I refer this link to implement variadic template:
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
// base case
void doPrint(std::ostream &out) {}
template <typename T, typename... Args>
void doPrint(std::ostream &out, T t, Args... args)
{
out << t; // add comma here, see below
doPrint(out, args...);
}
int main() {
// See how it works even better than varargs?
doPrint(std::cout, "Hola", " mundo ");
return 0;
}
But if I change function parameter from reference
void doPrint(std::ostream &out)
......
template <typename T, typename... Args>
void doPrint(std::ostream &out, T t, Args... args)
to value:
void doPrint(std::ostream out)
......
template <typename T, typename... Args>
void doPrint(std::ostream out, T t, Args... args)
I get the following build errors:
test.cpp: In function 'int main()':
test.cpp:16:40: error: 'std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::basic_ostream(const std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]' is protected within this context
doPrint(std::cout, "Hola", " mundo ");
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/7.1.1/iostream:39:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/7.1.1/ostream:391:7: note: declared protected here
basic_ostream(const basic_ostream&) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:16:40: error: use of deleted function 'std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::basic_ostream(const std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]'
doPrint(std::cout, "Hola", " mundo ");
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/7.1.1/iostream:39:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/7.1.1/ostream:391:7: note: declared here
basic_ostream(const basic_ostream&) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:8:6: note: initializing argument 1 of 'void doPrint(std::ostream, T, Args ...) [with T = const char*; Args = {const char*}; std::ostream = std::basic_ostream<char>]'
void doPrint(std::ostream out, T t, Args... args)
^~~~~~~
test.cpp: In instantiation of 'void doPrint(std::ostream, T, Args ...) [with T = const char*; Args = {const char*}; std::ostream = std::basic_ostream<char>]':
test.cpp:16:40: required from here
test.cpp:11:12: error: 'std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::basic_ostream(const std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]' is protected within this context
doPrint(out, args...);
~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/7.1.1/iostream:39:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/7.1.1/ostream:391:7: note: declared protected here
basic_ostream(const basic_ostream&) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:11:12: error: use of deleted function 'std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::basic_ostream(const std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]'
doPrint(out, args...);
~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/7.1.1/iostream:39:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/7.1.1/ostream:391:7: note: declared here
basic_ostream(const basic_ostream&) = delete;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:8:6: note: initializing argument 1 of 'void doPrint(std::ostream, T, Args ...) [with T = const char*; Args = {}; std::ostream = std::basic_ostream<char>]'
void doPrint(std::ostream out, T t, Args... args)
^~~~~~~
Per my understanding, use value may not have a good performance as reference, but it shouldn't cause compilation error. Why doesn't C++ variadic template accept iostream value as a parameter?
It's simply, because copy constructor in std::basic_ostream is deleted (by standard)
read about this here at cppreference.
So std::cout you can move or take by reference
example:
class A {
public:
A(const A& a) = delete;
};
void foo1(const A& a)
{
std::cout << "HEY1" << std::endl;
}
void foo2(const A a)
{
std::cout << "HEY2" << std::endl;
}
int main() {
A a{};
foo1(a);
// foo2(a);
return 0;
}
So in example you see that first function work fine when copy constructor is deleted, but if you uncomment foo2(a), that you get some information from compile e.g. (VS)
'A::A(const A &)': attempting to reference a deleted function
The explanation is in the first couple of lines of error messages.
std::ostream is actually a typedef for std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >.
Passing a std::ostream by value calls the copy constructor of the object, and the std::basic_ostream template has explicitly deleted the copy constructor so it cannot be called.
Related
Here's a watered down example of the code I'm try to compile:
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
template <class F>
auto foo(F&& fun)
{
return [callback = std::forward<F>(fun)](auto&&... args) {
std::invoke(callback, std::forward<decltype(args)>(args)...);
};
}
int main()
{
std::string cur("running"), target("ok");
foo([s1 = cur, s2 = target](std::string const& arg) /*mutable*/ {
if (s1 == arg)
{
std::cout << s1 << std::endl;
}
})("not ok");
return 0;
}
put simply I have a function foo that accepts callables, and is supposed to build a new callable from them. For the sake of the example, above I'm just invoking the fun argument but in the real case there are some decorations done to the callable and the result is placed into a data structure that invokes such "actions" under some conditions.
