I need to disable execution of one unit test on local environment. We run unit tests in local with local-test profile
-Dspring.profiles.active=local-test
I need to execute my test at all profiles except local-test How can I achieve this?
Here is my test, if I put value = "!local-test" it does not work
#IfProfileValue(name = "spring.profiles.active", value = "local-test")
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
public class EnvironmentTests {
#Test
public void TestNightTimeFormatCorrect() {
throw new RuntimeException("test exception");
}
}
I found a solution, hope it will be useful for somebody.
In this case TestNightTimeFormatCorrect will be executed every time when there is no local-test profile. It will be alse executed when no profile is set.
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ProfileValueSourceConfiguration(EnvironmentTests.ProfileProfileValueSource.class)
#IfProfileValue(name = "local-test", value = "false")
public class EnvironmentTests {
#Test
public void TestNightTimeFormatCorrect() {
throw new RuntimeException("test exception");
}
public static class ProfileProfileValueSource implements ProfileValueSource
{
#Override
public String get(String string)
{
final String systemProfiles = System.getProperty("spring.profiles.active", System.getProperty("SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE", ""));
final String[] profiles = systemProfiles.split(",");
return Arrays.asList(profiles).contains(string) ? "true" : "false";
}
}
}
Related
I am trying to create the simple web api test for the controller action method I have in my project. I already create and add the test project in my solution. And add the Nunit nuget package in test project.
The controller I am trying to test is look like this:
[ApiController]
[Route("[controller]")]
public class HomeController : ControllerBase
{
private readonly IConfiguration _configuration;
private readonly IHostEnvironment _hostEnvironment;
private readonly ILogger<HomeController> _logger;
private BaseDataAccess _datatAccess = new BaseDataAccess()
public HomeController(ILogger<HomeController> logger, IConfiguration configuration, IHostEnvironment hostEnvironment)
{
_logger = logger;
_configuration = configuration;
_hostEnvironment = hostEnvironment;
}
[HttpGet("GetInfo/{code}")]
public IActionResult GetInfo(string code)
{
List<InfoModel> infos = new List<InfoModel>();
int isNumber;
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(code) || !int.TryParse(code, out isNumber))
{
_logger.LogInformation(String.Format("The code pass as arguments to api is : {0}", code));
return BadRequest("Invalid code");
}
try
{
_logger.LogDebug(1, "The code passed is" + code);
SqlConnection connection = _datatAccess.GetConnection(_configuration, _hostEnvironment);
string sql = string.Format ("SELECT * from table1 where code={0}", code);
DataTable dt = _datatAccess.ExecuteQuery(connection,CommandType.Text, sql);
if (dt != null && dt.Rows.Count > 0)
{
foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows)
{
infos.Add(new InfoModel
{
ID = dr["id"].ToString(),
code = dr["code"].ToString()
});
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(4, String.Format("Error Message: " + ex.Message + "\n" + ex.StackTrace));
return BadRequest("There is something wrong.Please contact the administration.");
}
return new OkObjectResult(infos);
}
}
Now when I try to create the unit test I need to pass the configuration, hostenvironment and logger to HomeController from my TestHomeController. And I don't know how to instantiate these settings and pass to controller:
using NUnit.Framework;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using MyApi.Models;
using MyApi.Controllers;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
namespace MyApi.Tests
{
[TestFixture]
public class TestHomeController: ControllerBase
{
private readonly IConfiguration _configuration; //How to instantiate this so it is not null
private readonly IHostEnvironment _hostEnvironment ;//How to instantiate this so it is not null
private ILogger<HomeController> _logger;//How to instantiate this so it is not null
[Test]
public void GetInfo_ShouldReturnAllInfo()
{
var controller = new HomeConteoller(_logger, _configuration, _hostEnvironment);
var result = controller.GetInfo("11");
var okObjectResult = (OkObjectResult)result;
//Assert
okObjectResult.StatusCode.Equals(200);
}
}
}
Thanks for any help and suggestions.
