I'm trying to figure out how I can use recursion to do n-level nested for loops.
For example, if n=3, there would be 3 'levels'
for(z=0;z<6;z++){
for(y=0;y<6;y++){
for(x=0;x<6;x++){
if (z+y+x==f){
//do something
}
}
}
}
and so on.
I can't seem to figure out how I would be able to place the if loop in the last for loop and how I can access the variables of previous for loops from the if statement. I know that the question of variable nested loops has been asked alot of times, and I have looked through all of them. But none seem to help me.
Could someone present an easy way of using recursion to achieve this, keeping in mind that I'm still a beginner in c++, to point me in the right direction?
The use case is as follows:
Write a program to input the number of dice m. The program will output the total number of possible cases, the number of possible cases for each possible n and the n with the highest probability. Note: only one input m is read in. n is computed by the program
Example if user enters m=2 then program should output
The total number of possible cases is 36.
The possibilities are
2 1
3 2
4 3
.
.
.
12 1
For efficiency, I've avoided recursion. Also, it doesn't use any specific c++ stuff - it will work fine on C as well.
We're trying to create N nested "for" loops.
Instead of using
for(int i = 0; i<max; i++)
for (int j = 0; j<max; j++)
...
I'll be replacing i, j, ... with an array: i[0], i[1], ..., i[n-1].
Here's my solution:
const int n = /*Insert N here: how many loops do you need?*/;
int i[n+1]; // if "n" is not known before hand, then this array will need to be created dynamically.
//Note: there is an extra element at the end of the array, in order to keep track of whether to exit the array.
for (int a=0; a<n+1; a++) {
i[a]=0;
}
int MAX = 79; //That's just an example, if all of the loops are identical: e.g. "for(int i=0; i<79; i++)". If the value of MAX changes for each loop, then make MAX an array instead: (new) int MAX [n]; MAX[0]=10; MAX[1]=20;...;MAX[n-1]=whatever.
int p = 0; //Used to increment all of the indicies correctly, at the end of each loop.
while (i[n]==0) {//Remember, you're only using indicies i[0], ..., i[n-1]. The (n+1)th index, i[n], is just to check whether to the nested loop stuff has finished.
//DO STUFF HERE. Pretend you're inside your nested for loops. The more usual i,j,k,... have been replaced here with i[0], i[1], ..., i[n-1].
//Now, after you've done your stuff, we need to increment all of the indicies correctly.
i[0]++;
// p = 0;//Commented out, because it's replaced by a more efficient alternative below.
while(i[p]==MAX) {//(or "MAX[p]" if each "for" loop is different. Note that from an English point of view, this is more like "if(i[p]==MAX". (Initially i[0]) If this is true, then i[p] is reset to 0, and i[p+1] is incremented.
i[p]=0;
i[++p]++; //increase p by 1, and increase the next (p+1)th index
if(i[p]!=MAX)
p=0;//Alternatively, "p=0" can be inserted above (currently commented-out). This one's more efficient though, since it only resets p when it actually needs to be reset!
}
}
There, that's all. Hopefully the comments make it clear what it's meant to be doing. I think it should be pretty efficient - almost as much as real nested for-loops. Most of the overhead is a one-off at the beginning, so this should be more efficient that using recursive functions etc
The basic structure of a recursive algorithm with multiple loops is as follows:
void recursiveLoops(vector<int>& indexes, const vector<int>& endPerIndex, int currentIndex) {
if (currentIndex == indexes.size()) {
// This is where the real logic goes.
// indexes[i] contain the value of the i-th index.
} else {
for (indexes[pos] = 0 ; indexes[pos] != endPerIndex[pos] ; indexes[pos]++) {
// Recurse for the next level
recursiveLoops(indexes, endPerIndex, pos+1);
}
}
}
The setup for calling recursiveLoops from the top level requires two vectors - one for the indexes, and one for the number of iterations at each level. The example below sets up three nested loops, iterating 5, 6, and 9 times at each level:
vector<int> indexes(3, 0);
vector<int> endPerIndex;
endPerIndex.push_back(5);
endPerIndex.push_back(6);
endPerIndex.push_back(9);
recursiveLoops(indexes, endPerIndex, 0);
Here's an example in plain old C++. First I make a vector of the ranges for each dimension called maxes. if the sum of all indices are 2 then I print did something.
In the example I loop z from 0 to 1, y from 0 to 2, x from 0 to 3
You can for sure make this more neat.
