I am a beginner in c++ and I am having problems with making this code work the way I want it to. The task is to write a program that multiplies all the natural numbers up to the loaded number n.
To make it print the correct result, I divided x by n (see code below). How can I make it print x and not have to divide it by n to get the correct answer?
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
int main(){
int n,x=1;
int i=0;
cout<<"Enter a number bigger than 0:"<<endl;
cin>>n;
while(i<n){
i++;
x=i*x;
};
cout<<"The result is: "<<x/n<<endl;
return 0;
}
At very first a principle you best get used to as quickly as possible: Always check user input for correctness!
cin >> n;
if(cin && n > 0)
{
// valid
}
else
{
// appropriate error handling
}
Not sure, why do you need a while loop? A for loop sure is nicer in this case:
int x = 1;
for(int i = 2; i < n; ++i)
x *= i;
If you still want the while loop: Start with i == 2 (1 is neutral anyway) and increment afterwards:
i = 2;
while(i < n)
{
x *= i;
++i;
}
In case of n == 1, the loop (either variant) simply won't be entered and you are fine...
You already have two very good options, but here is an other one you might want to take a look at when you are at ease enough in programming :
unsigned factorial(unsigned value)
{
if (value <= 1)
{
return 1;
}
else
{
return value * factorial(value - 1);
}
}
It's a recursive function, which is kind of neat when used in proper moments (which could not be the case here unfortunately because the execution stack might get so big you fill your memory before you're done. But you can check it out to learn more about recursive functions)
When your memory is full, you then crash your app with what is called actually a stack overflow.
How can I make it so that in the last cout I can only put x and not have to divide x by n to get the correct answer?
It will be better to use a for loop.
// This stops when i reaches n.
// That means, n is not multiplied to the result when the loop breaks.
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i )
{
x *= i;
}
cout << "The result is: " << x <<endl;
Related
The problem is simple. I'm given N - the number of digits in a number and then N digits of a number. I need to do exactly one digit-switch and get the highest number possible. I did do the problem right (as in gives out the right number) but it will be hitting the 1 second time restriction afaik. How do I improve on the efficiency of my program so it would go under the 1 second time restriction with N <= 10^6. New on Stack overflow so tell me if I did something wrong
with asking the question so I can fix it. Thanks. Here's my solution:
main:
int n;
cin >> n;
int a[n+1];
for(int i=0;i<n;++i)
cin >> a[i];
int maxofarray1;
bool changeHappened=false;
bool thereAreTwoSame=false;
for(int i=0;i<n;++i) //changing the two digits to make the highest number if possible
{
maxofarray1=maxofarray(a,i+1,n);
if(a[i]<maxofarray1)
{
int temp=a[a[n]];
a[a[n]]=a[i];
a[i]=temp;
changeHappened = true;
break;
}
}
for(int i=0;i<n;++i) //need to check if there are two of the same digit so I can change
//those two making the number the same instead of making it lower
for(int j=i+1;j<n;++j)
if(a[i]==a[j])
{
thereAreTwoSame=true;
break;
}
if(!changeHappened) //if the change has not been yet made, either leaving the number as is
//(changing two same numbers) or changing the last two to do as little "damage" to the number
{
if(!thereAreTwoSame)
{
int temp=a[n-1];
a[n-1]=a[n-2];
a[n-2]=temp;
}
}
for(int i=0;i<n;++i)
cout << a[i] << " ";
return 0;
maxofarray:
int maxofarray(int a[], int i,int n) //finding the maximum of the array from i to n
{
int max1=0;
int maxind;
for(int j=i;j<n;++j)
{
if(max1<a[j])
{
max1=a[j];
maxind=j;
}
}
a[n]=maxind; //can't return both the index and maximum (without complicating with structs)
//so I add it as the last element
return max1;
}
The problem in your code is complexity. I didn't fully understand your algorithm, but having nested loops is a red flag. Instead of trying to improve bits and pieces of your code you should rather rethink your overall strategy.
Lets start by assuming the digit 9 does appear in the number. Consider the number is
9...9 c ...9...
where 9...9 are the leading digits that are all 9 (possibly there are none of them). We cannot make the number bigger by swapping one of those.
c is the first digits !=9, ie its the place where we can put a 9 to get a bigger number. 9 is the digit that will make the number maximum when put in this place.
