I am trying to remove leading and trailing spaces in a function but it does not work:
function Trim(s)
echo ">>>".a:s."<<<"
let ss = substitute(a:s, '\v^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$', '\1', '')
echo ">>>".ss."<<<"
endfunction
The regex \s*([^\s]+)\s* works ok on https://regex101.com/
Replacing * with + does not make any difference.
Testing:
: call Trim(" testing ")
Output:
>>> testing <<<
>>> testing <<<
Also it seems to matter if I use double quotes versus single quotes in substitute function.
Where are the problems and how can they be solved? Thanks.
Your issue is caused by your collection.
You should use [^ ] instead of [^\s]:
function! Trim(s)
echo ">>>".a:s."<<<"
let ss = substitute(a:s, '\v^\s*([^ ]+)\s*$', '\1', '')
echo ">>>".ss."<<<"
endfunction
This is because collections work on individual characters and \s is not an individual character; it's seen as \ followed by s, which doesn't resolve to anything because s is not a special character that needs escaping.
If you want your collection to include both spaces and tabs, use this:
[^ \t]
[ \t]
where \t represents a tab.
As romainl explained, [^\s] means neither \ nor s. The contrary of \s (i.e. anything but a space or a tab) would be \S.
Otherwise, here is another solution: in lh-vim-lib I've defined the following
function! lh#string#trim(string) abort
return matchstr(a:string, '^\v\_s*\zs.{-}\ze\_s*$')
endfunction
Regarding the difference(s) between the various kinds of quote characters, see this Q/A on vi.SE: https://vi.stackexchange.com/questions/9706/what-is-the-difference-between-single-and-double-quoted-strings
You are including what needs to be retained in your search/replace. Much easier is to just look for what needs te be removed and substitute that
:%s/\v(^\s+|\s+$)//g
Breakdown
%s Start a global search/replace
\v Use Very Magic
(^\s+ search for leading spaces
| or
\s+$) search for trailing spaces
//g remove all search results from entire line
Related
I'm having trouble trimming off some characters at the end of a string. The string usually looks like:
C:\blah1\blah2
But sometimes it looks like:
C:\blah1\blah2.extra
I need to extract out the string 'blah2'. Most of the time, that's easy with a substring command. But on the rare occasions when the '.extra' portion is present, I need to first trim that part off.
The thing is, '.extra' always begins with a dot, but then is followed by various combinations of letters with various lengths. So wildcards will be necessary. Essentially, I need to script, "If the string contains a dot, trim off the dot and anything following it."
$string.replace(".*","") doesn't work. Nor does $string.replace(".\*",""). Nor does $string.replace(".[A-Z]","").
Also, I can't get at it from the beginning of the string either. 'blah1' is unknown and of various lengths. I have to get at 'blah2' from the end of the string.
Assuming that the string is always a path to a file with or without an extension (such as ".extra"), you can use Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension():
PS C:\> [System.IO.Path]::GetFileNameWithoutExtension("C:\blah1\blah2")
blah2
PS C:\> [System.IO.Path]::GetFileNameWithoutExtension("C:\blah1\blah2.extra")
blah2
The path doesn't even have to be rooted:
PS C:\> [System.IO.Path]::GetFileNameWithoutExtension("blah1\blah2.extra")
blah2
If you want to implement similar functionality on your own, that should be fairly simply as well - use String.LastIndexOf() to find the last \ in the string and use that as your starting argument for Substring():
function Extract-Name {
param($NameString)
# Extract part after the last occurrence of \
if($NameString -like '*\*') {
$NameString = $NameString.Substring($NameString.LastIndexOf('\') + 1)
}
# Remove anything after a potential .
if($NameString -like '*.*') {
$NameString.Remove($NameString.IndexOf("."))
}
$NameString
}
And you'll see similar results:
PS C:\> Extract-Name "C:\blah1\blah2.extra"
blah2
PS C:\> Extract-Name "C:\blah124323\blah2.extra"
blah2
PS C:\> Extract-Name "C:\blah124323\blah2"
blah2
PS C:\> Extract-Name "abc124323\blah2"
blah2
As the other posters have said, you can use special file name manipulators for this. If you'd like to do it with regular expressions, you can say
$string.replace("\..*","")
The \..* regex matches a dot (\.) and then any string of characters (.*).
