Travis CI Deploy by SSH Script/Hosts issue - django

I have a django site which I would like to deploy to a Digital Ocean server everytime a branch is merged to master. I have it mostly working and have followed this tutorial.
.travis.yml
language: python
python:
- '2.7'
env:
- DJANGO_VERSION=1.10.3
addons:
ssh_known_hosts: mywebsite.com
git:
depth: false
before_install:
- openssl aes-256-cbc -K *removed encryption details* -in travis_rsa.enc -out travis_rsa -d
- chmod 600 travis_rsa
install:
- pip install -r backend/requirements.txt
- pip install -q Django==$DJANGO_VERSION
before_script:
- cp backend/local.env backend/.env
script: python manage.py test
deploy:
skip_cleanup: true
provider: script
script: "./travis-deploy.sh"
on:
all_branches: true
travis-deploy.sh - runs when the travis 'deploy' task calls it
#!/bin/bash
# print outputs and exit on first failure
set -xe
if [ $TRAVIS_BRANCH == "master" ] ; then
# setup ssh agent, git config and remote
echo -e "Host mywebsite.com\n\tStrictHostKeyChecking no\n" >> ~/.ssh/config
eval "$(ssh-agent -s)"
ssh-add travis_rsa
git remote add deploy "travis#mywebsite.com:/home/dean/se_dockets"
git config user.name "Travis CI"
git config user.email "travis#mywebsite.com"
git add .
git status # debug
git commit -m "Deploy compressed files"
git push -f deploy HEAD:master
echo "Git Push Done"
ssh -i travis_rsa -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null travis#mywebsite.com 'cd /home/dean/se_dockets/backend; echo hello; ./on_update.sh'
else
echo "No deploy script for branch '$TRAVIS_BRANCH'"
fi
Everything works find until things get to the 'deploy' stage. I keep getting error messages like:
###########################################################
# WARNING: POSSIBLE DNS SPOOFING DETECTED! #
###########################################################
The ECDSA host key for mywebsite.com has changed,
and the key for the corresponding IP address *REDACTED FOR STACK OVERFLOW*
is unknown. This could either mean that
DNS SPOOFING is happening or the IP address for the host
and its host key have changed at the same time.
###########################################################
# WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! #
###########################################################
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
It is also possible that a host key has just been changed.
The fingerprint for the ECDSA key sent by the remote host is
* REDACTED FOR STACK OVERFLOW *
Please contact your system administrator.
Add correct host key in /home/travis/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.
Offending RSA key in /home/travis/.ssh/known_hosts:11
remove with: ssh-keygen -f "/home/travis/.ssh/known_hosts" -R mywebsite.com
Password authentication is disabled to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks.
Keyboard-interactive authentication is disabled to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks.
Permission denied (publickey,password).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Script failed with status 128
INTERESTINGLY - If I re-run this job the 'git push' command will succeed at pushing to the deploy remote (my server). However, the next step in the deploy script which is to SSH into the server and run some postupdate commands will fail for the same reason (hosts fingerprint change or something). Or, it will ask for travis#mywebsite.com password (it has none) and will hang on the input prompt.
Additionally when I debug the Travis CI build and use the SSH url you're given to SSH into the machine Travis CI runs on - I can SSH into my own server from it. However it takes multiple tries to get around the errors.
So - this seems to be a fluid problem with stuff persisting from builds into the next on retries causing different errors/endings.
As you can see in my .yml file and the deploy script I have attempted to disable various host name checks and added the domain to known hosts etc... all to no avail.
I know I have things 99% set up correctly as things do mostly succeed when I retry the job a few times.
Anyone seen this before?
Cheers,
Dean

