Here's the code:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int keyArray[7] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7};
int breakPoint;
int counter;
for (counter = 0; counter < 7; counter++)
{
// keyArray[counter] = (rand() % 9) + 1; later
keyArray[counter] = counter; //testing
}
cout << keyArray[0] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[1] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[2] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[3] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[4] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[5] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[6] + "\n";
cin >> breakPoint; //so I can see what the hell is going on before it disappears
return 0;
}
The only reason I gave values to keyArray was that I read in answer to a similar question that you have to initialize an array with data before you use it. But it made no difference. The output is just junk symbols whether you initialize or not.
The compiler is Visual Studio Community 2017. Thanks for any help.
The error is not in your logic but rather in your debugging output. Since the other answers focus on how to fix it, I'll rather explain what happens instead. There seems to be a misunderstanding about the way strings work in C++.
The failure is in this operation:
keyArray[0] + "\n"
Internally, string literals are arrays of characters, in this case const char[2], consisting of the newline and a terminating '\0' null terminator. When you then try to add the integer and this array together, the array will be represented by a pointer to its first element, i.e. it will decay to const char* in order to be used as the second argument to the plus operator used in your code.
So for the compiler, this line will need operator+(int, const char*). But the result of that will be const char*, the input pointer offset by the integer, as that is the operation that happens when adding integers to pointers.
So instead of printing the number and then the string, it will try to access a string that does not exist as the pointer now pointer behind the string "\n" and thus into some arbitrary memory.
Instead of doing
cout << keyArray[0] + "\n"
do:
cout << keyArray[0] << "\n"
or
cout << keyArray[0] << endl
You can't concatanate an integer with a string. That's why you got garbage output
Try this first:
cout << keyArray[0] << "\n";
If you are using compilers that support C++ 11 then try using std::to_string(...) to make a string from an integer before doing the addition:
cout << (std::to_string(keyArray[0]) + "\n");
you cannot concatenate int with string.
change
cout << keyArray[0] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[1] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[2] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[3] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[4] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[5] + "\n";
cout << keyArray[6] + "\n";
to
cout << keyArray[0] << "\n"
<< keyArray[1] << "\n"
<< keyArray[2] << "\n"
<< keyArray[3] << "\n"
<< keyArray[4] << "\n"
<< keyArray[5] << "\n"
<< keyArray[6] << endl;
You need to convert the integers into a string. Using a relatively recent version of C++:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int keyArray[7] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7};
int breakPoint;
int counter;
for (counter = 0; counter < 7; counter++)
{
// keyArray[counter] = (rand() % 9) + 1; later
keyArray[counter] = counter; //testing
}
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[0]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[1]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[2]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[3]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[4]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[5]) + "\n";
cout << std::to_string(keyArray[6]) + "\n";
cin >> breakPoint; //so I can see what the hell is going on before it disappears
return 0;
}
Related
I wrote a text cipher program. It seems to works on text strings a few characters long but does not work on a longer ones. It gets the input text by reading from a text file. On longer text strings, it still runs without crashing, but it doesn’t seem to work properly.
Below I have isolated the code that performs that text scrambling. In case it is useful, I am running this in a virtual machine running Ubuntu 19.04. When running the code, enter in auto when prompted. I removed the rest of code so it wasn't too long.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <sstream>
#include <random>
#include <cmath>
#include <cctype>
#include <chrono>
#include <fstream>
#include <new>
bool run_cypher(char (&a)[27],char (&b)[27],char (&c)[11],char (&aa)[27],char (&bb)[27],char (&cc)[11]) {
//lowercase cypher, uppercase cypher, number cypher, lowercase original sequence, uppercase original sequence, number original sequence
