I'm currently building a web app which is intended to run on an isolated, offline environment. However, semantic imports fonts from Google's datacenter by default (a terrible practice if you ask me), which obviously aren't reachable from this environment, hanging the app for 10 or 20 seconds until it times out.
Is there a way to prevent this behaviour?
I've read things about gulp here and there, but honestly I don't even know what gulp is. All I've used is npm/yarn.
Thanks in advance.
Using gulp is your most reliable approach, and this guide makes it easy to follow:
http://g14n.info/2016/11/react-semantic-customized/
Your second option would be to use a forked version of their CSS like this one:
https://github.com/arthurlacoste/semantic-ui-offline
Related
OK, I am desperate enough to finally post a github question.
SUMMARY:
Django deploy -> digital ocean droplet -> nginx and gunicord + git pull
It works, but manually writing all the commands is way to tedious + error prone. I have been trying to find a suitable tool ever since, and kinda need some advice.
SOO FAR:
I have tried Fabric, BUUUT complexity and simplicity baffles me. Some tutorial are way to trivial, some are way too complex and 95 % of them seems to be outdated(this seems relevant in this case , because syntax has changed drastically)
In addition, the most basic example in docs don't work no matter how many times I have tried to correct it(ssh connection vie password).
P.S. I am completely new to devops, so a lot of things is confusing for me
Beside that, I have tried to dive into some other tools like bash scripting and ansible and dropped them shortly after, mainly due to them not being as alluring as Fabric seems to be.
My question is!
Should I continue tring to solve Fabric, or is there some other commonly used way to make deployment a simple and enjoyable matter while preserving the functionality?
::btw I am windows 10 user put prefer to use git bash, could this be the problem for Fabric(it seemed not being able to recognize ls command and I used DIR instead)
I typically recommend using ansible over fabric unless you are working with *nix. If you have to work with AIX, Solaris, HPUX, fabric can offer you more flexibility since you don't need python on the server. It will take about two-days to get up to speed on ansible, but if you're already using django, jinja2 (the templating language used by anible) should be a snap.
We are currently using requirejs/backbone for development and firebug for debugging. We are thinking of moving to Ember and using ember appkit.
I noticed that because of the new ES6 javascript modules, the application needs to be pre-compiled into a single javascript file app.js.
I am concerned that this will make it difficult to debug problems because you are dealing with a massive single file instead of small ones that we have at the moment and can easily find in firebug.
Has this been an issue for people, are there any good solutions?
As kingpin2k mentions, Ember App Kit has been effectively superseded by Ember-CLI. I would recommend looking into that. Depending on your needs and planning, Ember-CLI may or may not be suitable for your situation. Some people have successfully put Ember-CLI apps in production, but this is brand new technology, so caveat emptor.
Ember-CLI provides a build system based on Broccoli that will transpile ES6-modules, compact the output into a single Javascript file, and lots more. Ember-CLI is still under heavy development, but is already shaping up quite nicely. In my opinion, the clean code organization and fast Broccoli build are really quite awesome.
Modern browsers such as Firefox and Chrome come with an integrated debugger that will show you the original source when source maps are supplied. This will eventually be provided to the browser in Ember-CLI projects as well when you run the development server. However, this functionality is currently incomplete. It is possible to get some source map support in Ember-CLI now, have a look at this issue.
In the mean time, there are more ways to debug code of course, and I suspect that before proper source map support lands in Ember-CLI/Broccoli, liberal use of console logging and such may be sufficient. Running Ember-CLI's live-reload development server means that when you change and save a file in your project, the results will be shown almost instantaneously in the browser; the Broccoli build is blazing fast.
Keep in mind that minifying and combining all Javascript code into a single output file is a common approach in single page application frameworks such as Ember, Angular, and Backbone. Debugging these applications with breakpoints and such will happen more and more through the browser's debug tools in combination with source maps.
Update
By now the Ember core team actively recommends Ember-CLI. It is quite awesome.
I am aware that we can make templates of domains in weblogic very easily using config_builder script. Is there a similar thing in websphere?
I know nothing about WebLogic, but fix pack 9 for WebSphere added something you may find useful. The wsadmin command AdminTask.extractConfigProperties with GenerateTemplates and PortablePropertiesFile options set to true will generate a portable, editable file transferable to another cell. AdminTask.applyConfigProperties is used to read your edited output and apply the properties to a new cell, server, etc. I haven't tried this yet outside of a controlled sandbox environment; so, I'm not sure what pitfalls may await you. But if you have a ton of servers to build, it may be worth your time to do some experimentation.
Here's the IBM doc on the topic.
As far as i know i don't think there is such a capability.
You can use the default product shipped profiles to start with and create the servers and configure them the way you want.
These servers can then be used as a template to build other servers.
I am not sure if this helps you but i thought i would point this out.
Manglu
Let me first say I am aware of this faq for Mach-II, which discusses using application specific mappings as a third option when:
locating the framework in the server root is not possible and
creating a server wide mapping to the Mach-II framework directory is impossible
Using application specific mappings would also work for other ColdFusion frameworks with similar requirements (ColdSpring). Here is my issue however: my (I should say "their") production servers are all running ColdFusion MX7, and application specific mappings were introduced in ColdFusion 8. I most likely will be unable to do option 1 or 2 because they involve creating server wide changes that could conflict with other applications (I don't have a final word on this but I am preparing for that to be the case).
