Inserting string at end of linked list [closed] - c++

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am inserting a string at the end of a linked list. When I compile my file I get 2 errors:
error: ‘setData’ was not declared in this scope
setData(*string_p);
error: ‘getNext’ was not declared in this scope
newNode = getNext();
However they are defined before I use them (defined in above methods) so I do not understand the error.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using std::string;
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
#define SUCCESS 0
#define FAIL 1
// Represents an entry object in the linked-list
class ListEntry
{
public:
explicit ListEntry();
explicit ListEntry(const char *string_p);
~ListEntry();
string getData();
void setData(const char* string_p);
void setData(string string);
ListEntry *getNext();
ListEntry *getPrevious();
ListEntry *prev_p; // pointer to previous entry in the linked-list
ListEntry *next_p; // pointer to next entry in the linked-list
private:
string data; // entry's string
};
// Represents the linked-list object
class List
{
public:
List();
~List();
bool printForward();
bool printReverse();
bool insert(const char *string_p);
private:
int entryCount; // number of entries present in the linked-list
ListEntry *head_p; // pointer to the first entry in the list
ListEntry *tail_p; // pointer to the last entry in the list
};
// ListEntry constructor
ListEntry::ListEntry()
{
this->prev_p = NULL;
this->next_p = NULL;
return;
}
// ListEntry constructor
ListEntry::ListEntry(const char *string_p)
{
this->data = string_p;
this->prev_p = NULL;
this->next_p = NULL;
return;
}
// List entry destructor
ListEntry::~ListEntry()
{
return;
}
// Return the stored string object
string ListEntry::getData()
{
return this->data;
}
// Set the internal string data from a char*
void ListEntry::setData(const char* string_p)
{
this->data = string_p;
}
// Set the internal string data from a string
void ListEntry::setData(string string)
{
this->data = string;
}
// Returns reference to the next entry in the list
ListEntry *ListEntry::getNext()
{
return this->next_p;
}
// Returns reference to the previous entry in the list
ListEntry *ListEntry::getPrevious()
{
return this->prev_p;
}
And my Insert function (which is below the above methods in my program):
bool List::insert(const char *string_p)
{
// Please write the list insert function
//new node to be inserted
ListEntry* newNode = new ListEntry();
//List *newList = new List();
if(newNode == NULL)
{
cout << "FAILED";
}
else
{
setData(*string_p); //////ERROR HERE
if(this->head_p = NULL)
{
newNode = getNext(); //////ERROR HERE
newNode = this->head_p;
this->head_p = newNode; // newNode now points to the head node
this->entryCount++;
return SUCCESS;
}
else
{
ListEntry* temp = this->head_p;
while(temp -> next_p != NULL)
{
temp = temp -> next_p;
}
temp -> next_p = newNode;
this->entryCount++;
return SUCCESS;
}
}
}

You have defined the functions but you are not using them the way you have defined:
setData(*string_p); // Takes a const char*, but you have provided a char.
// *string_p dereferences the string pointer, giving the
// first char.
newNode = getNext(); // getNext is a ListEntry function, but you are trying
// to use it in the context of List. This is also true of the
// above function.

Your insert() method is implemented all wrong. It should look more like this instead:
int List::insert(const char *string_p)
{
//new node to be inserted
ListEntry* newNode = new ListEntry(string_p);
if (newNode == NULL)
{
cout << "FAILED";
return FAIL;
}
if (this->head_p == NULL) {
this->head_p = newNode;
}
if (this->tail_p != NULL)
{
this->tail_p->next_p = newNode;
newNode->prev_p = this->tail_p;
}
this->tail_p = newNode;
this->entryCount++;
return SUCCESS;
}