std::ifstream out_buffer("text.txt",std::ios::in);
std::ofstream file_buffer("text_out.txt",std::ios::out);
//out_buffer.open();
out_buffer.seekg(0,out_buffer.end);
std::cout << "size of text: " << out_buffer.tellg() << std::endl;//debug
const int size = out_buffer.tellg();
std::cout << "size: " << size << std::endl;//debug
out_buffer.seekg(0,out_buffer.beg);
char *out_array = new char[size + 1];
std::cout << "size of out array: " << sizeof(out_array) << std::endl;//debug
for (int u = 0;u <= size;u = u + 1) {
out_array[u] = 0;
}
out_buffer.read(out_array,size);
out_buffer.close();
char original[size + 1];//debug
for (int bn = 0;bn <= size;bn = bn + 1) {//debug
original[bn] = out_array[bn];//debug
}//debug
for (int y = 0;y <= size - 1;y = y + 1) {
std::cout << "- - - - - - - -" << std::endl;
std::cout << "out_array[" << y << "]: " << out_array[y] << std::endl;//debug
int match;
int case_n; //0 = lowercase, 1 = uppercase
if (isalpha(out_array[y])) {
if (islower(out_array[y])) {
//std::cout << "out_array[" << y << "]: " << out_array[y] << std::endl;//debug
//int match;
for (int ab = 0;ab <= size - 1;ab = ab + 1) {
if (out_array[y] == aa[ab]) {
match = ab;
case_n = 0;
std::cout << "matched letter: " << aa[match] << std::endl;//debug
std::cout << "letter index: " << match << std::endl;//debug
std::cout << "case_n: " << case_n << std::endl;//debug
}
}
}
if (isupper(out_array[y])) {
for (int cv = 0;cv <= size - 1;cv = cv + 1) {
if (out_array[y] == bb[cv]) {
case_n = 1;
match = cv;
std::cout << "matched letter: " << bb[match] << std::endl;//debug
std::cout << "letter index: " << match << std::endl;//debug
std::cout << "case_n: " << case_n << std::endl;//debug
}
}
}
if (case_n == 0) {
out_array[y] = a[match];
std::cout << "replacement letter: " << a[match] << " | new character: " << out_array[y] << std::endl;//debug
}
if (case_n == 1) {
std::cout << "replacement letter: " << b[match] << " | new character: " << out_array[y] << std::endl;//debug
out_array[y] = b[match];
}
}
if (isdigit(out_array[y])) {
for (int o = 0;o <= size - 1;o = o + 1) {
if (out_array[y] == cc[o]) {
match = o;
std::cout << "matched letter: " << cc[match] << std::endl;//debug
std::cout << "letter index: " << match << std::endl;//debug
}
}
out_array[y] = c[match];
std::cout << "replacement number: " << c[match] << " | new character: " << out_array[y] << std::endl;//debug
}
std::cout << "- - - - - - - -" << std::endl;
}
std::cout << "original text: " << "\n" << original << "\n" << std::endl;
std::cout << "encrypted text: " << "\n" << out_array << std::endl;
delete[] out_array;
return 0;
}
int main() {
const int alpha_size = 27;
const int num_size = 11;
char l_a_set[] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
char cap_a_set[] = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
char n_a_set[] = "0123456789";
std::cout << "sizeof alpha_set: " << std::endl;//debug
char lower[alpha_size] = "mnbvcxzasdfghjklpoiuytrewq";
char upper[alpha_size] = "POIUYTREWQASDFGHJKLMNBVCXZ";
char num[num_size] = "9876543210";
int p_run; //control variable. 1 == running, 0 == not running
int b[alpha_size]; //array with values expressed as index numbers
std::string mode;
int m_set = 1;
while (m_set == 1) {
std::cout << "Enter 'auto' for automatic cypher generation." << std::endl;
std::cout << "Enter 'manual' to manually enter in a cypher. " << std::endl;
std::cin >> mode;
std::cin.ignore(1);
std::cin.clear();
if (mode == "auto") {
p_run = 2;
m_set = 0;
}
if (mode == "manual") {
p_run = 3;
m_set = 0;
}
}
if (p_run == 2) { //automatic mode
std::cout <<"lower cypher: " << lower << "\n" << "upper cypher: " << upper << "\n" << "number cypher: " << num << std::endl;//debug
run_cypher(lower,upper,num,l_a_set,cap_a_set,n_a_set);
return 0;//debug
}
while (p_run == 3) {//manual mode
return 0;//debug
}
return 0;
}
For example, using an array containing “mnbvcxzasdfghjklpoiuytrewq” as the cipher for lower case letters, I get “mnbv” if the input is “abcd”. This is correct.
If the input is “a long word”, I get “m gggz zzzv” as the output when it should be “m gkjz rkov”. Sort of correct but still wrong. If I use “this is a very very long sentence that will result in the program failing” as the input, I get "uas” as the output, which is completely wrong. The program still runs but it fails to function as intended. So as you can see, it does work, but not on any text strings that are remotely long. Is this a memory problem or did I make horrible mistake somewhere?
For your specific code, you should run it through a memory checking tool such as valgrind, or compile with an address sanitizer.
Here are some examples of memory problems that most likely won't crash your program:
Forgetting to delete a small object, which is allocated only once in the program. A memory leak can remain undetected for decades, if it does not make the program run out of memory.