Probably, you have startup.cs. Don't you?
if you gonna test a controller, then you need to build a whole instance of an application. Here I put an example of how you can test your code if you have Startup.cs.
public class SUTFactory : WebApplicationFactory<Startup>
{
protected override IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder()
{
return Program.CreateHostBuilder(null);
}
}
public class TestControllerTests
{
private SUTFactory factory;
private HttpClient _client;
public TestControllerTests()
{
factory = new SUTFactory();
_client = factory.CreateClient();
}
[Test]
public async Task GetPatientInterviewID_ShouldReturnAllInterviewID()
{
// Arrange
var id = "11";
// Act
var result = await _client.GetAsync($"Home/GetInfo/{id}");
// Assert
Assert.AreEqual(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK, result.StatusCode);
}
}
This example is closer to Integration testing rather than Unit-testing. If you want to have unit-test then you need to do the following things
BaseDataAccess _datatAccess this is a specific realization and it cannot be mocked (comparing to ILogger, IHostEnvironment etc)
move all your code from the controller to a separate class, and test this class.
I am using AEM Mocks to test a custom servlet that uses a configuration, as such:
#Activate
void activate(final Config config) { ... }
I am following the approach described here and here to register and inject the service together with a HashMap, as such:
private static Map<String, Object> myHashMap = new HashMap<>();
...
myHashMap.put("a", "b");
myHashMap.put("c", "d");
...
servlet = context.registerInjectActivateService(new MyServlet(), myHashMap);
However, this approach doesn't work. The config object passed above, inside the activate function, is corrupted. For every key-value pair above, it sets null as the value. So instead of:
a -> b
c -> d
It sets:
a -> null
c -> null
Inside the HashMap. Can anyone please help? Thanks!
P.S. I should add that I am using version 2.3.0 of AEM Mocks since the recent versions cause an issue with an older artifact. For more info on that, see here.
I tested it, and it works with version 2.3.0 too. Could you check the following example? After that, it is probably a maven issue. Then we would need more information.
Here is my test servlet:
#Component(service = Servlet.class,
property = {
SLING_SERVLET_PATHS + "=/bin/servlet/test",
SLING_SERVLET_METHODS + "=GET",
SLING_SERVLET_EXTENSIONS + "=text"
})
#Designate(ocd = TestServlet.Config.class)
public class TestServlet extends SlingSafeMethodsServlet {
#ObjectClassDefinition
public #interface Config {
#AttributeDefinition(
name = "Name",
description = "Name used in the hello world text"
)
String name() default "Alex";
#AttributeDefinition(
name = "Greeting",
description = "Greeting - Morning, to demonstrate the dot-replacement"
)
String greeting_morning() default "Good Morning";
}
private Config config;
#Override
protected void doGet(#Nonnull SlingHttpServletRequest request, #Nonnull SlingHttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
response.setContentType("text/plain");
response.setCharacterEncoding("utf-8");
response.getWriter().println(this.getGreeting());
}
public String getGreeting() {
return config.greeting_morning() + ", " + config.name();
}
#Activate
void activate(final Config config) {
this.config = config;
}
}
Here is a JUnit 4 test:
public class TestServletTest {
#Rule
public final AemContext context = new AemContext();
#Test
public void testWithoutConfig() {
final TestServlet testServlet = context.registerInjectActivateService(new TestServlet());
assertEquals("Good Morning, Alex", testServlet.getGreeting());
}
#Test
public void testWithConfig() {
final Map<String, Object> properties = new HashMap<>();
properties.put("name", "Berndt");
properties.put("greeting.morning", "Keep sleeping");
final TestServlet testServlet = context.registerInjectActivateService(new TestServlet(), properties);
assertEquals("Keep sleeping, Berndt", testServlet.getGreeting());
}
}
I am developing a web API using ASP.Net core. I am doing integrated testing to my project. I am following this link, https://koukia.ca/integration-testing-in-asp-net-core-2-0-51d14ede3968. This is my code.
