Good afternoon.
I am trying to get a User Event script to call or use a Map Reduce script. I am really new to the concept of a Map Reduce script and am not having much luck finding resources. Essentially, what I want to do is call a Map Reduce script that finds open transactions with the same Item Name and sets the Class on that item to the new item set by the User. The Map Reduce script would need to the Item Name and Class from the current record.
Here is my User Event:
/**
* #NApiVersion 2.0
* #NScriptType UserEventScript
*/
define(['N/record', 'N/log'],
function (record, log) {
function setFieldInRecord (scriptContext) {
log.debug({
'title': 'TESTING',
'details': 'WE ARE IN THE FUNCTION!'
});
if (scriptContext.type === scriptContext.UserEventType.EDIT) {
var old_Record = scriptContext.oldRecord;
var cur_Record = scriptContext.newRecord;
var oldClassId = old_Record.getValue({ fieldId: 'class'});
var curClassId = cur_Record.getValue({ fieldId: 'class'});
if ( oldClassId != curClassId ) {
// CALL MAP REDUCE HERE
}
}
}
return {
beforeSubmit: setFieldInRecord
};
}
);
Is the Map Reduce Script a separate file or is it embedded in the User Event script? I think I can get the Map Reduce to work if I know how to call it from the User Event. I appreciate any input with this question. Thank you!
Here is how we handled this situation.
We made sure to add 'N/task' to the define statement in the above code for the User Event. Then, in the User Event when the conditions were met in order to call the Map / Reduce Script, we did this:
var scriptTask = task.create({
taskType: task.TaskType.MAP_REDUCE
});
scriptTask.scriptId = 'customscript_id';
scriptTask.deploymentId = 'customdeploy_id';
var scriptTaskId = scriptTask.submit();
This successfully called the Map Reduce Script from the User Event.
I hope this helps out someone in the future.
Thank you.
Related
How do I increment a number in AWS Dynamodb?
The guide says when saving an item to simply resave it:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/mobile/sdkforios/developerguide/dynamodb_om.html
However I am trying to use a counter where many users may be updating at the same time.
Other documentation has told me to use and UpdateItem operation but I cannot find a good example to do so.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/Expressions.Modifying.html
However, I cannot find a method to implement the expression. In the future I will be adding values to arrays and maps. Will this be the same? My code is in Obj C
Currently my code looks like:
AWSDynamoDBUpdateItemInput *updateItemInput = [AWSDynamoDBUpdateItemInput new];
updateItemInput.tableName = #"TableName";
updateItemInput.key = #{
UniqueItemKey:#"KeyValue"
};
updateItemInput.updateExpression = #"SET counter = counter + :val";
updateItemInput.expressionAttributeValues =#{
#":val":#1
};
It looks like you're missing the last bit of code that actually makes the update item request:
AWSDynamoDB *dynamoDB = [AWSDynamoDB defaultDynamoDB];
[[dynamoDB updateItem:updateItemInput]
continueWithBlock:^id(AWSTask *task) {
if (task.error) {
NSLog(#"The request failed. Error: [%#]", task.error);
}
if (task.exception) {
NSLog(#"The request failed. Exception: [%#]", task.exception);
}
if (task.result) {
//Do something with result.
}
return nil;
}];
In DynamoDB if you want to increment the value of the any propertie/field you can use the UpdateItemRequest with action option ADD. I used in android this method would update the existing value of the field. Let me share the code snippet. You can use any actions such like add,delete,put etc.
.....
AttributeValue viewcount = new AttributeValue().withS("100");
AttributeValueUpdate attributeValueUpdate = new AttributeValueUpdate().withAction(AttributeAction.ADD).withValue(viewcount);
updateItems.put(UploadVideoData.FIELD_VIEW_COUNT, attributeValueUpdate);
UpdateItemRequest updateItemRequest = new UpdateItemRequest().withTableName(UploadVideoData.TABLE_NAME)
.withKey(primaryKey).withAttributeUpdates(updateItems);
UpdateItemResult updateItemResult = amazonDynamoDBClient.updateItem(updateItemRequest);
....
You can see the above code will add 100 count into the existing value of that field.
This code is for android but the technique would remain the same.
Thank you.
I'm trying to implement a searching feature in a Meteor application that re-subscribes/publishes a collection on every search, so there is only the exact Collection necessary in the client. I'm creating a reactive variable searchString, then changing it to the text in the search box on every search, then splitting the string into tags:
// Client
var searchString = "";
var searchStringDep = new Deps.Dependency;
var getSearchString = function(){
searchStringDep.depend();
return searchString;
}
var handle = Deps.autorun(function(){
var tags = getSearchString().split(" ");
tags = _.map(tags, function(tag){
return tag.replace(/[^\w]/g, "");
}).filter(function(t){
return t.toLowerCase();
});
Meteor.subscribe('results', tags);
});
Template.library.events({
'submit form': function(ev){
ev.preventDefault();
searchString = ev.target.search.value;
searchStringDep.changed();
}
})
Then, publishing a new Collection on the server, based on the tags:
// Server
Meteor.publish('results', function(tags){
regTags = _.map(tags, function(tag) { return new RegExp(tag)});
return Samples.find({tags: {$in: regTags}})
});
So I'm trying to match on regexes, but am having a weird issue where the subscription only changes when I add another tag, but changing existing tags fails.
