I have a dataset analogous to the simplified table below (let's call it "DS_have"):
SurveyID Participant FavoriteColor FavoriteFood SurveyMonth
S101 G92 Blue Pizza Jan
S102 B34 Blue Cake Feb
S103 Z28 Green Cake Feb
S104 V11 Red Cake Feb
S105 P03 Yellow Pizza Mar
S106 A71 Red Pizza Mar
S107 C48 Green Cake Mar
S108 G92 Blue Cake Apr
...
I'd like to create a set of numeric variables that identify the discrete categories/levels of each variable in the dataset above. The result should look like the following dataset ("DS_want"):
SurveyID Participant FavoriteColor FavoriteFood SurveyMonth ColorLevels FoodLevels ParticipantLevels MonthLevels
S101 G92 Blue Pizza Jan 1 1 1 1
S102 B34 Blue Cake Feb 1 2 2 2
S103 Z28 Green Cake Feb 2 2 3 2
S104 V11 Red Cake Feb 3 2 4 2
S105 P03 Yellow Pizza Mar 4 1 5 3
S106 A71 Red Pizza Mar 3 1 6 3
S107 C48 Green Cake Mar 2 2 7 3
S108 G92 Blue Cake Apr 1 1 1 4
...
Essentially, I want to know what syntax I should use to generate unique numerical values for each "level" or category of variables in the DS_Have dataset. Note that I cannot use conditional if/then statements to create the values in the ":Levels" variables for each category, as the number of levels for some variables is in the thousands.
One straightforward solution is to use proc tabulate to generate a tabulated list, then iterate over that and create informats to convert the text to a number; then you just use input to code them.
*store variables you want to work with in a macro variable to make this easier;
%let vars=FavoriteColor FavoriteFood SurveyMonth;
*run a tabulate to get the unique values;
proc tabulate data=have out=freqs;
class &vars.;
tables (&vars.),n;
run;
*if you prefer to have this in a particular order, sort by that now - otherwise you may have odd results (as this will). Sort by _TYPE_ then your desired order.;
*Now create a dataset to read in for informat.;
data for_fmt;
if 0 then set freqs;
array vars &vars.;
retain type 'i';
do label = 1 by 1 until (last._type_); *for each _type_, start with 1 and increment by 1;
set freqs;
by _type_ notsorted;
which_var = find(_type_,'1'); *parses the '100' value from TYPE to see which variable this row is doing something to. May not work if many variables - need another solution to identify which (depends on your data what works);
start = coalescec(vars[which_var]);
fmtname = cats(vname(vars[which_var]),'I');
output;
if first._type_ then do; *set up what to do if you encounter a new value not coded - set it to missing;
hlo='o'; *this means OTHER;
start=' ';
label=.;
output;
hlo=' ';
label=1;
end;
end;
run;
proc format cntlin=for_fmt; *import to format catalog via PROC FORMAT;
quit;
Then code them like this (you might create a macro to do this looping over the &vars macro variable).
data want;
set have;
color_code = input(FavoriteColor,FavoriteColorI.);
run;
Another approach - create a hash object to keep track of the levels encountered for each variable, and read the dataset twice via a double DOW-loop, applying the level numbers on the second pass. It's perhaps not as elegant as Joe's solution, but it should use slightly less memory and I suspect it will scale to a somewhat larger number of variables.
