At the beginning, I wrote something like this
char* argv[] = { "ls", "-al", ..., (char*)NULL };
execvp("ls", argv);
However, GCC popped up this warning, "C++ forbids converting a string constant to char*."
Then, I changed my code into
const char* argv[] = { "ls", "-al", ..., (char*)NULL };
execvp("ls", argv);
As a result, GCC popped up this error, "invalid conversion from const char** to char* const*."
Then, I changed my code into
const char* argv[] = { "ls", "-al", ..., (char*)NULL };
execvp("ls", (char* const*)argv);
It finally works and is compiled without any warning and error, but I think this is a bit cumbersome, and I cannot find anyone wrote something like this on the Internet.
Is there any better way to use execvp in C++?
You hit a real problem because we are facing two incompatible constraints:
One from the C++ standard requiring you that you must use const char*:
In C, string literals are of type char[], and can be assigned directly
to a (non-const) char*. C++03 allowed it as well (but deprecated it,
as literals are const in C++). C++11 no longer allows such assignments
without a cast.
The other from the legacy C function prototype that requires an array of (non-const) char*:
int execv(const char *path, char *const argv[]);
By consequence there must be a const_cast<> somewhere and the only solution I found is to wrap the execvp function.
Here is a complete running C++ demonstration of this solution. The inconvenience is that you have some glue code to write once, but the advantage is that you get a safer and cleaner C++11 code (the final nullptr is checked).
#include <cassert>
#include <unistd.h>
template <std::size_t N>
int execvp(const char* file, const char* const (&argv)[N])
{
assert((N > 0) && (argv[N - 1] == nullptr));
return execvp(file, const_cast<char* const*>(argv));
}
int main()
{
const char* const argv[] = {"-al", nullptr};
execvp("ls", argv);
}
You can compile this demo with:
g++ -std=c++11 demo.cpp
You can see a similar approach in the CPP Reference example for std::experimental::to_array.
This is a conflict between the declaration of execvp() (which can't promise not to modify its arguments, for backwards compatibility) and the C++ interpretation of string literals as arrays of constant char.
If the cast concerns you, your remaining option is to copy the argument list, like this:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <cstring>
#include <memory>
int execvp(const char *file, const char *const argv[])
{
std::size_t argc = 0;
std::size_t len = 0;
/* measure the inputs */
for (auto *p = argv; *p; ++p) {
++argc;
len += std::strlen(*p) + 1;
}
/* allocate copies */
auto const arg_string = std::make_unique<char[]>(len);
auto const args = std::make_unique<char*[]>(argc+1);
/* copy the inputs */
len = 0; // re-use for position in arg_string
for (auto i = 0u; i < argc; ++i) {
len += std::strlen(args[i] = std::strcpy(&arg_string[len], argv[i]))
+ 1; /* advance to one AFTER the nul */
}
args[argc] = nullptr;
return execvp(file, args.get());
}
(You may consider std::unique_ptr to be overkill, but this function does correctly clean up if execvp() fails, and the function returns).
Demo:
int main()
{
const char *argv[] = { "printf", "%s\n", "one", "two", "three", nullptr };
return execvp("printf", argv);
}
one
two
three
execvpe requires an char *const argv[] as it's second argument. That is, it requires a list of const pointers to non-const data. String literals in C are const hence the problem with warnings and casting your argv to char* const* is a hack as execvp is now allowed to write to the strings in your argv. Te solution I see is to either allocate a writeble buffer for each item or just use execlp instead which works with const char* args and allows for passing string literals.
Related
I have a bluez header file get_opt.h where argv is an argument:
extern int getopt_long (int ___argc, char *__getopt_argv_const *___argv,.....
which requires char* const* for argv. Because the unit is called from a different file I was trying to emulate argv but whatever permutation of declaring char, const and * is used I get unqualified-id or the compiler moans about not converting to char* const*. I can get const char * easily, of course. char const * argv = "0"; compiles OK in Netbeans with C++14 but
char * const * argv = "0";
produces
"error: cannot convert 'const char *' to 'char * const *'" in initialisation (sic).
How do you declare char* const* or am I mixing C with C++ so I'm up the wrong tree?
Let's review the pointer declarations:
char * -- mutable pointer to mutable data.
char const * -- mutable pointer to constant data.
char * const -- constant pointer to mutable data.
char const * const -- constant pointer to constant data.