So if the first searchString was tag1 and the second tag1 tag2, it works fine.
But if the first is tag1 and the second is tag2, the Collection doesn't update.
Any help is appreciated...I'm a beginner to Meteor, so if there is a better way to do what I'm trying to do, all suggestions are welcome. Thanks so much
'change #search': function(){
Meteor.subscribe('sampleResults', $('#search').val()); // or if you want on submit it's the same idea
}
and publish like
Meteor.publish('sampleResults, function(text){
return Samples.find({tags: {$regex: text}});
}
A few things:
1) Meteor has a very nice way of setting up reactive variables with the ReactiveVar component. I would suggest using that rather than creating another dependency for a variable.
2) The name that you are subscribing to: results is different than what is published on the server sampleResults and that can cause issues.
3) If you are on Meteor >= 0.9.1 you should be using Tracker and not Deps. You can use Deps if you want, but the new updated API is Tracker and is probably more stable. See the changelog for more details on that.
4) You don't have to set your Deps.autorun function equal to a variable. So you can have it as:
Tracker.autorun(function() {
// Code here
});
My problem is how to ensure that no data will be lost while concurrent access.
I have script published as web-app. I want to add new row to DATA_SHEET. The function that handles submit button looks like this:
function onButtonSubmit(e) {
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
var lock = LockService.getPublicLock();
while (! lock.tryLock(1000))
;
var ssheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById(SHEET_ID);
var sheet = ssheet.getSheetByName(DATA_SHEET);
var lastRow = sheet.getLastRow();
var lastCol = sheet.getLastColumn();
var rangeToInsert = sheet.getRange(lastRow+1, 1, 1, lastCol);
var statText = rangeToInsert.getA1Notation();
rangeToInsert.setValues(<some data from webapp form>);
app.getElementById('statusLabel').setText(statText);
lock.releaseLock();
return app;
}
But it seems that this does not work. When I open two forms and click submit button within one second, it shows same range in statsLabel and writes data into same range. So I lose data from one form.
What is wrong with this code? It seems like tryLock() does not block script.
Is there any other way how to prevent concurrent write access to sheet?
It might be worth taking a look at appendRow(), rather than using getLastRow()/setValues() etc.
Allows for atomic appending of a row to a spreadsheet; can be used
safely even when multiple instances of the script are running at the
same time. Previously, one would have to call getLastRow(), then write
to that row. But if two invocations of the script were running at the
same time, they might both read the same value for getLastRow(), and
then overwrite each other's values.
while (! lock.tryLock(1000))
;
seems a bit hinky. Try this instead:
if (lock.tryLock(30000)) {
// I got the lock! Wo000t!!!11 Do whatever I was going to do!
} else {
// I couldn’t get the lock, now for plan B :(
GmailApp.sendEmail(“admin#example.com”, “epic fail”,
“lock acquisition fail!”);
}
http://googleappsdeveloper.blogspot.com/2011/10/concurrency-and-google-apps-script.html
You must insert this code when using getLastRow()/setValues() with lock.
SpreadsheetApp.flush();
// before
lock.releaseLock();
I am creating items on the fly via Sitecore Web Service. So far I can create the items from this function:
AddFromTemplate
And I also tried this link: http://blog.hansmelis.be/2012/05/29/sitecore-web-service-pitfalls/
But I am finding it hard to access the fields. So far here is my code:
public void CreateItemInSitecore(string getDayGuid, Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleDataReader reader)
{
if (getDayGuid != null)
{
var sitecoreService = new EverBankCMS.VisualSitecoreService();
var addItem = sitecoreService.AddFromTemplate(getDayGuid, templateIdRTT, "Testing", database, myCred);
var getChildren = sitecoreService.GetChildren(getDayGuid, database, myCred);
for (int i = 0; i < getChildren.ChildNodes.Count; i++)
{
if (getChildren.ChildNodes[i].InnerText.ToString() == "Testing")
{
var getItem = sitecoreService.GetItemFields(getChildren.ChildNodes[i].Attributes[0].Value, "en", "1", true, database, myCred);
string p = getChildren.ChildNodes[i].Attributes[0].Value;
}
}
}
}
So as you can see I am creating an Item and I want to access the Fields for that item.
I thought that GetItemFields will give me some value, but finding it hard to get it. Any clue?
My advice would be to not use the VSS (Visual Sitecore Service), but write your own service specifically for the thing you want it to do.
This way is usually more efficient because you can do exactly the thing you want, directly inside the service, instead of making a lot of calls to the VSS and handle your logic on the clientside.
For me, this has always been a better solution than using the VSS.
I am assuming you are looking to find out what the fields looks like and what the field IDs are.
You can call GetXml with the ID, it returns the item and all the versions and fields set in it, it won't show fields you haven't set.