This example compiles and works just fine. The problem manifests when trying to pass mutable lambdas to foo. When I uncomment the mutable keyword above, I get this compilation error:
main.cpp: In instantiation of 'foo<main()::<lambda(const string&)> >(main()::<lambda(const string&)>&&)::<lambda(auto:1&& ...)> [with auto:1 = {const char (&)[7]}]':
main.cpp:21:7: required from here
main.cpp:8:20: error: no matching function for call to 'invoke(const main()::<lambda(const string&)>&, const char [7])'
8 | std::invoke(callback, std::forward<decltype(args)>(args)...);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from main.cpp:2:
/usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/functional:94:5: note: candidate: 'template<class _Callable, class ... _Args> std::invoke_result_t<_Callable, _Args ...> std::invoke(_Callable&&, _Args&& ...)'
94 | invoke(_Callable&& __fn, _Args&&... __args)
| ^~~~~~
/usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/functional:94:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/move.h:57,
from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/nested_exception.h:40,
from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/exception:148,
from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/ios:39,
from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/ostream:38,
from /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/iostream:39,
from main.cpp:1:
/usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/type_traits: In substitution of 'template<class _Fn, class ... _Args> using invoke_result_t = typename std::invoke_result::type [with _Fn = const main()::<lambda(const string&)>&; _Args = {const char (&)[7]}]':
/usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/functional:94:5: required by substitution of 'template<class _Callable, class ... _Args> std::invoke_result_t<_Callable, _Args ...> std::invoke(_Callable&&, _Args&& ...) [with _Callable = const main()::<lambda(const string&)>&; _Args = {const char (&)[7]}]'
main.cpp:8:20: required from 'foo<main()::<lambda(const string&)> >(main()::<lambda(const string&)>&&)::<lambda(auto:1&& ...)> [with auto:1 = {const char (&)[7]}]'
main.cpp:21:7: required from here
/usr/local/include/c++/11.2.0/type_traits:2933:11: error: no type named 'type' in 'struct std::invoke_result<const main()::<lambda(const string&)>&, const char (&)[7]>'
2933 | using invoke_result_t = typename invoke_result<_Fn, _Args...>::type;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any idea why is that? Can my foo accept mutable lambdas as well?
Just add mutable to the lambda inside the foo:
template <class F>
auto foo(F&& fun)
{
return [callback = std::forward<F>(fun)](auto&&... args) mutable {
//^^^
std::invoke(callback, std::forward<decltype(args)>(args)...);
};
}
I have made a function that is supposed to output data types which include ints, chars, strings and a class called item. This is the function:
template < typename T >
void Output(const T* first, const T* last, char outforchar= '\0')
{
if (outforchar== '\0')
{
std::for_each(first, last, [](T i){std::cout << i;});
}
else
{
std::for_each(first, last, [outforchar](T i){std::cout << i << outforchar;});
}
}
While this function works for types like ints, chars, and strings. It doesn't work for the item class which has a >> operator which formats the input according to the specifications. The compiler throws this error:
./tempsorter.h:14:47: error: cannot bind ‘std::ostream {aka std::basic_ostream<char>}’ lvalue to ‘std::basic_ostream<char>&&’
std::for_each(beg, end, [](T i){std::cout << i;});
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/iostream:39:0,
from psort.cpp:16:
/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/ostream:602:5: error: initializing argument 1 of ‘std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& std::operator<<(std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&&, const _Tp&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>; _Tp = Product]’
operator<<(basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&& __os, const _Tp& __x)
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/algorithm:62:0,
from ./tempsorter.h:2,
from psort.cpp:18:
/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algo.h:4411:5: error: ‘_Funct std::for_each(_IIter, _IIter, _Funct) [with _IIter = const Item*; _Funct = Output(const T*, const T*, char) [with T = Item]::__lambda0]’, declared using local type ‘Output(const T*, const T*, char) [with T = Item]::__lambda0’, is used but never defined [-fpermissive]
for_each(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last, _Function __f)
^
/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algo.h:4411:5: error: ‘_Funct std::for_each(_IIter, _IIter, _Funct) [with _IIter = const Item*; _Funct = Output(const T*, const T*, char) [with T = Item]::__lambda1]’, declared using local type ‘Output(const T*, const T*, char) [with T = Item]::__lambda1’, is used but never defined [-fpermissive]
I understand this error and can get rid of it using something like:
for (auto i = first; i != last; ++i)
{
std::cout << i;
}
But then this gives me incorrect outputs so I can't use it at all.