The functions setData and getNext are non-static member functions of the class ListEntry. So they have to be called using a member access expression.
Moreover the supplied argument of this call
setData(*string_p);
has different type than the the function expects.
You have to write at least like
newNode->setFata( string_p );
and
newNode->getNext();
though this code snippet even if the call of the function will be correct from the syntax point of view does not make sense
if(this->head_p = NULL)
{
newNode = newNode->getNext();
newNode = this->head_p;
because there is at least a memory leak.
Also this if statement
if(newNode == NULL)
will make sense if you use the following call of the new operator
ListEntry* newNode = new ( std::nothrow ) ListEntry();
The function can look the following way
bool List::insert( const char *string_p )
{
//new node to be inserted
ListEntry *newNode = new ( std::nothrow ) ListEntry( string_p );
bool success = newNode != nullptr;
if ( success )
{
if ( tail_p )
{
tail_p->next_p = newNode;
newNode->prev_p = tail_p;
}
else
{
head_p = newNode;
}
tail_p = newNode;
entryCount++;
}
return success;
}

Related

Link List null ptr error

This is in the main function. Using visual studio 2017.
list a;
a.insertAtEnd("i", 1);
a.insertAtEnd("love", 1);
Here in the main when second insert at end is called. The program crashes and says the getnext() is NULL. Even though at the creation of every new node the next pointer is declared NULL.
class node {
public:
node(string value) {
next = NULL;
data = value;
}
void setNext(node *temp) {
next = temp;
}
void setdata(string value) {
data = value;
}
node* getNext() {
return next;
}
Debugger shows this function to be at fault^
string getData() {
return data;
}
void createDetail() {
detail *tmp = new detail();
d = tmp;
}
void setDetail(int lin) {
d->insertAtEnd(lin);
}
void getDetails() {
d->print();
}
private:
node *next;
string data;
detail *d;
};
class list {
public:
list() {
head = NULL;
}
void insertAtEnd(string, int);
void insertAfter(string, string);
void display();
private:
node *head;
};
void list::insertAtEnd(string value, int lin) { //main func being used
if (head == NULL) {
node *temp = new node(value);
temp->createDetail();
temp->setDetail(lin);
head = temp;
}
else {
node *temp2 = head;
while (temp2->getNext() != NULL || temp2->getData()!=value)
{
temp2 = temp2->getNext();
}
if (temp2->getData() == value)
{
temp2->setDetail(lin); //if same line then increment frequency, dont create new detail as word exists
}
else
{
node *temp = new node(value);
temp->createDetail();
temp->setDetail(lin);
temp2->setNext(temp);
}
}
}
In
while (temp2->getNext() != NULL || temp2->getData() != value)
{
temp2 = temp2->getNext();
}
temp2->getNext() != NULL will be be NULL for the last item in the list, and the data in the last item in the list may not match value. In this case,
while (NULL != NULL || "I" != "love") // false or true = true. Enter loop
{
temp2 = NULL;
}
Next iteration fails because
while (NULL->getNext() != NULL || temp2->getData() != value)
{
temp2 = temp2->getNext();
}
Ka-blam.
My solution changes a lot of code. You might not like it. Also note I've removed everything that will not compile because it was left out of the question.
class node
{
friend class list; // list has access to node's private members
public:
node(string value)
{
next = NULL;
data = value;
}
// removed setNext. Only list should ever be allowed to set the next member
void setdata(string value) {
data = value;
}
// same deal for get. Some shmuck could delete link->getNext();, so why let them?
string getData()
{
return data;
}
private:
node *next;
string data;
};
This is a much safer list node. All a user can interact with is the data. The rest is safely locked up and only exposed to list.
class list
{
public:
list()
{
head = NULL;
}
void insertAtEnd(string);
private:
node *head;
};
Unchanged, other than the stuff removed because it supported code not included in the question.
void list::insertAtEnd(string value)
{ //main func being used
node **cur = &head; // double pointer abstracts away need to test for head.
// Now all nodes are equal and we're always pointed at a next.
while (*cur != NULL && (*cur)->getData() != value) // note && not ||
//we loop until out of nodes unless we find a match
{
cur = &(*cur)->next; // get pointer to next next
}
if (*cur != NULL) // pointing at a node. Must have exited because of match
{
// did stuff I ommtted because no MCVE
}
else // not pointing at node. Need a new node.
{
*cur = new node(value);
}
}
Bloodbath. Rather than drop a big ball of explanation here, I commented inline what I was doing and why.