Related

Connect to VPN with Podman

Having this Dockerfile:
FROM fedora:30
ENV LANG C.UTF-8
RUN dnf upgrade -y \
&& dnf install -y \
openssh-clients \
openvpn \
slirp4netns \
&& dnf clean all
CMD ["openvpn", "--config", "/vpn/ovpn.config", "--auth-user-pass", "/vpn/ovpn.auth"]
Building the image with:
podman build -t peque/vpn .
If I try to run it with (note $(pwd), where the VPN configuration and credentials are stored):
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
I get the following error:
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Any ideas on how could I fix this? I would not mind changing the base image if that could help (i.e.: to Alpine or anything else as long as it allows me to use openvpn for the connection).
System information
Using Podman 1.4.4 (rootless) and Fedora 30 distribution with kernel 5.1.19.
/dev/net/tun permissions
Running the container with:
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
Then, from the container, I can:
# ls -l /dev/ | grep net
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 60 Jul 23 07:31 net
I can also list /dev/net, but will get a "permission denied error":
# ls -l /dev/net
ls: cannot access '/dev/net/tun': Permission denied
total 0
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? tun
Trying --privileged
If I try with --privileged:
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --privileged --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
Then instead of the permission-denied error (errno=13), I get a no-such-file-or-directory error (errno=2):
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2)
I can effectively verify there is no /dev/net/ directory when using --privileged, even if I pass the --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun parameters.
Verbose log
This is the log I get when configuring the client with verb 3:
OpenVPN 2.4.7 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [LZ4] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH/PKTINFO] [AEAD] built on Feb 20 2019
library versions: OpenSSL 1.1.1c FIPS 28 May 2019, LZO 2.08
Outgoing Control Channel Authentication: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
Incoming Control Channel Authentication: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
Socket Buffers: R=[212992->212992] S=[212992->212992]
UDP link local (bound): [AF_INET][undef]:0
UDP link remote: [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
TLS: Initial packet from [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194, sid=3ebc16fc 8cb6d6b1
WARNING: this configuration may cache passwords in memory -- use the auth-nocache option to prevent this
VERIFY OK: depth=1, C=ES, ST=XXX, L=XXX, O=XXXXX, emailAddress=email#domain.com, CN=internal-ca
VERIFY KU OK
Validating certificate extended key usage
++ Certificate has EKU (str) TLS Web Server Authentication, expects TLS Web Server Authentication
VERIFY EKU OK
VERIFY OK: depth=0, C=ES, ST=XXX, L=XXX, O=XXXXX, emailAddress=email#domain.com, CN=ovpn.server.address
Control Channel: TLSv1.2, cipher TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 2048 bit RSA
[ovpn.server.address] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
SENT CONTROL [ovpn.server.address]: 'PUSH_REQUEST' (status=1)
PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,route xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.0,route xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0,dhcp-option DOMAIN server.net,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.254,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.1,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.1,route-gateway xx.xx.xx.1,topology subnet,ping 10,ping-restart 60,ifconfig xx.xx.xx.24 255.255.255.0,peer-id 1'
OPTIONS IMPORT: timers and/or timeouts modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: --ifconfig/up options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: route options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: route-related options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: --ip-win32 and/or --dhcp-option options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: peer-id set
OPTIONS IMPORT: adjusting link_mtu to 1624
Outgoing Data Channel: Cipher 'AES-128-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key
Outgoing Data Channel: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
Incoming Data Channel: Cipher 'AES-128-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key
Incoming Data Channel: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
ROUTE_GATEWAY xx.xx.xx.xx/255.255.255.0 IFACE=tap0 HWADDR=0a:38:ba:e6:4b:5f
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2)
Exiting due to fatal error
Error number may change depending on whether I run the command with --privileged or not.
It turns out that you are blocked by SELinux: after running the client container and trying to access /dev/net/tun inside it, you will get the following AVC denial in the audit log:
