Im having an issue getting my variable from my original class to print in another class method
Quick example of my issue:
say the variable was declared here in the test.h file:
class player{
private:
int x = 10;
void setX(); //method for setting X from user input
int getX(); //Method for retrieving variable
}
Then in another class method where i want to print X
class inTheWoods{
public:
printInfo();
}
test.cpp file:
void player::setX(){
cout << "Set X to a number:" << endl;
cin >> x
}
int player::getX(){
return x;
}
int inTheWoods::printInfo(){
player playerObj; //Player object to access methods in player class
cout << playerObj.getX();
}
main.cpp:
int main(){
inTheWoods woodsObj;
woodsObj.printInfo();
return 0;
}
Whenever I run my program that resembles this problem the int does not display correctly and throws me a strange negative number. I hope this isnt too much code and that I documented everything correctly
If you want the classes to be in a separate files, it should still work:
Main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "inTheWoods.h"
int main()
{
inTheWoods woodsObj;
woodsObj.printInfo();
return 0;
}
Player.h
#pragma once
#include <iostream>
class Player
{
int x = 10;
void setX();
public:
int getX();
};
Player.cpp
#include "Player.h"
void Player::setX()
{
std::cout << "Set X to a number:" << std::endl;
std::cin >> x;
}
int Player::getX()
{
return x;
}
inTheWoods.h
//#pragma once
#include "Player.h"
#include <iostream>
class inTheWoods
{
public:
void printInfo();
};
inTheWoods.cpp
#include "inTheWoods.h"
void inTheWoods::printInfo()
{
Player playerObj; //Player object to access methods in player class
std::cout << playerObj.getX();
}
#pragma once is a preprocessor that prevents multiple includes, in case you didn't know. You can choose to skip it (Visual Studio auto-generated the file with the line).
In summary, these are the changes I needed to make from your implementation:
Move declaration of getX() from private to public.
Add semicolons to the end of every class.
Add a return type to printInfo(). If you don't want a function to return anything, the return type is void. Unless you care declaring a constructor, which doesn't seem to be the case here.
Here is the working one. It's always a good practice to give a constructor, in order to create an instance with some default values. the following code will work hopefully according to your requirements:
main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "inTheWoods.h"
int main()
{
inTheWoods woodsObj;
woodsObj.printInfo();
return 0;
}
player.h
#pragma once
class player
{
private:
int m_x;
public:
player();
player(const int& x);
void setX(); //method for setting X from user input
const int& getX()const; //Method for retrieving variable
};
player.cpp
#include "player.h"
#include <iostream>
player::player() // defualt constructor
:m_x(0) {}
player::player(const int& x)
:m_x(x) {} // parameterised
void player::setX()
{
std::cout << "Set X to a number:" << std::endl;
std::cin >> m_x;
}
const int& player::getX()const
{
return m_x;
}
inTheWoods.h
#pragma once
class inTheWoods
{
public:
inTheWoods();
~inTheWoods();
void printInfo();
};
inTheWoods.cpp
#include "inTheWoods.h"
#include "player.h"
#include <iostream>
inTheWoods::inTheWoods() {}
inTheWoods::~inTheWoods() {}
void inTheWoods::printInfo()
{
//Player object to access methods in player class
player playerObj; // will beinitialized with 0
player playerObj2(10); // will beinitialized with 10
std::cout << playerObj.getX() <<std::endl;
std::cout << playerObj2.getX() <<std::endl;
}
Edit: Well if you wanna allow the user to set values your printInfo() must be as follows:
void inTheWoods::printInfo()
{
//Player object to access methods in player class
player playerObj; // will beinitialized with 0
playerObj.setX();
std::cout << playerObj.getX() <<std::endl;
}
Related
Based on my Snack.cpp, Snack header file, MiniVend header file & miniVend.cpp file, I am trying to move my Snack private member - price into my MiniVend.cpp file to generate the amount * price to return a total value of items in my machine. How do I access the price from another class?
Portion of my miniVend.cpp file
double miniVend::valueOfSnacks()
{
return //// I don't know how to get snacks price in here? I need to access snacks & getSnackPrice.
}
miniVend header
#ifndef MINIVEND
#define MINIVEND
#include <string>
#include "VendSlot.h"
#include "Snack.h"
using std::string;
class miniVend
{
public:
miniVend(VendSlot, VendSlot, VendSlot, VendSlot, double); //constructor
int numEmptySlots();
double valueOfSnacks();
//void buySnack(int);
double getMoney();
~miniVend(); //desructor
private:
VendSlot vendslot1; //declare all the vending slots.
VendSlot vendslot2; //declare all the vending slots.
VendSlot vendslot3; //declare all the vending slots.
