I am working on a live-streaming prototype, I have been reading a lot about how live-streaming works and many different approaches but I still can't find a live-streaming stack that suits my needs...
These are the requirements for my prototype:
1)The video/audio recording must come from a web browser using the webcam, the idea is that the client preferably shouldn't need to install plugins or do anything complicated(maybe installing Flash player plugin is acceptable, only for recording the video, the viewers should be able to view the stream without plugins).
2)It can't be peer to peer since I also need to store the entire video in my server (or in Amazon s3 servers for example) for viewing later.
3)The viewers should also be able to watch the stream without the need of installing anything, from their web browsers, say Chrome and Firefox for example. We want to use the HTML5 video tag if possible.
4)The prototype should be constructed without expending money preferably. I have seen that AWS-Cloudfront and Wowza offer free trials so we are thinking about using these 2 services.
5)The prototype should be able to maintain 1 live stream at a time and 2 viewers, just that, so there are no restrictions regarding this.
Any suggestions?
I am specially stuck/confused with the uploading/encoding video part of the architecture(I am new to streaming and all the formats/codecs/protocols/technologies are making it really hard to digest).
As of right now, I came across WebRTC that apparently allows me to do what I want, record and encode video from the browser using the webcam, but this API only works with HTTPS sites. Are there any alternatives that work with HTTP sites?
The other part that I am not completely sure about is the need for an encoding server, for example Wowza Streaming Engine, why do I need it? Isn't it enough if I use for example WebRTC for encoding the video and then I just send it to the distribution service (AWS-Cloudfront for example)? I do understand that the encoding server would allow me to support many different devices since it will create lots of different encodings and serve many different HTTP protocols, but do I need it for this prototype? I just want to make a 1 format (MP4 for example) live-stream that can be viewed in 2 web browsers, that's all, I don't need variety of formats nor support for different bandwidths or devices.
Base on your requirement, WebRTC is good way.
API only works with HTTPS sites. Are there any alternatives that work
with HTTP sites?
No. Currently Firefox is only browser is allow WebRTC on HTTP, but finally it need HTTPS
For doing this prototype you need to go with the Wowza WebRTC.
While going with wowza all the streams are delivered from the wowza only.So it become a routed WebRTC.
Install Wowza - https://www.wowza.com/docs/how-to-install-and-configure-wowza-streaming-engine
Enable the WebRTC - https://www.wowza.com/docs/how-to-use-webrtc-with-wowza-streaming-engine
Downaload and configure the Streamlock. or Selfsigned JKS file - https://www.wowza.com/docs/how-to-request-an-ssl-certificate-from-a-certificate-authority
Download the sample WebRTC - https://www.wowza.com/_private/webrtc/
Publish stream using the Publish HTML and Play through the Play HTML ( Supported Chrome,Firefox & Opera Browsers)
For MP4 files in WebRTC : you need to enable the transcoder with h264 & aac. Also you need to enable the option Record all the incoming Streams in the properties of application which you are creating for the WebRTC ( Not the DVR ).Using the File writer module save all the recorded files in a custom location.By using a custom script(Bash,Python) Move all the Transcoded files to the s3 bucket, Deliver through cloudfront.
Related
I am trying to loop audio from my Icecast server 24/7.
I have seen examples where people talk about storing their audio files on the EC2 instance or in an S3 bucket.
Do I also need a source client running on my EC2 Instance to be able to stream audio to the server? Or is there a way to play static files from Icecast?
Icecast and SHOUTcast servers work by passing a live audio stream from a source on to the users. You need something to produce a single audio stream in realtime from those source files.
The flow looks something like this:
Basically, you'll need to do everything you would in a normal radio studio, but automated. You'll stream the files from your bucket, play them to a raw audio stream, send that stream to your encoder to be compressed with the codec, and then sent to your streaming servers for distribution.
You can't simply push your audio files as-is to the Icecast server, for a few reasons:
Stream must be realtimeThe server doesn't really know or care about the timing of the stream. It takes the data its given and sends that off to the client. Therefore, if you push data faster than realtime, the server will attempt to deliver it to the client at this faster rate. Some clients will attempt to buffer this fast stream, but most will put backpressure on the stream, causing the TCP window to close, causing the client to eventually get far enough behind that the server drops the connection.
