I have a user that can create a document library in our SharePoint 2013 site. The problem is after she creates it she is not given full control over the library so she isn't allowed to grant permissions to other users.
When someone creates a library aren't they by default the owner of that library? If that isn't how it works by default is there something I can do to make that happen?
Thanks,
Brian
you could create or modify the permission level of the user's group. Thats a way to go
Here is a link:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263239.aspx
Related
So i have a list on Sharepoint.
The point of the list is that only administrators can edit the documents and upload them. The rest of the users are going to be able to see the document exmpl. Title ( Ok so i hid couple of columns and made it so that only the name of the file is shown, but not the link to the document).
The issue is that users can select the item and edit them (I don't wnat that), they can also download them (not exceptable either).
Any idea how to solve this?
Things to check:
What are the users permissions? You mentioned that they can edit documents so they might have contribute permissions. Check the permissions by going to the Ribbon > Library tab > Library Permissions. Users need to have at least Contribute/Edit permissions to be able to edit documents in SharePoint.
Who are the members of the Contribute group? Is "Everyone" added there? If so, every user will be able to edit documents.
Is the library inheriting permissions from the site? One possible solution (not great) is to break the library inheritance and grant users/SharePoint group with Read-Only/View permission.
Is there any custom permission level granting the users ability to Edit documents? -> "https://yoursite/_layouts/15/role.aspx" will show you what permission level you have on that Site Collection.
Useful MS Article - Edit and manage permissions for a SharePoint list or library
Is anyone aware of any Google API with the user scope (NOT the Admin API in the Directory SDK) that allows you to retrieve the custom employee attributes?
The G+ API seems to skip these
https://developers.google.com/+/web/api/rest/latest/people#resource
Our issue is that we don't want to grant access to the developer console, but rather do this PER-USER. I.E. a user logs into our app and we display to her the custom attributes for her G Suite account, but we do this as her (not as an approved API scope via the dev console).
Leaving this answer for anyone like me who finds this question.
The Directory API allows a user to query the custom attributes for their account even without any admin permissions at all.
https://developers.google.com/admin-sdk/directory/v1/reference/users/get
You need to ensure that projection is set to full and viewType is set to domain_public.
You may need to check the permissions for reading the custom attributes to ensure that a user is allowed to see theirs. We do this in the Google Cloud Directory Sync.
I'm using SharePoint 2013.
I need to enable new option only for user. other option need to disable in document library.
below is my screen shots for your reference.
I need to enable new option only for user. other option like Open&Check out, Manage, share&Track, copies, workflows, tags & notes need to disable also Library.
how to set and what permission need to be set.
Most of your requirements can be achieved with a custom permission level. If you create a new permission level and grant the user only Add Items, View Items (required), View Pages and Open access, they will only be able to upload and view items.
However, this will not stop them from opening items already uploaded. The permission level requires they have the access to open if you want them to upload.
The only other way I can think of to accomplish your request is to create a file upload web part that will run with elevated privledges, allowing the user to upload a document even if they do not have access to the library.
I am new with sharepoint. I want to create a document library( e.g FinanceDocs) in sharepoint 2013 and want to allow FinanceGroupUser to view, edit, etc. But, I don't to allow other user to view, except Full Control users. I set permission for that library. But, It is not working as I intended. Limited Access user out of FinanceGroup can view that library. Thank in advance.
It sounds like you've set it up correctly.
One way to check is to have a test user with similar permissions to the restricted users and see if that functions as you want.
Have a look at this blog to understand Limited Access:
http://en.share-gate.com/blog/what-are-sharepoint-limited-access
Site Contents - > Add an App -> New Document Library (To Create a Library)
You can set the permission levels according to the Group of Users from the Active Directory .
Library Settings - > Permissions for this Library -> Add the User & Set the Permission .
I have downloaded a 3rd party plugin for Joomla (Breezing Forms). I have created a new user for my Joomla instance who only has access to certain privileges. Breezing Forms is the only component they can use.
I have set these settings correctly from the super user, there is one action, "Configure" which I have set to "allow" for my specific user type.
Now when I log in as that user, I cannot see the components menu (I have disallowed all other components).
But if I navigate to the component:
http://domain.co.uk/administrator/index.php?option=com_breezingforms
Then I can access the page.
I have tried denying access, then trying to access the page and it rightfully prevents me from using it, so the ACL privileges are working, but there is an issue with it displaying in the menu.
I am using Joomla 2.5
Thanks,
Ian
Usually a component has two permissions which deal with that kind of stuff.
core.manage (Access Administration Interface) allows access to the component in the backend. This means the menu item is present in the Components menu.
core.admin (Configure) allows to set the options for this component.
So make sure you have set the correct permissions in BreezingForms. You probably want to have core.manage (Access Administration Interface) and not the other one. Also if you set the Configure one, make sure you also enable the manage one. It doesn't make much sense otherwise.