VendSlot vendslot4; //declare all the vending slots.
double moneyInMachine; //money in the machine
};
#endif // !MINIVEND
Snack.cpp
#include "Snack.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using std::endl;
using std::string;
using std::cout;
using std::cin;
Snack::Snack() //default constructor
{
nameOfSnack = "bottled water";
snackPrice = 1.75;
numOfCalories = 0;
}
Snack::Snack(string name, double price, int cals)
{
nameOfSnack = name;
snackPrice = price;
numOfCalories = cals;
}
Snack::~Snack()
{
}
string Snack::getNameOfSnack()
{
return nameOfSnack;
}
double Snack::getSnackPrice()
{
return snackPrice;
}
int Snack::getNumOfCalories()
{
return numOfCalories;
}
Snack.h file
#ifndef SNACK_CPP
#define SNACK_CPP
#include <string>
using std::string;
class Snack
{
private:
string nameOfSnack;
double snackPrice;
int numOfCalories;
public:
Snack(); //default constructor
Snack(string name, double price, int cals); //overload constructor
~Snack(); //destructor
//Accessor functions
string getNameOfSnack(); //returns name of snack
double getSnackPrice(); //returns the price of the snack
int getNumOfCalories(); //returns number of calories of snack
};
#endif // !SNACK_CPP
Assuming getSnackPrice() is public, and Snack.h does exist, you should just be able to call
snackObject.getSnackPrice() * ammount
what you need is friend keyword. Define the
friend class className;
I don't really understand why you don't just implement get()? Accessing private data is really bad. You are breaking the encapsulation. But if you really want to know (i.e. you should NOT do it, it is really BAD), then you just return a reference to a private data as shown below
#include <iostream>
class A
{
public:
A(int a) : x(a) {}
int &getPrivateDataBAD() { return x; }
void print() { std::cout << x << std::endl; }
private:
int x;
};
class B
{
public:
void print(int &s) { std::cout << s << std::endl; }
};
int main()
{
A obj(2);
B bObj;
bObj.print( obj.getPrivateDataBAD() );
return 0;
}
I am learning classes and OOP, so I was doing some practice programs, when I came across the weirdest bug ever while programming.
So, I have the following files, beginning by my class "pessoa", located in pessoa.h:
#pragma once
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class pessoa {
public:
//constructor (nome do aluno, data de nascimento)
pessoa(string newname="asffaf", unsigned int newdate=1996): name(newname), DataN(newdate){};
void SetName(string a); //set name
void SetBornDate(unsigned int ); //nascimento
string GetName(); //get name
unsigned int GetBornDate();
virtual void Print(){}; // print
private:
string name; //nome
unsigned int DataN; //data de nascimento
};
Whose functions are defined in pessoa.cpp
#include "pessoa.h"
string pessoa::GetName ()
{
return name;
}
void pessoa::SetName(string a)
{
name = a;
}
unsigned int pessoa::GetBornDate()
{
return DataN;
}
void pessoa::SetBornDate(unsigned int n)
{
DataN=n;
}
A function, DoArray, declared in DoArray.h, and defined in the file DoArray.cpp:
pessoa** DoArray(int n)
{
pessoa* p= new pessoa[n];
pessoa** pointer= &p;
return pointer;
}
And the main file:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include "pessoa.h"
#include "DoArray.h"
#include <cstdio>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
//pessoa P[10];
//cout << P[5].GetBornDate();
pessoa** a=DoArray(5);
cerr << endl << a[0][3].GetBornDate() << endl;
cerr << endl << a[0][3].GetName() << endl;
return 0;
}
The weird find is, if I comment one of the methods above, "GetBornDate" or GetName, and run, the non-commented method will run fine and as supposed. However, if both are not commented, then the first will run and the program will crash before the 2nd method.
Sorry for the long post.
Let's look into this function:
int *get()
{
int i = 0;
return &i;
}
what is the problem with it? It is returning pointer to a local variable, which does not exist anymore when function get() terminates ie it returns dangling pointer. Now your code:
pessoa** DoArray(int n)
{
pessoa* p= new pessoa[n];
return &p;
}
do you see the problem?
To clarify even more:
typedef pessoa * pessoa_ptr;
pessoa_ptr* DoArray(int n)
{
pessoa_ptr p= whatever;
return &p;
}
you need to understand that whatever you assign to p does not change lifetime of p itself. Pointer is the same variable as others.
How could I keep an object valid in a different class? Here is an example below.
This code would give as a result on the screen:
2
2
What I want is to give me this:
2
3
In other words, I desire object Bita (or even the whole class two) to acknowledge object Alpha and not create a new object.
Is there a way to include the object Alpha to object Bita ? Please be simple because I am a beginner.
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstdio>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
using namespace std;
class one
{
int a, b;
public:
one() { a = 2; }
int func()
{
return a;
}
void func2()
{
a = 3;
}
};
class two
{
int z, b;
public:
void test();
};
void two::test()
{
one Alpha;
cout << Alpha.func() << '\n';
}
int main()
{
one Alpha;
cout << Alpha.func() << '\n';
Alpha.func2();
two Bita;
Bita.test();
return 0;
}
Each instance of an object has its own values for its member variables. So when you declare two Bita, and call Bita.test(), test() creates its own object of class Alpha inside of it, with its own value, which is still at 2, prints that, and then that Alpha object goes out of scope and is removed from the stack as test() completes.
