Some time ago I started coding my application in Visual Studio 2015, had no issues setting all of the library dependencies.
Now, I decided to move to CLion. However my application has a dependency of cryptopp library, which I need to link in my CLion project.
Currently, I'm facing tons of undefined reference errors
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::Integer::Integer(char const*)'
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::Integer::Integer(char const*)'
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::Integer::Integer(char const*)'
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::DH_Domain<CryptoPP::DL_GroupParameters_GFP_DefaultSafePrime, CryptoPP::EnumToType<CryptoPP::CofactorMultiplicationOption, 0> >::AccessGroupParameters()'
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::DH_Domain<CryptoPP::DL_GroupParameters_GFP_DefaultSafePrime, CryptoPP::EnumToType<CryptoPP::CofactorMultiplicationOption, 0> >::GetGroupParameters() const'
undefined reference to `CryptoPP::DH_Domain<CryptoPP::DL_GroupParameters_GFP_DefaultSafePrime, CryptoPP::EnumToType<CryptoPP::CofactorMultiplicationOption, 0> >::GetGroupParameters() const'
[..]
I have indeed set include directories in my CMakeLists:
set(EXTERN_LIBS E:/dev/libs)
include_directories(${EXTERN_LIBS} ${EXTERN_LIBS}/include)
link_directories(${EXTERN_LIBS})
However, I still cannot get it to work.
I'm using MinGW for my project. Here is a preview of settings and versions:
How can I properly add cryptopp library into my project in CLion?
I think we may have mostly cleared the MinGW/C++11 issue at Commit e4cef84883b2. You should work from Master or perform a git pull, and then uncomment the define for CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11 in config.h : 65 (or so):
// Define CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11 to avoid C++11 related features shown at the
// end of this file. Some compilers and standard C++ headers advertise C++11
// but they are really just C++03 with some additional C++11 headers and
// non-conforming classes. You might also consider `-std=c++03` or
// `-std=gnu++03`, but they are required options when building the library
// and all programs. CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11 is probably easier to manage but it may
// cause -Wterminate warnings under GCC. MSVC++ has a similar warning.
// Also see https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/529
// #define CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11 1
I think the problems is, you are hitting issues related to Windows and its lack of proper C++11 support, but you are getting them indirectly. They are indirect because MinGW and GCC is layered on top. MinGW and GCC cannot possibly provide C++11 because the underlying platform cannot.
I think your best bet at this point is to define CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11. I don't believe we can do it for you like we do on Windows because the defines we need access to are hidden behind MinGW and GCC. And we also have some MSVC++ bugs to workaround.
Here's how we do it on Windows, but we don't have access to these defines in MinGW (from config.h : 950):
// Dynamic Initialization and Destruction with Concurrency ("Magic Statics")
// MS at VS2015 with Vista (19.00); GCC at 4.3; LLVM Clang at 2.9; Apple Clang at 4.0; Intel 11.1; SunCC 5.13.
// Microsoft's implementation only works for Vista and above, so its further
// limited. http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/1789709
#if (CRYPTOPP_MSC_VERSION >= 1900) && ((WINVER >= 0x0600) || (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600)) || \
(CRYPTOPP_LLVM_CLANG_VERSION >= 20900) || (CRYPTOPP_APPLE_CLANG_VERSION >= 40000) || \
(__INTEL_COMPILER >= 1110) || (CRYPTOPP_GCC_VERSION >= 40300) || (__SUNPRO_CC >= 0x5130)
# define CRYPTOPP_CXX11_DYNAMIC_INIT 1
#endif // Dynamic Initialization compilers
If you define CRYPTOPP_NO_CXX11, then the following will not be defined and you will avoid the problems: CRYPTOPP_CXX11_DYNAMIC_INIT, CRYPTOPP_CXX11_SYNCHRONIZATION, and CRYPTOPP_CXX11_ATOMICS.
The second issue, the one related to Clion and Cmake, was settled as follows. We setup a separate GitHub with our Autotools and Cmake files. The Autotools files are at cryptopp-autotools, and the Cmake files are at cryptopp-cmake.
The repositories are in my GiHub because this is the sort of administrivia that Wei Dai, who wrote the library and provides the Crypto++ GitHub, prefers to avoid. The logical separation also helps establish the logical boundary so folks know Autotools and CMake are not part of the official Crypto++ distribution.
The community is responsible for Autotools and Cmake, and we will work with the community on issues. If the community puts in the work, then Autotools and Cmake will improve. If either Autotools or CMake gets stable, then we will add a tarball with the files to the official distribution.
Currently Autotools and Cmake are in states that needs improvement. The problems with Cmake are detailed at CMake | Current Status on the wiki. The problems with Autotools are not really documented because I work with distro maintainers on them. Its kind of like we know what the prolems are, but most others do not.
Related
Within my bazel.rc file for the C++ Bazel build options, I have specified:
'build --cxxopt="-std=c++1y"'
When I try to change to build --cxxopt="-std=c++14", bazel Throws error of :
''build --cxxopt="-std=c++14"' is not an option'
, with a cursor below 4 in c++14. If I change the 4 to y (c++1y), it compiles with no problem. I tried adding 'std:make_unique' in my code (c++14 addition) , and it clearly does not compile (make _unique is not part of std) which is assume is complaining that c++14 is not set as the standard, hence no make_unique for me.