Here goes:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int f(){
return 2 ;
}
void inner(int depth,vector<int> & numbers,vector<int> & maxes){
if (depth>0){
for(int i=0;i<maxes[depth-1];i++){
numbers[depth-1]=i;
inner(depth-1, numbers,maxes) ;
}
}else{
// calculate sum of x,y,z:
cout << "values are ";
for(int i=0;i<numbers.size();i++){
cout <<numbers[i]<<" ";
}
int thesum(0);
for(int i=0;i<numbers.size();i++){
thesum+=numbers[i];
}
if (thesum==f()){
cout << "did something! ";
}
cout<<endl;
}
}
void donest(){
vector<int> numbers;
numbers.resize(3);
vector<int> maxes;
maxes.push_back(4);
maxes.push_back(3);
maxes.push_back(2);
inner(numbers.size(),numbers,maxes);
}
int main(){
donest();
}
result:
values are 0 0 0
values are 1 0 0
values are 2 0 0 did something!
values are 3 0 0
values are 0 1 0
values are 1 1 0 did something!
values are 2 1 0
values are 3 1 0
values are 0 2 0 did something!
values are 1 2 0
values are 2 2 0
values are 3 2 0
values are 0 0 1
values are 1 0 1 did something!
values are 2 0 1
values are 3 0 1
values are 0 1 1 did something!
values are 1 1 1
values are 2 1 1
values are 3 1 1
values are 0 2 1
values are 1 2 1
values are 2 2 1
values are 3 2 1
just count the depth for each recursion function, and count to f..
void myRecursiveFunc(int depth){
if(depth == f)
//do something
return;
else{
myRecursiveFunc(depth + 1);
}
}
if you really want you can use three different functions for x,y and z.
You are very vague about why you want this. For a starter a possible solution is to replace each for loop with a recursive function.
void recursiveX(int zVal, int yVal, int xVal)
{
if(zVal+yVal+xVal == f)...
if(xVal != 0)
recursiveX(zVal, yVal, xVal -1);
}
void recursiveY(int zVal, int yVal)
{
recursiveX(zVal, yVal, 6);
if(yVal != 0)
recursiveY(zVal, yVal-1);
}
void recursiveZ(int val)
{
recursiveY(val, 6);
if(val != 0)
recursiveZ(val-1);
}
...
recursiveZ(6);
And in the end you can merge this all into one function. Nevertheless using recursion just because it is possible is never a good Idea.
You could write it like this, but... I wouldn't. It's confusing code and doesn't give you any benefits. If you want it because your true use case has a high number of nested loops, consider just not doing that, instead; it's a serious design smell.
void nested_loop(const int levels, const int comparator, const int level = 0, const int accumulator = 0)
{
if (level < levels) {
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
nested_loop(levels, comparator, level + 1, accumulator + i);
}
}
else {
if (accumulator == comparator) { // your if (z+y+x==f)
//do something
}
}
}
int main() {
const int levels = 3;
const int f = 42;
nested_loop(levels, f);
}
Live demo.
Variable loop using while loop in "C".
Concept
Creating a 2-dimensional array (arr[level][2]) in which first element is starting, and second element is end.
x[3][2] = {{0, 10}, {5, 20}, {2, 60}};
Creating another array with starting elements.
y[3] = {0, 5, 2};
We created a second array, because during the loop we will change the first element of "x" array.
Code
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
// bruteforce
int level = 10;
int start[10] = {0, 0, 0, 0};
int x[10][2] = {{0, 5}, {0, 5}, {0, 5}, {0, 5}};
for (int i = 1;i < level; ++i){
x[i][1] = x[i][1] + 1;
}
while(3>2){
// Your code here
//
printf("%d %d %d %d\n", x[0][0], x[1][0], x[2][0], x[3][0]);
// variable loop code
// ==== Not To Modify ====
int a = 0;
int b = 0;
for(int i = 0;i < level; ++i){
if (x[i][0] >= x[i][1])
{
if(i != level-1){
x[i][0] = start[i];
x[i+1][0] = x[i+1][0] + 1;
}else{
a = 1;
}
b = 1;
}else{
if(b == 0){
x[0][0] = x[0][0] + 1;
b = 1;
}
}
}
if(a == 1){
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
This is a late answer, but maybe it will help someone.
Here is my solution in c++ without recursive function.:
int n_loops{3}; //number of nested for loops
int loops_idx[n_loops]; //like i,j,k but in an array
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops; i++)
loops_idx[i]=0;
int max_idx[n_loops]{3,2,4}; // like in for(; i < counter ;), but the counters in an array
bool is_finished = false;
int debug_n_of_execution{0};
while (!is_finished)
{
for (; loops_idx[0]<max_idx[0]; loops_idx[0]++)
{
/*
some code with loops_idx array as i,j,k...