I am expected to traverse through the various types with something like the following:
for (typename E::ConsItr i = e.Begin(); i != e.End(); ++i)
I can't seem to understand how to implement this into the function, what am I doing wrong?
First,
[](T const& i){std::cout << i;}
is probably better. In addition, you probably wrote your << operator wrong.
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const SomeType& x)
it should look like that, and possibly be a friend of your type. Ensure it is in the same namespace as your type. Or you overloades >> instead of <<
The following code compiles well:
int main()
{
variant<any> var;
var = 5;
cout << any_cast<int>(get<any>(var)) << endl;
return 0;
}
But when I'm trying to put variant<any> as a class member
struct MyClass{
variant<any> var;
};
int main()
{
MyClass s;
return 0;
}
It doesn't compile. Am I doing something wrong or it is some bug?
I'm using gcc 7.1.0
In file included from /home/zak/Projects/Anytest/main.cpp:3:0:
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant: In instantiation of ‘struct std::__detail::__variant::__accepted_index<const std::variant<std::any>&, std::variant<std::any>, void>’:
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:911:26: required from ‘constexpr const size_t std::variant<std::any>::__accepted_index<const std::variant<std::any>&>’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:940:6: required by substitution of ‘template<class _Tp, class> constexpr std::variant<std::any>::variant(_Tp&&) [with _Tp = const std::variant<std::any>&; <template-parameter-1-2> = <missing>]’
/home/zak/Projects/Anytest/main.cpp:14:13: required from here
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:559:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<std::any>::_S_fun(const std::variant<std::any>&)’
decltype(__overload_set<_Types...>::_S_fun(std::declval<_Tp>()),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: candidate: static std::integral_constant<long unsigned int, sizeof... (_Rest)> std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_First, _Rest ...>::_S_fun(_First) [with _First = std::any; _Rest = {}]
static integral_constant<size_t, sizeof...(_Rest)> _S_fun(_First);
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const std::variant<std::any>’ to ‘std::any’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate: static void std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_Types>::_S_fun() [with _Types = {}]
{ static void _S_fun(); };
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:559:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<std::any>::_S_fun(const std::variant<std::any>&)’
decltype(__overload_set<_Types...>::_S_fun(std::declval<_Tp>()),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: candidate: static std::integral_constant<long unsigned int, sizeof... (_Rest)> std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_First, _Rest ...>::_S_fun(_First) [with _First = std::any; _Rest = {}]
static integral_constant<size_t, sizeof...(_Rest)> _S_fun(_First);
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const std::variant<std::any>’ to ‘std::any’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate: static void std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_Types>::_S_fun() [with _Types = {}]
{ static void _S_fun(); };
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:559:49: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<std::any>::_S_fun(const std::variant<std::any>&)’
decltype(__overload_set<_Types...>::_S_fun(std::declval<_Tp>()),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: candidate: static std::integral_constant<long unsigned int, sizeof... (_Rest)> std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_First, _Rest ...>::_S_fun(_First) [with _First = std::any; _Rest = {}]
static integral_constant<size_t, sizeof...(_Rest)> _S_fun(_First);
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const std::variant<std::any>’ to ‘std::any’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate: static void std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_Types>::_S_fun() [with _Types = {}]
{ static void _S_fun(); };
