I got some data, which is 3.2 million entries in a csv file. I'm trying to use CNN estimator in tensorflow to train the model, but it's very slow. Everytime I run the script, it got stuck, like the webpage(localhost) just refuse to respond anymore. Any recommendations? (I've tried with 22 CPUs and I can't increase it anymore)
Can I just run it and use a thread, like the command line python xxx.py & to keep the process going? And then go back to check after some time?
Google offers serverless machine learning with TensorFlow for precisely this reason. It is called Cloud ML Engine. Your workflow would basically look like this:
Develop the program to train your neural network on a small dataset that can fit in memory (iron out the bugs, make sure it works the way you want)
Upload your full data set to the cloud (Google Cloud Storage or BigQuery or &c.) (documentation reference: training steps)
Submit a package containing your training program to ML Cloud (this will point to the location of your full data set in the cloud) (documentation reference: packaging the trainer)
Start a training job in the cloud; this is serverless, so it will take care of scaling to as many machines as necessary, without you having to deal with setting up a cluster, &c. (documentation reference: submitting training jobs).
You can use this workflow to train neural networks on massive data sets - particularly useful for image recognition.
If this is a little too much information, or if this is part of a workflow that you'll be doing a lot and you want to get a stronger handle on it, Coursera offers a course on Serverless Machine Learning with Tensorflow. (I have taken it, and was really impressed with the quality of the Google Cloud offerings on Coursera.)
I am sorry for answering even though I am completely igonorant to what datalab is, but have you tried batching?
I am not aware if it is possible in this scenario, but insert maybe only 10 000 entries in one go and do this in so many batches that eventually all entries have been inputted?
Related
I have the task of optimizing search on the website. The search should be for pictures and for text by text query. I have already developed, trained, tested and selected a machine learning model that transforms images and text into a feature vector (Python, based on OpenAI CLIP). This feature vector will be transferred to Elastic Search. Elastic Search will be configured by another specialist.
The model will be used first to determine the feature vector on all existing images and texts, and then be used whenever new content is added or existing content is changed.
There is a lot of existing content (approximately several tens of millions of pictures and texts together). About 100-500 pieces of content are added and changed per day.
I haven't worked much with AWS, but in this case the model needs to be deployed to AWS somehow. Of course, I have the model and the entire project locally, I can write an API app and make a Docker container.
The question is, what is the best method to deploy this application on AWS? The best in terms of speed and ease of implementation (for me as an AWS beginner), as well as cost optimization, taking into account the number of requests for the application.
I've seen different possibilities, from simply deploying the application on EC2 (probably the easiest option) to using SageMaker. Also Kubernetes and ECS...
I'd recommend using SageMaker Hosting endpoint if you need to be able to run vectorization in near-real time any time of the day, or in a SageMaker Training job if you can run vectorization batched, for example once every few hour.
For both systems you can use pre-defined Framework containers and SDK to which you pass a Python code and optionally requirements.txt, or you can create your own image.
I've been reading some articles regarding this topic and have preliminary thoughts as what I should do with it, but still want to see if anyone can share comments if you have more experience with running machine learning on AWS. I was doing a project for a professor at school, and we decided to use AWS. I need to find a cost-effective and efficient way to deploy a forecasting model on it.
What we want to achieve is:
read the data from S3 bucket monthly (there will be new data coming in every month),
run a few python files (.py) for custom-built packages and install dependencies (including the files, no more than 30kb),
produce predicted results into a file back in S3 (JSON or CSV works), or push to other endpoints (most likely to be some BI tools - tableau etc.) - but really this step can be flexible (not web for sure)
First thought I have is AWS sagemaker. However, we'll be using "fb prophet" model to predict the results, and we built a customized package to use in the model, therefore, I don't think the notebook instance is gonna help us. (Please correct me if I'm wrong) My understanding is that sagemaker is a environment to build and train the model, but we already built and trained the model. Plus, we won't be using AWS pre-built models anyways.
