I am attempting to cross-compile an OpenGL program using Mingw32 but have run into a road block. After invoking mingw32-configure; the compilation is interrupted by
configure: error: lacking proper OpenGL support
I checked the config.log file and found the following entries:
configure:21709: checking GL/gl.h usability
configure:21726: ccache i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields conftest.cpp >&5
configure:21732: $? = 0
configure:21746: result: yes
configure:21750: checking GL/gl.h presence
configure:21765: ccache i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -E conftest.cpp
configure:21771: $? = 0
configure:21785: result: yes
configure:21813: checking for GL/gl.h
configure:21820: result: yes
configure:21834: checking for glEnable in -lGL
configure:21869: ccache i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -o conftest.exe -O2 -g -pipe - Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms- bitfields conftest.cpp -lGL >&5
/tmp/ccjGmlvX.o: In function 'main':../rpmbuild/SOURCES/poker3d-1.1.36/conftest.cpp:34: undefined reference to `_glEnable'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure:21875: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
I have added the llvm software rasterizer to my system after a suggestion on this website from another thread related to this problem and have also implemented a suggestion from the Mingw site to copy libopengl32.a to libGL.a. So far nothing has changed the errors that I get after each compile attempt.
Give me some advice on how to resolve this.
autotools/autoconf is abysmally bad for crosscompilation. The way the generated configure script works is, that for many tests it attempts to compile and execute short test snippet programs. Of course the whole "execute" part will miserably fail for cross compiled libraries, due to either lack in instruction set support (compiling for a different CPU) or targeting an entirely different OS.
At least in Linux one can work around this using the "misc binfmt" kernel support, which allows to register interpreters for non-native executable formats. For Windows targets you'd use Wine as an interpreter and for foreign CPUs you can use QEmu which not only can emulate whole machines, but focus CPU emulation on a single process/binary. And of course you can combine it.
However this is just a crutch and honestly you should probably ditch autoconf/autotools entirely and just write Makefiles. Today the *nix-ish systems are so similar that none of these compiled tests make a lot of sense at all.
Related
I am using WSL Ubuntu. And use GCC to compile my C++ code.
I am trying to use OpenACC to parallelize my code. I heard that I can use OpenACC with GCC.
So after I install Ubuntu, I installed GCC.
And then I typed as follows:
$ g++ -fopenacc -o t testfile.cpp
As far as I know, -fopenacc should enable me to use OpenACC inside my code.
However, I got an message saying:
lto-wrapper: fatal error: could not find accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/ (consider using ‘-B’)
So I guess I missed something.
Does anyone know how to use OpenACC with GCC?
Edited:
I tried:
sudo apt-get install gcc-9-offload-nvptx
And then the error message is now changed to:
lto1: error: ‘-fcf-protection=full’ is not supported for this target
mkoffload: fatal error: x86_64-linux-gnu-accel-nvptx-none-gcc-9 returned 1 exit status
compilation terminated.
lto-wrapper: fatal error: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9//accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload returned 1 exit status
compilation terminated.
/usr/bin/ld: error: lto-wrapper failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I got one step further with:
gcc-10 -O2 -ffast-math -fopenacc -fopt-info-all-omp -fcf-protection=none -foffload=nvptx laplace2dkernels.c
but just to find the next problem:
gcc-10: fatal error: GCC is not configured to support nvptx as offload target
compilation terminated
So it seems they only compiled it for AMD GCN.
If you use
gcc-10 -O2 -ffast-math -fopenacc -fopt-info-all-omp -fcf-protection=none -foffload=nvptx-none laplace2dkernels.c
>laplace2dkernels.c:74:9: optimized: assigned OpenACC seq loop parallelism
>/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccYd0cZe.crtoffloadtable.o: warning: relocation against >`__offload_vars_end' in read-only section `.rodata'
It compiles but then when running it misses:
libgomp: while loading libgomp-plugin-gcn.so.1: libgomp-plugin-gcn.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I do not need to install those libraries because I want to get it to run with my Nvidia card.