Counting occurrence in singly linked list by nodes

I am writing a simple app that gets a list and saves the objects as nodes in a singly linked list and we can add(), remove(), copy(), etc. each node depending on the given data set. each node has a char value which is our data and an int count which counts the occurrence of the related char.
e.g. for a list like
a, a, b, b, c, a
there would be three nodes (since there are three different characters) which are:
[a,3,*next] -> [b,2,*next] -> [c,1,*next] -> nullptr
bool isAvailable() checks if the data is already in the list or not.
Q: When inserting a data there are two options:
The data has not been entered: so we have to create a newNodewith the given data, count=1and *next=NULL.
The data is already entered: so we have to count++ the node that has the same data.
I know if the given data is available or not, but how can I point to the node with same data?
Here's the code:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class Snode
{
public:
char data;
int count;
Snode *next;
Snode(char d, int c)
{
data = d;
count = c;
next = NULL;
}
};
class set
{
private:
Snode *head;
public:
set()
{
head = NULL;
tail = NULL;
}
~set();
void insert(char value);
bool isAvailable(char value);
};
set::~set()
{
Snode *t = head;
while (t != NULL)
{
head = head->next;
delete t;
}
}
bool set::isAvailable(char value)
{
Snode *floatingNode = new Snode(char d, int c);
while(floatingNode != NULL)
{
return (value == floatingNode);
floatingNode->next = floatingNode;
}
}
void set::insert(char value)
{
Snode *newNode = new Snode(char d, int c);
data = value;
if (head == NULL)
{
newNode->next = NULL;
head = newNode;
newNode->count++;
}
else
{
if(isAvailable)
{
//IDK what should i do here +_+
}
else
{
tail->next= newNode;
newNode->next = NULL;
tail = newNode;
}
}
}
I know if the given data is available or not, but how can I point to the node with same data?
You'll need to start at the head of the list and iterate along the list by following the next pointers until you find the node with the same data value. Once you've done that, you have your pointer to the node with the same data.
Some other notes for you:
bool set::isAvailable(char value)
{
Snode *floatingNode = new Snode(char d, int c);
while(floatingNode != NULL)
{
return (value == floatingNode);
floatingNode->next = floatingNode;
}
}
Why is this function allocating a new Snode? There's no reason for it to do that, just initialize the floatingNode pointer to point to head instead.
This function always returns after looking at only the first node in the linked list -- which is not the behavior you want. Instead, it should return true only if (value == floatingNode); otherwise it should stay inside the while-loop so that it can go on to look at the subsequent nodes as well. Only after it drops out of the while-loop (because floatingNode finally becomes NULL) should it return false.
If you were to modify isAvailable() slightly so that instead of returning true or false, it returned either floatingPointer or NULL, you'd have your mechanism for finding a pointer to the node with the matching data.
e.g.:
// Should return either a pointer to the Snode with data==value,
// or NULL if no such Snode is present in the list
Snode * set::getNodeWithValueOrNullIfNotFound(char value) const
{
[...]
}
void set::insert(char value)
{
Snode * theNode = getNodeWithValueOrNullIfNotFound(value);
if (theNode != NULL)
{
theNode->count++;
}
else
{
[create a new Snode and insert it]
}
}
You had a lot of problems in your code, lets see what are they:
First of all, Snode doesn't need to be a class, rather you can go with a simple strcut; since we need everything public.(not a mistake, but good practice)
You could simple initialize count = 1 and next = nullptr, so that no need of initializing them throw constructor. The only element that need to be initialized through constructor is Snod's data.
Since c++11 you can use keyword nullptr instead of NULL, which denotes the pointer literal.