I have the controller to be tested in the thegoodyard.api project.
namespace thegoodyard.api.Controllers
{
[Produces("application/json")]
[Route("api/category")]
public class CategoryController: Controller
{
[HttpGet("details/{id}")]
public string GetCategory(int id = 0)
{
return "This is the message: " + id.ToString();
}
}
}
I added a new unit test project called thegoodyard.tests to the solution. I added a TestServerFixture class with the following definition
namespace thegoodyard.tests
{
public class TestServerFixture : IDisposable
{
private readonly TestServer _testServer;
public HttpClient Client { get; }
public TestServerFixture()
{
var builder = new WebHostBuilder()
.UseContentRoot(GetContentRootPath())
.UseEnvironment("Development")
.UseStartup<Startup>(); // Uses Start up class from your API Host project to configure the test server
_testServer = new TestServer(builder);
Client = _testServer.CreateClient();
}
private string GetContentRootPath()
{
var testProjectPath = PlatformServices.Default.Application.ApplicationBasePath;
var relativePathToHostProject = #"..\..\..\..\..\..\thegoodyard.api";
return Path.Combine(testProjectPath, relativePathToHostProject);
}
public void Dispose()
{
Client.Dispose();
_testServer.Dispose();
}
}
}
Then again in the test project, I created a new class called, CategoryControllerTests with the following definition.
namespace thegoodyard.tests
{
public class CategoryControllerTests: IClassFixture<TestServerFixture>
{
private readonly TestServerFixture _fixture;
public CategoryControllerTests(TestServerFixture fixture)
{
_fixture = fixture;
}
[Fact]
public async Task GetCategoryDetai()
{
var response = await _fixture.Client.GetAsync("api/category/details/3");
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
var responseString = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
bool containMessage = false; //responseString.Contains("This is the message: 3"); - I commented on purpose to make the test fails.
Assert.True(containMessage);
}
}
}
Then I right on the test method and clicked run tests in the option to run the test. But none of the tests was run. This is the output.
What is missing in my code? How can I get my integrated test running?
Please check following NuGet packages in your project:
Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost
Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
xunit
xunit.runner.visualstudio
Perhaps there's a build error that's preventing the project from being compiled. There's really not enough information here to say for sure. Rebuild your solution, and ensure there's no errors.
Aside from that, you can remove some variables by reducing the test code needed. ASP.NET Core includes a WebApplicationFactory<TEntryPoint> fixture out of the box for bootstrapping a test server. You can therefore change your test code to just:
public class CategoryControllerTests: IClassFixture<WebApplicationFactory<Startup>>
{
private readonly WebApplicationFactory<Startup> _factory;
public CategoryControllerTests(WebApplicationFactory<Startup> factory)
{
_factory = factory;
}
[Fact]
public async Task GetCategoryDetail()
{
var client = _factory.CreateClient();
var response = await client.GetAsync("api/category/details/3");
...
See the documentation for additional information and more advanced scenarios.
This way works fine for xUnit based intergration tests, which use Startup configuration. the code blow also demonstrates how to override some settings in appSetting.json to specific values for testing, as well as how to access to DI services.