Last, ...9... denotes the last appearance of the digit 9 and digits sourrinding that. After that 9 no other 9 appears. While we increase the number by replacing c, the number will get smaller be replacing that 9, hence we have to choose the very last one.
For the general case only a tiny step more is needed. Here is a rough sketch:
std::array<size_t,10> first_non_appearance;
std::array<size_t,10> last_appearance;
size_t n;
std::cin >> n;
std::vector<int> number(n);
for (size_t i=0;i <n;++i) {
std::cin >> a[i];
for (int d=0;d<10;++d) {
// keep track of first and last appearance of each digit
}
}
size_t first = 0;
size_t second = 0;
for (int d=0;d<10;++d) {
// determine biggest digit that appeared and use that
}
std:swap( a[first],a[last] );
It is not complete, perhaps requires handling of special cases (eg number with only one digit), but I hope it helps.
PS: You are using a variable length array (int a[n+1];), this is not standard C++. In C++ you should rather use a std::vector when you know the size only at runtime (and a std::array when the size is known).
VLA (variable length arrays) are not standard. So instead of using this nonstandard feature, you might want to use a STL data type.
Given N is rather big, you also avoid stack overflow, given that VLA are allocated on the stack. And STL containers with variable length allocate on the heap.
Then, as you pointed out yourself, it makes sense to remember the index of the last occurrence of each digit, avoiding to search over and over again for a swap candidate index.
Your implementation idea is basically, to replace the first digit from the left, which has a bigger replacement to the right of it.
This is how I did it:
static void BigSwap(std::string& digits)
{
int64_t fromRight[10];
size_t ndigitsFound = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; i++)
fromRight[i] = -1;
size_t i = digits.size() - 1;
while (ndigitsFound < 10 && i > 0)
{
if (-1 == fromRight[digits[i] - '0'])
{
fromRight[digits[i] - '0'] = static_cast<int64_t>(i);
ndigitsFound++;
}
i--;
}
for (size_t j = 0; j < digits.size(); j++)
{
char d = digits[j] - '0';
for (char k = 9; k > d; k--)
{
if (fromRight[k] != -1 && static_cast<size_t>(fromRight[k]) > j)
{
auto temp = digits[j];
digits[j] = k + '0';
digits[fromRight[k]] = temp;
return;
}
}
}
}
I solved this problem but I got TLE Time Limit Exceed on online judge
the output of program is right but i think the way can be improved to be more efficient!
the problem :
Given n integer numbers, count the number of ways in which we can choose two elements such
that their absolute difference is less than 32.
In a more formal way, count the number of pairs (i, j) (1 ≤ i < j ≤ n) such that
|V[i] - V[j]| < 32. |X|
is the absolute value of X.
Input
The first line of input contains one integer T, the number of test cases (1 ≤ T ≤ 128).
Each test case begins with an integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10,000).
The next line contains n integers (1 ≤ V[i] ≤ 10,000).
Output
For each test case, print the number of pairs on a single line.
my code in c++ :
int main() {
int T,n,i,j,k,count;
int a[10000];
cin>>T;
for(k=0;k<T;k++)
{ count=0;
cin>>n;
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
cin>>a[i];
}
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
for(j=i;j<n;j++)
{
if(i!=j)
{
if(abs(a[i]-a[j])<32)
count++;
}
}
}
cout<<count<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
I need help how can I solve it in more efficient algorithm ?
Despite my previous (silly) answer, there is no need to sort the data at all. Instead you should count the frequencies of the numbers.