Member function bool set::isAvailable(char value) will not work as you think. Here you have unnecessarily created a new Snode and cheacking whether it points to nullptr which doesn't allow you to even enter the loop. BTW what you have written in the loop also wrong. What do you mean by return (value == floatingNode); ? floatingNode is a Snode by type; not a char.
Hear is the correct implementation. Since we don't wanna overwrite the head, will create a Node* pointer and assign head to it. Then iterate through list until you find a match. If not found, we will reach the end of the isAvailable() and return false.
inline bool isAvailable(const char& value)
{
Node *findPos = head;
while(findPos != nullptr)
{
if(findPos -> data == value) return true;
else findPos = findPos->next_node;
}
return false;
}
In void set::insert(char value), your logic is correct, but implementation is wrong. Following is the correct implementation.(Hope the comments will help you to understand.
void insert(const char& value)
{
if(head == nullptr) // first case
{
Node *newNode = new Node(value);
newNode->next_node = head;
head = newNode;
}
else if(isAvailable(value)) // if node available
{
Node *temp = head;
while(temp->data != value) // find the node
temp = temp->next_node;
temp->count += 1; // and count it by 1
}
else // all new nodes
{
Node *temp = head;
while(temp->next_node != nullptr) // to find the null point (end of list)
temp = temp->next_node;
temp = temp->next_node = new Node(value); // create a node and assign there
}
}
Your destructor will not delete all what you created. It will be UB, since your are deleting newly created Snode t ( i.e, Snode *t = head;). The correct implementation is as bellow.(un-comment the debugging msg to understand.)
~set()
{
Node* temp = head;
while( temp != nullptr )
{
Node* next = temp->next_node;
//std::cout << "deleting \t" << temp->data << std::endl;
delete temp;
temp = next;
}
head = nullptr;
}
Last but not least, the naming (set) what you have here and what the code exactly doing are both different. This looks more like a simple linked list with no duplicates. This is however okay, in order to play around with pointers and list.
To make the code or iteration more efficient, you could do something like follows. In the isAvailable(), in case of value match/ if you found a node, you could simply increment its count as well. Then in insert(), you can think of, if node is not available part.
Hope this was helpful. See a DEMO
#include <iostream>
// since you wanna have all of Node in public, declare as struct
struct Node
{
char data;
int count = 1;
Node* next_node = nullptr;
Node(const char& a) // create a constrcor which will initilize data
: data(a) {} // at the time of Node creation
};
class set
{
private:
Node *head; // need only head, if it's a simple list
public:
set() :head(nullptr) {} // constructor set it to nullptr
~set()
{
Node* temp = head;
while( temp != nullptr )
{
Node* next = temp->next_node;
//std::cout << "deleting \t" << temp->data << std::endl;
delete temp;
temp = next;
}
head = nullptr;
}
inline bool isAvailable(const char& value)
{
Node *findPos = head;
while(findPos != nullptr)
{
if(findPos -> data == value) return true;
else findPos = findPos->next_node;
}
return false;
}
void insert(const char& value)
{
if(head == nullptr) // first case
{
Node *newNode = new Node(value);
newNode->next_node = head;
head = newNode;
}
else if(isAvailable(value)) // if node available
{
Node *temp = head;
while(temp->data != value) // find the node
temp = temp->next_node;
temp->count += 1; // and count it by 1
}
else // all new nodes
{
Node *temp = head;
while(temp->next_node != nullptr) // to find the null point (end of list)
temp = temp->next_node;
temp = temp->next_node = new Node(value);
}
}
void print() const // just to print
{
Node *temp = head;
while(temp != nullptr)
{
std::cout << temp->data << " " << temp->count << "\n";
temp = temp->next_node;
}
}
};
int main()
{
::set mySet;
mySet.insert('a');
mySet.insert('a');
mySet.insert('b');
mySet.insert('b');
mySet.insert('c');
mySet.insert('a');
mySet.print();
return 0;
}