*/
++debug_n_of_execution;
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops; i++)
std::cout<<loops_idx[i]<<" ";
std::cout << "\n";
}
--loops_idx[0]; //to cancel last increment
//Here it will increment the last loop_idx which isn't equal to max_idx[i]-1
//eg. after first above for loop loops_idx will be (max-1, 0, 0)
//So it will be after this loop (0, 1, 0) and start from the beginning...
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops+1; i++) //+1 to know if all loops are finished
{
if (i == n_loops)
{is_finished= true; break;}
if(loops_idx[i]==max_idx[i]-1)
continue;
++loops_idx[i];
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) //make any previous loop = 0
loops_idx[j]=0;
break;
}
}
//just to check
int debug_perfect_n_of_execution{max_idx[0]};
for (int i = 1; i < n_loops; i++)
debug_perfect_n_of_execution*= max_idx[i];
std::cout<<"Number of execution: "<<debug_n_of_execution<<" = "<<debug_perfect_n_of_execution;
assert(debug_n_of_execution==debug_perfect_n_of_execution);
std::cout << "\nTests Finished";
And here is the result:
0 0 0
1 0 0
2 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 0
2 1 0
0 0 1
1 0 1
2 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1
2 1 1
0 0 2
1 0 2
2 0 2
0 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
0 0 3
1 0 3
2 0 3
0 1 3
1 1 3
2 1 3
Number of execution: 24 = 24
Tests Finished
Related
I am a beginner programmer and I need some assistance.
I need to write a program that reads an array of 10 numbers from a user, then scans it and figures out the most common number/s in the array itself and prints them. If there is only one number that is common in the array, only print that number. But, if there's more than one number that appears more than once, print them also in the order they appear in in the array.
For example- 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - output would be 3
For- 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 - output would be 1 2 3 4
for- 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 - output would be 1 2 3
Now, the problem I've been running into, is that whenever I have a number that repeats more than twice (see third example above), the output I'm getting is the number of iterations of the loop for that number and not only that number once.
Any assistance would be welcome.
Code's attached below-
#include <iostream>
using std::cin;
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
int array [10], index, checker, common;
main ()
{
for (index=0; index<10; index++)
{
cin >> array [index];
}
for (index=0; index<10; index++)
{
int tempcount=0;
for (checker=(index+1);checker<10;checker++)
{
if (array[index]==array[checker])
tempcount++;
}
if (tempcount>=1)
cout << array[index]<<" ";
}
return 0;
}
Use appropriate data structures for the task.
Create a std::unordered_map that maps value to number_of_occurrences, and make a single pass over the input data.
Then create another map from number_of_occurrences to value. Sort it, in descending order. Report the first value, plus any additional ones that occurred as many times as the first did.
The reason you are having problems is that anytime a number appears two times or more it will print out. A solution is that you create another variable maxCount, then find the maximum times a number appears. Then loop through the array and print out all the numbers that appears the maximum amount of times.
Hope this helps.
Jake
Rather than writing you a solution, I will try to give you some hints that you can hopefully use to correct your code. Try to keep track of the following things:
Remember the position of the first occurrence of each distinct number in the array.
Count the number of times each number appears
and combine the two to get your solution.
EDIT:
int array[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
int first [11], cnt[11];
for(int i = 0; i < 11; i++){
first[i] = -1;
cnt[i] = 0;
}
int max = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++){
cnt[array[i]]++;
if(max < array[i]) max = array[i];
}
for(int i = 0; i <= max; i++){
if(cnt[i] > 1 && first[i] == -1) {
printf(" %d", i);
first[i] = i;
}
}
You could do something like this. At any index in the array look for previous occurences of that element. If you find that that it is the first occurence of that element, you only need to look if there is an occurence of that element ahead in the array.
Lastly display the element whose frequency(here num) would be greater than 1.
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
int presentBefore = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) //if any previous occurence of element
{
if (array[i] == array[j]) presentBefore++;
}
if (presentBefore == 0)//if first occurence of the element
{
int num = 1;
for (int j = i + 1; j < 8; j++)// if occurences ahead in the array
{
if (array[i] == array[j]) num++;
}
if(num>1)cout<<array[i]<<" ";
}
}
Here is another solution using STL and std::set.
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <set>
#include <iterator>
int main()
{
int array[12] = { 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 3, 4, 1, 2 };
std::set<int> dupes;
for (auto it = std::begin(array), end = std::end(array); it != end; ++it)
{
if (std::count(it, end, *it) > 1 && dupes.insert(*it).second)
std::cout << *it << " ";
}
return 0;
}
Prints:
1 2 3 4
I will try to explain how this works:
The original array is iterated from start to finish (BTW as you can see it can be any length, not just 10, as it uses iterators of beginning and end)
We are going to store duplicates which we find with std::count in std::set
We count from current iterator until the end of the array for efficiency
When count > 1, this means we have a duplicate so we store it in set for reference.
std::set has unique keys, so trying to store another number that already exists in set will result in insert .second returning false.