With the PGI compilers everything worked fine.
NOTE: I am also using WSL and special NVIDIA drivers to allow for GPU passthrough.
Here's what worked for me for a Tiny C++ stencil code with OpenACC directives, after installing gcc-10-offload-nvptx:
g++ -c -g -O -fopenacc -foffload=nvptx-none -fcf-protection=none -foffload=-misa=sm_35 -fno-stack-protector stencil_acc.cxx
g++ -o stencil_acc -g -O -fopenacc -foffload=nvptx-none -fcf-protection=none -foffload=-misa=sm_35 -fno-stack-protector util.o stencil_acc.o
I am cross-compiling gpsd3.20 on my Ubuntu 16.04 for the ARM architecture. As you may know, gpsd uses Sconsctruct to compile the source codes. During my cross-compilation, the moment when it needs to create the libgps.so it shows an error unrecognized option '-Wl, -Bsymbolic'.
Before posting the question here, I have tried t check my toolchain binaries and I found out that if I run this line manually:
sudo ./arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf-ld -o test/gpsd-3.20/libgps.so.25.0.0 -pthread -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-soname=libgps.so.25 test/gpsd-3.20/os_compat.os test/gpsd-3.20/rtcm2_json.os test/rtcm3_json.os test/gpsd-3.20/shared_json.os test/gpsd-3.20/timespec_str.os test/gpsd-3.20/libgpsmm.os -L. -lrt -lm -lrt
The above commands print out the exact error as I mentioned previously. However, if I run the exact command replacing ld with gcc, then there is no any errors.
sudo ./arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -o test/gpsd-3.20/libgps.so.25.0.0 -pthread -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-soname=libgps.so.25 test/gpsd-3.20/os_compat.os test/gpsd-3.20/rtcm2_json.os test/rtcm3_json.os test/gpsd-3.20/shared_json.os test/gpsd-3.20/timespec_str.os test/gpsd-3.20/libgpsmm.os -L. -lrt -lm -lrt
Upon checking the arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf-gcc --help, I found out that, gcc support -Wloptions whereas in the arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf-ld it doesn't support the -Wl options. So now I am not sure how to change the SConstruct file so that it doesn't execute ld instead I want it to execute gcc especially for the libgps.so part.
(can't comment), so as answer: have you tried to set the env.-var.:
export LD=arm-v7a-linux-gnuabihf-gcc
Gcc takes -Wl,XXX and passes XXX to the linker.
I think you've got two combining problems here, though there's some guessing involved without looking into the build itself. First, scons shouldn't be adding the flag when building a library (https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues/3248 - fixed but, I believe, not part of a release). Second, "linking" should probably be done using gcc. If you call gcc to link, it still calls the linker behind the scenes - after dealing with options that are intended for gcc, which -Wl,-Bsymbolic is, it means pass -Bsymbolic on to the linking phase (indicated by -Wl, the 'l' meaning linker). So I'm supposing that the way you've told scons about the cross toolchain isn't quite right either, if it's calling ld directly you're probably going to have other issues as well.
I am trying to compile yap on my PC since it seems YAP default installers don't come with the Depth limit flag enabled. I need this to work on an ILP project on Aleph.
The thing is, that I am forced to use a PC with windows 8 without enough memory for a Linux Virtual machine.
I got cygwin to attempt to install it, but once I get to the 'make' stage of the installation ( http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/~vsc/Yap/Yap4.3/yap.html#SEC2 ) I get this following error
$ make
Makefile:714: warning: overriding recipe for target 'yap.dll'
Makefile:545: warning: ignoring old recipe for target 'yap.dll'
gcc -mno-cygwin -c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -DCUT_C=1 -DCOROUTINING=1 -DRATIONAL_TREES=1 -DDEPTH_LIMIT=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_YAP_NOT_INSTALLED_=1 -I. -I../H -I../OPTYap -I../BEAM -I../MYDDAS ../C/agc.c -o agc.o
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mno-cygwin’
Makefile:488: recipe for target 'agc.o' failed
make: *** [agc.o] Error 1
I assume it's due to the latest YAP being outdated right now, does anyone know what to do to work around this?