Let me address each of the non-working regexes individually:
$string.replace(".*","")
The reason this doesn't work is that . and * are both special characters in regular expressions: . is a wildcard character that matches any character, and * means "match the previous character zero or more times." So .* means "any string of characters."
$string.replace(".\*","")
In this instance, you're escaping the * character, meaning that the regex treats it literally, so the regex matches any single character (.) followed by a star (\*).
$string.replace(".[A-Z]","")
In this case, the regex will match any character (.) followed by any single capital letter ([A-Z]).
If the strings are actual paths using Get-Item would be another option:
$path = 'C:\blah1\blah2.something'
(Get-Item $path).BaseName
The Replace() method can't be used here, because it doesn't support wildcards or regular expressions.
Could you help me to replace a char by a backslash in R? My trial:
gsub("D","\\","1D2")
Thanks in advance
You need to re-escape the backslash because it needs to be escaped once as part of a normal R string (hence '\\' instead of '\'), and in addition it’s handled differently by gsub in a replacement pattern, so it needs to be escaped again. The following works:
gsub('D', '\\\\', '1D2')
# "1\\2"
The reason the result looks different from the desired output is that R doesn’t actually print the result, it prints an interpretable R string (note the surrounding quotation marks!). But if you use cat or message it’s printed correctly:
cat(gsub('D', '\\\\', '1D2'), '\n')
# 1\2
When inputting backslashes from the keyboard, always escape them:
gsub("D","\\\\","1D2")
#[1] "1\\2"
or,
gsub("D","\\","1D2", fixed=TRUE)
#[1] "1\\2"
or,
library(stringr)
str_replace("1D2","D","\\\\")
#[1] "1\\2"
Note: If you want something like "1\2" as output, I'm afraid you can't do that in R (at least in my knowledge). You can use forward slashes in path names to avoid this.
For more information, refer to this issue raised in R help: How to replace double backslash with single backslash in R.
gsub("\\p{S}", "\\\\", text, perl=TRUE);
\p{S} ... Match a character from the Unicode category symbol.
I would like to match any character and any whitespace except comma with regex. Only matching any character except comma gives me:
[^,]*
but I also want to match any whitespace characters, tabs, space, newline, etc. anywhere in the string.
EDIT:
This is using sed in vim via :%s/foo/bar/gc.
I want to find starting from func up until the comma, in the following example:
func("bla bla bla"
"asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf"
"asdfasdfasdf", "more strings")
I
To work with multiline in SED using RegEx, you should look at here.
EDIT:
In SED command, working with NewLine is a bit different. SED command support three patterns to manage multiline operations N, P and D. To see how it works see this(Working with Multiple Lines) explaination. Here these three operations discussed.
My guess is that N operator is the area of consideration that is missing from here. Addition of N operator will allows to sense \n in string.
An example from here:
Occasionally one wishes to use a new line character in a sed script.
Well, this has some subtle issues here. If one wants to search for a
new line, one has to use "\n." Here is an example where you search for
a phrase, and delete the new line character after that phrase -
joining two lines together.
(echo a;echo x;echo y) | sed '/x$/ { N s:x\n:x: }'
which generates
a xy
However, if you are inserting a new line, don't use "\n" - instead
insert a literal new line character:
(echo a;echo x;echo y) | sed 's:x:X\ :'
generates
a X
y
So basically you're trying to match a pattern over multiple lines.
Here's one way to do it in sed (pretty sure these are not useable within vim though, and I don't know how to replicate this within vim)
sed '
/func/{
:loop
/,/! {N; b loop}
s/[^,]*/func("ok"/
}
' inputfile
Let's say inputfile contains these lines
func("bla bla bla"
"asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf"
"asdfasdfasdf", "more strings")
The output is
func("ok", "more strings")
Details:
If a line contains func, enter the braces.
