Everywhere I can see IAM Role is created on EC2 instance and given Roles like S3FullAccess.
Is it possible to create IAM Role on S3 instead of EC2? And attach that Role to S3 bucket?
I created IAM Role on S3 with S3FULLACCESS. Not able to attach that to the existing bucket or create a new bucket with this Role. Please help
IAM (Identity and Access Management) Roles are a way of assigning permissions to applications, services, EC2 instances, etc.
Examples:
When a Role is assigned to an EC2 instance, credentials are passed to software running on the instance so that they can call AWS services.
When a Role is assigned to an Amazon Redshift cluster, it can use the permissions within the Role to access data stored in Amazon S3 buckets.
When a Role is assigned to an AWS Lambda function, it gives the function permission to call other AWS services such as S3, DynamoDB or Kinesis.
In all these cases, something is using the credentials to call AWS APIs.
Amazon S3 never requires credentials to call an AWS API. While it can call other services for Event Notifications, the permissions are actually put on the receiving service rather than S3 as the requesting service.
Thus, there is never any need to attach a Role to an Amazon S3 bucket.
Roles do not apply to S3 as it does with EC2.
Assuming #Sunil is asking if we can restrict access to data in S3.
In that case, we can either Set S3 ACL on the buckets or the object in it OR Set S3 bucket policies.
Related
So I have created an IAM user and added a permission to access S3 then I have created an EC2 instance and SSH'ed into the it.
After giving "aws s3 ls" command, the reply was
"Unable to locate credentials. You can configure credentials by running "aws configure".
so what's the difference between giving IAM credentials(Key and Key ID) using "aws configure" and editing the bucket policy to allow s3 access to my instance's public IP.
Even after editing the bucket policy(JSON) to allow S3 access to my instance's public IP why am I not able to access the s3 bucket unless I use "aws configure"(Key and Key ID)?
Please help! Thanks.
Since you are using EC2 you should really use EC2 Instance Profiles instead of running aws configure and hard-coding credentials in the file system.
As for the your question of S3 bucket policies versus IAM roles, here is the official documentation on that. They are two separate tools you would use in securing your AWS account.
As for your specific command that failed, note that the AWS CLI tool will always try to look for credentials by default. If you want it to skip looking for credentials you can pass the --no-sign-request argument.
However, if you were just running aws s3 ls then that was trying to list all the buckets in your account, which you would have to have IAM credentials for. Individual bucket policies would not be taken into account in that scenario.
If you were running aws s3 ls s3://bucketname then that may have worked as aws s3 ls s3://bucketname --no-sign-request.
When you create iam user so there are two parts
policies
roles
Policies are attached to user, like what all services user can pr can't access
roles are attached to application, what all access that application can have
So you have to permit ec2 to access S3
There are two ways for that
aws configure
attach role to ec2 instance
while 1 is tricky and legthy , 2 is easy
Go to ec2-instance-> Actions -> Security -> Modify IAM role -> then select role (ec2+s3 access role)
thats it , you can simply do aws s3 ls from ec2 instance
I have running app on auto-scaled ec2 env. of account1 created via AWS CDK (it also should have support to be run on multiple regions). During the app execution I need to get object from account2's s3.
One of the ways to get s3 data is use tmp credentials(via sts assume role):
on account1 side create a policy for ec2 instance role to assume sts tmp credentials for s3 object
on account2 side create a policy GetObject access to the s3 object
on account2 site create role and attach point2's policy to it + trust relationship to account1's ec2 role
Pros: no user credentials are required to get access to the data
Cons: after each env update requires manual permission configuration
Another way is to create a user in account2 with permission to get s3 object and put the credentials on account1 side.
Pros: after each env update doesn't require manual permission configuration
Cons: Exposes IAM user's credentials
Is there a better option to eliminate manual permission config and explicit IAM user credentials sharing?
You can add a Bucket Policy on the Amazon S3 bucket in Account 2 that permits access by the IAM Role used by the Amazon EC2 instance in Account 1.
That way, the EC2 instance(s) can access the bucket just like it is in the same Account, without have to assume any roles or users.
Simply set the Principal to be the ARN of the IAM Role used by the EC2 instances.
Since Lightsail instances are hosted from a dedicated AWS account different from the user's account, what would be a good S3 bucket policy to restrict bucket/object actions for a specific Lightsail instance? Specifically, I would like to grant only s3:PutObject and s3:ListBucket actions to the instance.
Or, is there another, better solution for granting access than the bucket policy?
Since Lightsail is managed outside, you can create a IAM User (Not IAM Role) and attach IAM Policy to it in the AWS account where the private S3 bucket resides.
Then use the AWS IAM User's programmatic access cresentials from you Lightsail instance to access S3.
I am trying to configure jboss to use AWS IAM Roles for accessing S3 and SQS. All of the documentation I've seen uses static access and secret keys rather than the dynamic keys that roles allow for.
Is there any documentation on doing this?
Create an EC2 instance assigning that Role. Whatever you run any app in that instance will be able to access the AWS resources.
This way you don't need to write any code for security within the application.
Also in your code you don't need to supply any credentials when you assign the role to the EC2 instance.
In AWS there are two approaches to provide permission using AWS IAM to your code to access AWS resources such as S3 and SQS.
If your code runs in Amazon Compute Services such as EC2, Lambda it is recommended to create a IAM Role with required policies to access S3 & SQS also allowing the Compute Service (EC2, Lambda) to assume that role (Using Trust Relationships). After attaching this role, either to EC2 or Lambda, you can directly use AWS SDK to access S3 and SQS without needing any credentials or access tokens to configure for SDK.
For more information, see Using an IAM Role to Grant Permissions to
Applications Running on Amazon EC2 Instances.
If your code runs on premise or external to the Amazon infrastructure, you need to create a IAM user with required policies and also create access keys (Access Key ID & Secret Key) and initialize SDK to allow access to S3 or SQS as shown below.
var AWS = require('aws-sdk');
AWS.config.credentials = new AWS.Credentials({
accessKeyId: 'akid', secretAccessKey: 'secret'
});
I have a question on using IAM roles with EC2 and EMR. Here's my current setup:
I have a EC2 machine launched with a particular IAM role (let's call this role 'admin'). My workflow is to upload a file to S3 from this machine and then create an EMR cluster with a particular IAM role (a 'runner' role). The EMR cluster works on the file uploaded to S3 from the admin machine.
Admin is a role with privileges to all APIs in all AWS services. Runner has access to all APIs in EMR, EC2 and S3.
For some reason, the EMR cluster is unable to access the input file loaded in S3. It keeps getting an 'access denied' exception from s3.
I guess writing to s3 from one IAM role and reading it from a different IAM role is what is causing the issue.
Any ideas on what is going wrong here or whether this is even a supported use-case is appreciated.
Thanks!
http://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/post/TxPOJBY6FE360K/IAM-policies-and-Bucket-Policies-and-ACLs-Oh-My-Controlling-Access-to-S3-Resourc
S3 objects are protected in three ways as seen in the post I linked to.
Your IAM role will need the permission to read S3 objects.
The S3 bucket policy must allow your IAM role access to the object.
The S3 ACL for the specific object must also allow your IAM role access to the object.