It seems long time has passed since the question is asked. But I would like to answer since the problem is still relevant (I had this problem lately).
Asking at YAP-users mailing list, I was able to solve this problem. You can check the details here.
In short, using MSYS2 or MinGW-w64 (with toolchain installed) and making few changes in the source code makes it possible.
Changes are:
Adding #include <stdio.h> in blob.c file.
Refactoring H with HEAD (or some other name) in whole project. Which was defined in Regs.h, line 590.
I have recently got an account on a supercomputer grid, and I'm trying to compile my code in theri system. Problem is that program won't link with following errors:
/mnt/opt/tools/slc6/binutils/2.22/bin/ld: warning: libboost_system.so.1.55.0, needed by /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55//lib/libboost_thread.so, may conflict with libboost_system.so.5
/mnt/opt/tools/slc6/binutils/2.22/bin/ld: /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55//lib/libboost_thread.so: undefined reference to symbol '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv'
/mnt/opt/tools/slc6/binutils/2.22/bin/ld: note: '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' is defined in DSO /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55//lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0 so try adding it to the linker command line
/mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55//lib/libboost_system.so.1.55.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Which is due to the fact that my program needs boost 1.55, and only 1.39 is instlled on the system in /usr/lib64. I have installed my version of boost in local folder, but somehow still system one is loaded first.
Here is excerpt from flags passed to the compiler:
-std=gnu++11 -Werror -Wall -lboost_thread -lboost_filesystem -lboost_system -lboost_iostreams -g -DG4OPTIMISE -Iinclude
-W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -pipe -O2
full listing of flags is here (they should be irrevelant).
Here are revelant config variables:
LIBRARY_PATH /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55/lib:
CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55/include:/mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/geant4.9.6.3/compile/include/Geant4
LD_LIBRARY_PATH /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55/lib:/mnt/opt/tools/slc6/gcc/4.8.3/lib64: ...
Directory /mnt/home/jbzdak/tools/boost_1_55 contains installed boost library.
I use GCC 4.8.3 with ld 2.22.
I have very little experience with linker errors hence the question. Is there any way to exclude boost libraries in /usr/lib64, or make the linker use locally installed libraries, and and ignore the system one?
I said in a comment:
There's no -L/alternative/location/of/boost/lib shown, so the compiler (linker) doesn't know it needs to look somewhere else for your modern Boost library. You may need -Wl,rpath,/alternative/location/of/boost/lib as well.
And the question was asked:
Why didn't LD_LIBRARY_PATH solve the issue?
Because LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a run-time variable rather than a link-time variable. It affects where the /lib/ld.so.1 (or equivalent) dynamic loader looks for libraries when you run a program, not where the linker looks to find its libraries.
After some additional debugging and asking another question, I found out the root cause of problem. Any -L parameter has precedence over LIBRARY_PATH and somehow -L/usr/lib64 was added (hence it had precedence over my version).
To check what options are sent to gcc pass -v parameter.
I'm trying to cross-compile Qt 4.7.1 from source, here are some notes on my setup:
my expected output is the shared object libraries that are required to be present in order to run a Qt application.
My target platform is a TI AM335x processor which is of the ARM Cortex-A8 architecture.
My development platform is a x86 64-bit Ubuntu virtual machine
My understanding of how this should work is that I download the toolchain for my target platform (this is the Linaro toolchain from TI), I download the source code for Qt 4.7.1, I set the mkspec to use my tool chain, run configure, then just need to run make/make install and I should be able to find all the .so's where I told it to install to. I'm having a lot of problems getting this idea to work however.
