I am currently installing the HDF5 library, more precisely the hdf5-1.10.0-patch1, on Cygwin, as I want to use it with Fortran. Following the instructions from the hdfgroup website
(here is the link), I did the following:
./configure --enable-fortran
make > "out1_check.txt" 2> "warn1_check.txt" &
make check > "out2_check.txt" 2> "warn2_check.txt" &
The execution of the last command (make check) proceeds as it should, until it gets stuck. The process does not stop and something is happening (8-12% CPU are in use by sh.exe, already 39 hours of CPU time) but "out2_check.txt" looks like
Making check in src
...
[many successful checks]
...
============================
No need to test testlinks_env.sh again.
============================
============================
Testing testswmr.sh
Unfortunately, I do not have the output file from the first run of make check, but it did not contain more information on Testing testswmr.sh. There was never any error message.
So, what is this testswmr.sh, why does it get stuck and how can I finalize the installation process? Maybe I can skip the remaining checks and just proceed to make install?
Important note: an older version of HDF5 is already installed from the Cygwin repo. It does not seem to support Fortran however, so I decided to install the current version myself.
Available (and used) compilers are gcc and gfortran.
As far as I can tell, only Intel Fortran is supported on Windows. There is no Cygwin download here https://support.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/release/obtain518.html and I have never come across a report of experience for Cygwin/Fortran/HDF5.
Your options:
Use Intel Fortran
Use Linux or Mac
Sorry
Related
I am trying to use ocamldebug with my project, to understand why a 3rd party lib I'm using is not behaving the way I expected.
https://ocaml.org/manual/debugger.html
The OCaml debugger is invoked by running the program ocamldebug with the name of the bytecode executable file as first argument
I have added (modes byte exe) to my dune file.
When I run dune build I can see the bytecode file output, alongside the exe, as _build/default/bin/cli.bc
When I pass this to ocamldebug I get the following error:
ocamldebug _build/default/bin/cli.bc
OCaml Debugger version 4.12.0
(ocd) r
Loading program... done.
Fatal error: debugger does not support channel locks
Lost connection with process 33035 (active process)
between time 170000 and time 180000
Restart from time 170000 and try to get closer of the problem ? (y or n)
If I choose y the console seems to hang indefinitely.
I found the source of the error here:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/f68acd1a618ac54790a8347fad466084f15a9a9e/runtime/debugger.c#L144
/* The code in this file does not bracket channel I/O operations with
Lock and Unlock, so fail if those are not no-ops. */
if (caml_channel_mutex_lock != NULL ||
caml_channel_mutex_unlock != NULL ||
caml_channel_mutex_unlock_exn != NULL)
caml_fatal_error("debugger does not support channel locks");
...but I don't know what might be triggering it.
My project is using cmdliner and lwt ...I think at this early point of execution it hasn't hit any lwt code though.
Is ocamldebug incompatible with cmdliner?
If that's the case then I will need to make a new entrypoint just for debugging I guess. (currently the bin/cli is the only executable artefact in my project, the code I need to debug is all under lib/s)
It looks like that the OCaml debugger is broken for your version of macOS. Please, report the issue to the OCaml issue tracker including the detailed information on your system. I can't reproduce it on my machine, but I am using a pretty old version of macOS (10.11.6) and I have the 4.12 debugger working flawlessly.
As a workaround, try using an older version of OCaml, as this channel lock test was introduced very recently you can install any version prior to 4.12,
opam switch create 4.11.0
eval $(opam env)
Then, do not forget to rebuild your project (previously installing the required dependencies),
opam install lwt cmdliner
dune build
and then you can use the debugger to your taste.
I have an OCaml program that worked fine on Ubuntu 16 but when recompiled and run on Ubuntu 20 I get the following error:-
$ ocamldebug ./linearizer
OCaml Debugger version 4.08.1
(ocd) r
Loading program... done.
Time: 89534
Program end.
Uncaught exception: Sys_error "Illegal seek"
(ocd) b
Time: 89533 - pc: 624888 - module Netaccel_link
No source file for Netaccel_link.
I thought this was due to missing dev libraries but:-
$ sudo apt install libocamlnet-ocaml-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libocamlnet-ocaml-dev is already the newest version (4.1.6-1build6).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 20 not upgraded.
What setup step am I missing on Ubuntu 20?
This looks like a regression bug in libocamlnet and you should report an issue there or, I am a bit pessimistic that you will get any response, you can try to debug the issue yourself.
The problem that you are facing has nothing to do with missing libraries (they will be reported during installation or, if the package is broken, end up in linker errors). It may result, however, from some misconfiguration of the system. If that is true, then you're lucky as you can fix it yourself.
I will give you some advice that might help you in debugging this issue. For more, please try using discuss.ocaml.org as a more suitable media (SO doesn't favor this kind of a discussion and we might get deleted by admins).
The illegal seek exception is thrown when the seek operation is applied on a non-regular file, aka ESPIPE Unix error. So check your inputs. It could be that what was previously regarded as a file in Ubuntu is now a pipe or a socket.
Try to use ltrace or strace to pinpoint the culprit e.g.,
ltrace ./linearizer
or, if it overwhelms you, try strace
strace ./linearizer
Instead of using ocamldebug you can use plain gdb. You can use gdb's interfaces to provide the path to the source code (though most likely it won't work since ocamlnet is not compiled with debug information). I believe that it will give you a more meaningful backtrace.
Instead of using the system installation try using opam. Install your dependencies with opam and try older versions as well as newer versions of the OCaml compiler. Also, try different versions of ocamlnet. Ideally, try to reproduce the environment that used to work for you.