Another thing is if we want to use custom-built package, we will need to create container image, and I've never done that before, not sure about the efforts to do that.
2nd option is to create multiple lambda functions
one that triggers to run the python scripts from S3 bucket (2-3 .py files) every time a new file is imported into S3 bucket, which will happen monthly.
one that trigger after the python scripts are done running and produce results and save into S3 bucket.
3rd option will combine both options:
- Use lambda function to trigger the implementation on the python scripts in S3 bucket when the new file comes in.
- Push the result using sagemaker endpoint, which means we host the model on sagemaker and deploy from there.
I am still not entirely sure how to put pre-built model and python scripts onto sagemaker instance and host from there.
I'm hoping whoever has more experience with AWS service can help give me some guidance, in terms of more cost-effective and efficient way to run model.
Thank you!!
I would say it all depends on how heavy your model is / how much data you're running through it. You're right to identify that Lambda will likely be less work. It's quite easy to get a lambda up and running to do the things that you need, and Lambda has a very generous free tier. The problem is:
Lambda functions are fundamentally limited in their processing capacity (they timeout after max 15 minutes).
Your model might be expensive to load.
If you have a lot of data to run through your model, you will need multiple lambdas. Multiple lambdas means you have to load your model multiple times, and that's wasted work. If you're working with "big data" this will get expensive once you get through the free tier.
If you don't have much data, Lambda will work just fine. I would eyeball it as follows: assuming your data processing step is dominated by your model step, and if all your model interactions (loading the model + evaluating all your data) take less than 15min, you're definitely fine. If they take more, you'll need to do a back-of-the-envelope calculation to figure out whether you'd leave the Lambda free tier.
Regarding Lambda: You can literally copy-paste code in to setup a prototype. If your execution takes more than 15min for all your data, you'll need a method of splitting your data up between multiple Lambdas. Consider Step Functions for this.
SageMaker is a set of services that each is responsible for a different part of the Machine Learning process. What you might want to use is the hosted version of Jupyter notebooks in SageMaker. You get a lot of freedom in the size of the instance that you are using (CPU/GPU, memory, and disk), and you can install various packages on that instance (such as FB Prophet). If you need it once a month, you can stop and start the notebook instances between these times and "Run all" the cells in your notebooks on this instance. It will only cost you the minutes of execution.
regarding the other alternatives, it is not trivial to run FB Prophet in Lambda due to the size limit of the libraries that you can install on Lambda (to avoid too long cold start). You can also use ECS (container Service) where you can have much larger images, but you need to know how to build a Docker image of your code and endpoint to be able to call it.
I have to do a deep learning project at my university, where I need to work with a medical image database. This database is stored in a Google Cloud Platform bucket.
However, the database's size is over 4 TB, so I can't afford download the data using gsutil. I can't use Google Colab notebook either, since it's disk storage size is 350GB.
Is there any way I can access the data and use it to teach my network?
I think you aren't on the right way.
When you build your model, you only need to have a representative subset of your dataset to validate your layers and the expected behavior.
Then, when all is done and packaged, you run your training job on dedicated VM (like Deep Learning VM). This process can be handle automatically by AI-Platform. You can also set up hyper-parameters server and parallelize your training.
In training phase, you often work with batches: you load only a subset of your dataset, you shuffle it and you train perform several steps on this subset (with RMSE/cross-entropy figure out, evaluation, gradient optimization).
Because you use a subset of your full dataset in batches, your don't need to have the 4Tb on your VM at the same time. Your training loop do it for you (download, train, evaluate, delete).
Like I said before, because you use a subset, you can also parallelize your training on several VMs for reducing your training duration.
I recommend you to review your training loop. If your give me the framework name/version which one you work, I could help you with tutorals and examples.
When I train my model locally I use a 20% test set and then cross validation. Sagameker seems like it needs a dedicated valdiation set (at least in the tutorials I've followed). Currently I have 20% test, 10% validation leaving 70% to train - so I lose 10% of my training data compared to when I train locally, and there is some performance loss as a results of this.
