I am leaning GLSL and in general some OpenGL and I am having some trouble with vertex movement and management.
I am good with camera rotations and translation but now I need to move a few vertices and have them stay in their new positions.
What I would like to do is move them using the vertex shader but also not keep track of their new positions trough matrices (as I need to move them around independently and it would be very pricey in terms of memory and computing power to store that many matrices).
If there were a way to change their position values in the VBO directly from the vertex shader, that would be optimal.
Is there a way to do that? What other ways do you suggest?
Thanks in advance.
PS I am using GLSL version 1.30
While it's possible to write values from a shader into a buffer and later read it from the CPU-client side (i.e., by using glReadPixels()) I don't think it is your case.
You can move a group of vertices, all with the same movement, with a single matrix. Why don't you do it with the CPU and store the results, updating their gl-buffer when needed? (VAO remains unchanged if you just update the glBuffer) Once they are moved, you don't need that matrix anymore, right? Or if you want to undo the movement, then, yes, yo need to store also the matrix.
It seems that transform feedback is exactly what you need.
What I would like to do is move them using the vertex shader but also not keep track of their new positions trough matrices
If I understand you correctly then what you want is to send some vertices to the GPU. Then having the vertex shader moving them. You can't because a vertex shader is only able to read from the vertex buffer, it isn't able to write back to it.
it would be very pricey in terms of memory and computing power to store that many matrices.
Considering:
I am good with camera rotations and translation
Then in wouldn't be expensive at all. Considering that you already have a view and projection matrix for the camera and viewport. Then having a model matrix contain the translation, rotation and scaling of each object isn't anywhere near a bottleneck.
In the vertex shader you'd simply have:
uniform mat4 mvp; // model view projection matrix
...
gl_Position = mvp * vec4(position, 1.0);
On the CPU side of things you'd do:
mvp = projection * view * model;
GLint mvpLocation​ = glGetUniformLocation(shaderGeometryPass, "mvp")
glUniformMatrix4fv(mvpLocation, 1, GL_FALSE, (const GLfloat*)&mvp);
If this gives you performance issues then the problem lies elsewhere.
If you really want to "save" which ever changes you make on the GPU side of things, then you'd have to look into Shader Storage Buffer Object and/or Transform Feedback
Related
This may seem like a basic question, but how can you work with/manipulate objects created with the help of shaders in OpenGL?
I am always in the need of the coordinates of different objects, to use in my host program, to create/manipulate different objects, based on those coordinates and then send them back to the vertex/fragment/geometry shader.
I have my initial vertex coordinates, that I have defined in my main program, but once they reach the geometry shader, the position is computed via:
gl_Position = projection_matrix * view_matrix * vec4(square_point,1);
EmitVertex();
And now, for example, I need to select and move them with the mouse, on the screen. But there is no easy way that I can think of getting the exact coordinates.
I've tried to do the position math in my main program, but I do not seem to get the same coordinates as the ones computed by the geometry shader. And calculating all on the CPU, is not really that optimal for the number of object that I have.
I've thought of doing some GPU->CPU data retrieve, via buffers, but there are so many object and so many coordinates, that it's relentless.
I imagine that there is another way to approach this, just that I may not have the proper knowledge of how OpenGL works.
You can use so called shader storage buffer objectsSSBO. You create them in your shader with the buffer qualifier. Then you do the necessary computation and download your data via glMapBufferRange and memcpy .
I am using OpenGL ES2 to render a fairly large number of mostly 2d items and so far I have gotten away by sending a premultiplied model/view/projection matrix to the vertex shader as a uniform and then multiplying my vertices with the resulting MVP in there.
All items are batched using texture atlases and I use one MVP per batch. So all my vertices are relative to the translation of that MVP.
Now I want to have rotation and scaling for each of the separate items, which means I need a different model for each of them. So I modified my vertex to include the model (16 floats!) and added a mat4 attribute in my shader and it all works well. But I'm kinda dissapointed with this solution since it dramatically increased the vertex size.
So as I was staring at my screen trying to think of a different solution I thought about transforming my vertices to world space before I send them over to the shader. Or even to screen space if its possible. The vertices I use are unnormalized coordinates in pixels.
So the question is, is such a thing possible? And if yes how do you do it? I can't think why it shouldn't be since its just maths but after a fairly long search on google, it doesn't look like a lot of people are actually doing this...
Strange cause if it is indeed possible, it would be quite a major optimization in cases like this one.
If the number of matrices per batch are limited then you can pass all those matrices as uniforms (preferably in a UBO) and expand the vertex data with an index which specifies which matrix you need to use.
This is similar to GPU skinning used for skeletal animation.
I'm writing a program that draws a number of moving/rotating polygons using OpenGL. Each polygon has a location in world coordinates while its vertices are expressed in local coordinates (relative to polygon location). Each polygon also has a rotation.