Read pointer declarations from right to left.
Looking at the descriptions, which kind of pointer do you want?
Because void main(void) is in a different file I was trying to emulate
argv
void main(void) is not the correct main function declaration. The main function has to have int return value.
Simply change the void main(void) to int main(int argc, char **argv) in that "other" file.
It does not require char const * to be passed to. Do not change the type of the main function arguments.
int getopt_long (int ___argc, char * const *___argv);
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf("%d\n", getopt_long(argc, argv));
}
Both language compile fine:
https://godbolt.org/z/5To5T931j
Credit #JaMiT above
[I don't know how to accept a commment]
Also, you might want to notice how you can remove the call to getopt_long() from that example while retaining the error (it's motivation for your declaration, but not the source of your issue). If you think about your presentation enough, you might realize that your question is not how to declare a char* const* but how to initialize it. Due to arrays decaying to a pointer, you could declare an array of pointers (char* const argv[]) instead of a pointer to pointer (char* const * argv). See The 1D array of pointers way portion of A: 2D Pointer initialization for how to initialize such a beast. Beware: given your setup, the "2D array way" from that answer is not an option. Reminder: The last pointer in the argument vector is null; argv[argc] == nullptr when those values are provided by the system to main().
I'm doing a school assignment where I have to call execvp, whose method signature is the following
execvp(const char* file, char* const argv[])
However my data is in the form:
std::vector<std::string*>
I've been trying to convert said vector into the right format for the second format of execvp(), but inevitably get the following error:
command.cc:120:29: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char**’ to ‘char* const*’ [-fpermissive]
execvp(args[0], argv);
I've tried different variations but they all lead to this error. This error confuses me, since I have no idea what it means by const*. How can you have a const*? I'd consider changing the std::vector to some other type, but this is an assignment and I'm not really allowed to change it. Below is the code I use to try and create a char*[] from the vector:
const size_t numArgs = _simpleCommands[i]->_arguments.size();
std::vector<const char*> args;
for(size_t j = 0; j < numArgs; ++j)
{
args.push_back(strPtrToCharPtr(_simpleCommands[i]->_arguments[i]));
}
const char** argv = new const char*[numArgs];
for(size_t j = 0; j < numArgs; ++j)
{
argv[j] = args[j];
}
execvp(args[0], argv);
The char* const argv[] prototype means that argv is (the address of) an array of pointers to char, that the pointers in the array cannot be modified, but that the strings they point to can be. This is different from a char const **, which is a pointer to a pointer to char whose characters cannot be modified. Since passing it to a function that might modify the strings in the array would violate the const qualifier of const char **, it is not allowed. (You could do it with const_cast, but that would be solving the wrong problem.)
Since execvp() is a very old UNIX function and would not have the same interface today, it doesn’t have any parameter to tell the OS how many arguments there are, nor does it promise not to modify the contents of the strings in the array. You terminate the array by setting the final element to NULL.
It’s a similar format to the argv parameter of main(). In fact, it becomes the argv parameter of the main() function of the program you run, if it was written in C.
This isn’t a complete solution, since this is a homework assignment and you want to solve it on your own, but you have to create that array yourself. You can do this by creating a std::vector<char *> argv( args.size() + 1 ), setting each element but the last to the .data() pointer from the corresponding element of args, and setting the last element to NULL. Then, pass argv.data() to execvp().
Note that the POSIX.1-2008 standard says,
The argv[] and envp[] arrays of pointers and the strings to which those arrays point shall not be modified by a call to one of the exec functions, except as a consequence of replacing the process image.
Therefore, you ought to be able to get away with casting away the const-ness of the strings in the array, this once, if you don’t mind living dangerously. Normally, you would need to make a modifiable copy of each constant string in the array.
Update
Enough time has passed that I’m not giving out answers to homework. A commenter claimed that my answer did not work on g++8, which means that they didn’t implement the same algorithm I was thinking of. Therefore, posting the complete solution will be helpful.
This actually solves the closely-related problem of how to convert a std::vector<std::string> for use with execvp(). (A std::vector<std::string*> is basically never correct, and certainly not here. If you really, truly want one, change the type of s in the for loop and dereference.)