:loop is a label named loop
If the line does not contain , (that's what /,/! means)
append the next line to pattern space (N)
branch to / go to loop label (b loop)
So it will keep on appending lines and looping until , is found, upon which the s command is run which matches all characters before the first comma against the (multi-line) pattern space, and performs a replacement.
How do I get the substring " It's big \"problem " using a regular expression?
s = ' function(){ return " It\'s big \"problem "; }';
/"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*"/
Works in The Regex Coach and PCRE Workbench.
Example of test in JavaScript:
var s = ' function(){ return " Is big \\"problem\\", \\no? "; }';
var m = s.match(/"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*"/);
if (m != null)
alert(m);
This one comes from nanorc.sample available in many linux distros. It is used for syntax highlighting of C style strings
\"(\\.|[^\"])*\"
As provided by ePharaoh, the answer is
/"([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"/
To have the above apply to either single quoted or double quoted strings, use
/"([^"\\]*(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"|\'([^\'\\]*(\\.[^\'\\]*)*)\'/
Most of the solutions provided here use alternative repetition paths i.e. (A|B)*.
You may encounter stack overflows on large inputs since some pattern compiler implements this using recursion.
Java for instance: http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6337993
Something like this:
"(?:[^"\\]*(?:\\.)?)*", or the one provided by Guy Bedford will reduce the amount of parsing steps avoiding most stack overflows.
/(["\']).*?(?<!\\)(\\\\)*\1/is
should work with any quoted string
"(?:\\"|.)*?"
Alternating the \" and the . passes over escaped quotes while the lazy quantifier *? ensures that you don't go past the end of the quoted string. Works with .NET Framework RE classes
/"(?:[^"\\]++|\\.)*+"/
Taken straight from man perlre on a Linux system with Perl 5.22.0 installed.
As an optimization, this regex uses the 'posessive' form of both + and * to prevent backtracking, for it is known beforehand that a string without a closing quote wouldn't match in any case.
This one works perfect on PCRE and does not fall with StackOverflow.
"(.*?[^\\])??((\\\\)+)?+"
Explanation:
Every quoted string starts with Char: " ;
It may contain any number of any characters: .*? {Lazy match}; ending with non escape character [^\\];
Statement (2) is Lazy(!) optional because string can be empty(""). So: (.*?[^\\])??
Finally, every quoted string ends with Char("), but it can be preceded with even number of escape sign pairs (\\\\)+; and it is Greedy(!) optional: ((\\\\)+)?+ {Greedy matching}, bacause string can be empty or without ending pairs!
An option that has not been touched on before is:
Reverse the string.
Perform the matching on the reversed string.
Re-reverse the matched strings.
This has the added bonus of being able to correctly match escaped open tags.
Lets say you had the following string; String \"this "should" NOT match\" and "this \"should\" match"
Here, \"this "should" NOT match\" should not be matched and "should" should be.
On top of that this \"should\" match should be matched and \"should\" should not.
First an example.
// The input string.
const myString = 'String \\"this "should" NOT match\\" and "this \\"should\\" match"';
// The RegExp.
const regExp = new RegExp(
// Match close
'([\'"])(?!(?:[\\\\]{2})*[\\\\](?![\\\\]))' +
'((?:' +
// Match escaped close quote
'(?:\\1(?=(?:[\\\\]{2})*[\\\\](?![\\\\])))|' +
// Match everything thats not the close quote
'(?:(?!\\1).)' +
'){0,})' +
// Match open
'(\\1)(?!(?:[\\\\]{2})*[\\\\](?![\\\\]))',
'g'
);
// Reverse the matched strings.
matches = myString
// Reverse the string.
.split('').reverse().join('')
// '"hctam "\dluohs"\ siht" dna "\hctam TON "dluohs" siht"\ gnirtS'
// Match the quoted
.match(regExp)
// ['"hctam "\dluohs"\ siht"', '"dluohs"']
// Reverse the matches
.map(x => x.split('').reverse().join(''))
// ['"this \"should\" match"', '"should"']
// Re order the matches
.reverse();
// ['"should"', '"this \"should\" match"']
Okay, now to explain the RegExp.