First I downloaded the TI SDK version: ti-sdk-am335x-evm-06.00.00.00 which has the arm tool's at:
[root_install_dir]/linux-devkit/sysroots/i686-arago-linux/usr/bin
I updated my $PATH with that directory:
mike#mike-VirtualBox:~$ echo $PATH
/home/mike/ti-sdk-am335x-evm-06.00.00.00/linux-devkit/sysroots/i686-arago-linux/usr/bin
:/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.8.5/bin:/home/mike/bin:/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm:
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/home/mike/bin
I then created my own mkspec based on the closest example:
cp -R [qt_install_dir]/mkspecs/qws/linux-arm-gnueabi-g++/ [qt_install_dir]/mkspecs/qws/linux-am335x-g++
and I modified the linux-am335x-g++/qmake.conf to point to the tools from the TI sdk:
# modifications to g++.conf
QMAKE_CC = arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
QMAKE_CXX = arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
QMAKE_LINK = arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
QMAKE_LINK_SHLIB = arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
# modifications to linux.conf
QMAKE_AR = arm-linux-gnueabihf-ar cqs
QMAKE_OBJCOPY = arm-linux-gnueabihf-objcopy
QMAKE_STRIP = arm-linux-gnueabihf-strip
Then I ran a configure command:
./configure -prefix /home/mike/qt4.7.1_source/my_qt -embedded arm -platform qws/linux-x86_64-g++ -xplatform qws/linux-am335x-g++ -no-mmx -no-3dnow -no-sse -no-sse2 -no-glib -no-cups -no-largefile -no-accessibility -no-openssl -no-gtkstyle -fast -opensource
It runs for a while then completes and says it's ready to do make/make install at this point I run make and that's where it starts to fail:
/home/mike/qt4.7.1_source/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.7.1/bin/moc
-DQT_SHARED -DQT_BUILD_CORE_LIB -DQT_NO_USING_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT_USE_FAST_OPERATOR_PLUS -DQT_USE_FAST_CONCATENATION -DELF_INTERPRETER=\"/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2\" -DHB_EXPORT=Q_CORE_EXPORT -DQT_HAVE_NEON -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I../../mkspecs/qws/linux-am335x-g++ -I. -I../../include -I../../include/QtCore -I.rcc/release-shared-emb-arm -Iglobal -I../3rdparty/harfbuzz/src -I../3rdparty/md5 -I../3rdparty/md4 -I.moc/release-shared-emb-arm kernel/qobject.h -o .moc/release-shared-emb-arm/moc_qobject.cpp arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ -c
-include .pch/release-shared-emb-arm/QtCore -pipe -fno-exceptions -mfpu=neon -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_SHARED -DQT_BUILD_CORE_LIB -DQT_NO_USING_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT_USE_FAST_OPERATOR_PLUS -DQT_USE_FAST_CONCATENATION -DELF_INTERPRETER=\"/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2\" -DHB_EXPORT=Q_CORE_EXPORT -DQT_HAVE_NEON -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I../../mkspecs/qws/linux-am335x-g++ -I. -I../../include -I../../include/QtCore -I.rcc/release-shared-emb-arm -Iglobal -I../3rdparty/harfbuzz/src -I../3rdparty/md5 -I../3rdparty/md4 -I.moc/release-shared-emb-arm -o .obj/release-shared-emb-arm/qobject.o kernel/qobject.cpp {standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1294: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode 'swp r6,r4,[r3]'
make[1]: [.obj/release-shared-emb-arm/qobject.o] Error 1* make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/mike/qt4.7.1_source/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.7.1/src/corelib'
make: * [sub-corelib-make_default-ordered] Error 2
So, the question...
Why is the compiler complaining that the thumb mode is not supported? Since this is a cross compile tool chain for an ARM based processor, it should be supported. The fact that it's not makes me feel that make is somehow picking up the wrong version of g++.
Any thoughts on what went wrong and how to fix this?
{standard input}:1294: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode 'swp r6,r4,[r3]'
Why is the compiler complaining that the thumb mode is not supported?
Note, the compiler is complaining about the swp instruction not being available for thumb mode. Your CPU supports thumb, thumb2, and ARM. The Cortex series deprecates the use of swp and prefers ldrex/strex pairs.