Hence, we print only unique insertions, which appear to be in the order of elements appearing in the array.
In your case you can use class std::vector which allows you to Erase elements, resize the array...
Here is an example I provide which produces what you wanted:
1: Push the values into a vector.
2: Use 2 loops and compare the elements array[i] and array[j] and if they are identical push the the element j into a new vector. Index j is always equal to i + 1 in order to avoid comparing the value with itself.
3- Now you get a vector of the repeated values in the temporary vector; You use 2 loops and search for the repeated values and erase them from the vector.
4- Print the output.
NB: I overloaded the insertion operator "<<" to print a vector to avoid each time using a loop to print a vector's elements.
The code could look like :
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& out, std::vector<int> vecInt){
for(int i(0); i < vecInt.size(); i++)
out << vecInt[i] << ", ";
return out;
}
int main() {
std::vector< int > vecInt;
//1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4
vecInt.push_back(1);
vecInt.push_back(1);
vecInt.push_back(1);
vecInt.push_back(1);
vecInt.push_back(2);
vecInt.push_back(2);
vecInt.push_back(2);
vecInt.push_back(3);
vecInt.push_back(3);
vecInt.push_back(4);
std::vector<int> vecUniq;
for(int i(0); i < vecInt.size(); i++)
for(int j(i + 1); j < vecInt.size(); j++)
if(vecInt[i] == vecInt[j])
vecUniq.push_back(vecInt[j]);
std::cout << vecUniq << std::endl;
for(int i = 0; i < vecUniq.size(); i++)
for(int j = vecUniq.size() - 1 ; j >= 0 && j > i; j--)
if(vecUniq[i] == vecUniq[j])
vecUniq.erase(&vecUniq[j]);
std::cout << vecUniq << std::endl;
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
The input: 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The output: 3
The input: 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6
The output: 1 2 3 4
The input: 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4
The output: 1 2 3
For this problem, you can use a marking array that will count the number of times you a digit is visited by you, it's just like counting sort. let's first see the program :
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int print(int a[],int b[])
{
cout<<"b :: ";
for (int index=0;index<10;index++)
{
cout<<b[index]<<" ";
}
cout<<endl;
}
int main ()
{
int a[10],b[11], index, checker, common;
for (index=0; index<10; index++)
{
cin >> a [index];
b[index] = 0;
}
b[10] =0;
for (index=0;index<10;index++)
{
b[a[index]]++;
if (b[a[index]] == 2)
cout<<a[index];
//print(a,b);
}
return 0;
}
As you can see that I have used array b as marking array which counts the time a number is visited.
The size of array b depends upon what is the largest number you are going to enter, I have set the size of array b to be of length 10 that b[11] as your largest number is 10. Index 0 is of no use but you need not worry about it as it will be not pointed until your input has 0.
Intially all elements in array in b is set 0.
Now assume your input to be :: 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6
Now value of b can be checked after each iteration by uncommenting the print function line::
b :: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....1
b :: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....2
b :: 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....3
b :: 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ....4
b :: 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ....5
b :: 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ....6
b :: 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 ....7
b :: 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 ....8
b :: 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 ....9
b :: 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 ....10
In line 5 you can b's at index 1 has value 2 so it will print 1 that is a[index].
And array a's element will be printed only when it is repeated first time due to this line if(b[a[index]] == 2) .
This program uses the idea of counting sort so if you want you can check counting sort.
I can't figure out the logic behind this one... here's what I have so far:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int thearray[4][4];
int NbPos = 4;
int main() {
int i2;
int q2;
for(int i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
for(int q = 1; q < 4; q++) {
for(int c = 0; c < NbPos; c++) {
thearray[i][q] = c;
}
}
}
}
This is filling the array up to the end is still:
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
but it's doing so without hitting anywhere near every possible combination.