This is the regexp can be easily broken into three pieces. As follows:
# Part 1
(['"]) # Match a closing quotation mark " or '
(?! # As long as it's not followed by
(?:[\\]{2})* # A pair of escape characters
[\\] # and a single escape
(?![\\]) # As long as that's not followed by an escape
)
# Part 2
((?: # Match inside the quotes
(?: # Match option 1:
\1 # Match the closing quote
(?= # As long as it's followed by
(?:\\\\)* # A pair of escape characters
\\ #
(?![\\]) # As long as that's not followed by an escape
) # and a single escape
)| # OR
(?: # Match option 2:
(?!\1). # Any character that isn't the closing quote
)
)*) # Match the group 0 or more times
# Part 3
(\1) # Match an open quotation mark that is the same as the closing one
(?! # As long as it's not followed by
(?:[\\]{2})* # A pair of escape characters
[\\] # and a single escape
(?![\\]) # As long as that's not followed by an escape
)
This is probably a lot clearer in image form: generated using Jex's Regulex
Image on github (JavaScript Regular Expression Visualizer.)
Sorry, I don't have a high enough reputation to include images, so, it's just a link for now.
Here is a gist of an example function using this concept that's a little more advanced: https://gist.github.com/scagood/bd99371c072d49a4fee29d193252f5fc#file-matchquotes-js
here is one that work with both " and ' and you easily add others at the start.
("|')(?:\\\1|[^\1])*?\1
it uses the backreference (\1) match exactley what is in the first group (" or ').
http://www.regular-expressions.info/backref.html
One has to remember that regexps aren't a silver bullet for everything string-y. Some stuff are simpler to do with a cursor and linear, manual, seeking. A CFL would do the trick pretty trivially, but there aren't many CFL implementations (afaik).
A more extensive version of https://stackoverflow.com/a/10786066/1794894
/"([^"\\]{50,}(\\.[^"\\]*)*)"|\'[^\'\\]{50,}(\\.[^\'\\]*)*\'|“[^”\\]{50,}(\\.[^“\\]*)*”/
This version also contains
Minimum quote length of 50
Extra type of quotes (open “ and close ”)
If it is searched from the beginning, maybe this can work?
\"((\\\")|[^\\])*\"
I faced a similar problem trying to remove quoted strings that may interfere with parsing of some files.
I ended up with a two-step solution that beats any convoluted regex you can come up with:
line = line.replace("\\\"","\'"); // Replace escaped quotes with something easier to handle
line = line.replaceAll("\"([^\"]*)\"","\"x\""); // Simple is beautiful
Easier to read and probably more efficient.
If your IDE is IntelliJ Idea, you can forget all these headaches and store your regex into a String variable and as you copy-paste it inside the double-quote it will automatically change to a regex acceptable format.
example in Java:
String s = "\"en_usa\":[^\\,\\}]+";
now you can use this variable in your regexp or anywhere.
(?<="|')(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*(?="|')
" It\'s big \"problem "
match result:
It\'s big \"problem
("|')(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*("|')
" It\'s big \"problem "
match result:
" It\'s big \"problem "
Messed around at regexpal and ended up with this regex: (Don't ask me how it works, I barely understand even tho I wrote it lol)
"(([^"\\]?(\\\\)?)|(\\")+)+"
I need to clip out all the occurances of the pattern '--' that are inside single quotes in long string (leaving intact the ones that are outside single quotes).
Is there a RegEx way of doing this?
(using it with an iterator from the language is OK).
