I have a perplexing issue. I have Web Service A (henceforth WSA), a 3.5 .Net WCF, which I have added a call to Web Service B (henceforth WSB) which is a 3.5 .Net ASMX. When running WSA in the client (SOAPUI or WCFStorm), the WSB call times out per the client timeout setting.
In the VS event viewer I can see that the call to WSB immediately throws two error 400s:
Exception thrown: 'System.Net.WebException' in System.dll ("The remote
server returned an error: (400) Bad Request."). Exception thrown:
'System.Net.WebException' in System.dll ("The remote server returned
an error: (400) Bad Request.")
No reason is given. What is just as puzzling to me is the error doesn't go to my catch. When I debug and I hit the line of code that calls WSB, it's like a reset. No further code gets executed and no error is thrown by my WSA.
If I call WSB directly, it works. So nothing is wrong with WSB. At suggestion of a coworker, I took the code specific to my change and put it in a stand-alone service. I literally C&P the code and configs setting specific to me and adjust namespaces and class names. Lo and behold it works. My stand-alone web service called WSB just fine and get the data I expect.
A coworker and I checked the logs (IIS log for the service and the HTTPERR log) on the IIS server that WSB resides on to see if there was any mention of the 400 error. We found none.
So we are kind of perplexed at this point. The only thing we can think of is perhaps something in the web config might be interfering but have no idea what it could be.
If you have any suggestions of where else to look that would be helpful.
And it would be nice to know why it isn't falling into my error handler.
Thanks.
Update: It was requested I add config and code. I don't think it will help honestly and it is pretty straightforward. I can't put the real code due to company reasons but it is basically this:
In web config:
<configuration>
<appSettings>
<add key="endpointUrl" value = "someurl" />
</appSettings>
.
.
.
<applicationSettings>
<MyService.Properties.Settings>
<setting name="MyService_TheirService"
serializeAs="String">
<value>someurl</value>
</setting>
</MyService.Properties.Settings>
</applicationSettings>
Even though the data is super small I did try making large reader settings and such:
<binding name="CustomHtttpBinding" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" closeTimeout="01:50:00" openTimeout="01:50:00" sendTimeout="01:50:00" receiveTimeout="01:50:00" >
<readerQuotas maxDepth="128"
maxStringContentLength="8388608"
maxArrayLength="2147483646"
maxBytesPerRead="4096"
maxNameTableCharCount="16384" />
</binding>
Code:
using MyService.TheirService
.
.
.
var theirURL = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["endpointUrl"];
var oSvc = new TheirServiceObject
{
Url = theirURL
};
int numberIneed = oSvc.SomeMethod();
That last line is where it throws the 400.
UPDATE 2:
A colleague show me how to use Fiddler. And I can now see that the request to WSB is absolute garbage.
xڭ s 6 mr!!u \ .3 5'3 G QOH>Iп kX M3 ~vY ) X e Z
w ~ :jv -ݴwڽHb Yqv A :(Q Z; >9W O0g 6 .ɖVlU Ţ 8Z
< ( t eSv U]r R $N \
Some odd encoding? At least it's another clue.
Wanted to let you know this problem was solved. Another Dev that had worked on this service before but no longer just happened to walk by and I said "Hey! Look at this!"
They saw the garbage request data and said "That looks like compression. Look up compression in the project."
Turn out there was a custom compression component that was compressing the outgoing data of the service and you needed to add 2 lines of code to decompress. After adding those lines to the top of my method everything immediately worked.
The lesson here is if your project is doing some weird stuff that defies reason, try and find as many people as you can that worked on it before even if they aren't working on it anymore.
Related
I am struggling with this error message which has no direct forum discussion anywhere. From some of the things I saw around the web I tried:
Changing localhost to 127.0.0.1
Played around with browser.driver.manage() v/s browser.manage()
Cleaning out/updating my node modules
The same code runs on other machines with same configuration (Win 10, chromedriver 2 etc.)
The code essetially gets the cookie value through API calls before
and uses it as such:
browser.get(URL);
browser.manage().addCookie('cookie_name', value);
Any help would be appreciated!
Assumption that you are on Protractor 5.0.0. Adding cookies have been changed in selenium webdriver 3 and was noted as a breaking change in the Protractor changelog:
Before:
browser.manage().addCookie('testcookie', 'Jane-1234');
After:
browser.manage().addCookie({name:'testcookie', value: 'Jane-1234'});
The answer above did not work for me because i kept getting this error:
"Expected 2-6 arguments but got 1"
This is what I had to do to make it compile at least:
(browser.manage() as any).addCookie({name:'cookieName', value: 'cookieVal'});
Here is the thread I got this info from:
https://github.com/angular/protractor/issues/4148
It is still an open issue.
I'm trying to build a simple web app using Django. I'd like a minimal user model with verification using Mozilla Persona. Using Persona happens without a hitch, until the SSL certificate fails when tossing the authentication (success or failure) back to the Django app.
I know there is a lot on Stack Overflow already about SSL errors, but I haven't turned up anything that works in this case. For example, trying to use verify = False when using the requests package still produces the error.