Ideally once it gets to:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 3
the next step SHOULD be:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
so it hits a TON of combinations. Any ideas on how to make it hit them all? I'm stumped on the logic!
with the way you're iterating over this, a 1-dimensional array would make the looping simpler. you can still mentally treat it to have rows and columns, however they are just layed out end-to-end in the code.
you could try something like this; however if you want it in a 2D format specifically that challenge is left to you ;)
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
#define rows 4
#define columns 4
int main() {
int thearray[rows * columns] = {0};
int NbPos = 4;
int lastPos = rows * columns - 1;
while (true) {
thearray[lastPos]++;
int pos = lastPos;
while (thearray[pos] == NbPos and pos >= 1) {
thearray[pos - 1]++;
thearray[pos] = 0;
pos--;
}
bool finished = true;
for (int i = 0; i < rows * columns; i++) {
if (thearray[i] != NbPos - 1) {
finished = false;
}
}
if (finished) {
break;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < rows * columns; i++) {
std::cout << thearray[i] << " ";
if (i % rows == rows - 1) {
cout << endl; // makes it look like a 2D array
}
}
}
It makes sense to have the final form as all 3s , since you loop every element of the array and you assign it at the end with 3 .
So the next element will only take into account the combination with the final value of the previous element (which will be 3).
Thinking in math terms, your complexity is N^3 so to speak (actually is N^2 * 4 , but since your N is 3 ...).
Your approach is wrong, since you want to find permutations, which are defined by a factorial function , not a polinomial function.
The necessary complexity for the output doesn't match the complexity of your algorithm (your algorithm is incredbily fast for the amount of output needed).
What you are looking for is backtracking (backtacking will match the complexity needed for your output).
The recursion function should be something like this (thinking on a 1D array, with 9 elements):
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(int* curArray, int curIdx)
{
if (curIDX==9)
{
for (int i=0; i<9;i++)
{
// write the array
}
} else {
curArray[curIdx]=0;
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(curIdx+1);
curArray[curIdx]=1;
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(curIdx+1);
curArray[curIdx]=2;
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(curIdx+1);
curArray[curIdx]=3;
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(curIdx+1);
}
}
Now you only need to call the function for the index 0 :
RecursiveGeneratePermutations(arrayPtr,0);
Then wait...allot :).
I've been working on a brute force algorithm to generate all permutations of a given set. Eventually, I want to feed each of these permutations into a nxn matrix to test if it is a valid magic square or not.
--I KNOW THAT THERE IS A WAY TO GENERATE A MAGIC SQUARE EASILY--
That is not what I want to do, though. I'm focusing on the brute force aspect of it.
For a set of 3 elements, it works wonderfully. However, once I use 4 or more elements, I lose out on a few permutations. Just from looking at the output of 4, I am missing 7 permutations.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
//ms = magic square
//n = size
void perm(int ms[], int n) {
int pivot = 0;
int index = 0;
int pivBit = 1;
int fin = 0;
int hold = 0;
//While we are not finished
while (fin == 0) {
//Incriment the index
++index;
if (index >= n) {
index = 0;
}
//if index is equal to the pivot
if (index == pivot) {
//Is this the first time visiting the pivot?
if (pivBit == 0) {
//Are we at the beginning again?
if (index == 0 && pivot == 0)
{
fin = 1;
}
pivBit = 1;
++index;
}
//Second time visiting?
else {
pivBit = 0;
++pivot;
if (pivot >= n) {
pivot = 0;
}
}
}
//If we are out of bounds
if (index >= n) {
index = 0;
}
//swap
hold = ms[index];
ms[index] = ms[pivot];
ms[pivot] = hold;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
cout << ms[i];
if (i < n - 1) {
cout << ", ";
}
else {
cout << endl;
}
}
}
}
int main() {
cout << "Are you ready to brute force, my brother?" << endl;
//Set
int magicsquare[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4};
int size = 4;
perm(magicsquare, size);
getchar();
return 0;
}
My output is:
2 1 3 4
3 1 2 4
4 1 2 3
1 4 2 3
1 2 4 3
1 3 4 2
3 1 4 2
3 4 1 2
3 4 2 1
2 4 3 1
2 3 4 1
2 3 1 4
4 3 1 2
4 2 1 3
4 2 3 1
1 2 3 4
2 1 3 4
Looking at it, I can already see that I am missing both 1 4 3 2 and 1 3 2 4.
Where've I gone wrong in my algorithm?
The wiki article on permutation includes a common algorithm used to produce all permutations in lexicographic order, starting with an array of sequentially increasing integers, ending with that array reversed. wiki next permutation.
If dealing with an array of objects, you can generate an array of indices 0 through n-1 and use next permutation on the indices to produce all permutations of the array of objects.
You can also do a web search for next permutation to find similar algorithms. The recursive ones produce all permutations, but not in lexicographic order.
The simplest way to generate all permutations is recursive. For each i, swap the i'th element to the 0 position. Then recursively find all permutations of of the remaining array.
int buf[1000], n; // better to wrap these in a class...
void permute(int *a, int a_len) {
if (a_len == 1) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) printf("%d ", buf[i]);
printf("\n");
} else {
for (int i = 0; i < a_len; i++) {
swap(a, 0, i);
permute(a + 1, a_len - 1);
swap(a, 0, i);
}
}
}
void run(int buf_len) {
for (int i = 0; i < buf_len; i++) buf[i] = i + 1;
n = buf_len;
permute(buf, buf_len);
}
This assumes no repeated elements in the original array. It's not to hard to have it take repeated elements into account.