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant: In instantiation of ‘constexpr const size_t std::__detail::__variant::__accepted_index<const std::variant<std::any>&, std::variant<std::any>, void>::value’:
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:911:26: required from ‘constexpr const size_t std::variant<std::any>::__accepted_index<const std::variant<std::any>&>’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:940:6: required by substitution of ‘template<class _Tp, class> constexpr std::variant<std::any>::variant(_Tp&&) [with _Tp = const std::variant<std::any>&; <template-parameter-1-2> = <missing>]’
/home/zak/Projects/Anytest/main.cpp:14:13: required from here
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:564:12: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<std::any>::_S_fun(const std::variant<std::any>&)’
- decltype(__overload_set<_Types...>::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_S_fun(std::declval<_Tp>()))::value;
~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: candidate: static std::integral_constant<long unsigned int, sizeof... (_Rest)> std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_First, _Rest ...>::_S_fun(_First) [with _First = std::any; _Rest = {}]
static integral_constant<size_t, sizeof...(_Rest)> _S_fun(_First);
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:541:58: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const std::variant<std::any>’ to ‘std::any’
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate: static void std::__detail::__variant::__overload_set<_Types>::_S_fun() [with _Types = {}]
{ static void _S_fun(); };
^~~~~~
/usr/local/gcc-7.1/include/c++/7.1.0/variant:535:19: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
The problem is with MyClass's implicitly defined copy constructor, when it tries to copy construct the member of type std::variant<std::any>.
To perform overload resolution, the compiler first needs to try to instantiate all of std::variant's constructor templates, with the function argument being a const std::variant<std::any>&1. The constructor of our interest is this one:
template <class T> constexpr variant(T&& t) noexcept(/*...*/);
It only participates in overload resolution if, among others, the expression FUN(std::forward<T>(t)) is well formed, where FUN is a set of overloaded functions produced according to [variant.ctor]/12.2
In this case, there is only one alternative type (std::any), so there is only one imaginary function FUN, whose signature is FUN(std::any). Now, the compiler needs to decide whether FUN can be called with a const std::variant<std::any>&1. In this process, the compiler needs to know whether std::any can be constructed with const std::variant<std::any>&1.
This will trigger the instantiation of std::any's constructor template template<class T> any(T&& value);, which only participates in overload resolution if std::is_copy_constructible_v<VT> is true (VT being std::decay_t<T>, and T being const std::variant<std::any>&).
Now in order to see whether VT (i.e. std::variant<std::any>) is copy constructible, the compiler needs to try to instantiate all of std::variant's constructor templates... and this is where we started, and we are stuck in a loop.
This can explain why we see template<class _Tp, class> constexpr std::variant<std::any>::variant(_Tp&&) and __overload_set<std::any>::_S_fun (which corresponds to the function FUN mentioned above) in the error message, and why we see the same error appearing several times.
It remains a question how GCC breaks from the above loop, and why tweaking the program can stop GCC from reporting the error. Maybe these are indication of some bug.
1. Strictly speaking, it should be "an lvalue of type const std::variant<std::any>" rather than "a const std::variant<std::any>&".
2. The standard also requires that this constructor shall only participate in overload resolution if is_same_v<decay_t<T>, variant> is false. GCC (libstdc++) chooses to check that later. I don't know whether this is conforming.
Below is a condensed version of my code that gives me a compiler error. The compiler tells me to put typename in front of 'std::deque::reverse_iterator', which makes sense. But if I do I receive the error at the bottom. What does it mean? How can it be resolved?