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
// The next three lines are defensive coding:
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L
#define _XOPEN_VERSION 700
#define _XOPEN_UNIX 1
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
const std::vector<std::string> cmdline{ "ls", "-al" };
std::vector<const char*> argv;
for ( const auto& s : cmdline ) {
argv.push_back( s.data() );
}
argv.push_back(NULL);
argv.shrink_to_fit();
errno = 0;
/* Casting away the const qualifier on the argument list to execvp() is safe
* because POSIX specifies: "The argv[] [...] arrays of pointers and the
* strings to which those arrays point shall not be modified by a call to
* one of the exec functions[.]"
*/
execvp( "/bin/ls", const_cast<char* const *>(argv.data()) );
// If this line is reached, execvp() failed.
perror("Error executing /bin/ls");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
Another twist on this would be to write a conversion function that returns the std::vector<const char*> containing the command-line arguments. This is equally efficient, thanks to guaranteed copy elision. I normally like to code using RIIA and static single assignments, so I find it more elegant to return an object whose lifetime is managed automatically. In this case, the elements of argv are weak references to the strings in cmdline, so cmdline must outlive argv. Because we used C-style pointers as weak references, RIIA does not quite work here and we still need to pay attention to object lifetimes.
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L
#define _XOPEN_VERSION 700
#define _XOPEN_UNIX 1
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <vector>
std::vector<const char*> make_argv( std::vector<std::string>const& in )
{
std::vector<const char*> out;
out.reserve( in.size() + 1 );
for ( const auto& s : in ) {
out.push_back( s.data() );
}
out.push_back(NULL);
out.shrink_to_fit();
return out; // Benefits from guaranteed copy elision.
}
int main()
{
const std::vector<std::string> cmdline{ "ls", "-al" };
errno = 0;
/* Casting away the const qualifier on the argument list to execvp() is safe
* because POSIX specifies: "The argv[] [...] arrays of pointers and the
* strings to which those arrays point shall not be modified by a call to
* one of the exec functions[.]"
*/
execvp( "/bin/ls", const_cast<char* const *>(make_argv(cmdline).data()) );
// If this line is reached, execvp() failed.
perror("Error executing /bin/ls");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
I don't understand the std::vector<std::string *> part (are you sure you don't need a std::vector<std::string>?), anyway...
Rule for const: it's applied to the element on the left; if there is non element on the left, it's applied to the element on the right.
So a const char** (or char const **, if you prefer) is a pointer to a pointer to a constant char. I mean: the constant part is the char pointed, not the pointers.
And char * const * is a pointer to a constant pointer to a char; in this case the constant part is one of the two pointers, not the char pointed.
In your case the function
execvp(const char* file, char* const argv[])
expect, as second parameter, a char * const argv[] (a C-style array of constant pointers to a char) that you can see as a char * const *.
But you call
execvp(args[0], argv);
where argv is a char const **, that is different to a char * const *.
So the error: the function expect to be able to modify the pointed char's and you pass a pointer to a pointer to not modifiable char's
And you can't define argv as a char * const *
char * cont * argv = new char * const [numArgs]; // <-- WRONG
because you can't modify it.
So, to solve the problem, I suppose you can define argv as a char **
char** argv = new char* [numArgs];
for(size_t j = 0; j < numArgs; ++j)
argv[j] = args[j];
execvp(args[0], argv);
There ins't problem if you pass a not-constant object to a function that require a constant one (the contrary can be a problem), so you can pass a char ** to a function that expect a char * const *.
1) You don't need to have const * (const pointer) because pointer is automatically converted to const pointer if needed;
2) But you do need to supply char* (not const char* !) array as a second argument of execvp, i.e. your string characters should be modifiable. By having such a signature, execvp reserve its right to modify the supplied argument strings (yes it seems strange - but a process does have right to change its argument - note that main() routine may have (non-const) char** argv arguments!). Thus, you need to get rid of const char* in your piece of code and replace them by char *
I am converting a project written in C++ for windows. Everything is going fine (meaning I clearly see what needs to be changed to make things proper C++) until I hit this, which is my own little routine to find a keyword in along string of keyword=value pairs:
bool GetParameter(const char * haystack, const char *needle) {
char *search, *start;
int len;
len = strlen(needle) + 4; // make my own copy so I can upper case it...
search = (char *) calloc(1,len);
if (search == NULL) return false;
strcpy(search,needle);
strupr(search);
strcat(search,"="); // now it is 'KEYWORD='
start = strstr(haystack,search); <---- ERROR from compiler
g++ is telling me "Invalid conversion from const char * to char * "
(the precise location of the complaint is the argument variable 'search' )
But it would appear that g++ is dyslexic. Because I am actually going the other way. I am passing in a char * to a const char *
(so the conversion is "from char * to const char *" )
The strstr prototype is char * strstr(const char *, const char *)
There is no danger here. Nothing in any const char * is being modified.