using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using MyNamespace.Web;
using MyNamespace.Services;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
namespace MyNamespace.Tests
{
public class TestServerDependent : IDisposable
{
private readonly TestServerFixture _fixture;
public TestServer TestServer => _fixture.Server;
public HttpClient Client => _fixture.Client;
public TestServerDependent()
{
_fixture = new TestServerFixture();
var myService = GetService<IMyService>();
// myService.PerformAnyPreparationsForTests();
}
protected TService GetService<TService>()
where TService : class
{
return _fixture.GetService<TService>();
}
public void Dispose()
{
_fixture?.Dispose();
}
}
public class TestServerFixture : IDisposable
{
public TestServer Server { get; }
public HttpClient Client { get; }
public TestServerFixture()
{
var hostBuilder = WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()
.ConfigureAppConfiguration(
(builderContext, config) =>
{
var env = builderContext.HostingEnvironment;
config
.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", optional: false)
.AddJsonFile("appsettings.Testing.json", optional: false,
reloadOnChange: true);
})
.ConfigureLogging(
(hostingContext, logging) =>
{
logging.AddConfiguration(hostingContext.Configuration.GetSection("Logging"));
logging.AddConsole();
logging.AddDebug();
})
.UseStartup<Startup>();
Server = new TestServer(hostBuilder);
Client = Server.CreateClient();
}
public void Dispose()
{
Server.Dispose();
Client.Dispose();
}
public TService GetService<TService>()
where TService : class
{
return Server?.Host?.Services?.GetService(typeof(TService)) as TService;
}
}
}
How the simple integration test might look like with the described above:
using System.Net;
using Xunit;
namespace MyNamespace.Tests
{
public class SimpleIntegrationTest : TestServerDependent
{
[Fact]
public void RedirectToLoginPage()
{
var httpResponseMessage = Client.GetAsync("/").Result;
// Smoke test to make sure you are redirected (to Login page for instance)
Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.Redirect, httpResponseMessage.StatusCode);
}
}
}
I have the following code I'm trying to unit test :
if (networkUtils.isOnline()) {
return remoteDataSource.postComment(postId, commentText)
.doOnSuccess(postCommentResponse ->
localDataSource.postComment(postId, commentText))
.subscribeOn(schedulerProvider.io())
.observeOn(schedulerProvider.mainThread());
} else {
return Single.error(new IOException());
}
And this is how I'm trying to test it :
#Test
public void postComment_whenIsOnline_shouldCallLocalToPostComment() throws Exception {
// Given
when(networkUtils.isOnline())
.thenReturn(true);
String postId = "100";
String comment = "comment";
Response<PostCommentResponse> response = postCommentResponse();
when(remoteDataSource.postComment(anyString(), anyString()))
.thenReturn(Single.just(response));
// When
repository.postComment(postId, comment);
// Then
verify(localDataSource).postComment(postId, comment);
}
where I fake Response from Retrofit like :
private Response<PostCommentResponse> postCommentResponse() {
PostCommentResponse response = new PostCommentResponse();
response.setError("0");
response.setComment(postCommentResponseNestedItem);
return Response.success(response);
}
but it results to : Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
Any ideas ?
EDIT :
#RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class CommentsRepositoryTest {
#Mock
private CommentsLocalDataSource localDataSource;
#Mock
private CommentsRemoteDataSource remoteDataSource;
#Mock
private NetworkUtils networkUtils;
#Mock
private PostCommentResponseNestedItem postCommentResponseNestedItem;
private CommentsRepository repository;
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
BaseSchedulerProvider schedulerProvider = new ImmediateSchedulerProvider();
repository = new CommentsRepository(localDataSource, remoteDataSource, networkUtils, schedulerProvider);
}
// tests
}
When you want to test an Observable you have to subscribe to it so it will start emitting items.
As soon as I used :
TestObserver<Response<PostCommentResponse>> testObserver = new TestObserver<>();
and subscribed to :
repository.postComment(postId, comment)
.subscribe(testObserver);
the test worked as expected.
Below is a class (Class1) that I want to test, but I'm not fully satisfied with my Unit Test. Please see below code samples.
System Under Test
public interface IRepository {
string GetParameter(int id);
}
public class Repository {
public string GetParameter(int id) {
return "foo";
}
}
public class ErrorInfo {
public string ErrorCodes { get; set; }
}
public interface IErrorProvider {
ErrorInfo BuildErrorMessage(string errorCodes);
}
public class ErrorProvider {
public ErrorInfo BuildErrorMessage(string errorCodes) {
return new ErrorInfo(){ErrorCodes = errorCodes};
}
}
public class Class1 {
private readonly IRepository _repository;
private readonly IErrorProvider _errorProvider;
public Class1(IRepository repository, IErrorProvider errorProvider) {
_repository = repository;
_errorProvider = errorProvider;
}
public List<ErrorInfo> GetErrorList(int id) {
var errorList = new List<ErrorInfo>();
string paramName = _repository.GetParameter(id);
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(paramName)) {
string errorCodes = string.Format("{0}, {1}", 200, 201);
var error = _errorProvider.BuildErrorMessage(errorCodes);
errorList.Add(error);
}
return errorList;
}
}
Unit Tests
Below test passes and we check whether the correct error codes being used within the system under test.