type=AVC msg=audit(1563869264.270:833): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=11429 comm="ls" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15236 scontext=system_u:system_r:container_t:s0:c502,c803 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=0
To allow your container configuring the tunnel while staying not fully privileged and with SELinux enforced, you need to customize SELinux policies a bit. However, I did not find an easy way to do this properly.
Luckily, there is a tool called udica, which can generate SELinux policies from container configurations. It does not provide the desired policy on its own and requires some manual intervention, so I will describe how I got the openvpn container working step-by-step.
First, install the required tools:
$ sudo dnf install policycoreutils-python-utils policycoreutils udica
Create the container with required privileges, then generate the policy for this container:
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --name ovpn peque/vpn
$ podman inspect ovpn | sudo udica -j - ovpn_container
Policy ovpn_container created!
Please load these modules using:
# semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
Restart the container with: "--security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process" parameter
Here is the policy which was generated by udica:
$ cat ovpn_container.cil
(block ovpn_container
(blockinherit container)
(allow process process ( capability ( chown dac_override fsetid fowner mknod net_raw setgid setuid setfcap setpcap net_bind_service sys_chroot kill audit_write net_admin )))
(allow process default_t ( dir ( open read getattr lock search ioctl add_name remove_name write )))
(allow process default_t ( file ( getattr read write append ioctl lock map open create )))
(allow process default_t ( sock_file ( getattr read write append open )))
)
Let's try this policy (note the --security-opt option, which tells podman to run the container in newly created domain):
$ sudo semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
<...>
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Ugh. Here is the problem: the policy generated by udica still does not know about specific requirements of our container, as they are not reflected in its configuration (well, probably, it is possible to infer that you want to allow operations on tun_tap_device_t based on the fact that you requested --device /dev/net/tun, but...). So, we need to customize the policy by extending it with few more statements.
Let's disable SELinux temporarily and run the container to collect the expected denials:
$ sudo setenforce 0
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
These are:
$ sudo grep denied /var/log/audit/audit.log
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:839): avc: denied { read write } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" name="tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:840): avc: denied { open } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:841): avc: denied { ioctl } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 ioctlcmd=0x54ca scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.947:842): avc: denied { nlmsg_write } for pid=3273 comm="ip" scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tclass=netlink_route_socket permissive=1
Or more human-readable:
$ sudo grep denied /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow
#============= ovpn_container.process ==============
allow ovpn_container.process self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg_write;
allow ovpn_container.process tun_tap_device_t:chr_file { ioctl open read write };
OK, let's modify the udica-generated policy by adding the advised allows to it (note, that here I manually translated the syntax to CIL):
(block ovpn_container
(blockinherit container)
(allow process process ( capability ( chown dac_override fsetid fowner mknod net_raw setgid setuid setfcap setpcap net_bind_service sys_chroot kill audit_write net_admin )))
(allow process default_t ( dir ( open read getattr lock search ioctl add_name remove_name write )))
(allow process default_t ( file ( getattr read write append ioctl lock map open create )))
(allow process default_t ( sock_file ( getattr read write append open )))
; This is our new stuff.
(allow process tun_tap_device_t ( chr_file ( ioctl open read write )))
(allow process self ( netlink_route_socket ( nlmsg_write )))
)
Now we enable SELinux back, reload the module and check that the container works correctly when we specify our custom domain:
$ sudo setenforce 1
$ sudo semodule -r ovpn_container
$ sudo semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
<...>
Initialization Sequence Completed
Finally, check that other containers still have no these privileges:
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z peque/vpn
<...>
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Yay! We stay with SELinux on, and allow the tunnel configuration only to our specific container.