When nothing else works, you can use objdump -d and look at the disassembly of your binary. OCaml is using a pretty readable and intuitive name mangling scheme (<module_name>__<function_name>_<uid>), so you can easily find the source code (search for <module_name>.ml file and look for the <function_name> there)
Finally, just use docker or any other container to run your application. Consider switching from ocamlnet to something more modern and supported.
I know how to code but I really do not know my way around a computer.
I have a program that I have to run for my master thesis. It is a code with multiple collabs and runs perfectly on Linux. However, it is a very complex simulational code and therefore it takes time to run for multiple parameters. I've been using my Linux at the university to run it but would like to run some of it on my personal computer (MAC OS). It works by using the R language to call upon c++ functions as follows (being filename a code on c++).
On a Rstudio script:
Sys.setenv("PKG_CPPFLAGS" = "-fopenmp -DPARALLEL")
system("rm filename.so")
system("rm filename.o")
system ("R CMD SHLIB filename.cpp")
dyn.load("filename.so")
After system ("R CMD SHLIB filename.cpp") I get error:
clang: error: unsupported option '-fopenmp'
make: *** [filename.o] Error 1
I've researched on the subject and found this
Enable OpenMP support in clang in Mac OS X (sierra & Mojave)
I've Installed LLVM, yet I do not know how to use it in this case.
How do I use it in this case?
Thank you in advance.
"Don't do it that way." Read up on R and Rcpp and use the proper tools (especially for packaging and/or compiling) which should pick up OpenMP where possible. In particular,
scan at least the Rcpp Introduction vignette
also look at the Rcpp Attributes vignette
"Just say no" to building the compilation commands by hand unless you know what you are doing with R and have read Writing R Extensions carefully a few times. It can be done, I used to show how in tutorials and workshops (see old slides from 12-15 years ago on my website) but we first moved to package inline which helps here, and later relied on the much better Rcpp Attributes.
Now, macOS has some extra hurdles in which tools work and which ones don't. The rcpp-devel mailing list may be of help, the default step is otherwise to consult the tutorial by James.
Edit: And of course if you "just want the above to work" try the obvious step of removing the part causing the error, i.e. use
Sys.setenv("PKG_CPPFLAGS" = "")
as your macOS box appears to have a compiler but not OpenMP (which, as I understand it, is the default thanks to some "surprising" default choices at Apple -- see the aforementioned tutorial for installation help.)
I am trying to run the Woden Physics Example inside Pharo which involves getting Bullet properly compiled and the smalltalk bindings properly installed in Pharo.
I am using Linux Mint 17 x64.
But NativeBoost seems unable to load the compiled libraries. I have been using the sources provided here:
https://github.com/ronsaldo/bullet-pharo
https://github.com/ronsaldo/swig
I built the modified version of swig as well as the bullet libraries and bindings with the provided build scripts.
I also have doublechecked that the bullet libraries are 32 bit.
Opening up the Woden physics example returns this error:
failed to get a symbol address:
PharoNB_new_BTDefaultCollisionConfiguration__SWIG_1
When examining the call stack in the debugger, it turns out that the module handle is 0.
I verified this by executing the same message as
BulletCInterface nbLibraryNameOrHandle
executes:
NativeBoost forCurrentPlatform loadModule: 'BulletPharo'
This message returns 0. I tried to specify the full path to libPharoBullet.so in the workspace, like:
NativeBoost forCurrentPlatform loadModule:
'/home/martin/.local/share/Pharo/bullet-pharo/libBulletPharo.so'
with the same result. I also verified it with a 32 bit system library of mine (liblzma) and there NativeBoost was able to load it, as it returned a non-zero handle.
So i suspect something during compilation went wrong...
I also did
readelf -h libPharoBullet.so
and its ABI was "UNIX - GNU" while the ABI of pharo-vm is "UNIX - System V"
Could this be the problem here ?
How can i force the ABI to be System V when compiling ? I use gcc 4.8.2
Or what steps could i otherwise perform ?
I'm trying to profile a C++ application, that I did not write, to get a sense for where the major computation points are. I'm not a C++ expert and even less so C++ debugging/profiling expert. I believe I am running into a (common?) problem with dynamic libraries.
I compile link to Google CPU Profiler using (OS X, G++):
env LIBS=-lprofiler ./configure
make
make install
I then run profile the installed application (jags) with:
env CPUPROFILE=./jags.prof /usr/local/bin/jags regression.cmd
pprof /usr/local/bin/jags jags.prof
Unfortunately, I get the error:
pprof /usr/local/bin/jags jags.prof Can't exec "objdump":
No such file or directory at /usr/local/bin/pprof line 2833.
objdump /System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/
Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libLAPACK.dylib: No such file or directory
The program dynamically links to libLAPACK.dylib. So prof does not seem to understand it (?). I thought about trying to statically link, but the documents associated with the program say that it is impossible to statically link in LAPACK or BLAS (two required libraries).
Is there a way to have the profiler ignore libLAPACK? I'm okay if it doesn't sample within libLAPACK. Or how might I get profiling to work?
This error was caused by jags being a shell script, that subsequently called profilable code.
pprof /usr/local/bin/REAL_EXEC jags.prof
fixes the problem.
I don't see a clean way to do it, but maybe there's a hacky workaround -- what happens if you hack the pprof perl script (or better a copy thereof;-), line 2834, so that instead of calling error it emits the message and then does return undef;?
If you're profiling on OSX, the Shark tool is really great as well. It's very simple to use, and has worked out of the box for me when I've tried it.