Consistent format is requiredChances are, your source files have varying sample rate, channel count, and even codec. Most clients are unable to take a change in sample rate or channel count mid-stream. I don't know of any client that supports a codec change mid-stream. (Theoretically possible with Ogg and Matroska/WebM, but yeah... not worth messing with.)
Stream should be free of ID3 tags and other file format cruftIf you simply PUT your files directly to your Icecast server, the output stream will contain more than just the audio data. At a minimum, you'd want to remove all that. Depending on your container format, you'll need to deal with timestamps as well.
Solutions
There are a handful of ways to solve this:
Radio automation softwareMany folks simply run something like RadioDJ on cloud-based servers. If you already have a radio station that uses automation, this might be a good solution. It can be expensive though, and not as flexible. You could even go as low as VLC or something for playout, but then you wouldn't have music transitions and what not.
Custom playout script (recommended)I use a browser engine, such as Chromium, and script my channels with normal JavaScript. From there, I take the output stream and pass it off to FFmpeg to encode and send to the streaming servers. This works really well, as I can do all my work in a language everybody knows, and I have easy access to data on cloud-hosted services. I can use the Web Audio API to mix and blend audio based on what's happening in realtime. As an alternative, there is Liquidsoap, but I do not recommend it these days as its language is difficult to deal with and it is not as flexible as a browser engine.
I want to build a live streaming app.
My thought process:
Get the Video/Audio data from the
navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia(constraints); [client-streamer]
create rooms using sockets(Socket.IO or WebSockets from flask) [backend]
Send the data in 1 to the room members using sockets.
display the media on the client-side.
Is that correct? How should I do it?
how do I broadcast data to specific room members and not to everyone? (flask)
How to consistently send data from the streamer -> server -> room members. the stream is given from 1 is an object, where is the data?
any other better ideas will be great! thanks.
I need to implement the server-side by myself without help from libraries that will do the work for me.
Implementing a streaming platform is not trivial. Unfortunately, it is not as simple as emitting chunks received from the MediaRecorder with onndatavailable and forwarding them to users using a WebSocket server - this is not scalable nor efficient nor reliable.
Below are some strategies you can try for different types of scenarios:
P2P: If you want to have simple peer-to-peer streaming, you can use WebRTC to achieve that with a simple socket.io server for signaling purposes.
Conference: Here things start to get more complicated. You will need a media server if you want to be somewhat scalable. One approach is to route your stream to the users using an SFU or MCU. This will take care of forwarding/processing media to different peers efficiently.
Broadcast: Here things are also non-trivial. Common WebRTC-based architectures include ingesting the WebRTC stream and forward that to an HLS server which will let your stream chunks available for clients through a CDN, or perform RTP forwarding of the WebRTC stream, convert it to RTMP using something like FFmpeg and deliver it through Youtube Live or Twitch to leverage from their infrastructure.
Be aware that the last 2 items are resource-intensive and will certainly not be cheap to maintain.
Below are some open source projects that could help you along the way:
Janus
MediaSoup
AntMedia
Jitsi
Good luck!
Explaining all this is far beyond the scope of a Stack Overflow answer.
Here are a few hints:
You need to use the MediaRecorder API to capture compressed data from your gUM (getUserMedia) stream. MediaRecorder support is inconsistent between makes and models of browser. though.
It kicks a Blob into its onndatavailable handler every so often.
They're compressed as a webm data stream.
You can push those Blobs to a server with socket.io, and the server can turn around and push them to whatever clients you want to.
Playing the webm on the clients is tricky. You may, on some makes and models of browsers, be able to feed the webm stream to the Media Source API using appendBuffer(). But some browsers cannot consume the webm streams.
These webm streams are useless to a player without all their Blob data in order. You can't just start sending a new client the Blobs of the stream when they sign in; you have to restart the MediaRecorder.