Something wrong on deploy chaincode for hyperledger v1.0

I have tried to use docker toolbox to setup Hyperledger V1.0 in my local machines.
I according to this document:
http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/asset_setup.html
But when I tried to deploy chaincode.
$node deploy.js
I got an error message:
info: Returning a new winston logger with default configurations
info: [Chain.js]: Constructed Chain instance: name - fabric-client1, securityEnabled: true, TCert download batch size: 10, network mode: true
info: [Peer.js]: Peer.const - url: grpc://localhost:8051 options grpc.ssl_target_name_override=tlsca, grpc.default_authority=tlsca
info: [Peer.js]: Peer.const - url: grpc://localhost:8055 options grpc.ssl_target_name_override=tlsca, grpc.default_authority=tlsca
info: [Peer.js]: Peer.const - url: grpc://localhost:8056 options grpc.ssl_target_name_override=tlsca, grpc.default_authority=tlsca
info: [Client.js]: Failed to load user "admin" from local key value store
info: [FabricCAClientImpl.js]: Successfully constructed Fabric COP service client: endpoint - {"protocol":"http","hostname":"localhost","port":8054}
info: [crypto_ecdsa_aes]: This class requires a KeyValueStore to save keys, no store was passed in, using the default store C:\Users\daniel\.hfc-key-store
[2017-04-15 22:14:29.268] [ERROR] Helper - Error: Calling enrollment endpoint failed with error [Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:8054]
at ClientRequest.<anonymous> (C:\Users\daniel\node_modules\fabric-ca-client\lib\FabricCAClientImpl.js:304:12)
at emitOne (events.js:96:13)
at ClientRequest.emit (events.js:188:7)
at Socket.socketErrorListener (_http_client.js:310:9)
at emitOne (events.js:96:13)
at Socket.emit (events.js:188:7)
at emitErrorNT (net.js:1278:8)
at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:74:11)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:98:9)
[2017-04-15 22:14:29.273] [ERROR] DEPLOY - Error: Failed to obtain an enrolled user
at ca_client.enroll.then.then.then.catch (C:\Users\daniel\helper.js:59:12)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:103:7)
events.js:160
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error: Connect Failed
at ClientDuplexStream._emitStatusIfDone (C:\Users\daniel\node_modules\grpc\src\node\src\client.js:201:19)
at ClientDuplexStream._readsDone (C:\Users\daniel\node_modules\grpc\src\node\src\client.js:169:8)
at readCallback (C:\Users\daniel\node_modules\grpc\src\node\src\client.js:229:12)
Is this an question about unable to connect to ca? Or other causes?
Edit:
Environment:
OS: Windows 10 Professional Edition
Docker Toolbox: 17.04.0-ce
Go: 1.7.5
Node.js: 6.10.0
My steps:
1.Open Docker Quickstart Terminal and key commands.
$curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hyperledger/fabric/master/examples/sfhackfest/sfhackfest.tar.gz -o sfhackfest.tar.gz 2> /dev/null; tar -xvf sfhackfest.tar.gz
$docker-compose -f docker-compose-gettingstarted.yml build
$docker-compose -f docker-compose-gettingstarted.yml up -d
$docker ps
It has been confirmed that six containers have been activated
2.Download examples and install modules.
$curl -OOOOOO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hyperledger/fabric-sdk-node/v1.0-alpha/examples/balance-transfer/{config.json,deploy.js,helper.js,invoke.js,query.js,package.json}
//This link didn't work, so I downloaded the required files from GitHub of fabric-sdk-node
$npm install --global windows-build-tools
$npm install
3.Try to deploy chaincode.
$node deploy.js
There were several problems, not the least of which that documentation was outdated and was for a preview release of Hyperledger Fabric. The docs are actually in the process of being removed as we need to update our examples / samples.
You mentioned Docker Toolbox - so are you trying to run all of this on Windows or Mac?
UPDATE:
So one of the issue with Docker Toolbox or Docker for Windows is that you cannot use localhost / 127.0.0.1 as the address when trying to communicate from apps on the host (even in the QuickStart Terminal) to the endpoints of the Docker containers. When the QuickStart Terminal first launches Docker, you'll see that it will output the IP address of the endpoint you should use when communicating with exposed ports.
I was having the same issue while following the latest "Writing Your First Application" tutorial (http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/write_first_app.html). I had installed all the pre-requisites and the fabric-samples and started the local network.
When I got to the step of enrolling the Admin user, $ node enrollAdmin.js, I was getting the same error message as above, Error: connect ECONNREFUSED, followed by the localhost domain.
As the first answer suggests, the root cause is that I'm running Docker Toolbox. I'm developing on an older Mac, OSX v10.9.5, so I couldn't use Docker for Mac.
To fix the issue, I replaced 'localhost' in the enrollAdmin.js code with the IP from Docker Toolbox.
Here are the steps I took:
Started Docker with Applications > Docker Quickstart Terminal
Copied the IP from this sentence: docker is configured to use the default machine with IP...
Opened the copy of enrollAdmin.js from fabric-samples/fabcar directory
Found this code:
// be sure to change the http to https when the CA is running TLS enabled
fabric_ca_client = new Fabric_CA_Client('http://localhost:7054', tlsOptions , 'ca.example.com', crypto_suite); // <-- This is the line to change
Replaced 'localhost' with the Docker IP, leaving the port :7054 as is.
Saved
Re-ran the command, $ node enrollAdmin.js
The script connected to the CA and successfully completed the Admin enrollment.
On to the next step!

