Django Channels Nginx production - django

Question

I have a django project and recently added channels to use websockets. This seems to all work fine, but the problem I have is to get the production ready.
My setup is as follows:
Nginx web server
Gunicorn for django
SSL enabled
Since I have added channels to the mix. I have spent the last day trying to get it to work.
On all the turtotials they say you run daphne on some port then show how to setup nginx for that.
But what about having gunicorn serving django?
So now I have guncorn running this django app on 8001
If I run daphne on another port, lets say 8002 - how should it know its par of this django project? And what about run workers?
Should Gunicorn, Daphne and runworkers all run together?

Answer 1

This question is actually addressed in the latest Django Channels docs:
It is good practice to use a common path prefix like /ws/ to
distinguish WebSocket connections from ordinary HTTP connections
because it will make deploying Channels to a production environment in
certain configurations easier.
In particular for large sites it will be possible to configure a
production-grade HTTP server like nginx to route requests based on
path to either (1) a production-grade WSGI server like Gunicorn+Django
for ordinary HTTP requests or (2) a production-grade ASGI server like
Daphne+Channels for WebSocket requests.
Note that for smaller sites you can use a simpler deployment strategy
where Daphne serves all requests - HTTP and WebSocket - rather than
having a separate WSGI server. In this deployment configuration no
common path prefix like is /ws/ is necessary.
In practice, your NGINX configuration would then look something like (shortened to only include relevant bits):
upstream daphne_server {
server unix:/var/www/html/env/run/daphne.sock fail_timeout=0;
}
upstream gunicorn_server {
server unix:/var/www/html/env/run/gunicorn.sock fail_timeout=0;
}
server {
listen 80;
server_name _;
location /ws/ {
proxy_pass http://daphne_server;
}
location / {
proxy_pass http://gunicorn_server;
}
}
(Above it is assumed that you are binding the Gunicorn and Daphne servers to Unix socket files.)

Answer 2

I have created an example how to mix Django Channels and Django Rest Framework. I set nginx routing that:
websockets connections are going to daphne server
HTTP connections (REST API) are going to gunicorn server
Here is my nginx configuration file:
upstream app {
server wsgiserver:8000;
}
upstream ws_server {
server asgiserver:9000;
}
server {
listen 8000 default_server;
listen [::]:8000;
client_max_body_size 20M;
location / {
try_files $uri #proxy_to_app;
}
location /tasks {
try_files $uri #proxy_to_ws;
}
location #proxy_to_ws {
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
proxy_redirect off;
proxy_pass http://ws_server;
}
location #proxy_to_app {
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https;
proxy_set_header X-Url-Scheme $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
proxy_redirect off;
proxy_pass http://app;
}
}

Answer 3

I recently answered a similiar question, have a look there for an explanation on how django channels work.
Basically, you don't need gunicorn anymore. You have daphne which is the interface server that accepts HTTP/Websockets and you have your workers that run django views. Then obviously you have your channel backend that glues everything together.
To make it work you have to configure CHANNEL_LAYERS in settings.py and also run the interface server: $ daphne my_project.asgi:channel_layer
and your worker:
$ python manage.py runworker
NB! If you chose redis as the channel backend, pay attention to file sizes you're serving. If you have large static files make sure NGINX serves them or otherwise clients will experience cryptic errors that may occur due to redis running out of memory.