIB"
The commands I ran for this were
$ echo -e "\n\n## Allow Perl to use the files in Perl4::CoreLibs" >> $HOME/.bashrc
$ echo -e "export PERLLIB=\"/usr/lib/libperl4_corelibs_perl:$PERLLIB\"" >> $HOME/.bashrc
$ source $HOME/.bashrc
(Thanks to #melpomene for noting that the current version is 0.004, not 0.003.)
After that, I went back to the base folder of the install and ran make clean, make config, make all, and make check.
That did get me farther in the make check but not by far.
I'm wondering if using the old Perl (Perl4::CoreLibs) is safe and/or good programming practice. Would it be better to change the source code to use Perl5 stuff?
P.S. After all this, you probably want to go back and delete the folder where you untarred everything. In my case:
rm -rf /path/to/where/I/started/perl_added
The Result/Next Steps
A bunch of tests that passed and then
(cd hubscr; make check)
make[2]: Entering directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/hubscr'
Testing hubscr.pl
./RunTests.pl
Running test 'test1-sastt', operation 'test', options '-G -f rttm -F rttm -a', directory 'test1-sastt.test'
Executing command
Unescaped left brace in regex is illegal here in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/{_recursive_/_recur_{ <-- HERE _sive_/_si_ve_}_}/ at ../../md-eval/md-eval.pl line 1099, <DATA> line 12.
Error: MDEVAL failed
Command: md-eval.pl -nafcs -c 0.25 -o -r sastt-case1.ref.rttm.filt -s sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt -M sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt.mdeval.spkrmap 1> sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt.mdeval at ../hubscr.pl line 679.
Error: Execution failed at ./RunTests.pl line 30.
make[2]: *** [makefile:20: check] Error 255
make[2]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src/hubscr'
make[1]: *** [makefile:68: checkFast] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/David/programs/sctk2.4.0/sctk/src'
make: *** [makefile:52: check] Error 2
Maybe this will be helpful. I will post a separate question for this issue or, if the solution is quick, I will add the solution on this post.
A Better Way
(Actually, a couple of better ways. See my comment under the question for the kaldi solution.)
In talking with colleagues and friends, it seems that there isn't anything unsafe about the Perl4 stuff. I did find a better way to get them "installed", but I'll leave the notes in the question showing the "long way" with the tarball, PERLPATH, etc.
Check that you have CPAN
$ which cpan
If you see something starting with which: no cpan in (...), you most likely don't have it. Try installing perl. For me, on Cygwin, I used
$ apt-cyg install perl
(Install apt-cyg if necessary, cf. here for instructions.)
You probably won't have to install Perl. You will likely see something like /usr/bin/cpan as the output of which cpan. If so, you're good. Enter cpan at the command prompt.
$ cpan
If it's your first time, it will ask a bunch of questions about the configuration. I just pressed "Enter" to accept the default each time, I finally got a prompt like this:
cpan shell -- CPAN exploration and modules installation (v2.18)
Enter 'h' for help.
cpan[1]>
There, I entered
cpan[1]> install Perl4::CoreLibs
The install will proceed. When it will have finished, you will be able to type exit and press "Enter", which will take you back to the bash command prompt.
cpan[2]> exit
Lockfile removed.
$
At this point, make check will still choke, but the install will complete successfully. If you want the make check to get all the way through, go to the "Getting past make check" section below. At this point, though, you can do the last two steps in the process.
$ make install
At this point I added the install path to my PATH variable. Hopefully, I'll be able to put in a link about that process. Here is a one-time solution.
$ export PATH=/path/to/sctk/bin:$PATH
Here is a lasting solution.
Now, for the last step in the installation process:
$ make doc
After the make doc, I made sure that the man pages were available. I looked on my machine until I found the place where other man files went. (Sorry, I don't have a systematic way of doing it, I just looked in a lot of places.) For me, on Cygwin, the directory was /usr/man/man1
I went into the doc directory
cd doc
and copied all of the files into the directory I had found
cp -r ./* /usr/man/man1/
Note that there are also now html and htm files in the directory that also provide documentation.
Getting past `make check`
So, you really want to see it go through without errors. You need to change the following file: src/hubscr/RunTests.pl
Originally it has the following beginning, which I have used the head command to show.