What is the latest supported version of C++ in bazel? More specifically, how do I enable C++14 / C++17 (and even C++2x) for Bazel build, it those are supported? Thanks!
NOTE: this is not the same as How to set C++ standard version when build with Bazel??. (I am not asking about cpp 11 and I am asking about a very specific toolchain -- GCC/g++) I am not using any of the tools suggested by that thread. I am using GCC / g++ and am restricted in not being able to use the tools suggested by the answer in the previous question, I've RTFMd and googled. Thanks in advance.
I'm testing VS2017 to see if I can move to it from VS2008 (I think we can drop Win9x now but still need NT4) and all is looking pretty favorable building the libraries, but one won't build due to the 'IAsyncOperation': base class undefined and IID_IAsyncOperation undefined errors. I thought maybe because I didn't install MFC in the initial install, so went back in and added MFC, but still have the problem. I searched the include directories and couldn't find it either. Searching Internet, no luck. So is there a direct replacement for those (I'd like to wrap them in an #if so I can still build with V2008 if needed).
TIA!!
Finally found it:
#if _MSC_VER >= 1900
#include "Shldisp.h"
#define IAsyncOperation IDataObjectAsyncCapability
#define IID_IAsyncOperation IID_IDataObjectAsyncCapability
#endif
TL,DR:
Is there a way for me (no root access) to make the linker (invoked by gcc) unaware of the contents of a directory contained in /etc/ld.so.conf after it has been cached via ldconfig?
In Detail:
I'm trying (and failing) to compile HTCondor on a custom linux distro without root access. For various reasons (see below) I believe that the problems I encounter are related to the fact that there are two versions of libssl and two versions of libcrypto installed on this machine. The newer version (1.0.0) of each of these is located at /usr/lib64 and an older version (0.9.8) is kept at /usr/local/lib64 for compatibility reasons. /etc/ld.so.conf contains both of these paths, so the linker knows about both.
During compilation I get an error
../condor_utils/libcondor_utils_8_7_9.so: undefined reference to `ERR_remove_thread_state'
since, for some reason, libcondor_utils_8_7_9.so is linked against libcrypto.so.0.9.8, while ERR_remove_thread_state was introduced in 1.0.0. It appears exactly once in the source code:
#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10000000L
ERR_remove_state( 0 );
#elif OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L || defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER)
ERR_remove_thread_state( 0 );
#endif
so the preprocessor seems to make its decision based on version 1.0.0.
This question made me aware of this blog post, so I tried surrogating cpp with the following script:
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/gcc -Wl,-rpath-link="/usr/lib64",-rpath="/usr/lib64" "$#"
to no avail, unfortunately.
Just for the heck of it, I also tried commenting the prepocessor directives in the source code snippet above to force the selection of ERR_remove_state. This results in the linker warning me that libssl.so.1.0.0 may conflict with libssl.so.0.9.8 and, unsurprisingly, produces another "undefined reference" error.
EDIT:
The problem turned out not to be related to the linker at all. See my answer. However, out of curiosity, I'll leave the question open to see if anyone has a solution for it in its original formulation.
The comments by #user463035818 and #jww pointed me in the right direction to solve my specific problem, which turned out not be related to the linker directly.
Condor uses cmake as build system, so obviously it makes more sense to try to solve this at the cmake level (n00b here). Somewhere in the depths of all the things cmake does it finds both versions of the libraries and mixes them up for some reason. Invoking find_library with a specific version as per this answer in the main CMakeLists.txt solves that problem although it leaves a bad taste of dirty workaround in my mouth.
Making cmake ignore a certain directory when looking for libraries should not be hard, according to the docs. I haven't tried it, though.
When reading the std library implementation I could see lots of checks enabled by #if _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL >= 2 conditions. I tried to add _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL = 3 in xcode preprocessor options, but <iterator> doesn't compile anymore:
#if _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL >= 2
__get_db()->__insert_i(this); <----- the error is on this line
#endif
Is there something else I'm missing here to use a higher debug level for the standard library?
According to the libc++ documentation:
Debug mode is currently not functional. Defining _LIBCPP_DEBUG will result in fairly nasty compile errors.
So that is probably the source of that.
Baum mit Augen's answer that _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL >= 2 standard library code for lower level iterator debugging is basically unusable, appears to still be the case with the out-of-the-box Xcode 11.6. But if you're up for extra work or just want more specifics, read on...
Enabling _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL code is enabling LLVM's Debug Mode. According to that documentation, enabling this debug mode is done by defining the _LIBCPP_DEBUG to a value of 0 (that "enables most of libc++’s assertions") or 1 (that "enables 'iterator debugging' which provides additional assertions about the validity of iterators used by the program").
