I understand the use of ^ for making a string specific regex, but I'm not sure why my code isn't picking it up. I've messed with changing [] and (), but with no luck :/
/.*^([\/php|.html|.css])$/
Tested with
wss://worker.com/sdfsd.css
wss://worker.com/php
html://worker.com/sdfsd/bob.html
My current non-working example; https://regex101.com/r/qkupPT/1
I don't think you understand what your current regex is doing. The ^ is for the start of a string. The [] creates a character class which allows one of the characters in it to be present (or a range if the - is used, e.g. a-z, 0-9). For multiple characters from the character class to be allowed you'd add a quantifier after the closing ], either + for 1 or more character, or * for 0 or more (meaning none of the characters are required). Something like:
[.\/](php|css|html)$
Should allow for the three examples you've listed. That allows for the string to end with a . or a / and then either css, php, or html. Also note a . outside a character class needs to be escaped otherwise it is a single non new-line character.
Demo: https://regex101.com/r/qkupPT/2
Related
I want to select some string combination (with dots(.)) from a very long string (sql). The full string could be a single line or multiple line with new line separator, and this combination could be in start (at first line) or a next line (new line) or at both place.
I need help in writing a regex for it.
Examples:
String s = I am testing something like test.test.test in sentence.
Expected output: test.test.test
Example2 (real usecase):
UPDATE test.table
SET access = 01
WHERE access IN (
SELECT name FROM project.dataset.tablename WHERE name = 'test' GROUP BY 1 )
Expected output: test.table and project.dataset.tablename
, can I also add some prefix or suffix words or space which should be present where ever this logic gets checked. In above case if its update regex should pick test.table, but if the statement is like select test.table regex should not pick it up this combinations and same applies for suffix.
Example3: This is to illustrate the above theory.
INS INTO test.table
SEL 'abcscsc', wu_id.Item_Nbr ,1
FROM test.table as_t
WHERE as_t.old <> 0 AND as_t.date = 11
AND (as_t.numb IN ('11') )
Expected Output: test.table, test.table (Key words are INTO and FROM)
Things Not Needed in selection:as_t.numb, as_t.old, as_t.date
If I get the regex I can use in program to extract this word.
Note: Before and after string words to the combination could be anything like update, select { or(, so we have to find the occurrence of words which are joined together with .(dot) and all the number of such occurrence.
I tried something like this:
(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?) -: This only selected the word between two .dot and not all.
.(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?). - This everything before and after.
To solve your initial problem, we can just use some negation. Here's the pattern I came up with:
[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
[^ ... ] Means to make a character class including everything except for what's between the brackets. In this case, I put \s in there, which matches any whitespace. So [^\s] matches anything that isn't whitespace.
+ Is a quantifier. It means to find as many of the preceding construct as you can without breaking the match. This would happily match everything that's not whitespace, but I follow it with a \., which matches a literal .. The \ is necessary because . means to match any character in regex, so we need to escape it so it only has its literal meaning. This means there has to be a . in this group of non-whitespace characters.
I end the pattern with another [^\s]+, which matches everything after the . until the next whitespace.
Now, to solve your secondary problem, you want to make this match only work if it is preceded by a given keyword. Luckily, regex has a construct almost specifically for this case. It's called a lookbehind. The syntax is (?<= ... ) where the ... is the pattern you want to look for. Using your example, this will only match after the keywords INTO and FROM:
(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
Here (?:INTO|FROM) means to match either the text INTO or the text FROM. I then specify that it should be followed by a whitespace character with \s. One possible problem here is that it will only match if the keywords are written in all upper case. You can change this behavior by specifying the case insensitive flag i to your regex parser. If your regex parser doesn't have a way to specify flags, you can usually still specify it inline by putting (?i) in front of the pattern, like so:
(?i)(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
If you are new to regex, I highly recommend using the www.regex101.com website to generate regex and learn how it works. Don't forget to check out the code generator part for getting the regex code based on the programming language you are using, that's a cool feature.
For your question, you need a regex that understands any word character \w that matches between 0 and unlimited times, followed by a dot, followed by another series of word character that repeats between 0 and unlimited times.
So here is my solution to your question:
Your regex in JavaScript:
const regex = /([\w][.][\w])+/gm;
in Java:
final String regex = "([\w][.][\w])+";
in Python:
regex = r"([\w][.][\w])+"
in PHP:
$re = '/([\w][.][\w])+/m';
Note that: this solution is written for your use case (to be used for SQL strings), because now if you have something like '.word' or 'word..word', it will still catch it which I assume you don't have a string like that.
See this screenshot for more details
Using regexp_replace within PostgreSQL, I've developed (with a lot of help from SO) a pattern to match the first n characters, if the last character is not in a list of characters I don't want the string to end in.
regexp_replace(pf.long_description, '(^.{1,150}[^ -:])', '\1...')::varchar(2000)
However, I would expect that to simply end the string in an ellipses. However what I get is the first 150 characters plus the ellipses at the end, but then the string continues all the way to the end.
Why is all that content not being eliminated?
Why is all that content not being eliminated?
because you haven't requested that. you've asked to have the first 2-151 characters replaced with those same characters and elipsis. if you modify the pattern to be (^.{1,150}[^ -:]).* (notice the trailing .* has regex_replace work on the complete string, not just the prefix) you should get the desired effect.
Do your really want the range of characters between the space character and the colon: [^ -:]?
To include a literal - in a character class, put it first or last. Looks like you might actually want [^ :-] - that's just excluding the three characters listed.
Details about bracket expressions in the manual.
