I am having a web server running in Digitalocean. We are in a situation where we need to upload our clients' images (media files). Now, as far as the understating goes, in the following case:
class Car(models.Model):
...
photo = models.ImageField(storage=fs)
The photo field will store the url of the file, right?
Now we might move to amazon (with S3 as the storage system) in near future. Will the model field value change?
How do you, then, suggest us in taking care of the change (as we will have two servers then, one EC2 for django & S3 for media & static files)?
You can upload your static and media files to S3 during deployment after collectstatic. In case of multiple servers, you only need to run collectstatic in one server, then you will be able to reach same content from S3 for multiple servers.
If you take a look https://www.caktusgroup.com/blog/2014/11/10/Using-Amazon-S3-to-store-your-Django-sites-static-and-media-files/ there is a detailed guide on how to store files on S3.
Related
I’m trying to build application with backend in java that allows users to create a text with images in it (something like a a personal blog). I’m planning to store these images to s3 bucket. When uploading image files to bucket i’m hashing the original name and store the hashed one in the bucket. Images are for display purpose only, no user will be able to download them. Frontend displays these images by getting a path to them from the server. So the question is, is there any need to store original name of the image file in the database? And what are the reasons, if any, of doing so?
I guess in general it is not needed because what is more important is how these resources are used or managed in the system.
Assuming your service is something like data access (similar to google drive), I don't think it's necessary to store it in DB, unless you want to make faster search queries.
I'm using Rails 5.2 and GCS as cloud service.
I'd like to give an opportunity to users to crop and rotate user's image.
User has many Images, Image has one :image_file attached
In development I use such method:
class Image
...
def rotate(degree)
image = MiniMagick::Image.new(ActiveStorage::Blob.service.send(:path_for, self.image_file.key))
image.rotate "#{degree}"
image.write(ActiveStorage::Blob.service.send(:path_for, self.image_file.key))
self.image_file.blob.analyze
end
...
end
But I can't figure out how to get to image files in cloud.
I've made it to download the file to local storage and make all the operations needed.
Now it takes only to replace (delete current and create a new one with the same name) the file in the cloud (without changing anything in the database records if possible), but I can't figure out how to do this with active storage.
At least I need to get the file name in the cloud to use just bare google-cloud-ruby
To list files stored in Cloud Storage bucket using Ruby on Rails see the code example defined here. You can also upload files to cloud storage bucket and delete files from them using Ruby on Rails.
Also since you are allowing your customers to modify their files in Cloud Storage buckets, you may consider using versioning. This will incur you additional cost but will provide reliability for your customers.
Here is the link to Ruby on Google Cloud Platform documentation which might be helpful to you.
I have two separated servers: one is CD server and one is CM Server. I upload images on CM server and publish them. On the web database, although I saw the the images under Media Library item
But they aren't displayed on CD server (e.g on website), it indicates that the images not found. Please help me to know how I can solve that problem or I do need some configuration for that.
Many thanks.
Sitecore media items can carry actual media file either as:
Blob in the database - everything works automatically OOB
Files on the file system - one needs to configure either WebDeploy, or DFS
Database resources are costly, you might not want to waste them on something that can be achieved by free tools.
Since WebDeploy by default locates modified files by comparing file hashes between source, and target, it will become slower after a while.
You might have uploaded image in media library as a file. As such, image is stored as a File on file system. To verify this, your image item in media library will have a path value set in 'File Path' field of your image item. Such files have to be moved to file system of CD server as well.
If you uploaded your images in bulk, you can store them as blob in DB by default rather than as a File in file system using following setting-
<setting name="Media.UploadAsFiles" value="false">
I am trying to make my django app in production in aws, i used elastic beanstalk to deploy it so the ec2 instance is created and connected to an rds database mysql instance and i use a bucket in amazon s3 storage to store my media files on it.
When user upload a video, it is stored in s3 as : "https://bucketname.s3.amazonaws.com/media/videos/videoname.mp4".
In django developpement mode, i was using the video filename as an input to a batch script which gives a video as output.
My view in developpement mode is as follow:
def get(request):
# get video
var = Video.objects.order_by('id').last()
v = '/home/myproject/media/videos/' + str(var)
# call process
subprocess.call("./step1.sh %s" % (str(v)), shell=True)
return render(request, 'endexecut.html')
In production mode in aws (Problem), i tried:
v = 'https://bucketname.s3.amazonaws.com/media/videos/' + str(var)
but the batch process doesn't accept the url as input to process.
How can i use my video file from s3 bucket to do process with in my view as i described ? Thank you in advance.
You should not hard-code that string. There are a couple of things wrong with that:
"bucketname" is not the name of your bucket. You should use the name of your bucket if this would at all work.
Your Media File URl (In settings.py) should be pointing to the bucket url where your files are saved (If it's well configured). So you can make use of:
video_path = settings.MEDIA_URL + video_name
I am assuming you are using s3boto to handle your storages (That's not a prerequisite though, it only makes your storage handling smarter and it's highly recommended if you are pushing to s3 from a django app)
I am working with zf2, and and storing my user profile pictures in my public folder, like this
zf2-project/public/uploads/users/photo.png
so i will be configuring the above path like in config file:
ASSET_BASE_URL = "http://my-project/uploads/users"
and while retrieving, <img src = ASSET_BASE_URL. $photo; >
In my production machine, i am storing the images outside the project folder
my project is in opt/mybucket/uploads/users/photo.png
my boss said that, when we put the images in the above place, it will mount directly to amazon bucket.
so i will be accessing the file from the following url..
http://s3.amazonbucket.com/uploads/users/photo.png
ASSET_BASE_URL = "http://s3.amazonbucket.com/uploads/users/photo.png"
i.e <img src = ASSET_BASE_URL.$photo; >
for the above scenarios, its ok to do like that, local machine and production machine.
But how can i do that in testing machine, because i am not using amazon service here. My boss said that, find the way to do this.
Because the scenario here is,
storing images in /opt/virtual-bucket/users/
But my project folder is in /var/www/my-project/
How can i show the images here in img src..
/
Anyone got idea, can you help me on this,