"lvalue required as left operand of assignment" error writing a linked list

I am currently learning some C++ for a course I am taking in school. I have basic understanding of lvalues and rvalues, but I am unable to determine why I am receiving a compiler error.
I am creating a singly linked list and need to be able to reverse it. As per my assignment I have two classes. The first is the node and just holds an int as well as a pointer.
class Node {
int data;
Node *next;
public:
//Constructor
Node(int d) {
data = d;
next = NULL;}
//Set to next Node
void SetNext(Node *nextOne) {
next = nextOne;}
//Returns data value
int Data(){return data;}
//Returns next Node
Node *Next() {return next;}
};
Then I have a linked list class that has a header pointer and then a number of functions for adding, printing etc. the list.
class LinkedList {
Node *head;
public:
//Constructor
LinkedList(){head = NULL;}
void AddNode(int d) {
//Create a new Node
Node *newNode = new Node(d);
//Create a temporary pointer
Node *temp = head;
//If there are already nodes in the list
if(temp != NULL) {
//Parse through to the end of the list
while(temp->Next() != NULL) {
temp = temp->Next();}
//Point the last Node in the list to the new Node
temp->SetNext(newNode);
}
//If adding as the first Node
else{
head = newNode;}
}
void PrintList() {
//Temporary pointer
Node *temp = head;
//If there are no nodes in the list
if(temp == NULL) {
std::cout << "The list is empty" << std::endl;}
//If there is only one node in the list
if(temp->Next() == NULL) {
std::cout << temp->Data() << std::endl;}
//Parse through the list and print
else {
do {
std::cout << temp->Data();
temp = temp->Next();
}
while(temp != NULL);
}
}
//Returns the number of nodes in the list
int CountList() {
//Temporary pointer
Node *temp = head;
//Counter variable
int counter = 0;
//If the list is empty
if(temp == NULL) {
return counter;}
//Parse through Nodes counting them
else {
do {counter++;
temp = temp->Next();
}
while(temp != NULL);
}
return counter;
}
//Reverses the list
Node *ReverseList() {
//Initially set to NULL then tracks the new head
Node *marker = NULL;
//Tracks the next one in the list
Node *nextOne;
//Sets the first Node to NULL and then sets the last Node to point to
//the first one and rotates through the list pointing the last to the
//first
while(head != NULL) {
nextOne = head->Next();
head->Next() = marker;
marker = head;
head = nextOne;
}
//Setting the head back to the start again
head = marker;
}
};
One of those functions is supposed to reverse the list. The line "head->Next() = marker;" in the ReverseList function is causing a "lvalue required as left operand of assignment" error when compiling.
Any insight as to why this is occurring and how I can correct the problem?
Thank you in advance!
The return from the call to Next() is an rvalue. As you are in a class function, you don't need to call the Next function to get at the private next pointer, you can just use it directly.
head->next = marker;
Your Next() function returns a pointer, and you then do this:
head->Next() = marker;
You're changing the pointer to marker and not what it's pointing at. To solve this you need to dereference that pointer:
*head->Next() = marker;
your signature for next is:
Node *Next() {return next;}
This makes a copy of next pointer at return and hence it is treated as r-value and not l-value.
One way of overcoming this would be to use a pointer-to-pointer:.
Node **Next() {return &next;}
And then use it as:
int main()
{
Node* marker=new Node(89);
Node* nod=new Node(9);
*(nod->Next())= marker;
cout<<(nod->next)->data<<endl;
cout << "Hello World" << endl;
return 0;
}
This makes it more complicated to use.