That whould be (building on what #just already provided):
SELECT regexp_replace(pf.long_decript-ion, '(^.{1,150}[^ :-]).*$', '\1...');
But it should be cheaper to use substring() instead:
SELECT substring(pf.long_decript-ion, '^.{1,150}[^ :-]') || '...';
I'm trying to replace \\u0061 and \u0061 to %u0061 with QRegExp,
So I did this,
QString a = "\\u0061";
qDebug() << a.replace(QRegExp("\\?\\u"), "%u");
Since the slash can appear either once or twice, so I used a ? to represen the first slash, but it ain't working, what's wrong about it?
EDIT
Thanks to Denomales, it should be \\\\u that represents \\u, and I'm using \\\\+u right now.
Description
Per the QT qregex documentation , see the section on Characters and Abbreviations for Sets of Characters:
Note: The C++ compiler transforms backslashes in strings. To include a \ in a regexp, enter it twice, i.e. \\. To match the backslash character itself, enter it four times, i.e. \\\\.
Care to give this a try:
[\\\\]{1,2}(u)
I've entered 4 backslashes so the various language layers can escape the backslash correctly. Then nested it inside square brackets and required it to appear 1 to 2 times. Essentially this should find the single and double backslashes before the letter u. You could then just replace with %u as in your example.
In my example the u character is captured and should be returned as group 1 to be used later in your replacement.
Regular expressions are not strong point.
I can do simple stuff, but this one has just got my goat !!
So could someone give me a hand with this one.
Here's the comment in the code :
// If utf8 detection didnt work before, strip those weird characters for an underscore, as a last resort.
eregi_replace("[^a-z0-9 \-\.\(\)\/\\]","_",$str);
to (here's what I tried)
preg_replace("{[^a-z0-9 \-\.\(\)\/\\]}i","_",$str);
Any regex pros out there who give me a hand?
You need to specify regexp identifier such as # or /
preg_replace("#[^a-z0-9 \-\.\(\)\/\\]#i","_",$str);
So you should enclose your regular expression in those identifier characters.
First, I believe the { and } are fine as delimiters for the expression from the flags, but I know there are some regex flavors that don't support it, so it might be a good idea to just use something like ! or #
Second, I am not sure how the expression before worked, because AFAIK escaping with a \ character does not work with ERE expressions. You have to represent special characters like ^, -, and ] by their position within the class (^ cannot be the first character, ] must be the first character, and - must be either the first or the last character). The - character in the first expression would be interpreted as a range specifier (in this case a character in the range between \ and \). Additionally, the \ characters are treated literally, so you've got a confusing looking and largely redundant regex.
The replacement expression, however, needs to be in preg notation/flavor, so there are rule changes:
Very few things need to be escaped in a character class, even with the new rules
The \ character needs to be escaped twice - once for the string, and then one more time for the regex - otherwise, it will escape the closing bracket ]
Assuming you want to match a dash (or rather match something OTHER than a dash, it needs to be moved to the end of the class
So, here is some code (link) that I believe does what you need it to do:
$source = 'hello! ##$%^&* wazzup-dawg?.()/\\[]{}<>:"';
$blah = preg_replace('![^a-z0-9 .()/\\\\-]!i','_',$source);
print($blah);
preg_replace("{[^a-z0-9]-.()/\/}i","_",$str)
works just fine.
I tried it with all # and / and { and they all worked.
Hiho everyone! :)
I have an application, in which the user can insert a string into a textbox, which will be used for a String.Format output later. So the user's input must have a certain format:
I would like to replace exactly one placeholder, so the string should be of a form like this: "Text{0}Text". So it has to contain at least one '{0}', but no other statement between curly braces, for example no {1}.
For the text before and after the '{0}', I would allow any characters.
So I think, I have to respect the following restrictions: { must be written as {{, } must be written as }}, " must be written as \" and \ must be written as \.
Can somebody tell me, how I can write such a RegEx? In particular, can I do something like 'any character WITHOUT' to exclude the four characters ( {, }, " and \ ) above instead of listing every allowed character?
Many thanks!!
Nikki:)
I hate to be the guy who doesn't answer the question, but really it's poor usability to ask your user to format input to work with String.Format. Provide them with two input requests, so they enter the part before the {0} and the part after the {0}. Then you'll want to just concatenate the strings instead of use String.Format- using String.Format on user-supplied text is just a bad idea.
[^(){}\r\n]+\{0}[^(){}\r\n]+
will match any text except (, ), {, } and linebreaks, then match {0}, then the same as before. There needs to be at least one character before and after the {0}; if you don't want that, replace + with *.
You might also want to anchor the regex to beginning and end of your input string:
^[^(){}\r\n]+\{0}[^(){}\r\n]+$
(Similar to Tim's answer)
Something like:
^[^{}()]*(\{0})[^{}()]*$
Tested at http://www.regular-expressions.info/javascriptexample.html
It sounds like you're looking for the [^CHARS_GO_HERE] construct. The exact regex you'd need depends on your regex engine, but it would resemble [^({})].
Check out the "Negated Character Classes" section of the Character Class page at Regular-Expressions.info.
I think your question can be answered by the regexp:
^(((\{\{|\}\}|\\"|\\\\|[^\{\}\"\\])*(\{0\}))+(\{\{|\}\}|\\"|\\\\|[^\{\}\"\\])*$
Explanation:
The expression is built up as follows:
^(allowed chars {0})+(allowed chars)*$
one or more sequences of allowed chars followed by a {0} with optional allowed chars at the end.
allowed chars is built of the 4 sequences you mentioned (I assumed the \ escape is \\ instead of \.) plus all chars that do not contain the escapes chars:
(\{\{|\}\}|\\"|\\\\|[^\{\}\"\\])
combined they make up the regexp I started with.