Using modular arithmetic (or) (%) operator in C++ we can cycle through the successive numbers with a range.
For example:
if range is 5 (or) modulo 5 then
we can cycle through
0 1 2 3 4 0 (5) 1(6) 2(7) 3(8) 4(9) 0(10)............0 1 2 3 etc.
Question:
In the similar sense is there any arithmetical relation / C++ trick we can use to move increasing numbers in forward(till upper bound) and decreasing numbers in reverse direction(till lower bound or 0) with a range.
For example:
if range = 5 then
0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0.....................0 1 2 3 etc.
In the below program I used two approaches to iterate forward/reverse within a given range.
But I'm interested in- Is there any best way (C++ trick/Mathematical relation) of iterate through forward and reverse within a given range ?.
#include<iostream>
int main() {
int range = 5;
// 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 .....(Cycle through in the range 0 - 4)
int i = 0;
while(true) {
// 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 .....(cycle through in the range 0 - 4)
std::cout<< i;
i = (i+1)% range; // Modulo
// some break condition
}
// 0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 .......... (Forward and Reverse in the range 0 - 4)
// Method 1:
int j = 0;
bool reverse = false;
while(true) {
if(reverse == false) {
if(j < range) {
std::cout << j;
j = j+1;
}
else {
reverse = true;
j = j-1;
}
}
else {
j = j-1;
std::cout << j;
if(j == 0) {
reverse = false;
j = j + 1;
}
}
// some break condition
}
// 0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 .......... (Forward and Reverse in the range 0 - 4)
// Method 2:
// Using modulo (if the range is big value then this is not good approach)
int limit[8] = {0,1,2,3,4,3,2,1};
int k = 0;
while(true) {
std::cout<< limit[k];
k = (k+1)%8;
// some break condition
}
return 0;
}
You can use the absolute value function like this:
int i = range;
int a = range;
while(true) {
// 0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 .......... (Forward and Reverse in the range 0 - 4)
a = abs(i-range);
std::cout<< a;
i = (i+1)%(range*2); // Modulo
}
Basically, you double the range, subtract half the range (so it goes from -range to +range), then take absolute value.
EDIT: fixed code to start from zero instead of range.
I figured out another solution, although it's without any tricks. This is how I would have done your problem, without the absolute function:
range = 7; //can be whatever
reverse = false;
for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
if(i%range != 0){
if(!reverse){
std::cout<< i % range;
}else{
std::cout<< range - (i % range);
}
}
else{
if((i/range)%2 == 1){
reverse = true;
std::cout<< range;
}else{
std::cout<< i % range;
reverse = false;
}
}
}
This will provide you with the output 01234567654321012345676543210 ...
Took me a while to do this, and I know it's not really what you wanted, but just thought I'd share.
Cheers.
Edit: Although absolute is easier, sometimes it's better to write your own code, as you can modify the amount of conditions. I doubt my code is more efficient, but you never know!
Edit2: Forgot to change reverse to true.
I'm trying to figure out how I can use recursion to do n-level nested for loops.
For example, if n=3, there would be 3 'levels'
for(z=0;z<6;z++){
for(y=0;y<6;y++){
for(x=0;x<6;x++){
if (z+y+x==f){
//do something
}
}
}
}
and so on.
I can't seem to figure out how I would be able to place the if loop in the last for loop and how I can access the variables of previous for loops from the if statement. I know that the question of variable nested loops has been asked alot of times, and I have looked through all of them. But none seem to help me.
Could someone present an easy way of using recursion to achieve this, keeping in mind that I'm still a beginner in c++, to point me in the right direction?
The use case is as follows:
Write a program to input the number of dice m. The program will output the total number of possible cases, the number of possible cases for each possible n and the n with the highest probability. Note: only one input m is read in. n is computed by the program
Example if user enters m=2 then program should output
The total number of possible cases is 36.
The possibilities are
2 1
3 2
4 3
.
.
.
12 1
For efficiency, I've avoided recursion. Also, it doesn't use any specific c++ stuff - it will work fine on C as well.
We're trying to create N nested "for" loops.
Instead of using
for(int i = 0; i<max; i++)
for (int j = 0; j<max; j++)
...
I'll be replacing i, j, ... with an array: i[0], i[1], ..., i[n-1].