unsorted linked list implementation check full

I am working on unsorted linked list check full currently, below is my specification and implementation.
Specification:
#ifndef UNSORTEDLIST_H
#define UNSORTEDLIST_H
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
struct Node {
float element;
Node* next;
};
class UnsortedList
{
public:
UnsortedList();
bool IsEmpty();
bool IsFull();
void ResetList();
void MakeEmpty();
int LengthIs();
bool IsInTheList(float item);
void InsertItem(float item);
void DeleteItem(float item);
float GetNextItem();
private:
Node* data;
Node* currentPos;
int length;
};
#endif
And implemetation:
UnsortedList::UnsortedList()
{
length = 0;
data = NULL;
currentPos = NULL;
}
bool UnsortedList:: IsEmpty(){
if(length == 0)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
bool UnsortedList::IsFull(){
Node* ptr = new Node();
if(ptr == NULL)
return true;
else
{
delete ptr;
return false;
}
}
void UnsortedList::ResetList(){
currentPos = NULL;
}
void UnsortedList::MakeEmpty()
{
Node* tempPtr = new Node();
while(data != NULL)
{
tempPtr = data;
data = data->next;
delete tempPtr;
}
length = 0;
}
int UnsortedList::LengthIs(){
return length;
}
bool UnsortedList:: IsInTheList(float item){
Node* location = new Node();
location = data;
bool found = false;
while(location != NULL && !found)
{
if(item == location->element)
found = true;
else
location = location->next;
}
return found;
}
void UnsortedList:: InsertItem(float item){
Node* location = new Node();
location->element = item;
location->next=data;
data = location;
length++;
}
void UnsortedList:: DeleteItem(float item){
Node* location = data;
Node* tempPtr;
if(item == data->element){
tempPtr = location;
data = data->next;
}
else{
while(!(item == (location->next) ->element) )
location = location->next;
tempPtr = location->next;
location->next = (location->next)->next;
}
delete tempPtr;
length--;
}
float UnsortedList::GetNextItem(){
if(currentPos == NULL)
currentPos = data;
else
currentPos = currentPos->next;
return currentPos->element;
}
1.In the constructor, why don't assign currentPos as null?
2.In the IsInTheList function, Why points to pointer "next" ? Isn't next is a null pointer since it has been declared in struct as Node* next?
The pointer value is not set to NULL value by default, you should set to to null explicitly. Also instead of using NULL, choose using nullptr.
This code is rather incomplete, so it is difficult to answer your questions.
This does not contain the code to insert an item in the list, which is where I would expect both the next and currentPos pointers to be set. However, that's based on a number of assumptions.
However, I don't see where next is used in the "check full function" at all, so that question is a bit confusing.
I'll also point out that this code has a glaring memory leak. The first line in IsInTheList allocates memory for a new Node, which is immediately lost with location = data.
Pointers (like any other basic type) need to be initialized before use. A value of NULL is still a value.
The code you provided seems to be very incomplete. Is data supposed to be the head of your list? I am not sure how you define "fullness". If you want to test if the list is empty, you can see if your "head" of the list is null:
bool UnsortedList::IsEmpty() {
if (data == NULL) {return true;} // if there is no first element, empty
else {return false;} // if there is ANY element, not empty
}
Or more compactly:
bool UnsortedList::Empty() {
return (data == NULL);
}
When a node is added to a linked list, we usually add the node as a whole and modify the element that came before it. For example, we might create a new node and add it using code like the following:
// implementation file
void UnsortedList::InsertItem(const float& item) {
if (data == NULL) { // no elements in list, so new node becomes the head
data = new Node; // allocate memory for new node
data->element = item; // fill with requested data
data->next = NULL; // there is no element after the tail
}
else {
new_node = new Node; // allocate memory
new_node->element = item // set data
new_node->next = NULL; // new end of the list, so it points to nothing
tail->next = new_node; // have the OLD end node point to the NEW end
tail = new_node; // have the tail member variable move up
}
}
// driver file
int main() {
UnsortedList my_list;
float pie = 3.14159;
my_list.AddNode(pie);
return 0;
}
Please note that I made use of a Node* member variable called tail. It is a good idea to keep track of both where the list begins and ends.
In your IsFull function, it will always return false since it can always create a new Node*. Except perhaps if you run out of memory, which is probably more problematic.
Your functions are rather confusing and your pointer work leaves many memory leaks. You might want to review the STL list object design here.