Reading from allocated uninitialized memory. May still crash if the system allocates objects lazily at the first write.
Writing out of bounds slightly after an object that sits on heap, whose size is sizeof(obj) % 8 != 0. This is so, since heap allocation is usually done in multiples of 8 or 16. You can read about it at answers of this SO question.
Dereferencing a nullptr does not crash on some systems. For example AIX used to put zeros at and near address 0x0. Newer AIX might still do it.
On many systems without memory management, address zero is either a regular memory address, or a memory mapped register. This memory can be accessed without crashing.
On any system I have tried (POSIX based), it was possible to allocate valid memory at address zero through memory mapping. Doing so can even make writing through nullptr work without crashing.
This is only a partial list.
Note: these memory problems are undefined behavior. This means that even if the program does not crash in debug mode, the compiler might assume wrong things during optimization. If the compiler assumes wrong things, it might create an optimized code that crashes after optimization.
For example, most compilers will optimize this:
int a = *p; // implies that p != nullptr
if (p)
boom(p);
Into this:
int a = *p;
boom(p);
If a system allows dereferencing nullptr, then this code might crash after optimization. It will not crash due to the dereferencing, but because the optimization did something the programmer did not foresee.
if x > INT_MAX or if x > INT_MIN the function will return 0... or that's what i'm trying to do :)
in my test case i pass in a value that is INT_MAX + 1... 2147483648 ... to introduce integer overflow to see how the program handles it.
i step through... my IDE debugger says that the value immediately goes to -2147483648 upon overflow and for some reason the program executes beyond both of these statements:
if (x > INT_MAX)
if (x < INT_MIN)
and keeps crashes at int revInt = std::stoi(strNum);
saying out of range
Must be something simple, but it's got me stumped. Why isn't the program returning before it ever gets to that std::stoi() given x > INT_MAX? Any help appreciated. Thanks! Full listing of function and test bed below: (sorry having trouble with the code insertion formatting..)
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <string> //using namespace std;
class Solution {
public: int reverse(int x)
{
// check special cases for int and set flags:
// is x > max int, need to return 0 now
if(x > INT_MAX)
return 0;
// is x < min int, need to return 0 now
if(x < INT_MIN)
return 0;
// is x < 0, need negative sign handled at end
// does x end with 0, need to not start new int with 0 if it's ploy numeric and the functions used handle that for us
// do conversion, reversal, output:
// convert int to string
std::string strNum = std::to_string(x);
// reverse string
std::reverse(strNum.begin(), strNum.end());
// convert reversed string to int
int revInt = std::stoi(strNum);
// multiply by -1 if x was negative
if (x < 0)
revInt = revInt * -1;
// output reversed integer
return revInt;
}
};
Main:
#include <iostream>
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
// test cases
// instance Solution and call it's method
Solution sol;
int answer = sol.reverse(0); // 0
std::cout << "in " << 0 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(-1); // -1
std::cout << "in " << -1 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(10); // 1
std::cout << "in " << 10 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(12); // 21
std::cout << "in " << 12 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(100); // 1
std::cout << "in " << 100 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(123); // 321
std::cout << "in " << 123 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(-123); // -321
std::cout << "in " << -123 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(1024); // 4201
std::cout << "in " << 1024 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(-1024); // -4201
std::cout << "in " << -1024 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(2147483648); // 0
std::cout << "in " << 2147483648 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
answer = sol.reverse(-2147483648); // 0
std::cout << "in " << -2147483648 << ", out " << answer << "\n";
return 0;
}
Any test like (x > INT_MAX) with x being of type int will never evaluate to true, since the value of x cannot exceed INT_MAX.
Anyway, even if 2147483647 would be a valid range, its reverse 7463847412 is not.
So I think its better to let stoi "try" to convert the values and "catch" any out_of_range-exception`. The following code illustrates this approach:
int convert() {
const char* num = "12345678890123424542";
try {
int x = std::stoi(num);
return x;
} catch (std::out_of_range &e) {
cout << "invalid." << endl;
return 0;
}
}
So in this program I'm trying to go through word by word and make it only lowercase letters, no whitespace or anything else. However, my string "temp" isn't holding anything in it. Is it because of the way I'm trying to modify it? Maybe I should try using a char * instead? Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm brand new to c++, but I've been trying to debug it for hours and can't find much searching for this.