I have a DS.Store which uses the DS.RESTAdapter and a ChatMessage object defined as such:
App.ChatMessage = DS.Model.extend({
contents: DS.attr('string'),
roomId: DS.attr('string')
});
Note that a chat message exists in a room (not shown for simplicity), so in my chat messages controller (which extends Ember.ArrayController) I only want to load messages for the room the user is currently in:
loadMessages: function(){
var room_id = App.getPath("current_room.id");
this.set("content", App.store.find(App.ChatMessage, {room_id: room_id});
}
This sets the content to a DS.AdapterPopulatedModelArray and my view happily displays all the returned chat messages in an {{#each}} block.
Now it comes to adding a new message, I have the following in the same controller:
postMessage: function(contents) {
var room_id = App.getPath("current_room.id");
App.store.createRecord(App.ChatMessage, {
contents: contents,
room_id: room_id
});
App.store.commit();
}
This initiates an ajax request to save the message on the server, all good so far, but it doesn't update the view. This pretty much makes sense as it's a filtered result and if I remove the room_id filter on App.store.find then it updates as expected.
Trying this.pushObject(message) with the message record returned from App.store.createRecord raises an error.
How do I manually add the item to the results? There doesn't seem to be a way as far as I can tell as both DS.AdapterPopulatedModelArray and DS.FilteredModelArray are immutable.
so couple of thoughts:
(reference: https://github.com/emberjs/data/issues/190)
how to listen for new records in the datastore
a normal Model.find()/findQuery() will return you an AdapterPopulatedModelArray, but that array will stand on its own... it wont know that anything new has been loaded into the database
a Model.find() with no params (or store.findAll()) will return you ALL records a FilteredModelArray, and ember-data will "register" it into a list, and any new records loaded into the database will be added to this array.
calling Model.filter(func) will give you back a FilteredModelArray, which is also registered with the store... and any new records in the store will cause ember-data to "updateModelArrays", meaning it will call your filter function with the new record, and if you return true, then it will stick it into your existing array.
SO WHAT I ENDED UP DOING: was immediately after creating the store, I call store.findAll(), which gives me back an array of all models for a type... and I attach that to the store... then anywhere else in the code, I can addArrayObservers to those lists.. something like:
App.MyModel = DS.Model.extend()
App.store = DS.Store.create()
App.store.allMyModels = App.store.findAll(App.MyModel)
//some other place in the app... a list controller perhaps
App.store.allMyModels.addArrayObserver({
arrayWillChange: function(arr, start, removeCount, addCount) {}
arrayDidChange: function(arr, start, removeCount, addCount) {}
})
how to push a model into one of those "immutable" arrays:
First to note: all Ember-Data Model instances (records) have a clientId property... which is a unique integer that identifies the model in the datastore cache whether or not it has a real server-id yet (example: right after doing a Model.createRecord).
so the AdapterPopulatedModelArray itself has a "content" property... which is an array of these clientId's... and when you iterate over the AdapterPopulatedModelArray, the iterator loops over these clientId's and hands you back the full model instances (records) that map to each clientId.
SO WHAT I HAVE DONE
(this doesn't mean it's "right"!) is to watch those findAll arrays, and push new clientId's into the content property of the AdapterPopulatedModelArray... SOMETHING LIKE:
arrayDidChange:function(arr, start, removeCount, addCount){
if (addCount == 0) {return;} //only care about adds right now... not removes...
arr.slice(start, start+addCount).forEach(function(item) {
//push clientId of this item into AdapterPopulatedModelArray content list
self.getPath('list.content').pushObject(item.get('clientId'));
});
}
what I can say is: "its working for me" :) will it break on the next ember-data update? totally possible
For those still struggling with this, you can get yourself a dynamic DS.FilteredArray instead of a static DS.AdapterPopulatedRecordArray by using the store.filter method. It takes 3 parameters: type, query and finally a filter callback.
loadMessages: function() {
var self = this,
room_id = App.getPath('current_room.id');
this.store.filter(App.ChatMessage, {room_id: room_id}, function (msg) {
return msg.get('roomId') === room_id;
})
// set content only after promise has resolved
.then(function (messages) {
self.set('content', messages);
});
}
You could also do this in the model hook without the extra clutter, because the model hook will accept a promise directly:
model: function() {
var self = this,
room_id = App.getPath("current_room.id");
return this.store.filter(App.ChatMessage, {room_id: room_id}, function (msg) {
return msg.get('roomId') === room_id;
});
}
My reading of the source (DS.Store.find) shows that what you'd actually be receiving in this instance is an AdapterPopulatedModelArray. A FilteredModelArray would auto-update as you create records. There are passing tests for this behaviour.
As of ember.data 1.13 store.filter was marked for removal, see the following ember blog post.
The feature was made available as a mixin. The GitHub page contains the following note
We recommend that you refactor away from using this addon. Below is a short guide for the three filter use scenarios and how to best refactor each.
Why? Simply put, it's far more performant (and not a memory leak) for you to manage filtering yourself via a specialized computed property tailored specifically for your needs