That said, is there anybody out there who was in similar bind and has done an option 4, in any ColdFusion version, or with any similar framework? The only option 4 I can think of is modifying the entire framework to change this hardcoded path, and even if that worked it would be time consuming and risky. I'm fairly sure that if there was a simple modification or other simple solution it would already be included in the framework (maybe it's included in version 1.8 of Mach-II and I don't know about it yet).
Any thoughts on solving this problem or even unorthodox setups with libraries that have specific path requirements would be appreciated. Any thoughts from Team Mach-II would especially appreciated...we're on the same team here Matt! ;-)
EDIT
Apparently, the ColdBox framework includes a refactor.xml ANT task which includes a target that refactors the ColdBox code to use a different absolute path as a base along with several other useful refactoring targets. So problem solved for ColdBox users.
Looking at the build.xml for Mach-II (1.6 and 1.8) I don't see any target in there that would allow me to refactor the code. I thought about creating a feature request ticket for such a task for Mach-II but frankly I don't think creating such an ANT task is a big priority for the MachII team since the need really only relates to either
a) users of ColdFusion versions below 8
b) someone who wants to use multiple Mach-II versions in the same application, a use I doubt they want to support
The ColdSpring code I have doesn't come with any ANT tasks at all, although I do have unit tests, and I bet if I poked around the SVN I'd find a few build scripts.
Using Ant tasks to refactor and retest the code, or the simpler (and sort of cop out) solution of creating a separate ColdFusion instance for the application are the best answers I've been able to come up with. I don't need this application to exist in the shared scope of other applications, so my first solution is going to be to try and get a dedicated CF instance for this application.
I'm also going to look at the ColdBox refactor.xml ANT task however and see if I can modify it to work generically to recognize and refactor CFC references with modified absolute paths. If I complete this task I'll be sure to post the code somewhere and edit create an answer to link to it. If anybody else wants to take a crack at that or help me out with it feel free.
Until then I'll leave this question open and see if someone comes up with a better solution.
Fusebox is not so strict, I think.
In XML mode (maybe I call this not 100% correcly, just mean using the Application.cfm) it's just proper include in index.cfm, something like:
<cfinclude template="fusebox5/fusebox5.cfm" />
In non-XML mode it will need proper extending in the root Application.cfc:
<cfcomponent extends="path.to.fusebox5.Application" output="false">
All you need is to know the path.
Perhaps you could create a symbolic link and let the operating system resolve the issue for you?
I've been playing with FW/1 lately, and while it may look like you need to add a mapping and extend org.corfield.framework, you can actually move the framework.cfc file into your web root and just extend="framework". It's dead simple, and gets you straight into a great framework with no mess and very little overhead.
It should be as simple as dropping the 'MachII' folder at the root of your domain (i.e. example.com/MachII). No mappings are required to use Mach-II if you just deploy at the root of the domain of your website.
Also:
Please file a ticket for the ANT task you mentioned in your question. Team Mach-II would love to have this issue logged:
Enter a new ticket on the Mach-II Trac
If you want to tackle an ANT task for us, we can get stuff like this incorporated into the builds faster than waiting to for a Team member to work on the ticket. Code submissions from the community are welcome and appreciated.
We don't keep an eye on Stack Overflow very often so we invite you to join our official community group at called "Mach-II for ColdFusion" at Google Groups. The Google Group is the best place to ask questions or comments like this if you want feedback from the Team.
We develop custom survey web sites and I am looking for a way to automate the pattern testing of these sites. Surveys often contain many complex rules and branches which are triggered on how items are responded too. All surveys are rigorously tested before being released to clients. This testing results in a lot of manual work. I would like to learn of some options I could use to automate these tests by responding to questions and verifying the results in the database. The survey sites are produced by an engine which creates and writes asp pages and receives the responses to process into a database. So the only way I can determine to test the site is to interact with the web pages themselves. I guess in a way I need to build some type of bot; I really don't know much about the design behind them.
Could someone please provide some suggestions on how to achieve this? Thank you for your time.
Brett
Check out selenium: http://selenium.openqa.org/
Also, check out the answers to this other question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/484/how-do-you-test-layout-design-across-multiple-browsersoss
You could also check out WatiN.
Sounds like your engine could generate a test script using something like Test::WWW::Mechanize
Usual test methodologies applies; white box and black box.
White box testing for you may mean instrumenting your application to be able to make it go into a particular state, then you can predict the the result you expect.
Black box may mean that you hit a page, then consider of the possible outcomes valid. Repeat and rinse till you get sufficient coverage.
Another thing we use is monitoring statistics for our service. Did we get the expected number of hits on this page. We routinely run a/b tests, and I have run a/b tests against refactored code to verify that nothing changed before rolling things out.
/Allan
I can think of a couple of good web application testing suites that should get the job done - one free/open source and one commercial:
Selenium (open source/cross platform)
TestComplete (commercial/Windows-based)
Both will let you create test suites by verifying database records based on interactions with the web app.
The fact that you're Windows/ASP based might mean that TestComplete will get you up and running faster, as it's native to Windows and .NET. You can download a free trial to see if it'll work for you before making the investment.
Check out the unit testing framework 'lime' that comes with the Symfony framework. http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_0/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing. You didn't mention you language, lime is php.
I would suggest the mechanize gem,available for ruby . It's pretty intuitive to use .
I use the QEngine(commerical) for the same purpose. I need to add a data and check the same in the UI. I write one script which does this and call that in a loop. the data can be passed via either csv or excel.
check that www.qengine.com , you can try Watir also.
My proposal is QA Agent (http://qaagent.com). It seems this is a new approach because you do not need to install anything. Just develop your web tests in the browser based ide. By the way you can develop your tests using jQuery and java script. Really cool!