I need to rewrite almost all in complex item schema.
I can't find the way to rewrite it without actions.
I've found the only way to send old and new item attributes, delete all by using old attrs and then add all from new one.
And make it by Class: Aws::DynamoDB::Types::UpdateItemInput
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/sdkforruby/api/Aws/DynamoDB/Types/UpdateItemInput.html
Does it have another method?
Scheme is like:
{
"app_params": {
"production_params": {
"hard_time_control": true,
"index_max": 300,
"time_control": true,
"weight_fix": 100,
"weight_max": 200
},
"search_mx": "11g"
},
"client": "client_name",
"dashboard": false,
"data": true,
"test_port": 123,
"servers": [
{
"name": "server1",
"port": 123,
"search_type": "test"
}
],
"stock_port": 456
}
Thanks to jarmod.
The decision is PutItem method
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/sdkforruby/api/Aws/DynamoDB/Client.html#put_item-instance_method
Related
I have 2 API requests. 1st one is GET, that returns a response. This response is used as a Body/Payload in the 2nd request (POST). BUT the Payload should have certain values to be replaced before used in the 2nd request (in my case below it should be value for "Status" property).
How can I do it?
Here is my example Response:
{
"Variations":[
{
"ItemIds":[
"xxx"
],
"Items":[
{
"Id":"67-V1",
"GuId":"xxx",
"Type":"Unit",
"Status":"Active"
}
],
"Name":"VAR 1",
"Id":"67-V1"
},
{
"ItemIds":[
"yyy"
],
"Items":[
{
"Id":"67-V2",
"GuId":"yyy",
"Type":"Unit",
"Status":"Active"
}
],
"Name":"VAR 2",
"Id":"67-V2"
},
{
"ItemIds":[
"zzz"
],
"Items":[
{
"Id":"67-V3",
"GuId":"zzz",
"Type":"Unit",
"Status":"Active"
}
],
"Name":"VAR 3",
"Id":"67-V3"
}
],
"ItemIds":[
],
"Items":[
],
"Name":"MAINP",
"Id":"67",
"Color":null
}
Here is my code, but it does not seem to work (the replacement part):
var jsonData = pm.response.json();
function replaceStatus() {
_.each(jsonData.Variations, (arrayItem) => {
if(arrayItem.Items.Status !== "NonActive") {
arrayItem.Items.Status == "NonActive";
console.log("arrayItem " + arrayItem);
}
});
}
pm.test("Run Function", replaceStatus ());
pm.sendRequest({
url: 'localhost:3000/post',
method: 'POST',
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
body: {
mode: 'raw',
raw: JSON.stringify(jsonData)
}
}, (err, res) => {
console.log(res)
})
I guess you are trying to replace all NonActive values with Active. In that case, you should use = for assignment not ==. The JSON file you provided is not valid and couldn't run your code on my machine. I am happy to have a closer look if that didn't work
Based on your updates these changes need to be made
1- in order to deal with JSON object you need to parse the response as it is string and you can't call sth like JsonData.Variations on that.make sure jsonData is a JSON object. if not add sth like this to parse it
var parsedJson = JSON.parse(jsonData)
2- It seems that you missed one array layer in your function to iterate over items. As you have two nested arrays to reach Status the replaceStatus function should be as below
function replaceStatus() {
_.each(parsedJson.Variations, (arrayItem) => {
_.each(arrayItem.Items, (item) => {
if(item.Status !== "NonActive") {
item.Status = "NonActive";
console.log("arrayItem " + item.Status);
}
});
});
}
Have you posted your entire code in the tests section or only a part of it?
I saw from one of your comments that you cannot see the output logged to the console.
This may be very trivial, but, if you did post your entire code, it looks like you may have forgotten to call your replaceStatus() function before your post call.
I have a model event which referenceMany user.
"relations": {
"attendees": {
"type": "referencesMany",
"model": "user",
"foreignKey": "attendeeIds",
"options": {
"validate": true,
"forceId": false,
"persistent": true
}
}
How can I query event which attendees property contain a given value? attendees is an array containing userId.
For example:
Event.find({
where: {
attendees: {
contains: givenUserId
}
}
}
)
This feature is called 'Filter on level 2 properties' as referenced here and is being implemented for Memory and MongoDB connectors. It still has some issues.
For SQL connectors, this isn't supported yet and - as mentioned also inside this open discussion link - it requires some time which cannot be afforded now.