%macro levels_rename(DATA,OUT,VARS,NEWVARS);
%local i NUMVARS VARNAME;
data &OUT;
if 0 then set &DATA;
length LEVEL 8;
%let i = 1;
%let VARNAME = %scan(&VARS,&i);
%do %while(&VARNAME ne );
declare hash h&i();
rc = h&i..definekey("&VARNAME");
rc = h&i..definedata("LEVEL");
rc = h&i..definedone();
%let i = %eval(&i + 1);
%let VARNAME = %scan(&VARS,&i);
%end;
%let NUMVARS = %eval(&i - 1);
do _n_ = 1 by 1 until(eof);
set &DATA end = eof;
%do i = 1 %to &NUMVARS;
LEVEL = h&i..num_items + 1;
rc = h&i..add();
%end;
end;
do _n_ = 1 to _n_;
set &DATA;
%do i = 1 %to &NUMVARS;
rc = h&i..find();
%scan(&NEWVARS,&i) = LEVEL;
%end;
output;
end;
drop LEVEL;
run;
%mend;
%levels_rename(sashelp.class,class_renamed,NAME SEX, NAME_L SEX_L);
Related
I have a SAS data set t3. I want to run a data step inside a loop through a set of variables to create additional sets based on the variable value = 1, and rank two variables bal and otheramt in each subset, and then merge the ranks for each subset onto the original data set. Each rank column needs to be dynamically named so I know what subset is getting ranked. I know how to do proc rank and macros basically but do not know how to do this in the most dynamic way inside of a macro. Can you assist?
ID
bal
otheramt
firstvar
secondvar
lastvar
444
581
100
1
1
555
255
200
1
1
1
666
255
300
--------------
1
--------------
%macro dog();
data new;
set t3;
ARRAY Indicators(5) FirstVar--LastVar;
/*create data set for each of the subsets if firstvar = 1, secondvar = 1 ... lastvar = 1 */
/*for each new data set, rank by bal and otheramt*/
/*name the new rank columns [FirstVar]BalRank, [FirstVar]OtherAmtRank; */
/*merge the new ranks onto the original data set by ID*/
%mend;
%dog()
The Proc rank section would be something like this, but I would need the rank columns to have information about what subset I am ranking.
proc rank data=subset1 out=subset1ranked;
var bal otheramt;
ranks bal_rank otheramt_rank;
run;
Instead of using macro, use data transformation and reshaping that allows simpler steps to be written.
Example:
Rows are split into multiple rows based on flag so group processing in RANK can occur. Two transposes are required to reshape the results back a single row per id.
data have;
call streaminit(20230216);
do id = 1 to 100;
foo = rand('integer', 50,150);
bar = rand('integer', 100,200);
flag1 = rand('integer', 0, 1);
flag2 = rand('integer', 0, 1);
flag3 = rand('integer', 0, 1);
output;
end;
run;
data step1;
set have;
/* important: the group value becomes part of the variable name later */
if flag1 then do; group='flag1_'; output; end;
if flag2 then do; group='flag2_'; output; end;
if flag3 then do; group='flag3_'; output; end;
drop flag:;
run;
proc sort data=step1;
by group;
run;
proc rank data=step1 out=step2;
by group;
var foo bar;
ranks foo_rank bar_rank;
run;
proc sort data=step2;
by id group;
run;
* pivot (reshape) so there is one row per ranked var;
proc transpose data=step2 out=step3(drop=_label_);
by id foo bar group;
var foo_rank bar_rank;
run;
* pivot again so there is one row per id;
proc transpose data=step3 out=step4(drop=_name_);
by id;
var col1;
id group _name_;
run;
* merge so those 0 0 0 flag rows remain intact;
data want;
merge have step4;
by id;
run;
Since we don't have much sample data, I created test data from sashelp.class with some indicator variables like yours.
data have;
set sashelp.class;
firstvar=round(rand('uniform',1));
secondvar=round(rand('uniform',1));
thirdvar=round(rand('uniform',1));
drop sex weight;
run;
Partial output:
Name Age Height firstvar secondvar thirdvar
Alfred 14 69 1 0 1
Alice 13 56.5 0 1 1
Barbara 13 65.3 1 0 0
Carol 14 62.8 0 0 0
To dynamically rank data based on indicator variables, I created a macro that accepts a list of indicators and rank variables. The 2 lists help to create the specific variable names you requested. Here's the macro call:
%rank(indicators=firstvar secondvar thirdvar,
rank_vars=age height);
Here's part of the final output. Notice the indicators in the sample output above coincide with the ranks in this output. Also note that Carol is not in the output because she had no indicators set to 1.