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
template<class T>
class Stack{
public:
Stack(){}
~Stack(){}
void push(T c) { s.push_back(c); }
void inspect() const{
for(typename std::deque<T>::reverse_iterator i=s.rbegin(); i!=s.rend(); i++)
std::cout << *i << std::endl;
}
private:
typename std::deque<T> s;
};
int main(){
Stack<int> s;
s.push(1);
s.inspect();
return 0;
}
Error:
error: no matching function for call to 'std::_Deque_iterator<int, int&, int*>::_Deque_iterator(std::reverse_iterator<std::_Deque_iterator<int, const int&, const int*> >::iterator_type)'|
note: candidates are:|
note: std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::_Deque_iterator(const iterator&) [with _Tp = int; _Ref = int&; _Ptr = int*; std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::iterator = std::_Deque_iterator<int, int&, int*>]|
note: no known conversion for argument 1 from 'std::reverse_iterator<std::_Deque_iterator<int, const int&, const int*> >::iterator_type {aka std::_Deque_iterator<int, const int&, const int*>}' to 'const iterator& {aka const std::_Deque_iterator<int, int&, int*>&}'|
note: std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::_Deque_iterator() [with _Tp = int; _Ref = int&; _Ptr = int*]|
note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided|
note: std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::_Deque_iterator(_Tp*, std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::_Map_pointer) [with _Tp = int; _Ref = int&; _Ptr = int*; std::_Deque_iterator<_Tp, _Ref, _Ptr>::_Map_pointer = int**]|
note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided|
There's nothing dependent about std::deque<T>, so there mustn't be a typename. Only things to the right of a :: where the left depends on a template parameter is dependent.
This is a good example of where using auto would help you more than just saving typing. You're in a const member function, but trying to use your data member's reverse_iterator, not const_reverse_iterator.
Change typename std::deque<T>::reverse_iterator to typename std::deque<T>::const_reverse_iterator, or, more simply, auto.
This is in addition to the extra typename on your data member.
I have the following unordered_map, that maps a pointer to an object of type Item with a key of type int.
typedef std::unordered_map<int, Item*> ItemList;
ItemList Items;
However, in my addItem method, I receive a strange error at compilation.
void ItemManager::addItem(Item *it) {
int i = it->getItemID();
Items.insert(ItemList::value_type(i, *it));
}
Yields:
item_manager.cc: In member function ‘void ItemManager::addItem(Item*)’:
item_manager.cc:31:51: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::pair<const int, Item*>::pair(int&, Item&)’
item_manager.cc:31:51: note: candidates are:
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:140:2: note: template<class ... _Args1, class ... _Args2> std::pair::pair(std::piecewise_construct_t, std::tuple<_Args1 ...>, std::tuple<_Args2 ...>)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:135:2: note: template<class _U1, class _U2> std::pair::pair(std::pair<_U1, _U2>&&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:131:2: note: template<class _U1, class _U2, class> std::pair::pair(_U1&&, _U2&&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:125:2: note: template<class _U2, class> std::pair::pair(const _T1&, _U2&&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:120:2: note: template<class _U1, class> std::pair::pair(_U1&&, const _T2&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:112:17: note: constexpr std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair(const std::pair<_T1, _T2>&) [with _T1 = const int, _T2 = Process*, std::pair<_T1, _T2> = std::pair<const int, Process*>]
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:112:17: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:108:21: note: template<class _U1, class _U2> constexpr std::pair::pair(const std::pair<_U1, _U2>&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:103:26: note: constexpr std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair(const _T1&, const _T2&) [with _T1 = const int, _T2 = Process*]
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:103:26: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘Process’ to ‘Process* const&’
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:99:26: note: constexpr std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair() [with _T1 = const int, _T2 = Process*]
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_pair.h:99:26: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 2 provided
Any ideas what could be causing these errors? I'm new to C++, so I have been working off of examples of unordered_maps I've found around the web. Any help is greatly appreciated. Please and thank you!
The values in your map are of type Item*, so you need to insert Item*, not Item. This line
Items.insert(ItemList::value_type(i, *it));
should be
Items.insert(ItemList::value_type(i, it));
You don't need to dereference the pointer:
void ItemManager::addItem(Item *it) {
int i = it->getItemID();
Items.insert(ItemList::value_type(i, it));
}