Possible work around here with regexp that would apply to the underlying JSON string and executing SQL directly via datasource.connector.execute()
Simple implementaion could be:
AnyModel.getApp((err, app) => {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
next(err);
}
// Using MySQL
const MySQL = app.dataSources.MySQL;
MySQL.connector.execute(`select * from Table where column like '%${string}%'`,
[], {}, (err, data) => {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
next(err);
}
console.log(data);
next();
});
});
Generally, Ember HasMany relationship json format is follow,
{ "post" : { id:1, title:"this is title", comments:[1,2], writer: ...} }
But, i want to use next json format (because, my server return like this)
{ "post" : { id:1, title:"this is title",
comments:[
{id:1, bodytext:"blarblar...."},
{id:2, bodytext:"second blarblar...."},
], writer: ...} }
How can I use this?
Isn't there any problem in ember store relationship?
This is a job for EmbeddedRecordsMixin.
If you're implementing the server yourself and it's purpose-built for your ember application, you should consider switching to side-loading instead:
{ "post" : { id: 1,
title: "this is title",
comments: [1,2],
writer: ...
},
"comments": [ { id: 1,
bodytext: "blarblar...."
},
{ id: 2,
bodytext: "second blarblar...."
}
]
}
That way, it would be still just one request, but would work for more complicated structures (other than trees) as well.
My api basically returns something like this:
GET /api/projects/
{
"count": 26,
"next": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/projects/?page=2",
"previous": null,
"results": [
{
"id": 21,
"name": "Project A",
...
},
{
"id": 19,
"name": "Project B",
...
},
...
]
}
Using NgResource, I am able to query the api and get the data like this:
var PROJECT = $resource('/api/projects/:id/', {id:'#id'},{
query : {
method : 'GET',
isArray : false
}
});
factory.project_list = function(callback) {
PROJECT.query({},function(project_list){
factory.project_list = project_list.results;
callback();
});
};
My different projects are now available in factory.project_list. The issue here is that each item in factory.project_list are not ngResource items. So I can't call methods such as .$save(), .$update()...
I saw a transformResponse() function but I'm not able to get it working easily...
Do you have any idea what could be the best approach here ?
This is what worked for me:
app.config(['$resourceProvider', function($resourceProvider) {
$resourceProvider.defaults.stripTrailingSlashes = false;
}]);
services.factory('Project', ['$resource',
function($resource) {
return $resource('api/project/:id/', {}, {
query: {
method: 'GET',
url: 'api/projects/',
isArray: true,
transformResponse: function(data, headers) {
return angular.fromJson(data).results;
},
},
});
}
]);
My backend replies to find all requests:
User.find();
Like this
{ 'users' : [ user1_obj, user2_obj ] }
Ember-data is happy about it. Now if I do a simple single object find:
User.find('user1');
I have tried configuring the backend to return any of the following:
user1
{ 'user1' : user1_obj }
{ 'user' : { 'user1' : user1_obj } }
{ 'user' : user1_obj }
But none of those are working. What should I return from the backend in reply to find("obj-id") requests? According to the documentation about JSON ROOT, the right format looks like:
{ 'user' : user1_obj }
Ember does not complain about it, but the Ember Objects processed have a very strange structure, like this:
As you can see, _reference.record is referring to the top record. Also (not shown here) _data field is empty.
What could be causing that strange nesting?
EDIT
As linked by mavilein in his answer, the JSON API suggests using a different format for singular resources:
{ 'users' : [user1_obj] }
That means, the same format as for plural resources. Not sure if Ember will swallow that, I'll check now.
Following this specification, i would suspect the following:
{
'users' : [{
"id": "1",
"name" : "John Doe"
},{
"id": "2",
"name" : "Jane Doe"
}]
}
For singular resources the specification says:
Singular resources are represented as JSON objects. However, they are
still wrapped inside an array:
{
'users' : [{
"id": "1",
"name" : "John Doe"
}]
}
Using User.find() will expect the rootKey pluralized and in your content an array of elements, the response format is the following json:
{
users: [
{ id: 1, name: 'Kris' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Luke' },
{ id: 3, name: 'Formerly Alex' }
]
}
And with User.find(1) the rootKey in singular, and just one object:
{
user: {
id: 1, name: 'Kris'
}
}
Here a demo showing this working