Why is it telling me this?
What can I do to fix it?
Thanks for any help.
The background to the problem is that C defines the function strstr as:
char* strstr(const char*, const char*);
This is because C doesn't allow overloaded functions, so to allow you to use strstr with both const and non-const strings it accepts const strings and returns non-const. This introduces a weakness in C's already fragile type-system, because it removes const-ness from a string. It is the C programmer's job to not attempt to write via a pointer returned from strstr if you pased in non-modifiable strings.
In C++ the function is replaced by a pair of overloaded functions, the standard says:
7. The function signature strstr(const char*, const char*) shall be replaced by the two declarations:
const char* strstr(const char* s1, const char* s2);
char* strstr( char* s1, const char* s2);
both of which shall have the same behavior as the original declaration.
This is type-safe, if you pass in a const string you get back a const string. Your code passes in a const string, so G++ is following the standard by returning a const string. You get what you asked for.
Your code compiles on Windows because apparently the standard library you were using on Windows doesn't provide the overloads and only provides the C version. That allows you to pass in const strings and get back a non-const string. G++ provides the C++ versions, as required by the standard. The error is telling you that you're trying to convert the const return value to a non-const char*. The solution is the assign the return value to a const char* instead, which is portable and compiles everywhere.
Error is not regarding the arguments to stsrtr. Compiler is complaining about the conversion of the 'const char *' returned by strstr. You can't assign it to *start which is just char *
You can try one of these:
const char *start;
or
string start(strstr(haystack,search));
Although declaring start as const char* might suffice, what seems more appropriate to me is to use std::string objects instead:
#include <string>
#include <cctype>
#include <algorithm>
bool GetParameter(const char * haystack, const char *needle) {
std::string hstr(haystack), nstr(needle);
std::transform(nstr.begin(), nstr.end(),nstr.begin(), ::toupper);
nstr += "=";
std::size_t found = hstr.find(nstr);
if (found != std::string::npos) {
... // "NEEDLE=" found
}
else {
...
}
...
}
The conversion it is complaining about is from strstr(...) to start. Change the declaration of start to const char* start;
you can use such like:
start = const_cast<char *>(strstr( haystack, static_cast<const char *>(search) ));
I'm getting an access violation error (using Microsoft Visual C++ 2005) when passing a va_list parameter from one member function to another by value. If I pass it by reference everything works as expected but va_list isn't supposed to be passed by reference, is it?
class A
{
public:
char * getformatted( char const * a_format, ... )
{
va_list argp;
va_start( argp, a_format );
char * result = getformatted( a_format, argp );
va_end( argp );
return result;
}
char * getformatted( char const * a_format, va_list /*&*/ a_args )
{
static char buffer[ 256 ];
int length = vsprintf( buffer, a_format, a_args ); // Access violation.
return buffer;
}
};
int main( int argc, char * argv[] )
{
char * str = A().getformatted( "foo%s", "bar" );
return 0;
}
In <stdarg.h>:
typedef char * va_list
so A().getformatted( "foo%s", "bar" ) is calling A::getformatted( char const * a_format, va_list /*&*/ a_args) due to a string literal decaying to char * due to C compatibility.
If you step through execution, are both functions being called in the expected order?
Both the functions shown have similar signatures, so the first check is to make sure the call is occurring properly. This is particularly important since va_list is typically a typedef to char *, so getformatted("foo%s", "bar") could very well be called without getformatted(const char *, ...) being called first.
If that is the case, and vsprintf uses va_next at any point, the behavior will be undefined. Some compilers handle the va_ functions as simple macros, while others have significant functions.
Typically to solve this, the function with va_list will be prefixed with a v (vsprintf et al) to remove any potential ambiguity.