C++ Linked List assignment: trouble with insertion and deletion

I am working on a linked list implementation in C++. I am making progress but am having trouble getting the insertion functionality and deletion functionality to work correctly. Below is list object in the C++ header file:
#ifndef linkList_H
#define linkList_h
//
// Create an object to represent a Node in the linked list object
// (For now, the objects to be put in the list will be integers)
//
struct Node
{
Node() : sentinel(0) {}
int number;
Node* next;
Node* prev;
Node* sentinel;
};
//
// Create an object to keep track of all parts in the list
//
class List
{
public:
//
// Contstructor intializes all member data
//
List() : m_listSize(0), m_listHead(0) {}
//
// methods to return size of list and list head
//
Node* getListHead() const { return m_listHead; }
unsigned getListSize() const { return m_listSize; }
//
// method for adding and inserting a new node to the linked list,
// retrieving and deleting a specified node in the list
//
void addNode(int num);
void insertNode(Node* current);
void deleteNode(Node* current);
Node* retrieveNode(unsigned position);
private:
//
// member data consists of an unsigned integer representing
// the list size and a pointer to a Node object representing head
//
Node* m_listHead;
unsigned m_listSize;
};
#endif
And here is the implementation (.cpp) file:
#include "linkList.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
//
// Adds a new node to the linked list
//
void List::addNode(int num)
{
Node *newNode = new Node;
newNode->number = num;
newNode->next = m_listHead;
m_listHead = newNode;
++m_listSize;
}
//
// NOTWORKING: Inserts a node which has already been set to front
// of the list
//
void List::insertNode(Node* current)
{
// check to see if current node already at
// head of list
if(current == m_listHead)
return;
current->next = m_listHead;
if(m_listHead != 0)
m_listHead->prev = current;
m_listHead = current;
current->prev = 0;
}
//
// NOTWORKING: Deletes a node from a specified position in linked list
//
void List::deleteNode(Node* current)
{
current->prev->next = current->next;
current->next->prev = current->prev;
}
//
// Retrieves a specified node from the list
//
Node* List::retrieveNode(unsigned position)
{
if(position > (m_listSize-1) || position < 0)
{
cout << "Can't access node; out of list bounds";
cout << endl;
cout << endl;
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Node* current = m_listHead;
unsigned pos = 0;
while(current != 0 && pos != position)
{
current = current->next;
++pos;
}
return current;
}
After running a brief test program in the client C++ code, here is the resulting output:
Number of nodes: 10
Elements in each node:
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Insertion of node 5 at the list head:
4 9 8 7 6 5 4 9 8 7
Deletion of node 5 from the linked list
As you can see, the insertion is not simply moving node 5 to head of list, but is overwriting other nodes beginning at the third position. The pseudo code I tried to implement came from the MIT algorithms book:
LIST-INSERT(L, x)
next[x] <- head[L]
if head[L] != NIL
then prev[head[L]] <- x
head[L] <- x
prev[x] <- NIL
Also the deletion implementation is just crashing when the method is called. Not sure why; but here is the corresponding pseudo-code:
LIST-DELET'
next[prev[x]] <- next[x]
prev[next[x]] <- prev[x]
To be honest, I am not sure how the previous, next and sentinel pointers are actually working in memory. I know what they should be doing in a practical sense, but looking at the debugger it appears these pointers are not pointing to anything in the case of deletion:
(*current).prev 0xcdcdcdcd {number=??? next=??? prev=??? ...} Node *
number CXX0030: Error: expression cannot be evaluated
next CXX0030: Error: expression cannot be evaluated
prev CXX0030: Error: expression cannot be evaluated
sentinel CXX0030: Error: expression cannot be evaluated
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
You have got an error in addNode(). Until you fix that, you can't expect insertNode to work.