For example, starting with
"xxxx rt / $ 'dfdf--fggh-dfgdfg' ghgh- dddd -- 'dfdf' ghh-g '--ggh--' vcbcvb"
I should end up with:
"xxxx rt / $ 'dfdffggh-dfgdfg' ghgh- dddd -- 'dfdf' ghh-g 'ggh' vcbcvb"
So I am looking for a regex that could be run from the following languages as shown:
+-------------+------------------------------------------+
| Language | RegEx |
+-------------+------------------------------------------+
| JavaScript | input.replace(/someregex/g, "") |
| PHP | preg_replace('/someregex/', "", input) |
| Python | re.sub(r'someregex', "", input) |
| Ruby | input.gsub(/someregex/, "") |
+-------------+------------------------------------------+
I found another way to do this from an answer by Greg Hewgill at Qn138522
It is based on using this regex (adapted to contain the pattern I was looking for):
--(?=[^\']*'([^']|'[^']*')*$)
Greg explains:
"What this does is use the non-capturing match (?=...) to check that the character x is within a quoted string. It looks for some nonquote characters up to the next quote, then looks for a sequence of either single characters or quoted groups of characters, until the end of the string. This relies on your assumption that the quotes are always balanced. This is also not very efficient."
The usage examples would be :
JavaScript: input.replace(/--(?=[^']*'([^']|'[^']*')*$)/g, "")
PHP: preg_replace('/--(?=[^\']*'([^']|'[^']*')*$)/', "", input)
Python: re.sub(r'--(?=[^\']*'([^']|'[^']*')*$)', "", input)
Ruby: input.gsub(/--(?=[^\']*'([^']|'[^']*')*$)/, "")
I have tested this for Ruby and it provides the desired result.
This cannot be done with regular expressions, because you need to maintain state on whether you're inside single quotes or outside, and regex is inherently stateless. (Also, as far as I understand, single quotes can be escaped without terminating the "inside" region).
Your best bet is to iterate through the string character by character, keeping a boolean flag on whether or not you're inside a quoted region - and remove the --'s that way.
If bending the rules a little is allowed, this could work:
import re
p = re.compile(r"((?:^[^']*')?[^']*?(?:'[^']*'[^']*?)*?)(-{2,})")
txt = "xxxx rt / $ 'dfdf--fggh-dfgdfg' ghgh- dddd -- 'dfdf' ghh-g '--ggh--' vcbcvb"
print re.sub(p, r'\1-', txt)
Output:
xxxx rt / $ 'dfdf-fggh-dfgdfg' ghgh- dddd -- 'dfdf' ghh-g '-ggh-' vcbcvb
The regex:
( # Group 1
(?:^[^']*')? # Start of string, up till the first single quote
[^']*? # Inside the single quotes, as few characters as possible
(?:
'[^']*' # No double dashes inside theses single quotes, jump to the next.
[^']*?
)*? # as few as possible
)
(-{2,}) # The dashes themselves (Group 2)
If there where different delimiters for start and end, you could use something like this:
-{2,}(?=[^'`]*`)
Edit: I realized that if the string does not contain any quotes, it will match all double dashes in the string. One way of fixing it would be to change
(?:^[^']*')?
in the beginning to
(?:^[^']*'|(?!^))
Updated regex:
((?:^[^']*'|(?!^))[^']*?(?:'[^']*'[^']*?)*?)(-{2,})
Hm. There might be a way in Python if there are no quoted apostrophes, given that there is the (?(id/name)yes-pattern|no-pattern) construct in regular expressions, but it goes way over my head currently.
Does this help?
def remove_double_dashes_in_apostrophes(text):
return "'".join(
part.replace("--", "") if (ix&1) else part
for ix, part in enumerate(text.split("'")))
Seems to work for me. What it does, is split the input text to parts on apostrophes, and replace the "--" only when the part is odd-numbered (i.e. there has been an odd number of apostrophes before the part). Note about "odd numbered": part numbering starts from zero!
You can use the following sed script, I believe:
:again
s/'\(.*\)--\(.*\)'/'\1\2'/g
t again
Store that in a file (rmdashdash.sed) and do whatever exec magic in your scripting language allows you to do the following shell equivalent:
sed -f rmdotdot.sed < file containing your input data
What the script does is:
:again <-- just a label
s/'\(.*\)--\(.*\)'/'\1\2'/g
substitute, for the pattern ' followed by anything followed by -- followed by anything followed by ', just the two anythings within quotes.
t again <-- feed the resulting string back into sed again.
Note that this script will convert '----' into '', since it is a sequence of two --'s within quotes. However, '---' will be converted into '-'.
Ain't no school like old school.