In the best case, since you're using C++, a std::stringstream or boost::format are generally preferable. Both will give you type safety and prevent most situations like this, while the latter retains most of printf's syntax.
can any body tell me how to conver const char* to char*?
get_error_from_header(void *ptr, size_t size, size_t nmemb, void *data) {
ErrorMsg *error = (ErrorMsg *)data;
char* err = strstr((const char *)ptr,"550");
//error cannot convert const char** to char*
if(err) {
strncpy(error->data,(char*)ptr,LENGTH_ERROR_MESSAGE-1);
error->data[LENGTH_ERROR_MESSAGE-1] = '\0';
error->ret = true;
}
return size*nmemb;
}
There are a few things I don't understand here. I see that this is tagged for C++/CLI, but what I describe below should be the same as Standard C++.
Doesn't compile
The code you give doesn't compile; get_error_from_header does not specify a return type. In my experiments I made the return type size_t.
Signature of C++ strstr()
The signature for strstr() in the standard C library is:
char *
strstr(const char *s1, const char *s2);
but the signature for strstr() in the C++ library, depending on the overload, is one of:
const char * strstr ( const char * str1, const char * str2 );
char * strstr ( char * str1, const char * str2 );
I would choose the first overload, because you don't want to modify the string, you only want to read it. Therefore you can change your code to:
const char* err = strstr((const char *)ptr, "550");
if (err != NULL) {
...
}
Also, I'm assuming your comment reporting the error:
//error cannot convert const char** to char*
is a typo: there's no const char** to be seen.
Assignment to err unnecessary
As is pointed out in a previous answer, the use of err to store the result of strstr is unnecessary if all it's used for is checking NULL. Therefore you could use:
if (strstr((const char *)ptr, "550") != NULL) {
...
}
Use of reinterpret_cast<> encouraged
As is pointed out in another answer you should be using reinterpret_cast<> instead of C-style casts:
if (strstr(reinterpret_cast<const char *>(ptr), "550") != NULL) {
...
}
Use of const_cast<> to strip const
Given the example in the question, I don't see where this is necessary, but if you had a variable that you need to strip of const-ness, you should use the const_cast<> operator. As in:
const char * p1;
char * p2;
p2 = const_cast<char *>(p1);
As is pointed out in a comment, the reason to use const_cast<> operator is so that the author's intention is clear, and also to make it easy to search for the use of const_cast<>; usually stripping const is the source of bugs or a design flaw.
You don't appear to use err in the rest of that function, so why bother creating it?
if (NULL != strstr((const char *)ptr, "550"))
{
If you do need it, will you really need to modify whatever it points to? If not, then declare it as const also:
const char* err = strstr((const char *)ptr, "550");
Finally, as casts are such nasty things, it is best to use a specific modern-style cast for the operation you want to perform. In this case:
if (NULL != strstr(reinterpret_cast<const char *>(ptr), "550"))
{
Can't you just do:
char* err = strstr((char *)ptr,"550");
The error is because if you pass in a const char* to strstr you get one out (because of the overload).
//try this instead:
const char* mstr="";
char* str=const_cast<char*>(mstr);
Well is ptr (which you passed in as void*) actually const or not? (In other words, is the memory under your control?) If it's not, then cast it to char* instead of const char* when calling strstr. If it is, however, you'll get a const char* out (pointing to a location inside of the string pointed to by ptr), and will then need to strncpy out to another string which you are responsible for managing.
According to my deep research I have found numerous forums that have no direct solution or a reference answer to this question, I then delve into the GCC online documentation giving a brief read for their compiler properly docs and this is what I can provide.
In GNU C, pointers to arrays with qualifiers work similar to pointers to other qualified types. For example, a value of type int ()[5] can be used to initialize a variable of type const int ()[5]. These types however aren't compatible in ISO C because the const qualifier is formally attached to the element type of the array and not the array itself.
This description might be better understood if we take this
extern void
transpose (int N, int M, double out[M][N], const double in[N][M]);
double x[3][2];
double y[2][3];
…
transpose(3, 2, y, x);
Observing the above is that if you had an
s1=createStudent(s1, 123, "Poli");
s2=createStudent(s2, 456, "Rola);
Whereas the const char[5] for both "Poli" and "Rola" have correlation to a char a[]. It is strictly not permitted as each element has the qualifier attached and not the entire array as a const.