Here's my solution:
const int n = /*Insert N here: how many loops do you need?*/;
int i[n+1]; // if "n" is not known before hand, then this array will need to be created dynamically.
//Note: there is an extra element at the end of the array, in order to keep track of whether to exit the array.
for (int a=0; a<n+1; a++) {
i[a]=0;
}
int MAX = 79; //That's just an example, if all of the loops are identical: e.g. "for(int i=0; i<79; i++)". If the value of MAX changes for each loop, then make MAX an array instead: (new) int MAX [n]; MAX[0]=10; MAX[1]=20;...;MAX[n-1]=whatever.
int p = 0; //Used to increment all of the indicies correctly, at the end of each loop.
while (i[n]==0) {//Remember, you're only using indicies i[0], ..., i[n-1]. The (n+1)th index, i[n], is just to check whether to the nested loop stuff has finished.
//DO STUFF HERE. Pretend you're inside your nested for loops. The more usual i,j,k,... have been replaced here with i[0], i[1], ..., i[n-1].
//Now, after you've done your stuff, we need to increment all of the indicies correctly.
i[0]++;
// p = 0;//Commented out, because it's replaced by a more efficient alternative below.
while(i[p]==MAX) {//(or "MAX[p]" if each "for" loop is different. Note that from an English point of view, this is more like "if(i[p]==MAX". (Initially i[0]) If this is true, then i[p] is reset to 0, and i[p+1] is incremented.
i[p]=0;
i[++p]++; //increase p by 1, and increase the next (p+1)th index
if(i[p]!=MAX)
p=0;//Alternatively, "p=0" can be inserted above (currently commented-out). This one's more efficient though, since it only resets p when it actually needs to be reset!
}
}
There, that's all. Hopefully the comments make it clear what it's meant to be doing. I think it should be pretty efficient - almost as much as real nested for-loops. Most of the overhead is a one-off at the beginning, so this should be more efficient that using recursive functions etc
The basic structure of a recursive algorithm with multiple loops is as follows:
void recursiveLoops(vector<int>& indexes, const vector<int>& endPerIndex, int currentIndex) {
if (currentIndex == indexes.size()) {
// This is where the real logic goes.
// indexes[i] contain the value of the i-th index.
} else {
for (indexes[pos] = 0 ; indexes[pos] != endPerIndex[pos] ; indexes[pos]++) {
// Recurse for the next level
recursiveLoops(indexes, endPerIndex, pos+1);
}
}
}
The setup for calling recursiveLoops from the top level requires two vectors - one for the indexes, and one for the number of iterations at each level. The example below sets up three nested loops, iterating 5, 6, and 9 times at each level:
vector<int> indexes(3, 0);
vector<int> endPerIndex;
endPerIndex.push_back(5);
endPerIndex.push_back(6);
endPerIndex.push_back(9);
recursiveLoops(indexes, endPerIndex, 0);
Here's an example in plain old C++. First I make a vector of the ranges for each dimension called maxes. if the sum of all indices are 2 then I print did something.
In the example I loop z from 0 to 1, y from 0 to 2, x from 0 to 3
You can for sure make this more neat.
Here goes:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int f(){
return 2 ;
}
void inner(int depth,vector<int> & numbers,vector<int> & maxes){
if (depth>0){
for(int i=0;i<maxes[depth-1];i++){
numbers[depth-1]=i;
inner(depth-1, numbers,maxes) ;
}
}else{
// calculate sum of x,y,z:
cout << "values are ";
for(int i=0;i<numbers.size();i++){
cout <<numbers[i]<<" ";
}
int thesum(0);
for(int i=0;i<numbers.size();i++){
thesum+=numbers[i];
}
if (thesum==f()){
cout << "did something! ";
}
cout<<endl;
}
}
void donest(){
vector<int> numbers;
numbers.resize(3);
vector<int> maxes;
maxes.push_back(4);
maxes.push_back(3);
maxes.push_back(2);
inner(numbers.size(),numbers,maxes);
}
int main(){
donest();
}
result:
values are 0 0 0
values are 1 0 0
values are 2 0 0 did something!
values are 3 0 0
values are 0 1 0
values are 1 1 0 did something!
values are 2 1 0
values are 3 1 0
values are 0 2 0 did something!
values are 1 2 0
values are 2 2 0
values are 3 2 0
values are 0 0 1
values are 1 0 1 did something!
values are 2 0 1
values are 3 0 1
values are 0 1 1 did something!
values are 1 1 1
values are 2 1 1
values are 3 1 1
values are 0 2 1
values are 1 2 1
values are 2 2 1
values are 3 2 1
just count the depth for each recursion function, and count to f..
void myRecursiveFunc(int depth){
if(depth == f)
//do something
return;
else{
myRecursiveFunc(depth + 1);
}
}
if you really want you can use three different functions for x,y and z.