I was able to replicate the error in a minimal example app using the default settings for a new Django project and following the boilerplate installation for django_browserid. Even if this can be hacked, it might be worth noting in either the django_browserid docs or the Persona documentation if someone knows how to remedy this annoying bug.
I've put this minimal example with instructions on GitHub.com at:
https://github.com/pedmiston/ssl_error
The actual error is, with [blob] substituted in place of the assertion.
Error while verifying assertion [blob] with audience http://localhost:8000.
[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:598)
I'm on OSX Mavericks.
Update: I was able to get the minimal example to pass using sigmavirus24's answer, by adding the following to my virtualenv's src/django_browserid/base.py
class RemoteVerifier(object):
"""
Verifies BrowserID assertions using a remote verification service.
By default, this uses the Mozilla Persona service for remote verification.
"""
verification_service_url = 'https://verifier.login.persona.org/verify'
requests_parameters = {
'timeout': 5,
'verify': False,
}
# ...
This is great, and it gets the minimal example to pass (and assures me that this isn't really a django_browserid or Persona error?).
However, it does just kind of by-pass the merits of the verification procedure. Now that the error has been localized, any suggestions for how to fix it?
I've been reading that there were some changes in OS X when Mavericks came around, in a switch from open_ssl to Apple's own Secure Transport engine. If this is the cause of the problem I'm having, then it might be worth knowing for others who run into a similar problem when using Mavericks.
Looking at your example app and it's sole dependency it seems your trouble is coming from this line in django_browserid. I'm not familiar with your app or django_browserid but if you can pass verify=False to https://github.com/mozilla/django-browserid/blob/66641335751b869562ba7a554e61ca56bc880257/django_browserid/base.py#L167 this should solve your problems. In other words, if you specify which Verifier you use, then it should do something like
verifier = RemoteVerifier()
verifier.requests_parameters['verify'] = False
# or
verifier.verify(verify=False)
Of course you didn't show any code where you were doing that so that could be what you meant when you said:
For example, trying to use verify = False when using the requests package still produces the error.
But I can't tell that from the code you have posted.
My question seems to be related to this one:
Coldfusion memcached connections
however, i have been unable to solve it.
if i put this code in application.cfm:
<cfif not IsDefined("application.memcached")>
<cfset application.memcachedFactory = createObject("component","memcachedFactory").init("192.168.2.91:11211")>
<cfset application.memcached = application.memcachedFactory.getmemcached()>
</cfif>
the page will work for maybe 270 calls. then it will start to fail with an error "Object Instantiation Exception " The code is properly talking to memcached. I can send and receive data. it seems like java is running out of something .. threads, sockets, handles of some sort. I know little about java, and am stuck.
This seems wrong to me Don. Why would this code run again after the very first call? It should be running 1 time after which you have a reference to your object. What does the rest of your application.cfm look like? Have you added a cfapplication tag with a "name"?
If you fail to set an application "name" (via the cfapplication tag or "this.name" in application.cfc), the an "application.x" variable is treated just like a regular variable. After the page request ends it will "go away" and require the next request to reinstantiate the object over again.
The purpose of the "isDefined()" in this case is to insure it runs only once - providing you with a singleton (single reference) you can use again and again without reinstantiating it. It sounds like you are not "inside" an application.
I'm calling a .Net Web Service which takes a complex type as a parameter (using KSoap2). I've done this before successfully so I decided to just copy my old code and paste it into a new method, replacing some code with code relevant to the current web service of course.
The only real difference I can see is that the URL to the new web service's .asmx is different.
The thing is I keep getting the following error:
(I get the following when SoapEnvelope.VER11)
org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: expected: END_TAG {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body (position:END_TAG </{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}soap:Fault>#1:338 in java.io.InputStreamReader#199cb474)
(And the following when SoapEnvelope.VER12)
org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: expected: START_TAG {http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope}Envelope (position:START_TAG <{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}soap:Envelope>#1:207 in java.io.InputStreamReader#5b209e72
Why would the error message change like this depending on the version of SOAP I use?
I also tried printing out my envelope with HttpTransport.requestDump and I get the following:
xmlns:v="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<v:Header />
<v:Body>
<postMessage xmlns="http://www.magnatech.com/" id="o0" c:root="1">
<myMessage i:type="n0:Message" xmlns:n0="http://www.magnatech.com/">
<messageContent i:type="d:string">HEY</messageContent>
<userName i:type="d:string">TEST USERNAME</userName>
<agentName i:type="d:string">TEST AGENT NAME</agentName>
<userID i:type="d:string">0</userID>
<agentID i:type="d:string">0</agentID>
<fromAgent i:type="d:string">false</fromAgent>
<messageID i:type="d:string"></messageID>
<accountNumber i:type="d:string">TEST ACCOUNT</accountNumber>
</myMessage>
</postMessage>
</v:Body>
Which looks fine, I actually did the same thing with the envelope from my other "WORKING" web service call and they are the same, except for the element names of course.