$ head -n 15 src/hubscr/RunTests.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $operation = (defined($ARGV[0]) ? $ARGV[0] : "test");
sub runIt{
my ($op, $testId, $options, $glm, $hub, $lang, $ref, $systems) = #_;
my $baseDir = $testId.".base";
my $outDir = $testId.($op eq "setTests" ? ".base" : ".test");
print " Running test '$testId', operation '$op', options '$options',
directory '$outDir'\n";
system ("mkdir -p $outDir");
system ("rm -fr $outDir/test* $outDir/lvc*");
### Copy files
foreach my $file($glm, $ref, split(/\s+/,$systems)){
system("cp $file $outDir");
Change it so that, after the print command, you have new lines as follows. I again use the head command to show the beginning of the file
$ head -n 63 src/hubscr/RunTests.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $operation = (defined($ARGV[0]) ? $ARGV[0] : "test");
sub runIt{
my ($op, $testId, $options, $glm, $hub, $lang, $ref, $systems) = #_;
my $baseDir = $testId.".base";
my $outDir = $testId.($op eq "setTests" ? ".base" : ".test");
print " Running test '$testId', operation '$op', options '$options', directory '$outDir'\n";
####DWB, 2018-05-21 Getting `make check` to work####
if ( $testId eq "test1-sastt" &&
$operation eq "test" &&
$options eq "-G -f rttm -F rttm -a" &&
$outDir eq "test1-sastt.test" ) # <problem 1>
{
print "\n";
print "\n#### SKIPPING ####";
print "\nJust kidding. That breaks the make.";
print "\nIt said: \n\n";
print "\nUnescaped left brace in regex is illegal here in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/{_recursive_/_recur_{ <-- HERE _sive_/_si_ve_}_}/ at ../../md-eval/md-eval.pl line 1099, <DATA> line 12.";
print "\nrror: MDEVAL failed";
print "\nCommand: md-eval.pl -nafcs -c 0.25 -o -r sastt-case1.ref.rttm.filt -s sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt -M sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt.mdeval.spkrmap 1> sastt-case1.sys.rttm.filt.mdeval at ../hubscr.pl line 679.";
print "\nError: Execution failed at ./RunTests.pl line 30.\n\n";
print "\n"
print "\nThat's a perl legacy problem, see:"
print "\n[https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/375505/291375][1]"
print "\nI'm outta here.";
print "\n Sincerely, bballdave025";
print "\n";
print "\n";
return;
}#endof: if (<problem 1>)
if ( $testId eq "test2-sastt" &&
$operation eq "test" &&
$options eq "-G -f rttm -F rttm -a" &&
$outDir eq "test2-sastt.test" ) # <problem 2>
{
print "\n";
print "\n#### SKIPPING ####";
print "\nJust kidding. That breaks the make.";
print "\nIt said: \n\n";
print "\nError: Test test2-sastt has failed. Diff output is :";
print "\ndiff -i -x CVS -x .DS_Store -x log -x '*lur' -I '[cC]reation[ _]date' -I md-eval -r test2-sastt.test/sastt-case2.sys.rttm.filt.alignments/segmentgroup-116.html test2-sastt.base/sastt-case2.sys.rttm.filt.alignments/segmentgroup-116.html";
print "\n 45c45";
print "\n < jg.drawStringRect(\"SUB48\",0, 47, scale*656, \"left\");";
print "\n ---";
print "\n#### and a whole bunch of other draw stuff! ####";
print "\n1 at ./RunTests.pl line 61.\n\n";
print "\n"
print "\nThat looks like Java drawing code, and I don't"
print "\neven want to mess with it!"
print "\nI'm outta here.";
print "\n Sincerely, bballdave025";
print "\n";
print "\n";
return;
}#endof: if (<problem 2>)
system ("mkdir -p $outDir")
Now you should be able to get through. Try it:
make check
How can I increase the verbosity of the build process?
Bazel seems to print compiler commands only if something goes wrong during the build.
I would like to see which compiler comands the cc_library rule fires, even if everything seems to be fine, to debug linking problems.
I already tried various bazel command line parameters but nothing gives me the compiler commands :(
This is probably what you are looking for:
bazel build --subcommands //my:target
The --subcommands option causes Bazel's execution phase to print the full command line for each command prior to executing it.
Useful information taken from Envoy's bazel readme (https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/blob/master/bazel/README.md)
When trying to understand what Bazel is doing, the -s and --explain options are useful. To have Bazel provide verbose output on which commands it is executing:
bazel build -s //source/...
To have Bazel emit to a text file the rationale for rebuilding a target:
bazel build --explain=file.txt //source/...
To get more verbose explanations:
bazel build --explain=file.txt --verbose_explanations //source/...
Maybe you can generate the compile_commands.json file. I have created Shell scripts (under Linux) to automate that: https://github.com/vincent-picaud/Bazel_and_CompileCommands.
You might also find the following useful in addition to the accepted answer of using --subcommands (-s):
bazel build --subcommands --verbose_failures //my:target
The --verbose_failures option causes Bazel's execution phase to print the full command line for commands that failed.
Although it would seem the --subcommands option supercedes it given it is documented to display prior to command execution, I have found cases (with bazel 5.2.0) where for a failing command, --subcommands alone shows only a portion of the command along with <remaining N arguments skipped>. Using both --subcommands and --verbose_failures displays the full command line in these cases.
Im back porting ffmpeg to an older version of debian.
everything is going well, but its so slow.
I am running dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
with a debian rules file that looks like this:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $#
override_dh_auto_configure:
./configure
I notice, this is only processing on 1 core.
is there anything like make -j 4 that I could use to speed this up?
I've been using this guide, but i don't see anything for speeding up the build step
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
Sure, you can use -j 4 as an argument to dpkg-buildpackage. It is documented in the man page. The relevant section is:
-jjobs Number of jobs allowed to be run simultaneously, equivalent to
the make(1) option of the same name. Will add itself to
the MAKEFLAGS environment variable, which should cause all
subsequent make invocations to inherit the option. Also adds
parallel=jobs to the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable which
allows debian/rules files to use this information for their own
purposes. The parallel=jobs in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment
variable will override the -j value if this option is given.