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <ctype.h>
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
/*if (argc != 3) {
cout << "Error: wrong number of arguments." << endl;
}*/
ifstream infile(argv[1]);
//infile.open(argv[1]);
string content((std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(infile)),
(std::istreambuf_iterator<char>()));
string final;
string temp;
string distinct[5000];
int distinctnum[5000] = { 0 };
int numdist = 0;
int wordcount = 0;
int i = 0;
int j = 0;
int k = 0;
int isdistinct = 0;
int len = content.length();
//cout << "test 1" << endl;
cout << "length of string: " << len << endl;
cout << "content entered: " << content << endl;
while (i < len) {
temp.clear();
//cout << "test 2" << endl;
if (isalpha(content[i])) {
//cout << "test 3" << endl;
if (isupper(content[i])) {
//cout << "test 4" << endl;
temp[j] = tolower(content[i]);
++j;
}
else {
//cout << "test 5" << endl;
temp[j] = content[i];
++j;
}
}
else {
cout << temp << endl;
//cout << "test 6" << endl;
++wordcount;
final = final + temp;
j = 0;
for (k = 0;k < numdist;k++) {
//cout << "test 7" << endl;
if (distinct[k] == temp) {
++distinctnum[k];
isdistinct = 1;
break;
}
}
if (isdistinct == 0) {
//cout << "test 8" << endl;
distinct[numdist] = temp;
++numdist;
}
}
//cout << temp << endl;
++i;
}
cout << wordcount+1 << " words total." << endl << numdist << " distinct words." << endl;
cout << "New output: " << final << endl;
return 0;
}
You can't add to a string with operator[]. You can only modify what's already there. Since temp is created empty and routinely cleared, using [] is undefined. The string length is zero, so any indexing is out of bounds. There may be nothing there at all. Even if the program manages to survive this abuse, the string length is likely to still be zero, and operations on the string will result in nothing happening.
In keeping with what OP currently has, I see two easy options:
Treat the string the same way you would a std::vector and push_back
temp.push_back(tolower(content[i]));
or
Build up a std::stringstream
stream << tolower(content[i])
and convert the result into a string when finished
string temp = stream.str();
Either approach eliminates the need for a j counter as strings know how long they are.
However, OP can pull and endrun around this whole problem and use std::transform
std::transform(content.begin(), content.end(), content.begin(), ::tolower);
to convert the whole string in one shot and then concentrate on splitting the lower case string with substring. The colons in front of ::tolower are there to prevent confusion with other tolowers since proper namespacing of the standard library has been switched off with using namespace std;
Off topic, it looks like OP is performing a frequency count on words. Look into std::map<string, int> distinct;. You can reduce the gathering and comparison testing to
distinct[temp]++;
I have done a simple program testing pointers, references, and recursion.
Here is the code to overlook (the problem is complained to come from PassAddresses' function):
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
long RecRecur(short &caps);
void PassAddresses(short &address, short &address2, const char *nosey);
int main(int args, char **LOC)
{
short test = 15;
const char rosey = 0;
short myLick = 500;
short PersonalWhim = 250;
const char *LOG = &rosey;
RecRecur(test);
PassAddresses(myLick, PersonalWhim, LOG);
}
void PassAddresses(short &address, short &address2, const char *nosey)
{
address = address + address;
address2 += address;
for(short i = 100; i < 1000; i++)
{
for(short c = 50; c != 120; c++)
{
cout << "These are just for-loop tests...." << /n;
}
}
cout << address << /n << address2 << /n << nosey << /n << &rosey;
}
long RecRecur(short &caps)
{
caps--;
if(caps > 0x7CDE)
{
RecRecur();
}
else return;
}
Basically the compiler is complaining that a "primary-expression" is expected before the "/" character, and I am clueless on what the issue could be. The expressions/operators on the "address" value are perfectly interchangeable.
1. The escape character is '\', not '/'.
cout << address << /n << address2 << /n << nosey << /n << &rosey;
change above line with
cout << address << "\n" << address2 << "\n" << nosey << "\n" << &nosey;
or
cout << address << endl << address2 << endl << nosey << endl << &nosey;
2. Notice that you have a type in the same line. You may want to write nosey not rosey :)
3. RecRecur(); takes an argument please give one.
4. RecRecur() has to return a long
The escape character '\', not '/'. It also needs to be inside quotes:
cout << "hello world" << '\n';
It's a simple syntax error - a newline is endl, not \n.