You are very vague about why you want this. For a starter a possible solution is to replace each for loop with a recursive function.
void recursiveX(int zVal, int yVal, int xVal)
{
if(zVal+yVal+xVal == f)...
if(xVal != 0)
recursiveX(zVal, yVal, xVal -1);
}
void recursiveY(int zVal, int yVal)
{
recursiveX(zVal, yVal, 6);
if(yVal != 0)
recursiveY(zVal, yVal-1);
}
void recursiveZ(int val)
{
recursiveY(val, 6);
if(val != 0)
recursiveZ(val-1);
}
...
recursiveZ(6);
And in the end you can merge this all into one function. Nevertheless using recursion just because it is possible is never a good Idea.
You could write it like this, but... I wouldn't. It's confusing code and doesn't give you any benefits. If you want it because your true use case has a high number of nested loops, consider just not doing that, instead; it's a serious design smell.
void nested_loop(const int levels, const int comparator, const int level = 0, const int accumulator = 0)
{
if (level < levels) {
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
nested_loop(levels, comparator, level + 1, accumulator + i);
}
}
else {
if (accumulator == comparator) { // your if (z+y+x==f)
//do something
}
}
}
int main() {
const int levels = 3;
const int f = 42;
nested_loop(levels, f);
}
Live demo.
Variable loop using while loop in "C".
Concept
Creating a 2-dimensional array (arr[level][2]) in which first element is starting, and second element is end.
x[3][2] = {{0, 10}, {5, 20}, {2, 60}};
Creating another array with starting elements.
y[3] = {0, 5, 2};
We created a second array, because during the loop we will change the first element of "x" array.
Code
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
// bruteforce
int level = 10;
int start[10] = {0, 0, 0, 0};
int x[10][2] = {{0, 5}, {0, 5}, {0, 5}, {0, 5}};
for (int i = 1;i < level; ++i){
x[i][1] = x[i][1] + 1;
}
while(3>2){
// Your code here
//
printf("%d %d %d %d\n", x[0][0], x[1][0], x[2][0], x[3][0]);
// variable loop code
// ==== Not To Modify ====
int a = 0;
int b = 0;
for(int i = 0;i < level; ++i){
if (x[i][0] >= x[i][1])
{
if(i != level-1){
x[i][0] = start[i];
x[i+1][0] = x[i+1][0] + 1;
}else{
a = 1;
}
b = 1;
}else{
if(b == 0){
x[0][0] = x[0][0] + 1;
b = 1;
}
}
}
if(a == 1){
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
This is a late answer, but maybe it will help someone.
Here is my solution in c++ without recursive function.:
int n_loops{3}; //number of nested for loops
int loops_idx[n_loops]; //like i,j,k but in an array
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops; i++)
loops_idx[i]=0;
int max_idx[n_loops]{3,2,4}; // like in for(; i < counter ;), but the counters in an array
bool is_finished = false;
int debug_n_of_execution{0};
while (!is_finished)
{
for (; loops_idx[0]<max_idx[0]; loops_idx[0]++)
{
/*
some code with loops_idx array as i,j,k...
*/
++debug_n_of_execution;
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops; i++)
std::cout<<loops_idx[i]<<" ";
std::cout << "\n";
}
--loops_idx[0]; //to cancel last increment
//Here it will increment the last loop_idx which isn't equal to max_idx[i]-1
//eg. after first above for loop loops_idx will be (max-1, 0, 0)
//So it will be after this loop (0, 1, 0) and start from the beginning...
for (int i = 0; i < n_loops+1; i++) //+1 to know if all loops are finished
{
if (i == n_loops)
{is_finished= true; break;}
if(loops_idx[i]==max_idx[i]-1)
continue;
++loops_idx[i];
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) //make any previous loop = 0
loops_idx[j]=0;
break;
}
}
//just to check
int debug_perfect_n_of_execution{max_idx[0]};
for (int i = 1; i < n_loops; i++)
debug_perfect_n_of_execution*= max_idx[i];
std::cout<<"Number of execution: "<<debug_n_of_execution<<" = "<<debug_perfect_n_of_execution;
assert(debug_n_of_execution==debug_perfect_n_of_execution);
std::cout << "\nTests Finished";
And here is the result:
0 0 0
1 0 0
2 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 0
2 1 0
0 0 1
1 0 1
2 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1
2 1 1
0 0 2
1 0 2
2 0 2
0 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
0 0 3
1 0 3
2 0 3
0 1 3
1 1 3
2 1 3
Number of execution: 24 = 24
Tests Finished