I have multiple csv files with the same format (14 rows 4 columns).
I tried to load all of them into a single dataFrame, and use file's name to rename the values of the first column (1-14)
1 500 0 0
2 350 0 1
3 500 1 0
.............
13 600 0 0
14 800 0 0
I tried the following code but I am not getting what I am expecting:
filenames = os.listdir('Threshold/')
Y = pd.DataFrame () #empty df
# file name are in the following foramt "subx_ICA_thre.csv"
# need to get x (subject number to be used later for renaming columns values)
Sub_list=[]
for filename in filenames:
s= int(''.join(filter(str.isdigit, filename)))
Sub_list.append(int(s))
S_Sub_list= sorted(Sub_list)
for x in S_Sub_list: # get the file according to the subject number
temp = pd.read_csv('sub' +str(x)+'_ICA_thre.csv' )
df = pd.concat([Y, temp]) # concat the obtained frame with the empty frame
df.columns = ['id', 'data', 'isEB', 'isEM']
# replace the column values using subject id
for sub in range(1,15):
df['id'].replace(sub, 'sub' +str(x)+'_ICA_'+str(sub) ,inplace=True)
print (df)
output:
id data isEB isEM
0 sub1_ICA_2 200 0 0
1 sub1_ICA_3 275 0 0
2 sub1_ICA_4 500 1 0
................................
11 sub1_ICA_13 275 0 0
12 sub1_ICA_14 300 0 0
id data isEB isEM
0 sub2_ICA_2 275 0 0
1 sub2_ICA_3 500 0 0
2 sub2_ICA_4 400 0 0
.................................
11 sub2_ICA_13 300 0 0
12 sub2_ICA_14 450 0 0
First, it seems that the code makes different dataFrame not a single one.Second, the first row is removed (sub1_ICA_1 is missing, may be replaced with column names).
I couldn't find the problem in the loop that I am using
I think you need create list of DataFrames first, then concat with parameter keys for new values by range in MultiIndex, then modify column id and last remove MultiIndex by reset_index:
Also was added parameter names to read_csv for custom columns names.
Y = []
for x in S_Sub_list:
n = ['id', 'data', 'isEB', 'isEM']
temp = pd.read_csv('sub' + str(x) +'_ICA_thre.csv', names = n)
Y.append(temp)
#list comprehension alternative
#n = ['id', 'data', 'isEB', 'isEM']
#Y = [pd.read_csv('sub' + str(x) +'_ICA_thre.csv', names = n) for x in S_Sub_list]
df = pd.concat(Y, keys=range(1,len(S_Sub_list) + 1))
df['id'] = 'sub' + df.index.get_level_values(0).astype(str) +'_ICA_'+ df['id'].astype(str)
df = df.reset_index(drop=True)
Related
I have a dataframe that looks like the following. The rightmost two columns are my desired columns:
Open Close open_to_close close_to_next_open open_desired close_desired
0 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 4 8 3 7
0 0 1 1 15 16
The calculations are as the following:
open_desired = close_desired(prior row) + close_to_next_open(prior row)
close_desired = open_desired + open_to_close
How do I implement the following in a loop manner? I am trying to do this until the last row.
df = pd.DataFrame({'open': [0,0,0], 'close': [0,0,0], 'open_to_close': [0,4,1], 'close_to_next_open': [3,8,1]})
df['close_desired'] = 0
df['open_desired'] = 0
##First step is to create open_desired in current row which is dependent on close_desired in previous row
df['open_desired'] = df['close_desired'].shift() + df['close_to_next_open'].shift()
##second step is to create close_desired in current row which is dependent on open_desired in current row
df['close_desired'] = df['open_desired'] + df['open_to_close']
df.fillna(0,inplace=True)
The only way I can think of doing this is with iterrows()
for row, v in df.iterrows():
if row>0:
df.loc[row,'open_desired'] = df.shift(1).loc[row, 'close_desired'] + df.shift(1).loc[row, 'close_to_next_open']
df.loc[row,'close_desired'] = df.loc[row, 'open_desired'] + df.loc[row, 'open_to_close']
I want to count areas of interest in my dataframe column 'which_AOI' (ranging from 0 -9). I would like to have a new column with the results added to a dataframe depending on a variable 'marker' (ranging from 0 - x) which tells me when one 'picture' is done and the next begins (one marker can go on for a variable length of rows). This is my code so far but it seems to be stuck and runs on without giving output. I tried reconstructing it from the beginning once but as soon as i get to 'if df.marker == num' it doesn't stop. What am I missing?