Then all you need to do is keep track of the number of viable numbers to pair with, while iterating over the possible values. Sorry no c++ but java should be readable as well:
int solve (int[] numbers) {
int[] frequencies = new int[10001];
for (int i : numbers) frequencies[i]++;
int solution = 0;
int inRange = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < frequencies.length; i++) {
if (i > 32) inRange -= frequencies[i - 32];
solution += frequencies[i] * inRange;
solution += frequencies[i] * (frequencies[i] - 1) / 2;
inRange += frequencies[i];
}
return solution;
}
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int a[10010];
int N;
int search (int x){
int low = 0;
int high = N;
while (low < high)
{
int mid = (low+high)/2;
if (a[mid] >= x) high = mid;
else low = mid+1;
}
return low;
}
int main() {
cin >> N;
for (int i=0 ; i<N ; i++) cin >> a[i];
sort(a,a+N);
long long ans = 0;
for (int i=0 ; i<N ; i++)
{
int t = search(a[i]+32);
ans += (t -i - 1);
}
cout << ans << endl;
return 0;
}
You can sort the numbers, and then use a sliding window. Starting with the smallest number, populate a std::deque with the numbers so long as they are no larger than the smallest number + 31. Then in an outer loop for each number, update the sliding window and add the new size of the sliding window to the counter. Update of the sliding window can be performed in an inner loop, by first pop_front every number that is smaller than the current number of the outer loop, then push_back every number that is not larger than the current number of the outer loop + 31.
One faster solution would be to first sort the array, then iterate through the sorted array and for each element only visit the elements to the right of it until the difference exceeds 31.
Sorting can probably be done via count sort (since you have 1 ≤ V[i] ≤ 10,000). So you get linear time for the sorting part. It might not be necessary though (maybe quicksort suffices in order to get all the points).
Also, you can do a trick for the inner loop (the "going to the right of the current element" part). Keep in mind that if S[i+k]-S[i]<32, then S[i+k]-S[i+1]<32, where S is the sorted version of V. With this trick the whole algorithm turns linear.
This can be done constant number of passes over the data, and actually can be done without being affected by the value of the "interval" (in your case, 32).
This is done by populating an array where a[i] = a[i-1] + number_of_times_i_appears_in_the_data - informally, a[i] holds the total number of elements that are smaller/equals to i.
Code (for a single test case):
static int UPPER_LIMIT = 10001;
static int K = 32;
int frequencies[UPPER_LIMIT] = {0}; // O(U)
int n;
std::cin >> n;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { // O(n)
int x;
std::cin >> x;
frequencies[x] += 1;
}
for (int i = 1; i < UPPER_LIMIT; i++) { // O(U)
frequencies[i] += frequencies[i-1];
}
int count = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < UPPER_LIMIT; i++) { // O(U)
int low_idx = std::max(i-32, 0);
int number_of_elements_with_value_i = frequencies[i] - frequencies[i-1];
if (number_of_elements_with_value_i == 0) continue;
int number_of_elements_with_value_K_close_to_i =
(frequencies[i-1] - frequencies[low_idx]);
std::cout << "i: " << i << " number_of_elements_with_value_i: " << number_of_elements_with_value_i << " number_of_elements_with_value_K_close_to_i: " << number_of_elements_with_value_K_close_to_i << std::endl;
count += number_of_elements_with_value_i * number_of_elements_with_value_K_close_to_i;
// Finally, add "duplicates" of i, this is basically sum of arithmetic
// progression with d=1, a0=0, n=number_of_elements_with_value_i
count += number_of_elements_with_value_i * (number_of_elements_with_value_i-1) /2;
}
std::cout << count;
Working full example on IDEone.
You can sort and then use break to end loop when ever the range goes out.
int main()
{
int t;
cin>>t;
while(t--){
int n,c=0;
cin>>n;
int ar[n];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
cin>>ar[i];
sort(ar,ar+n);
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
for(int j=i+1;j<n;j++){
if(ar[j]-ar[i] < 32)
c++;
else
break;
}
}
cout<<c<<endl;
}
}
Or, you can use a hash array for the range and mark occurrence of each element and then loop around and check for each element i.e. if x = 32 - y is present or not.
A good approach here is to split the numbers into separate buckets:
constexpr int limit = 10000;
constexpr int diff = 32;
constexpr int bucket_num = (limit/diff)+1;
std::array<std::vector<int>,bucket_num> buckets;
cin>>n;
int number;
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
cin >> number;
buckets[number/diff].push_back(number%diff);
}
Obviously the numbers that are in the same bucket are close enough to each other to fit the requirement, so we can just count all the pairs:
int result = std::accumulate(buckets.begin(), buckets.end(), 0,
[](int s, vector<int>& v){ return s + (v.size()*(v.size()-1))/2; });
The numbers that are in non-adjacent buckets cannot form any acceptable pairs, so we can just ignore them.