I could just take my locally trained models and overwrite the sagemaker models stored in s3, but that seems like a bit of a work around. Is there a way to use Sagemaker without having to have a dedicated validation set?
Thanks
SageMaker seems to allow a single training set while in cross validation you iterate between for example 5 different training set each one validated on a different hold out set. So it seems that SageMaker training service is not well suited for cross validation. Of course cross validation is usually useful with small (to be accurate low variance) data, so in those cases you can set the training infrastructure to local (so it doesn't take a lot of time) and then iterate manually to achieve cross validation functionality. But it's not something out of the box.
Sorry, can you please elaborate which tutorials you are referring to when you say "SageMaker seems like it needs a dedicated validation set (at least in the tutorials I've followed)."
SageMaker training exposes the ability to separate datasets into "channels" so you can separate your dataset in whichever way you please.
See here for more info: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/your-algorithms-training-algo-running-container.html#your-algorithms-training-algo-running-container-trainingdata
I wanted to dive into the world of distributed systems, cloud computing, IoT, etc., and I gotta be honest, I imagined everything being a little more intuitive than it finally turned out.
I had a tiny testing architecture in mind, that I'd like to set up with Google Clouds and their services, but I am kinda stuck since I can't get my head around some concepts.
What I basically wanted to do (as a first step) is writing a simple java application that would run locally on my computer. This application should just generate random numbers and send those numbers somehow to the google cloud. On the cloud I wanted to define another java application that would manipulate those random numbers in some kind of way (it doesn't matter actually). Afterwards, the output should somehow get back to me of course. And actually, at the moment, I don't even care about how exactly. It could be somehow back to my local app (with some kind of listener, would that be possible?). But it could also simply store the results somewhere on the google cloud? Or maybe upload them to my google drive?
I guess you already noticed that - at some points - I don't even know what i want exactly, since I'm not sure of what is possible, and what not.
Could you provide me some help to get this set up?
The most important questions for me right now are:
Do I need to use a pubsub system, where my generated numbers are sent
to, and which then forwards this to the cloud app, that transforms my
data?
How do I get my data from the local app to the cloud services?
Would my data transforming app run on Google Dataflow?
Above I wrote "as a first step"... because later I would also like to send config files (for example in json format, or xml) to the cloud, and the
cloud application should transform those config files... if I get the
first scenario running the I guess this woul also be no problem
right?
Those are just a few of the questions that are on my mind currently. The most important ones I guess.
It would be a big help. Sorry, if the questions are not very precise, but I really need some kind of pointing into the right direction.
Thank you in advance!
I think it would be good to read up on some of the technologies you mention here:
Google Cloud Pubsub: Pub/Sub enables you to publish messages to a topic, and consume them in another place in the (Google) Cloud. You can see some different examples of publishers and consumers in the link. In your case you could for example write a Java application that writes random numbers to the Pub/Sub queue, where they will sit for 7 days to be consumed by another component (for example, Google Cloud Dataflow). To get started developing, you can find the SDKs here (there is a Java SDK).
Google Cloud Dataflow is managed service running Apache Beam pipelines to process your data at scale. You can learn about the different concepts here and get started designing your pipeline here. I suggest taking a look at some examples first though, which will make it more easy to grasp what is actually going on. Dataflow has a PubSub connector, so in your application you will be able to read from the topic you created before. In Dataflow you can for example multiply all your random numbers and write them to a certain sink (for example Google Cloud Storage, or even BigQuery or PubSub again).
Google Cloud Storage: is a cloud storage where you can put files, for example the output of your Dataflow pipeline. You will be able to manually download the files using the Cloud Console UI, or you can use one of the SDKs to download the output programmatically.
Hope this gives you an overview and some pointers to start. Whenever you are ready and have a more concrete use case in mind, you can start looking at some more components.