Run a ESP local for development

When i try to run a local ESP then i get this error.
ERROR:Fetching service config failed(status code 403, reason Forbidden, url ***)
I have a new created service account this account works fine with gcloud cli.
System: OSX Sierra with Docker for MAC
this is the command that i use to start the container:
docker run -d --name="esp" --net="host" -v ~/Downloads:/esp gcr.io/endpoints-release/endpoints-runtime:1.0 -s 2017-02-07r5 -v echo.endpoints.****.cloud.goog -p 8082 -a localhost:9000 -k /esp/serviceaccount.json
UPDATE:
I have found the error i have set for the service name the verision and for the version the servicename.
Now i get no error but it not works, this is the console output from the container. From my view is all fine but it not works, i can't call the proxy with localhost:8082/***
INFO:Constructing an access token with scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/service.management.readonly
INFO:Service account email: aplha-api#****.iam.gserviceaccount.com
INFO:Refreshing access_token
INFO:Fetching the service configuration from the service management service
nginx: [warn] Using trusted CA certificates file: /etc/nginx/trusted-ca-certificates.crt
This is the used correct command:
docker run -d --name="esp-user-api" --net="host" -v ~/Downloads:/esp gcr.io/endpoints-release/endpoints-runtime:1.0 -s echo.endpoints.***.cloud.goog -v 2017-02-07r5 -p 8082 -a localhost:9000 -k /esp/serviceaccount.json
Aron, I assume:
(1) you are following this user guide: https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/running-esp-localdev
(2) And you do have a backend running on localhost:9000
Have you issued a curl request as suggested in that user guide to localhost:8082/***? does curl command get stuck or returns any error message?
If you don't have a local backend running yet, I would recommend you to follow the user guide above to run a local backend. Note this guide will instruct you to run it at port 8080, so you'll need to change your docker run command from "-a localhost:9000" to "-a localhost:8080" as well.
Also, please note this user guide is for linux env. We haven't tried this set up in a Mac env yet. We do notice some user gets this working on Windows docker with extra work, where he sets backend to "IP of docker NIC". Note "-a" is short for "--backend".
see https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/google-cloud-endpoints/4sRaSkigPiU/KY8g46NSBgAJ

Authentication or permission failure, did not have permissions on the remote directory

I am using ansijet to automate the ansible playbook to be run on a button click. The playbook is to stop the running instances on AWS. If run, manually from command-line, the playbook runs well and do the tasks. But when run through the web interface of ansijet, following error is encountered
Authentication or permission failure. In some cases, you may have been able to authenticate and did not have permissions on the remote directory. Consider changing the remote temp path in ansible.cfg to a path rooted in "/tmp". Failed command was: mkdir -p $HOME/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1390414200.76-192986604554742 && chmod a+rx $HOME/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1390414200.76-192986604554742 && echo $HOME/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1390414200.76-192986604554742, exited with result 1:
Following is the ansible.cfg configuration.
# some basic default values...
inventory = /etc/ansible/hosts
#library = /usr/share/my_modules/
remote_tmp = $HOME/.ansible/tmp/
pattern = *
forks = 5
poll_interval = 15
sudo_user = root
#ask_sudo_pass = True
#ask_pass = True
transport = smart
#remote_port = 22
module_lang = C
I try to change the remote_tmp path to /home/ubuntu/.ansible/tmp
But still getting the same error.
By default, the user Ansible connects to remote servers as will be the same name as the user ansible runs as. In the case of Ansijet, it will try to connect to remote servers with whatever user started Ansijet's node.js process. You can override this by specifying the remote_user in a playbook or globally in the ansible.cfg file.
Ansible will try to create the temp directory if it doesn't already exist, but will be unable to if that user does not have a home directory or if their home directory permissions do not allow them write access.
I actually changed the temp directory in my ansible.cfg file to point to a location in /tmp which works around these sorts of issues.
remote_tmp = /tmp/.ansible-${USER}/tmp
I faced the same problem a while ago and solved like this . The possible case is that either the remote server's /tmp directory did not have enough permission to write . Run the ls -ld /tmp command to make sure its output looks something like this
drwxrwxrwt 7 root root 20480 Feb 4 14:18 /tmp
I have root user as super user and /tmp has 1777 permission .
Also for me simply -
remote_tmp = /tmp worked well.
Another check would be to make sure $HOME is present from the shell which you are trying to run . Ansible runs commands via /bin/sh shell and not /bin/bash.Make sure that $HOME is present in sh shell .
In my case I needed to login to the server for the first time and change the default password.
Check the ansible user on the remote / client machine as this error occurs when the ansible user password expires on the remote / client machine.
==========
'WARNING: Your password has expired.\nPassword change required but no TTY available.\n')
<*.*.*.*> Failed to connect to the host via ssh: WARNING: Your password has expired.
Password change required but no TTY available.
Actual error :
host_name | UNREACHABLE! => {
"changed": false,
"msg": "Failed to create temporary directory.In some cases, you may have been able to authenticate and did not have permissions on the target directory. Consider changing the remote tmp path in ansible.cfg to a path rooted in \"/tmp\", for more error information use -vvv. Failed command was: ( umask 77 && mkdir -p \"` echo /tmp/ansible-$USER `\"&& mkdir /tmp/ansible-$USER/ansible-tmp-1655256382.78-15189-162690599720687 && echo ansible-tmp-1655256382.78-15189-162690599720687=\"` echo /tmp/ansible-$USER/ansible-tmp-1655256382.78-15189-162690599720687 `\" ), exited with result 1",
"unreachable": true
===========
This could happen mainly because on the Remote Server, there is no home directory present for the user.
The following steps resolved the issue for me -
Log into the remote server
switch to root
If the user is linux_user from which Host (in my case Ansible) is trying to connect , then run following commands
mkdir /home/linux_user
chown linux_user:linux_user /home/linux_user