What you say you have in mind to do here is to have class one have what is called a static member variable. Add the keyword static:
static int a;
And then a will behave as you intend.
One explanation of this is here: http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/811-static-member-variables/
One solution would be to pass the object by reference you method two::test like this
class two
{
int z, b;
public:
void test(one& a);
};
void two::test(one& a)
{
cout << a.func() << '\n';
}
And then call it in main
Bita.test(Alpha);
So the full code will be
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstdio>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
using namespace std;
class one {
int a, b;
public:
one() { a = 2; }
int func() { return a; }
void func2() { a = 3; }
};
class two {
int z, b;
public:
void test(one&);
};
void two::test(one& a) {
cout << a.func() << '\n';
}
int main() {
one Alpha;
cout << Alpha.func() << '\n';
Alpha.func2();
two Bita;
Bita.test(Alpha);
return 0;
}
I have 1 main class
class Vehicle{
private:
int fuel;
public:
int get_fuel(){ return this->fuel; }
void set_fuel(int fuel){ this->fuel = fuel; }
};
also 1 subclass of Vehicle
class Car : public Vehicle{
public:
Car();
};
Car::Car(){
set_fuel(500);
}
also my main.cpp file
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include "Vehicle.h"
#include "Car.h"
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argcv[]){
Car c;
cout << c.get_fuel() << endl; //500
//set fuel to 200
c.set_fuel(200);
//print fuel again
cout << c.get_fuel() << endl;//still 500
}
why after using the setter the value still remains the same after i use the getter?
On VC++ 2012 your exact code works as expected. Output is 500 and 200.
class Vehicle {
private:
int _fuel;
public:
Vehicle(){
_fuel = 0;
}
int get_fuel(){
return _fuel;
}
// I like chainable setters, unless they need to signal errors :)
Vehicle& set_fuel(int fuel){
_fuel = fuel;
return *this;
}
};
class Car : public Vehicle {
public:
Car():Vehicle(){
set_fuel(500);
}
};
// using the code, in your main()
Car car;
std::cout << car.get_fuel() << std::endl; // 500
car.set_fuel(200);
std::cout << car.get_fuel() << std::endl; // actually 200
This is a slightly modified version. Place it in your .CPP file and try it. It can't not work!
PS: Stop using properties that have the same name as arguments. Always having to use this-> is very not cool! When you'll forget to use the this->, you'll see the bug of the century when you'll assign the value to itself and can't figure out what goes wrong.
Please have a look at the following code
GameObject.h
#pragma once
class GameObject
{
public:
GameObject(int);
~GameObject(void);
int id;
private:
GameObject(void);
};
GameObject.cpp
#include "GameObject.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
static int counter = 0;
GameObject::GameObject(void)
{
}
GameObject::GameObject(int i)
{
counter++;
id = i;
}
GameObject::~GameObject(void)
{
}
Main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "GameObject.h"
using namespace std;
int main()
{
//GameObject obj1;
//cout << obj1.id << endl;
GameObject obj2(45);
cout << obj2.id << endl;;
// cout << obj2.counter << endl;
GameObject obj3(45);
GameObject obj4(45);
GameObject obj5(45);
//Cannot get Static value here
//cout << "Number of Objects: " << GameObject
//
system("pause");
return 0;
}
Here, I am trying to record how many instances have been created. I know it can be done by a static data member, but I can't access it withing the Main method! Please help!
PS:
I am seeeking for a direct access, without a getter method
Your static variable, counter cannot be accessed because it isn't a member of GameObject. If you want to access the counter, you'll need to do something like this:
GameObject.h
#pragma once
class GameObject
{
public:
...
static int GetCounter();
...
};
GameObject.cpp
int GameObject::GetCounter()
{
return counter;
}
Then you can access the variable like:
cout << "Number of Objects: " << GameObject::GetCounter();
Of course, there are other ways of accessing a static variable, such as making the counter variable a static member of your GameObject class (which I would recommend).
In your code, counter is not a static member of your class, but just a good old global variable. You can read up on how to declare static member variables anywhere on the net, but here are some snippets:
GameObject.h
#pragma once
class GameObject
{
public:
GameObject(void);
GameObject(int);
~GameObject(void);
private:
int id;
// static members
public:
static int counter; // <<<<<<<<<<< declaration
};
ameObject.cpp
#include "GameObject.h"
int GameObject::counter = 0; // <<<<<<<<<<< instantiation
GameObject::GameObject(void)
{
counter++;
}
GameObject::GameObject(int i)
{
counter++;
id = i;
}
GameObject::~GameObject(void)
{
}
Main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "GameObject.h"
using namespace std;
int main()
{
GameObject obj2(45);
cout << "version one: " << obj2.counter << endl;
// second version:
cout << "version two: " << GameObject::counter << endl;
system("pause");
return 0;
}
Afaik accessing static members on an instance of that class should work fine, but it gives the wrong impression, you should prefer version two.
Never mind, I did it with a getter method. Closing thread