Also, I think your design is quite silly. For example a method named "insertNode" should insert a new item at arbitrary position, but your method insertNode does a pretty different thing, so you should rename it. Also addNode should be renamed. Also as glowcoder wrote, why are there so many sentinels? I am affraid your class design is bad as a whole.
The actual error is that you forgot to set prev attribute of the old head. It should point to the new head.
void List::addNode(int num)
{
Node *newNode = new Node;
newNode->number = num;
newNode->next = m_listHead;
if(m_listHead) m_listHead->prev = newNode;
m_listHead = newNode;
++m_listSize;
}
Similarly, you have got another error in deleteNode(). It doesn't work when deleting last item from list.
void List::deleteNode(Node* current)
{
m_listSize--;
if(current == m_listHead) m_listHead = current->next;
if(current->prev) current->prev->next = current->next;
if(current->next) current->next->prev = current->prev;
}
Now you can fix your so-called insertNode:
void List::insertNode(Node* current)
{
int value = current->number;
deleteNode(current);
addNode(value);
}
Please note that I wrote everything here without compiling and testing in C++ compiler. Maybe there are some bugs, but still I hope it helps you at least a little bit.
In deleteNode, you are not handling the cases where current->next and/or current->prev is null. Also, you are not updating the list head if current happens to be the head.
You should do something like this:
node* next=current->next;
node* prev=current->prev;
if (next!=null) next->prev=prev;
if (prev!=null) prev->next=next;
if (m_listhead==current) m_list_head=next;
(Warning: I have not actually tested the code above - but I think it illustrates my idea well enough)
I am not sure what exactly your InsertNode method does, so I can't offer any help there.
OK.
As #Al Kepp points out, your "add node" is buggy. Look at Al's code and fix that.
The "insert" that you are doing does not appear to be a normal list insert. Rather it seems to be a "move to the front" operation.
Notwithstanding that, you need to delete the node from its current place in the list before you add it to the beginning of the list.
Update
I think you have misunderstood how insert should work. It should insert a new node, not one that is already in the list.
See below for a bare-bones example.
#include <iostream>
// List Node Object
//
struct Node
{
Node(int n=0);
int nData;
Node* pPrev;
Node* pNext;
};
Node::Node(int n)
: nData(n)
, pPrev(NULL)
, pNext(NULL)
{
}
//
// List object
//
class CList
{
public:
//
// Contstructor
//
CList();
//
// methods to inspect list
//
Node* Head() const;
unsigned Size() const;
Node* Get(unsigned nPos) const;
void Print(std::ostream &os=std::cout) const;
//
// methods to modify list
//
void Insert(int nData);
void Insert(Node *pNew);
void Delete(unsigned nPos);
void Delete(Node *pDel);
private:
//
// Internal data
//
Node* m_pHead;
unsigned m_nSize;
};
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
CList::CList()
: m_pHead(NULL)
, m_nSize(0)
{
}
Node *CList::Head() const
{
return m_pHead;
}
unsigned CList::Size() const
{
return m_nSize;
}
void CList::Insert(int nData)
{
Insert(new Node(nData));
}
void CList::Insert(Node *pNew)
{
pNew->pNext = m_pHead;
if (m_pHead)
m_pHead->pPrev = pNew;
pNew->pPrev = NULL;
m_pHead = pNew;
++m_nSize;
}
void CList::Delete(unsigned nPos)
{
Delete(Get(nPos));
}
void CList::Delete(Node *pDel)
{
if (pDel == m_pHead)
{
// delete first
m_pHead = pDel->pNext;
if (m_pHead)
m_pHead->pPrev = NULL;
}
else
{
// delete subsequent
pDel->pPrev->pNext = pDel->pNext;
if (pDel->pNext)
pDel->pNext->pPrev = pDel->pPrev;
}
delete pDel;
--m_nSize;
}
Node* CList::Get(unsigned nPos) const
{
unsigned nCount(0);
for (Node *p=m_pHead; p; p = p->pNext)
if (nCount++ == nPos)
return p;
throw std::out_of_range("No such node");
}
void CList::Print(std::ostream &os) const
{
const char szArrow[] = " --> ";
os << szArrow;
for (Node *p=m_pHead; p; p = p->pNext)
os << p->nData << szArrow;
os << "NIL\n";
}
int main()
{
CList l;
l.Print();
for (int i=0; i<10; i++)
l.Insert((i+1)*10);
l.Print();
l.Delete(3);
l.Delete(7);
l.Print();
try
{
l.Delete(33);
}
catch(std::exception &e)
{
std::cerr << "Failed to delete 33: " << e.what() << '\n';
}
l.Print();
return 0;
}