Change Domain Problems

I have been trying to change the domain and have been running into issues. I hope someone can help me out here, I have documented the steps I went through below.
I requested the DNS resouuce from our dns admin team.
.mike-cf.company.com canonical name = mike-cf.company.com.
Name: mike-cf.company.com
Address: 10.52.88.123
I then installed with the -D switch:
bash < <(curl -s -k -B http ://raw.github.com/cloudfoundry/vcap/master/dev_setup/bin/vcap_dev_setup -D mike-cf.company.com)
I noticed that not all the config files in ~/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/config changed, so I changed those using sed command:
$ cd ~/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/config
$ sed -i 's/.vcap.me/.newdomain.com/g' *.yml
I restarted and things were looking good, I was able to run vmc target with no problem but I was not able to register a user.
$ vmc target http://api.mike-cf.company.com/
Successfully targeted to [http://api.mike-cf.company.com]
$ vmc register --email mike#company.com --passwd password
Creating New User: Error 100: Bad request
There was no entried in uaa.log only this in the cloud_controller.log
[2012-09-25 09:06:46.712110] cc - pid=20400 tid=8ee9 fid=4757 DEBUG -- ---> async\nrequest: post http://uaa.mike-cf.company.com/oauth/token\nheaders: {"content-type"=>"application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "accept"=>"application/json", "authorization"=>"Basic Y2xvdWRfY29udHJvbGxlcjpjbG91ZGNvbnRyb2xsZXJzZWNyZXQ="}\nbody: grant_type=client_credentials
[2012-09-25 09:06:46.718338] cc - pid=20400 tid=8ee9 fid=4757 DEBUG -- <---\nresponse: 404\nheaders: {"SERVER"=>"nginx", "DATE"=>"Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:06:46 GMT", "CONTENT_TYPE"=>"text/html", "CONTENT_LENGTH"=>"162", "CONNECTION"=>"close"}\nbody: \r\n404 Not Foundhttp://uaa.mike-cf.company.com: 404 trace ["/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/bundler/gems/uaa-dad29c9030f4/gem/lib/uaa/http.rb:56:in json_parse_reply'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/bundler/gems/uaa-dad29c9030f4/gem/lib/uaa/token_issuer.rb:157:inrequest_token'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/bundler/gems/uaa-dad29c9030f4/gem/lib/uaa/token_issuer.rb:128:in client_credentials_grant'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/cloud_controller/cloud_controller/app/models/uaa_token.rb:80:inaccess_token'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/cloud_controller/cloud_controller/app/models/uaa_token.rb:96:in user_account_instance'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/cloud_controller/cloud_controller/app/controllers/users_controller.rb:13:increate'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.14/lib/action_controller/metal/implicit_render.rb:4:in send_action'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.14/lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:150:inprocess_action'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.14/lib/action_controller/metal/rendering.rb:11:in process_action'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.14/lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:18:inblock in process_action'", "/home/mike/cloudfoundry/.deployments/devbox/deploy/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-3.0.14/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:446:in `run_3844132275556875466__process_action_2824786929479189233_callbacks'"]
[2012-09-25 09:06:46.896386] cc_events - pid=20400 tid=8ee9 fid=4757 INFO -- [2012-09-25 09:06:46 -0700, :USER, "N/A", "POST:/users", "mike#company.com", :FAILED, "Bad request"]
I have found the problem, there seemed to be an issue with the vmc I was using. Once I downgraded VMC I am now able to connect.
gem uninstall vmc
gem install --version '= 0.3.18' vmc
Here is the thread that lead me to the answer
https://groups.google.com/a/cloudfoundry.org/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/vcap-dev/enY2qKnSJWI
is it possible to see the content of the uaa config file? Make sure it has the correct IP address specified for the NATS message bus, the line should look something like this;
mbus: nats://nats:nats#192.168.1.10:4222/
If that IP address is incorrect, it needs to be changed. I take it the server it is installed on has a static IP address? was it assigned before you installed VCAP?