In XCode 11.6, I've found that adding _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 to a project's Debug Preprocessor Macros setting, compiles and links and indeed adds additional checks - at least checking against out of range references to std::vector elements via its [] operator. Enabling the _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL >= 2 code is done by instead setting _LIBCPP_DEBUG=1. That alone however won't fully link as not all the necessary symbols are found. Specifically, the std::__1::__libcpp_db::__insert_c(void*, std::__1::__c_node* (*)(void*, void*, std::__1::__c_node*)) symbol is reported as undefined and maybe others as well. Presumably, XCode 11.6 did not ship with this built into the standard C++ library it provides. If anybody knows better or could corroborate this, I'd appreciate hearing from them.
With the following extra work, I've been able to enable libc++'s assertions plus the additional iterator debugging capabilities:
Install a recent LLVM package somewhere that doesn't interfere with Xcode's included LLVM package. I installed LLVM 10.0.1 using Homebrew and I was able to access it then under /usr/local/Cellar/llvm/10.0.1.
Have Xcode recognize the Xcode tool chain support that this new LLVM package provides. I added a symbolic link to /usr/local/Cellar/llvm/10.0.1/Toolchains/LLVM10.0.1.xctoolchain into Xcode's /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains directory. I'd done that while Xcode was running and it immediately saw the new tool chain but I had to restart Xcode to get it to compile with it.
Under Xcode's "Xcode" -> "Toolchains" submenu, select the new tool chain. My setup showed "Xcode 11.7" and "org.llvm.10.0.1" and I selected the latter to accomplish this.
Add the path to the new tool chain's usr/lib directory to the LIBRARY_SEARCH_PATHS declaration for resulting executable Targets. I did this by adding /usr/local/Cellar/llvm/10.0.1/Toolchains/LLVM10.0.1.xctoolchain/usr/lib to a project's executable target "Library Search Paths" "Debug" setting.
Have the path to the new tool chain's include directory override the normal standard library's include directory. I haven't confirmed that this is necessary but did this by adding to my library and executable targets' OTHER_CPLUSPLUSFLAGS declaration the value of -nostdinc++ -I/usr/local/Cellar/llvm/10.0.1/Toolchains/LLVM10.0.1.xctoolchain/usr/include/c++/v1. From within Xcode, I'd achieved that by setting the "Other C++ Flags" setting to include this value for the targets of interest. I suspect it's probably safer to make this change at the project level than target level.
Set the COMPILER_INDEX_STORE_ENABLE declaration to NO. This prevented "Unknown argument: '-index-store-path'" errors that stopped builds right from the beginning. I used Xcode's "Enable Index-While-Building Functionality" setting and set it to "No" for this.
Add _LIBCPP_DEBUG=1 to the GCC_PREPROCESSOR_DEFINITIONS declaration for the project. Did this by adding it to Xcode's "Preprocessor Macros" "Debug" setting.
For related Q&A about this, see Is it possible to enable _LIBCPP_DEBUG2 in the current Xcode 4.6.1 toolchain on Mountain Lion?.
I have installed boost_1_54 on windows by checkout from svn and then
bootstrap
.\b2
QuantLib library dependent on boost compiles well all but one project: test-suite which uses BOOST_MESSAGE. this is undefined. I can see that there is no BOOST_MESSAGE in my version of boost.
Therefore is this QuantLib incompatibility or have I missed something?
On my linux boost version the same thing applies to BOOST_MESSAGE - it is undefined
I have seen this but I am not sure how to interpret this.
I'm afraid you gave us more credit than we deserved :)
We haven't compiled QuantLib against Boost svn yet. The latest I've tried is Boost 1.53 (the latest released version) in which BOOST_MESSAGE was still available.
Thanks for the heads-up, though. I'll patch the library so that it's ready for next version. As mentioned in the comments, it should be as simple as adding
#if BOOST_VERSION > 105300
#define BOOST_MESSAGE(msg) BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE(msg)
#endif
to test-suite/utilities.hpp.
on linux I had to add
libboost_unit_test_framework.so
to the Linker->Libraries and
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
#define BOOST_MESSAGE( M ) BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE( M )
is already present in test/test_tools.hpp.
on windows I have different #defines and this is not present, so I added it to the
unit_test_log.hpp
where BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE is defined (in boost files to avoid same issue again in the case of other applications using BOOST_MESSAGE).
BOOST_MESSAGE issue resolved but still can't disambiguate
const void* = boost::test_tools::check_is_close
and
const void* = boost::test_tools::check_is_small
because these are templates. so the solution is to remove it (test-suite compiles well) or use appropriate pointers to function templates
on Windows, after romoval or function
_use_check
in utilities.hpp
changed to not have pointers to TEMPLATE functions as default, so changed to:
void _use_check(
const void*,
const void*) const {}
there were still errors while building test-suite project. unresolved externals: fdmhestonfwdop, fdmblackscholesfwdop, fdmsquarerootfwdop. obviously this classes (headers+source) I had to add to Quantlib project, build library QuantLib-vc110-mt-gd.lib again and rebuild test-suite project then.
after pleasure with VS linker error "lnk1210 exceeded internal ilk size limit link with incremental no" (it really likes RAM, but on windows I have this resource quite limited), it is OK. compiled. : p