(example dataframe below)
## AOI count of spec. type function (in progress):
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
path_i = "/Users/Desktop/Pilot/results/gazedata_filename.csv"
df = pd.read_csv(path_i, sep =",")
#create a new dataframe for AOIs:
d = {'marker': []}
df_aoi = pd.DataFrame(data=d)
### Creating an Aoi list
item = df.which_AOI
aoi = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] #list for search
aoi_array = [0, 0 , 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] #list for filling
num = 0
for i in range (0, len (df.marker)): #loop through the dataframe
if df.marker == num: ## if marker = num its one picture
for index, item in enumerate(aoi): #look for item (being a number in which_AOI) in aoi list
if (item == aoi[index]):
aoi_array[index] += 1
print (aoi)
print (aoi_array)
se = pd.Series(aoi_array) # make list into a series to attach to dataframe
df_aoi['new_col'] = se.values #add list to dataframe
aoi_array.clear() #clears list before next picture
else:
num +=1
index pos_time pos_x pos_y pup_time pup_diameter marker which_AOI fixation Picname shock
1 16300 168.608779907227 -136.360855102539 16300 2.935715675354 0 7 18 5 save
2 16318 144.97673034668 -157.495513916016 16318 3.08838820457459 0 8 33 5 save
3 16351 152.92560577392598 -156.64172363281298 16351 3.0895299911499 0 7 17 5 save
4 16368 152.132453918457 -157.989685058594 16368 3.111008644104 0 7 18 5 save
5 16386 151.59835815429702 -157.55587768554702 16386 3.09514689445496 0 7 18 5 save
6 16404 150.88092803955098 -152.69479370117202 16404 3.10009074211121 1 7 37 5 save
7 16441 152.76554107666 -142.06188964843798 16441 3.0821495056152304 1 7 33 5 save
Not 100% clear based on your question but it sounds like you want to count the number of rows for each which_AOI value in each marker.
You can accomplish this using groupby
df_aoi = df.groupby(['marker','which_AOI']).size().unstack('which_AOI',fill_value=0)
In:
pos_time pos_x pos_y pup_time pup_diameter marker \
0 16300 168.608780 -136.360855 16300 2.935716 0
1 16318 144.976730 -157.495514 16318 3.088388 0
2 16351 152.925606 -156.641724 16351 3.089530 0
3 16368 152.132454 -157.989685 16368 3.111009 0
4 16386 151.598358 -157.555878 16386 3.095147 0
5 16404 150.880928 -152.694794 16404 3.100091 1
6 16441 152.765541 -142.061890 16441 3.082150 1
which_AOI fixation Picname shock
0 7 18 5 save
1 8 33 5 save
2 7 17 5 save
3 7 18 5 save
4 7 18 5 save
5 7 37 5 save
6 7 33 5 save
Out:
which_AOI 7 8
marker
0 4 1
1 2 0
A dataframe stores some values in columns, passing those values to a function I get another dataframe. I'd like to concatenate the returned dataframe's columns to the original dataframe.
I tried to do something like
i = pd.concat([i, i[['cid', 'id']].apply(lambda x: xy(*x), axis=1)], axis=1)
but it did not work with error:
ValueError: cannot copy sequence with size 2 to array axis with dimension 1
So I did like this:
def xy(x, y):
return pd.DataFrame({'x': [x*2], 'y': [y*2]})
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'cid': [4, 4], 'id': [6, 10]})
print('df1:\n{}'.format(df1))
df2 = pd.DataFrame()
for _, row in df1.iterrows():
nr = xy(row['cid'], row['id'])
nr['cid'] = row['cid']
nr['id'] = row['id']
df2 = df2.append(nr, ignore_index=True)
print('df2:\n{}'.format(df2))
Output:
df1:
cid id
0 4 6
1 4 10
df2:
x y cid id
0 8 12 4 6
1 8 20 4 10
The code does not look nice and should work slowly.
Is there pandas/pythonic way to do it properly and fast working?
python 2.7
Option 0
Most directly with pd.DataFrame.assign. Not very generalizable.
df1.assign(x=df1.cid * 2, y=df1.id * 2)
cid id x y
0 4 6 8 12
1 4 10 8 20
Option 1
Use pd.DataFrame.join to add new columns
This shows how to adjoin new columns after having used apply with a lambda
df1.join(df1.apply(lambda x: pd.Series(x.values * 2, ['x', 'y']), 1))
cid id x y
0 4 6 8 12
1 4 10 8 20
Option 2
Use pd.DataFrame.assign to add new columns
This shows how to adjoin new columns after having used apply with a lambda
df1.assign(**df1.apply(lambda x: pd.Series(x.values * 2, ['x', 'y']), 1))
cid id x y
0 4 6 8 12
1 4 10 8 20
Option 3
However, if your function really is just multiplying by 2
df1.join(df1.mul(2).rename(columns=dict(cid='x', id='y')))
Or
df1.assign(**df1.mul(2).rename(columns=dict(cid='x', id='y')))
Here is my minimal working example:
list1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] #len = 21
list2 = [1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0] #len = 21
list3 = [0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1] #len = 21
list4 = [1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1] #len = 21
I have four lists and I want to "clean" my list 1 using the following rule: "if any of list2[i] or list3[i] or list4[i] are equal to zero, then I want to eliminate the item I from list1. SO basically I only keep those elements of list1 such that the other lists all have ones there.
here is the function I wrote to solve this
def clean(list1, list2,list3,list4):
for i in range(len(list2)):
if (list2[i]==0 or list3[i]==0 or list4[i]==0):
list1.pop(i)
return list1
however it doesn't work. If you apply it, it give the error
Traceback (most recent call last):line 68, in clean list1.pop(I)
IndexError: pop index out of range
What am I doing wrong? Also, I was told Pandas is really good in dealing with data. Is there a way I can do it with Pandas? Each of these lists are actually columns (after removing the heading) of a csv file.