This leaves the last corner case - adjacent buckets - which can be solved in many ways:
for(int i=0;i<bucket_num-1;i++)
if(buckets[i].size() && buckets[i+1].size())
result += adjacent_buckets(buckets[i], buckets[i+1]);
Personally I like the "occurrence frequency" approach on the one bucket scale, but there may be better options:
int adjacent_buckets(const vector<int>& bucket1, const vector<int>& bucket2)
{
std::array<int,diff> pairs{};
for(int number : bucket1)
{
for(int i=0;i<number;i++)
pairs[i]++;
}
return std::accumulate(bucket2.begin(), bucket2.end(), 0,
[&pairs](int s, int n){ return s + pairs[n]; });
}
This function first builds an array of "numbers from lower bucket that are close enough to i", and then sums the values from that array corresponding to the upper bucket numbers.
In general this approach has O(N) complexity, in the best case it will require pretty much only one pass, and overall should be fast enough.
Working Ideone example
This solution can be considered O(N) to process N input numbers and constant in time to process the input:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void solve()
{
int a[10001] = {0}, N, n, X32 = 0, ret = 0;
cin >> N;
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i)
{
cin >> n;
a[n]++;
}
for (int i=0; i<10001; ++i)
{
if (i >= 32)
X32 -= a[i-32];
if (a[i])
{
ret += a[i] * X32;
ret += a[i] * (a[i]-1)/2;
X32 += a[i];
}
}
cout << ret << endl;
}
int main()
{
int T;
cin >> T;
for (int i=0 ; i<T ; i++)
solve();
}
run this code on ideone
Solution explanation: a[i] represents how many times i was in the input series.
Then you go over entire array and X32 keeps track of number of elements that's withing range from i. The only tricky part really is to calculate properly when some i is repeated multiple times: a[i] * (a[i]-1)/2. That's it.
You should start by sorting the input.
Then if your inner loop detects the distance grows above 32, you can break from it.
Thanks for everyone efforts and time to solve this problem.
I appreciated all Attempts to solve it.
After testing the answers on online judge I found the right and most efficient solution algorithm is Stef's Answer and AbdullahAhmedAbdelmonem's answer also pavel solution is right but it's exactly same as Stef solution in different language C++.
Stef's code got time execution 358 ms in codeforces online judge and accepted.
also AbdullahAhmedAbdelmonem's code got time execution 421 ms in codeforces online judge and accepted.
if they put detailed explanation to there algorithm the bounty will be to one of them.
you can try your solution and submit it to codeforces online judge at this link after choosing problem E. Time Limit Exceeded?
also I found a great algorithm solution and more understandable using frequency array and it's complexity O(n).
in this algorithm you only need to take specific range for each inserted element to the array which is:
begin = element - 32
end = element + 32
and then count number of pair in this range for each inserted element in the frequency array :
int main() {
int T,n,i,j,k,b,e,count;
int v[10000];
int freq[10001];
cin>>T;
for(k=0;k<T;k++)
{
count=0;
cin>>n;
for(i=1;i<=10000;i++)
{
freq[i]=0;
}
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
cin>>v[i];
}
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
count=count+freq[v[i]];
b=v[i]-31;
e=v[i]+31;
if(b<=0)
b=1;
if(e>10000)
e=10000;
for(j=b;j<=e;j++)
{
freq[j]++;
}
}
cout<<count<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
finally i think the best approach to solve this kind of problems to use frequency array and count number of pairs in specific range because it's time complexity is O(n).