Any thoughts on what went wrong and how to fix this?
You need to get gcc to define __ARM_ARCH_7__; this is done with either -mcpu=cortex-a8 or the combination -mtune=cortex-a8 and -march=armv7-a or what ever you like depending on how many types of boards you want Qt to run on.
In detail, see qatomic_arm.h for where a sub-file is selected. You have a very generic ARM selected (I guess), so you get qatomic_armv5.hNote1 where you can see the code around line 125. The right file for your CPU is qatomic_armv7.h, which mainly just includes qatomic_armv6.h. In this file you can find ldrex/strex which is the wholesome goodness that your gcc is requesting.
I also suggest you do not compile with -fast. There is another question where the OP says this solved his issue; but I think this is different.
You can try to pass -armfpa to configure. ./configure -embedded arm --help is useful. configure appears to have selected NEON, so it seems to know you have a more advanced CPU (there is no NEON on an armv5, but this maybe a fault of configure).
For certain, you don't want the swp code and the ldrex/strex is preferred for your system, even if swp could somehow work. I would at least resolve this. Alter the -xplatform qws/linux-am335x-g++ to update -mcpu or possibly pass an explicit -D__ARM_ARCH_7__. You can get a list of defines with arm-gcc -mcpu=cortex-a8 -dM -E - < /dev/null, to verify that the __ARM_ARCH_7__ is being defined. It looks like it is moc failing, so maybe the -D__ARM_ARCH_7_ solution will be needed.
You might also try to alter -mthumb in the compiler option. It is probably best to use -mcpu=cortex-a8 and -mthumb for your system, if you can get that to compile/build. Omitting -mthumb will make the code slightly larger. You might also try -Os. For some reason, I have huge builds with other optimizations and more recent gcc versions. It appears to be due to some C++ feature as normal 'C' doesn't behave this way; but this may just be my compiler. I looked and believe it is the exception tables, but I never confirmed anything and moved on. I am sure you are aware of how long Qt takes to compile.
Note1: The qatomic_armv5.h code is fairly confused and newer gcc or binutils will choke even when this is the correct file to use.
asm volatile("swpb %0,%2,[%3]"
: "=&r"(ret), "=m" (*ptr)
: "r"(newval), "r"(ptr)
: "cc", "memory");
This specifies some inline assembler parameters which are never used. Not to mention the condition codes are not used, etc.
asm volatile("swpb %0,%1,[%2]"
: "=r"(ret)
: "0"(newval), "r"(ptr)
: "memory");
will compile with newer gcc and binutils. It also uses less registers and is optimal for the way Qt is currently using it; there maybe cases where ret needs to be preserved to compare to newval but it is just a user space spin lock currently.
The bracket [x] is a memory operand register and must be different than the other two parameters for a valid swp. I believe the first form was used to stop %0 from being the same as %3. The 2nd form avoids this by making %0 and %1 the same, so %2 must be different.
the answer by usr: artless noise did in fact fix my issue, but since I want to make sure there is a very clear trail for myself (if needed) or others, I want to state exactly what the fix was:
First, I updated my .configure command to:
./configure -prefix /home/mike/qt4.7.1_source/my_qt -embedded arm -platform qws/linux-x86_64-g++ -xplatform qws/linux-am335x-g++ -no-mmx -no-3dnow -no-sse -no-sse2 -no-glib -no-cups -no-largefile -no-accessibility -no-openssl -no-gtkstyle -opensource -qt-mouse-tslib
The only difference from the question's configure command is the removal of the -fast option.
Then in my the linux-am335x-g++/qmake.conf file, I added a few command line options:
QMAKE_CFLAGS= -march=armv7-a -marm -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a8
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS= -march=armv7-a -marm -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a8
With these two change I can now see everything build and install Qt4.7.1 successfully.
I also tried Qt4.8.5 and everything works the same except one more option has to be added to the ./configure command:
-no-pch
This is to avoid an error regarding a: .pch
directory and files in side showing "No such file or directory"