EDIT
For example at the end I would like to get: list1 = [4,9,11,15]
I think the main problem is that at each iteration, when I pop out the elements, the index of all the successor of that element change! And also, the overall length of the list changes, and so the index in pop() is too large. So hopefully there is another strategy or function that I can use
This is definitely a job for pandas:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({
'l1':list1,
'l2':list2,
'l3':list3,
'l4':list4
})
no_zeroes = df.loc[(df['l2'] != 0) & (df['l3'] != 0) & (df['l4'] != 0)]
Where df.loc[...] takes the full dataframe, then filters it by the criteria provided. In this example, your criteria are that you only keep the items where l2, l3, and l3 are not zero (!= 0).
Gives you a pandas dataframe:
l1 l2 l3 l4
4 4 1 1 1
9 9 1 1 1
12 12 1 1 1
18 18 1 1 1
or if you need just list1:
list1 = df['l1'].tolist()
if you want the criteria to be where all other columns are 1, then use:
all_ones = df.loc[(df['l2'] == 1) & (df['l3'] == 1) & (df['l4'] == 1)]
Note that I'm creating new dataframes for no_zeroes and all_ones and that the original dataframe stays intact if you want to further manipulate the data.
Update:
Per Divakar's answer (far more elegant than my original answer), much the same can be done in pandas:
df = pd.DataFrame([list1, list2, list3, list4])
list1 = df.loc[0, (df[1:] != 0).all()].astype(int).tolist()
Here's one approach with NumPy -
import numpy as np
mask = (np.asarray(list2)==1) & (np.asarray(list3)==1) & (np.asarray(list4)==1)
out = np.asarray(list1)[mask].tolist()
Here's another way with NumPy that stacks those lists into rows to form a 2D array and thus simplifies things quite a bit -
arr = np.vstack((list1, list2, list3, list4))
out = arr[0,(arr[1:] == 1).all(0)].tolist()
Sample run -
In [165]: arr = np.vstack((list1, list2, list3, list4))
In [166]: print arr
[[ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20]
[ 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0]
[ 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1]
[ 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]]
In [167]: arr[0,(arr[1:] == 1).all(0)].tolist()
Out[167]: [4, 9, 12, 18]
I have a data frame that is composed of several datasets (about 146 and counting). two of my columns are labeled "start_time" and "stop_time," which represent the start and stop of a response (i.e., the total duration of the response).
I need to get the "inter-response time" or the start_time subtracted from the next corresponding value in start_time. Basically if:
start_time = [1,4,7]
stop_time = [2,5,8]
I need:
stop_time[0] - start_time[1]
stop_time[2] - start_time[3]
in order to get:
iri = [2,2]
My code looks like this:
iri_t = []
def grps():
for grp in lset2_name_grps.groups:
beg_eng_t = pd.DataFrame([lset2_name_grps.stop_time, lset2_name_grps.start_time], columns=['end_t','beg_t'])
end_t = [i for i in lset2_name_grps.stop_time]
beg_t = [i for i in lset2_name_grps.start_time]
beg_t = np.insert(beg_t, len(beg_t),0)
end_t = np.insert(end_t, 0,0)
iri_t.append(np.subtract(end_t, beg_t))
# for i,j in zip(end_t, beg_t):
# iri_t.append(np.subtract(i,j))
# lset2_name_grps['iri'] = iri_t
grps()
Essentially, it doesn't do anything close to what I'm trying to accomplish and the only out I get is either "Not Implemented" or an error.
How about something like this:
import pandas as pd
starts = pd.Series([1, 4, 7])
stops = pd.Series([2, 5, 8])
iri_t = [0]
for i in range(1, len(starts)):
iri_t.append(starts[i] - ends[i-1])
times_df = pd.concat([starts, stops, pd.Series(iri_t)], axis=1)
This creates the following data_frame:
0 1 2
0 1 2 0
1 4 5 2
2 7 8 2
I think what your asking (correct me if I'm wrong) is best accomplished by putting the two columns in a single dataframe, using shift to offset one of your columns, then doing an ordinary subtraction.
df = pd.DataFrame({'start_time':[1,4,7], 'stop_time':[2,5,8]})
df.stop_time - df.start_time.shift()
Out[5]:
0 NaN
1 4
2 4
dtype: float64