#include <cstdio>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main() {
int t,m,n;
scanf("%d",&t);
while(t--)
{
scanf("%d %d",&m,&n);
int rootn=sqrt(double(n));
bool p[10000]; //finding prime numbers from 1 to square_root(n)
for(int j=0;j<=rootn;j++)
p[j]=true;
p[0]=false;
p[1]=false;
int i=rootn;
while(i--)
{
if(p[i]==true)
{
int c=i;
do
{
c=c+i;
p[c]=false;
}while(c+p[i]<=rootn);
}
};
i=0;
bool rangep[10000]; //used for finding prime numbers between m and n by eliminating multiple of primes in between 1 and squareroot(n)
for(int j=0;j<=n-m+1;j++)
rangep[j]=true;
i=rootn;
do
{
if(p[i]==true)
{
for(int j=m;j<=n;j++)
{
if(j%i==0&&j!=i)
rangep[j-m]=false;
}
}
}while(i--);
i=n-m;
do
{
if(rangep[i]==true)
printf("%d\n",i+m);
}while(i--);
printf("\n");
}
return 0;
system("PAUSE");
}
Hello I'm trying to use the sieve of Eratosthenes to find prime numbers in a range between m to n where m>=1 and n<=100000000. When I give input of 1 to 10000, the result is correct. But for a wider range, the stack is overflowed even if I increase the array sizes.
A simple and more readable implementation
void Sieve(int n) {
int sqrtn = (int)sqrt((double)n);
std::vector<bool> sieve(n + 1, false);
for (int m = 2; m <= sqrtn; ++m) {
if (!sieve[m]) {
cout << m << " ";
for (int k = m * m; k <= n; k += m)
sieve[k] = true;
}
}
for (int m = sqrtn; m <= n; ++m)
if (!sieve[m])
cout << m << " ";
}
Reason of getting error
You are declaring an enormous array as a local variable. That's why when the stack frame of main is pushed it needs so much memory that stack overflow exception is generated. Visual studio is tricky enough to analyze the code for projected run-time stack usage and generate exception when needed.
Use this compact implementation. Moreover you can have bs declared in the function if you want. Don't make implementations complex.
Implementation
typedef long long ll;
typedef vector<int> vi;
vi primes;
bitset<100000000> bs;
void sieve(ll upperbound) {
_sieve_size = upperbound + 1;
bs.set();
bs[0] = bs[1] = 0;
for (ll i = 2; i <= _sieve_size; i++)
if (bs[i]) { //if not marked
for (ll j = i * i; j <= _sieve_size; j += i) //check all the multiples
bs[j] = 0; // they are surely not prime :-)
primes.push_back((int)i); // this is prime
} }
call from main() sieve(10000);. You have primes list in vector primes.
Note: As mentioned in comment--stackoverflow is quite unexpected error here. You are implementing sieve but it will be more efficient if you use bistet instead of bool.
Few things like if n=10^8 then sqrt(n)=10^4. And your bool array is p[10000]. So there is a chance of accessing array out of bound.
I agree with the other answers,
saying that you should basically just start over.
Do you even care why your code doesn’t work? (You didn’t actually ask.)
I’m not sure that the problem in your code
has been identified accurately yet.
First of all, I’ll add this comment to help set the context:
// For any int aardvark;
// p[aardvark] = false means that aardvark is composite (i.e., not prime).
// p[aardvark] = true means that aardvark might be prime, or maybe we just don’t know yet.
Now let me draw your attention to this code:
int i=rootn;
while(i--)
{
if(p[i]==true)
{
int c=i;
do
{
c=c+i;
p[c]=false;
}while(c+p[i]<=rootn);
}
};
You say that n≤100000000 (although your code doesn’t check that), so,
presumably, rootn≤10000, which is the dimensionality (size) of p[].
The above code is saying that, for every integer i
(no matter whether it’s prime or composite),
2×i, 3×i, 4×i, etc., are, by definition, composite.
So, for c equal to 2×i, 3×i, 4×i, …,
we set p[c]=false because we know that c is composite.
But look closely at the code.
It sets c=c+i and says p[c]=false
before checking whether c is still in range
to be a valid index into p[].
Now, if n≤25000000, then rootn≤5000.
If i≤ rootn, then i≤5000, and, as long as c≤5000, then c+i≤10000.
But, if n>25000000, then rootn>5000,†
and the sequence i=rootn;, c=i;, c=c+i;
can set c to a value greater than 10000.
And then you use that value to index into p[].