And finally, here is the output from HttpTransport.responseDump:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><soap:Fault><faultcode>soap:Client</faultcode><faultstring>Could not deserialize Soap message</faultstring></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
So obviously there is something wrong with the envelope as I'm sending it, yet I see nothing wrong with it.
What could be the problem? I've tried everything possible and am running out of ideas.
Any help at all will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
I'm running CF 9.0.1 Developer and Coldbox 3.0.0 on my local machine (64-bit Windows Vista running 32-bit CF9 on Apache). I'm working on an application that I've checked out from SVN and deployed locally. Everything seems to be working correctly, but my application log is filling up with entries like this:
Apr 18, 2011 12:41 PM Error jrpp-7
exception.log has an extremely long stack trace for each exception, maybe 150 lines or so. It starts with this:
"Error","jrpp-4","04/18/11","11:07:30",,""
java.lang.NullPointerException
at coldfusion.util.Utils.getServletPath(Utils.java:86)
at coldfusion.util.Utils.getServletPath(Utils.java:76)
at coldfusion.util.Utils.getBaseTemplatePath(Utils.java:405)
at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxyFactory.getTemplateFileHelper
(TemplateProxyFactory.java:1522)
at coldfusion.runtime.MetadataUtils.getComponentMetadata
(MetadataUtils.java:112)
at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage.GetComponentMetaData(CfJspPage.java:2667)
at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.getRuntimeComponentMetadata
(TemplateProxy.java:1756)
at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.getRuntimeMetadata
(TemplateProxy.java:1617)
at coldfusion.runtime.MetadataUtils.getMetaData(MetadataUtils.java:54)
at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage.GetMetaData(CfJspPage.java:2640)
at cfEventHandler2ecfc862260423$funcPOSTLOAD.runFunction
(C:\ColdFusion9\wwwroot\ybocv5\coldbox\system\orm\hibernate
\EventHandler.cfc:30)
This is a version of an app that has been running in production, and what makes me think this is just on my local version is the appearance of this in the stack trace:
at cfdump2ecfm471394032$funcRENDEROUTPUT.runFunction
(E:\cf9_updates_rc\cfusion\wwwroot\WEB-INF\cftags\dump.cfm:704)
...
at cfCollectionPanel2ecfm961210602.runPage
(C:\ColdFusion9\wwwroot\ybocv5\coldbox\system\includes
\panels\CollectionPanel.cfm:40)
We don't use cfdump in production; this looks like ColdBox is trying to display a complex object in a debugger panel and failing.
The only thing I found online so far was this thread in Google's transfer-dev group ... someone who saw a bunch of similar errors and thought maybe it was a CF9 bug. The only reply with any sort of solution was this one, suggesting a fix that seems to be Transfer-specific.
Does anyone know what might be causing these errors? It's not as important to me to fix them as it would be on a production app, but if I'm spamming my logs with these errors, it's hard to find legitimate errors when they do occur.
Update: I've been working with the CollectionPanel.cfm template to identify the root cause, and the exception is consistently thrown here:
<cfelseif isObject(varVal)>
<!--- this cfdump is the guilty party ... --->
<cfdump var="#varVal#" expand="false" top="2">
<cfelse>
I've tried wrapping the cfdump in a try-catch, but the exception is thrown anyway, always from that same line of code. This makes sense, I guess, given that these errors don't have any visible effect on the pages on which they occur.
It appears to not be caused from a <cfdump> instead from a GetMetaData() call.
Specifically when you get the meta data of a cfc, which extends another cfc which has been modified after the current has been compiled (and where GetMetaData has been run) where it needs to update the extends struct in the GetMetaData() return. Cf only generates the meta data struct once, most likely for performance reasons.
I think it might be a bug in cf...
Inside the TemplateProxyFactory.getTemplateFileHelper() it's calling runtime.resolveTemplatePath(compName + ".cfc") where compName is name.replace('.', '/')
All good and well until you use a mapping. If you straight out replace dots with slashes, you'll need to add a leading slash, just like they do in TemplateProxy.getMetaData()
Without the leading slash, resolveTemplatePath() returns null, which triggers the VFSFileFactory.getFileObject() call which tries to get a File object from the parent cfc name.
Before it even gets to the VFSFileFactory, it calls Util.getBaseTemplatePath() with the pageContext. Inside it gets the ServletContext from the pageContext and tries to call getServletPath() so that it can get its real path. Utils.getServletPath() tries to get the attribute "javax.servlet.include.servlet_path" which on my machine (and probably yours) doesn't exist and returns null.
You can check by calling this: isNull(getPageContext().getRequest().getRequest().getAttribute("javax.servlet.include.servlet_path")); - yes, there is supposed to be two .getRequest() calls in there.
So it seems Cf is trying to refresh it's extends struct in a cfc getMetaData() call when the extended file is modified and does it a different way then when it first generated the struct.
In you cf admin, what are you settings under Server Settings > Caching?
Trusted cache? Cache template in request? Component cache? Save class files? Cache web server paths?