The only way I can think of doing this is calculate vertex positions by translation/rotation in each frame and push them to the GPU be drawn, but I was wondering if this could be performed in the vertex shader.
I thought I might express vertex locations in local coordinates and then add location and rotation attributes to each vertex, but then it occurred to me that this won't be any better than pushing new vertex positions on each frame.
Should I do this kind of calculation on the CPU, or is there a way to do it efficiently in the vertex shader?
The vertex shader is indeed responsible for transforming your geometry. However, the vertex shader is run for every single vertex of your scene. If you do transformations inside the vertex shader, you'll do the same calculation over and over again which yields the same result every time (as opposed to simply multiplying the model view projection matrix with the vertex coordinate). So in terms of efficiency you're best off doing that on the CPU side.
If the models are small, like in your case, I don't expect there to be too much of a difference, because you still have to set the coordinates where the polygons are supposed to be drawn somehow. In this case doing the calculations once on the CPU side is still the best, given that it does the calculation once independent of the vertex count of your polygons, as well as that it will probably result in clearer code since it's easier to see what you're doing.
These calculations are usually done on CPU only. As doing them on CPU is efficient in general. your best shot is to send these rotation matrices in as uniform and do multiplication on GPU. Sending uniforms is not very expensive operation in general so u should be be worrying about that.
Say if i wanted to build matrices inside the gpu pipeline for vertex transforms, i realized that my current implementation is quite inefficient because it rebuilds the matrices from the source material for every single vertex (while it only needs to build it once per affected vertices really). Is there any way to modify the whole array of vertices that get drawn in a single draw call? Calculating the matrices and storing them in vram doesn't seem to be a very good option since multiple vertices will be getting processed at the same time and i dont think i can sync them efficiently. The only other option i can think of is compute shader, i havent looked into its uses yet but would it be possible to have it calculate the matrices and store them in the gpu so i can access them later on when drawing?
Do you have any source code? I never calculate matrices in the shaders, normally do it on the CPU and pass them over in a constant buffer.
One way of achieving this is to precompute the matrix and send them to the shader as a uniform variable. For example, if your shaders only ever need to multiply the MVP matrix with the vertex positions, then you could pre-compute the MVP matrix outside the shader and send it as a float4x4 uniform to the shader, all the vertex shader does then is to multiply that single matrix with each vertex. It doesn't get much more optimal than that, since vertices are processed in parallel on the GPU and the GPU has instruction sets optimized for vector calculus.
I have many positions and directions stored in 1D textures on the GPU. I want to use those as rendersources in a GLSL geometry shader. To do this, I need to create corresponding view matrices from those textures.
My first thought is to take a detour to the CPU, read the textures to memory and create a bunch of view matrices from there, with something like glm::lookat(). Then send the matrices as uniform variables to the shader.
My question is, wether it is possible to skip this detour and instead create the view matrices directly in the GLSL geometry shader? Also, is this feasible performance wise?
Nobody says (or nobody should say) that your view matrix has to come from the CPU through a uniform. You can just generate the view matrix from the vectors in your texture right inside the shader. Maybe the implementation of the good old gluLookAt is of help to you there.
If this approach is a good idea performance-wise, is another question, but if this texture is quite large or changes frequently, this aproach might be better than reading it back to the CPU.
But maybe you can pre-generate the matrices into another texture/buffer using a simple GPGPU-like shader that does nothing more than generate a matrix for each position/vector in the textures and store this in another texture (using FBOs) or buffer (using transform feedback). This way you don't need to make a roundtrip to the CPU and you don't need to generate the matrices anew for each vertex/primitive/whatever. On the other hand this will increase the required memory as a 4x4 matrix is a bit more heavy than a position and a direction.
Sure. Read the texture, and build the matrices from the values...
vec4 x = texture(YourSampler, WhateverCoords1);
vec4 y = texture(YourSampler, WhateverCoords2);
vec4 z = texture(YourSampler, WhateverCoords3);
vec4 w = texture(YourSampler, WhateverCoords4);
mat4 matrix = mat4(x,y,z,w);
Any problem with this ? Or did I miss something ?
The view matrix is a uniform, and uniforms don't change in the middle of a render batch, nor can they be written to from a shader (directly). Insofar I don't see how generating it could be possible, at least not directly.
Also note that the geometry shader runs after vertices have been transformed with the modelview matrix, so it does not make all too much sense (at least during the same pass) to re-generate that matrix or part of it.
You could of course probably still do some hack with transform feedback, writing some values to a buffer, and either copy/bind this as uniform buffer later or just read the values from within a shader and multiply as a matrix. That would at least avoid a roundtrip to the CPU -- the question is whether such an approach makes sense and whether you really want to do such an obscure thing. It is hard to tell what's best without knowing exactly what you want to achieve, but quite probably just transforming things in the vertex shader (read those textures, build a matrix, multiply) will work better and easier.