(You may be able to make it work without a MediaRecorder restart if you send the first few k bytes of the stream to each new client before sending the current Blob. Extracting those bytes is an intricate programming job involving the ebml package to parse the webm stream and extract the prologue. I have not proven this concept.)
Because getting all this to work -- originator -- server -- viewer is such a pain in the xxx neck, you may want to investigate using something like mediasoup instead. It uses WebRTC transport rather than socket.io, and works cross-platform.
We have ios mobile app application..We need to implement video streaming in wowza media Engine.How to work on Wowza media Engine in Aws
Since it sounds like you are trying to stream VOD files from a web server or S3 bucket, it's best to use the Wowza Streaming Engine MediaCache functionality. This is a more optimal way of streaming content that is not located locally. On initial player request, it grabs the specified number of blocks from the remote location and caches the segments locally, which it then serves to all subsequent player requests.
To use MediaCache, you need to first create the MediaCache store (where the cached content is stored) and the MediaCache sources (where your Wowza server will obtain the remote content). MediaCache sources can be a Cloud storage provider (currently AWS S3, Google Cloud or Microsoft Azure), a file server, or a web server. Each of these sources are identified with a prefix (for example, amazons3). You will then need to create a VOD Edge type of application which can access these MediaCache sources.
If your application name is vodedge, and you are streaming sample.mp4 from your amazons3 source, your example playback URL would then be:
http://localhost:1935/vodedge/_definst_/mp4:amazons3/sample.mp4/playlist.m3u8
Note that you need to include the application instance (default is _definst_).
The playback formats that you choose is really dependent on your target audience and players. Mobile devices don't support RTMP unless you use an app (like the VLC mobile app). But if you know that your target audience will only be using desktop, you control these machines (such as in an internal corporate network) where you can install the required plugins, and latency is a paramount requirement, then RTMP might be a better choice for you, as RTMP is a streaming protocol and is inherently less latent.
If you do need to stream to mobile devices and latency is important, you can opt to tweak the HTTP streaming packetization in your Wowza server so that your target chunk durations are shorter. You can do this by selecting your Wowza live application, and selecting the Properties tab (possible only if you have enabled Advanced Settings on your Manager UI account). Do note that Apple spec recommends a 10-second segment length (which is the Wowza default), and you may run into bandwidth issues as requests for the chunks would be more frequent.
I would like to create a distribution network for the mp3 files of my amazon S3 bucket. I managed to achieve it using aws Cloudfront using RTMP protocol. But as android has no native support for RTMP, i am exploring the idea of making it using RTSP protocol.Can some one help in figuring out how to achieve it.
RTSP is stateful as it maintains a connection trough RTCP, requires multiple ports and you will have issues with firewall traversal. Plus, if you want to take advantage of S3 you should use instead a HTTP streaming protocol, unless you want to stream the mp3 files directly via progressive download.
The are two alternatives: HLS and DASH, with HLS being the most used format at the moment.
Android 4.x+ has native support for HLS, it works on iOS out of the box since it's made by Apple and on desktops it works natively on Safari 6+ and all other browsers with a Flash fallback. There are many web players available, the most noteworthy being JWPlayer (paid) or clappr (open-source).
The Amazon Elastic Transcoder supports HLS transcoding and you can also use an open-source solution like ffmpeg.
https://developer.apple.com/streaming/
I'm in testing stage of launching an online radio. I'm using AWS CloudFormation stack with Adobe Media Server.
My existing instance type is m1.large and my Flash Media Live Encoder is streaming mp3 at 128kbps which i think is pretty normal but it's producing a stream that isn't smooth & stable at all and seems to have a lot of breaks.
Should i pick an instance type with higher specs?
I'm running my test directly off of LiveHLSManifest link that opens on my iPhone's Safari and plays on browser's build-in player..which doesn't set any buffering on client side - could this be the issue?
Testing HLS/HDS links directly on iPhone's Safari was a bad idea. I relied on built-in players already having some sort of buffering configuration by default but noo... I was able to receive stable & smooth stream when i used players like Strobe Media Playback, FlowPlayer etc.. Hopefully, this answer will save someone some time.