[TestMethod]
public void GetErrorList_WhenParameterIsEmpty_ReturnsExpectedErrorCodes2() {
//Arrange
var stubRepo = new Mock<IRepository>();
stubRepo.Setup(x => x.GetParameter(It.IsAny<int>())).Returns(string.Empty);
var stubErrorMock = new Mock<IErrorProvider>();
const int id = 5;
var sut = new Class1(stubRepo.Object, stubErrorMock.Object);
//Act
var result = sut.GetErrorList(id);
//Verify
string verifiableErrorCodes = "200, 201";
stubErrorMock.Verify(x => x.BuildErrorMessage(verifiableErrorCodes));
}
However I would prefer testing the end result. For example, I want to Assert against the error codes that have been used in the production code. Below test fails but I like to know your thoughts on how to Assert against the errorCodes that has been used in the system under test.
[TestMethod]
public void GetErrorList_WhenParameterIsEmpty_ReturnsExpectedErrorCodes1() {
//Arrange
var stubRepo = new Mock<IRepository>();
stubRepo.Setup(x => x.GetParameter(It.IsAny<int>())).Returns(string.Empty);
string expectedErrorCodes = "200, 201";
var stubErrorRepo = new Mock<IErrorProvider>();
stubErrorRepo.Setup(e => e.BuildErrorMessage(It.IsAny<string>()));
const int id = 5;
var sut = new Class1(stubRepo.Object, stubErrorRepo.Object);
//Act
var result = sut.GetErrorList(id);
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(expectedErrorCodes, result.Single().ErrorCodes);
}
What would be the correct way to test this error codes that has been used in the system?
I suggest to mock only the IRepository and use a real IErrorProvider. Then you can call GetErrorList(id) and check the result.
There is not really right or wrong answer and we have decided to use the Assert test as it test the end result.
I took the TDD approach and re-implemented/analysed as below.
Start with a failing test (to simplify the code I removed the Repository from both test and the sut)
//AssertTest
[TestMethod]
public void GetErrorList_WhenParameterIsEmpty_ReturnsExpectedErrorCodes1()
{
//Arrange
const string expectedErrorCodes = "200, 201";
var stubErrorRepo = new Mock<IErrorProvider>();
stubErrorRepo.Setup(e => e.BuildErrorMessage(expectedErrorCodes)).Returns(new ErrorInfo() { ErrorCodes = expectedErrorCodes });
var sut = new Class1(stubErrorRepo.Object);
//Act
var result = sut.GetErrorList();
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(expectedErrorCodes, result.Single().ErrorCodes);
}
//SUT
public IEnumerable<ErrorInfo> GetErrorList(int id)
{
yield return new ErrorInfo();
}
As you would expect the test fail.
Now if write enough production code to make this test pass.
public IEnumerable<ErrorInfo> GetErrorList()
{
yield return _errorProvider.BuildErrorMessage("200, 201");
}
The VerifyTest would still fail for the above SUT.
//VerifyTest
[TestMethod]
public void GetErrorList_WhenParameterIsEmpty_ReturnsExpectedErrorCodes2()
{
//Arrange
var stubErrorMock = new Mock<IErrorProvider>();
var sut = new Class1(stubErrorMock.Object);
//Act
sut.GetErrorList();
//Verify
string verifiableErrorCodes = "200, 201";
stubErrorMock.Verify(x => x.BuildErrorMessage(verifiableErrorCodes));
}
However if I want this test to pass, I can write the below production code as below
public IEnumerable<ErrorInfo> GetErrorList()
{
_errorProvider.BuildErrorMessage("200, 201");
return null;
}
Now the VerifyTest passes, but the AssertTest fails.
Both tests are valid in their own ways. However they test different semantics.
AssertTest test whether the end result contains the correct error codes. Verify test ensures
the method is called with the correct error codes. It is important to note that
the end value of the Assert test is based on the setup method "match" provided by the Moq
framework. In other words the setup dictates what the end result would be.
AssertTest would fail if the setup is configured incorrectly or the production code uses error codes that does not match the setup configuration.
It is preferred to use the AssertTest as it test the end result.