That’s probably where the stack overflow occurs.
Oh, BTW; you don’t need to say if(p[i]==true); if(p[i]) is good enough.
To add insult to injury, there’s a second error in the same block:
while(c+p[i]<=rootn).
c and i are ints,
and p is an array of bools, so p[i] is a bool —
and yet you are adding c + p[i].
We know from the if that p[i] is true,
which is numerically equal to 1 —
so your loop termination condition is while (c+1<=rootn);
i.e., while c≤rootn-1.
I think you meant to say while(c+i<=rootn).
Oh, also, why do you have executable code
immediately after an unconditional return statement?
The system("PAUSE"); statement cannot possibly be reached.
(I’m not saying that those are the only errors;
they are just what jumped out at me.)
______________
† OK, splitting hairs, n has to be ≥ 25010001
(i.e., 50012) before rootn>5000.
My program is supposed to take in a number from user input, determine whether or not it is prime, and then if it is not, output the factors of the entered number, 5 to a line. The 5 to the line part is where everything goes haywire, the loop i wrote should work fine as far as i can tell, however no matter how much i change it around, it does one of two things, 1) goes infinite with either new lines or the first factor, or 2) outputs a line with 5 of each factor. Here's the code:
else
{
cout << "\nNumber is not prime, it's factors are:\n";
for (int x = 2; x < num; x++)
{
factor=num%x;
if (factor==0)
{
int t=0;
cout << x << "\t";
t++;
for (int t; t <= 5; t++) // THE TROUBLE LOOP
{
if(t>=5)
{
t=0;
cout << endl;
}
}
}
}
}
Replace the declaration of t in the loop since you've declared t prior to the loop:
for(; t <= 5; t++)
With int t in the loop declaration you are overriding t as an uninitialized variable that will have a garbage value.
Outside of this problem your loop is infinite since you will be resetting t to 0 whenever it equals 5.
In the for loop change the
int t
to
t=0
it is the
for(int t,t<=5,t++)
the int t part in particular that is causing the issue.
#GGW
Or this:
int t = 0;
//some code
for(t; t <= 5; t++)
//more code
I am in a discrete mathematics class and one of the hw problems is to implement a bubble sort. Here's my futile attempt because it does not output the solution. Please advice. Thank you.
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
void BubbleSort();
int array1[100] = {0};
int k;
int main()
{
cout << "Enter your numbers and when you are done, enter 0000:\n";
int x = 0;
int i;
while (i != 0000)
{
cin >> i;
array1[x] = i;
x++;
k = x;
}
BubbleSort();
system("pause");
return 0;
}
void BubbleSort(){
int temp;
for( int i = 0; i < k; i++ ){
if ( array1[i] > array1[i+1]){
temp = array1[i+1];
array1[i+1] = array1[i];
array1[i] = temp;
}
}
int x = 0;
while (x <= k)
{
cout << array1[x] << "\n";
x++;
}
}
Please only use basic programming techniques because this is my first programming class. Thank you.
Edit: fixed the relational operator. But now I get incorrect results.
while (x >! k)
This doesn't do what you think it does. If you want something that says "while x is not greater than k", you want <=. Since array1[k] isn't one of the elements you sorted, though, you probably want <.
while (x < k)
Note that for exists for loops like these:
for (int x = 0; x < k; x++) {
cout << array1[x] << "\n";
}
As for the new bug, you're only doing one round of bubbling in your bubble sort. You need another for loop. Also, i is never initialized in main, and i != 0000 isn't going to check whether the user literally entered 4 zeros. It'll only check whether the user's input was equal to the number 0.
The primary problem is here:
while (x >! k)
On the first iteration, the condition checks whether (0 > !k), and k is not 0, so !k is 0, so the condition is false and the loop never executes. Try using:
for (int x = 0; x < k; x++)
cout << array1[x] << "\n";
You also have a problem in the sort phase of your bubble sort; you only iterate through the data once, which is not enough to sort it, in general.
Finally, some design issues.
You should have one function to sort the data and a separate function to print it. Don't combine the two functions as you have done here.
Avoid global variables. Pass the array and its operational length to the sort function, and to the print function if you have one.