I've been trying to format the output to the console for the longest time and nothing is really happening. I've been trying to use as much of iomanip as I can and the ofstream& out functions.
void list::displayByName(ostream& out) const
{
node *current_node = headByName;
// I have these outside the loop so I don't write it every time.
out << "Name\t\t" << "\tLocation" << "\tRating " << "Acre" << endl;
out << "----\t\t" << "\t--------" << "\t------ " << "----" << endl;
while (current_node)
{
out << current_node->item.getName() // Equivalent tabs don't work?
<< current_node->item.getLocation()
<< current_node->item.getAcres()
<< current_node->item.getRating()
<< endl;
current_node = current_node->nextByName;
}
// The equivalent tabs do not work because I am writing names,
// each of different length to the console. That explains why they
// are not all evenly spaced apart.
}
Is their anything that I can use to get it all properly aligned with each other?
The functions that I'm calling are self-explanatory and all of different lengths, so that don't align very well with each other.
I've tried just about everything in iomanip.
Think of it like using Microsoft Excel :)
You think of your stream as fields. So you set the width of the field first then you insert your text in that field. For example:
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
int main()
{
using namespace std;
string firstName = "firstName",
secondName = "SecondName",
n = "Just stupid Text";
size_t fieldWidth = n.size(); // length of longest text
cout << setw(fieldWidth) << left << firstName << endl // left padding
<< setw(fieldWidth) << left << secondName << endl
<< setw(fieldWidth) << left << n << endl;
cout << setw(fieldWidth) << right << firstName << endl // right padding
<< setw(fieldWidth) << right << secondName << endl
<< setw(fieldWidth) << right << n << endl;
}
......
......
The field width means nothing but the width of the text + spaces. You could fill anything other than spaces:
string name = "My first name";
cout << setfill('_') << setw(name.size() + 10) << left << name;
.....
output::
My first name__________
......
I think the best way is to figure out your format then, write a new formatter that does all what you want:
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
std::ostream& field(std::ostream& o)
{
// usually the console is 80-character wide.
// divide the line into four fields.
return o << std::setw(20) << std::right;
}
int main()
{
using namespace std;
string firstName = "firstName",
secondName = "SecondName",
n = "Just stupid Text";
size_t fieldWidth = n.size();
cout << field << firstName << endl
<< field << secondName << endl
<< field << n << endl;
}
If you started thinking about parametrized manipulators, only that accept one int or long parameter are easy to implement, other types are really obscure if you are not familiar with streams in C++.
Boost has a format library that allows you to easily format the ourput like the old C printf() but with type safety of C++.
Remember that the old C printf() allowed you to specify a field width. This space fills the field if the output is undersized (note it does not cope with over-sized fields).
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <boost/format.hpp>
struct X
{ // this structure reverse engineered from
// example provided by 'Mikael Jansson' in order to make this a running example
char* name;
double mean;
int sample_count;
};
int main()
{
X stats[] = {{"Plop",5.6,2}};
// nonsense output, just to exemplify
// stdio version
fprintf(stderr, "at %p/%s: mean value %.3f of %4d samples\n",
stats, stats->name, stats->mean, stats->sample_count);
// iostream
std::cerr << "at " << (void*)stats << "/" << stats->name
<< ": mean value " << std::fixed << std::setprecision(3) << stats->mean
<< " of " << std::setw(4) << std::setfill(' ') << stats->sample_count
<< " samples\n";
// iostream with boost::format
std::cerr << boost::format("at %p/%s: mean value %.3f of %4d samples\n")
% stats % stats->name % stats->mean % stats->sample_count;
}
Give up on the tabs. You should be able to use io manipulators to set the field width, the fill character, and the format flag (to get left or right justification). Use the same values for the headings as you do for the data, and everything should come out nicely.
Also beware that you've switched Rating and Acres in your example.
You can write a procedure that always print the same number of characters to standard output.
Something like:
string StringPadding(string original, size_t charCount)
{
original.resize(charCount, ' ');
return original;
}
And then use like this in your program:
void list::displayByName(ostream& out) const
{
node *current_node = headByName;
out << StringPadding("Name", 30)
<< StringPadding("Location", 10)
<< StringPadding("Rating", 10)
<< StringPadding("Acre", 10) << endl;
out << StringPadding("----", 30)
<< StringPadding("--------", 10)
<< StringPadding("------", 10)
<< StringPadding("----", 10) << endl;
while ( current_node)
{
out << StringPadding(current_node->item.getName(), 30)
<< StringPadding(current_node->item.getLocation(), 10)
<< StringPadding(current_node->item.getRating(), 10)
<< StringPadding(current_node->item.getAcres(), 10)
<< endl;
current_node = current_node->nextByName;
}
}