Name Age Height firstvar_age_rank firstvar_height_rank secondvar_age_rank secondvar_height_rank thirdvar_age_rank thirdvar_height_rank
Alfred 14 69 8 11 . . 6.5 10
Alice 13 56.5 . . 3.5 2 4.5 2
Barbara 13 65.3 6.5 8 . . . .
Henry 14 63.5 . . 5.5 5 . .
The full macro is listed below. It has 3 parts.
Create a temp data set with a group variable that contains the number of the indicator variable based on the order of the variable in the list. Whenever an indicator = 1 the obs is output. If an obs has all 3 indicators set to 1 then it will be output 3 times with the group variable set to the number of each indicator variable. This step is important because proc rank will rank groups independently.
Generate the rankings on the temp data set. Each group will be ranked independently of the other groups and can be done in one step.
Construct the final data set by essentially transposing the ranked data into columns.
%macro rank(indicators=, rank_vars=);
%let cnt_ind = %sysfunc(countw(&indicators));
%let cnt_vars = %sysfunc(countw(&rank_vars));
data temp;
set have;
array indicators(*) &indicators;
do i = 1 to dim(indicators);
if indicators(i) = 1 then do;
group = i; * create a group based on order of indicators;
output; * an obs can be output multiple times;
end;
end;
drop i &indicators;
run;
proc sort data=temp;
by group;
run;
* Generate rankings by group;
proc rank data=temp out=ranks;
by group;
var &rank_vars;
ranks
%let vars = ;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt_vars;
%let var = %scan(&rank_vars, &i);
%let vars = &vars &var._rank;
%end;
&vars;
run;
proc sort data=ranks;
by name group;
run;
* Contruct final data set by transposing the ranks into columns;
data want;
set ranks;
by name;
* retain statement to declare new variables and retain values;
retain
%let vars = ;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt_ind;
%let ivar = %scan(&indicators, &i);
%do j = 1 %to &cnt_vars;
%let jvar = %scan(&rank_vars, &j);
%let vars = &vars &ivar._&jvar._rank;
%end;
%end;
&vars;
if first.name then call missing (of &vars);
* option 1: build series of IF statements;
%let vars = ;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt_ind;
%let ivar = %scan(&indicators, &i);
%str(if group = &i then do;)
%do j = 1 %to &cnt_vars;
%let jvar = %scan(&rank_vars, &j);
%let newvar = &ivar._&jvar._rank;
%str(&newvar = &jvar._rank;)
%end;
%str(end;)
%end;
if last.name then output;
drop group
%let vars = ;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt_vars;
%let var = %scan(&rank_vars, &i);
%let vars = &vars &var._rank;
%end;
&vars;
run;
%mend;
When constructing the final data set and transposing the rank variables, there are a couple of options. The first option shown above is to dynamically build a series of if statements. Here is what the code generates:
MPRINT(RANK): * option 1: build series of IF statements;
MPRINT(RANK): if group = 1 then do;
MPRINT(RANK): firstvar_age_rank = age_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): firstvar_height_rank = height_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): end;
MPRINT(RANK): if group = 2 then do;
MPRINT(RANK): secondvar_age_rank = age_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): secondvar_height_rank = height_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): end;
MPRINT(RANK): if group = 3 then do;
MPRINT(RANK): thirdvar_age_rank = age_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): thirdvar_height_rank = height_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): end;
The 2nd option is to use an array and mathematically calculate the index into the array by the group number and variable number. Here is the snippet of macro code to replace the if series code:
* option 2: create arrays and calculate index into array
* by group number and variable number;
array ranks(*) &vars;
array rankvars(*)
%let vars = ;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt_vars;
%let var = %scan(&rank_vars, &i);
%let vars = &vars &var._rank;
%end;
&vars;
%str(idx = dim(rankvars) * (group - 1);)
%str(do i = 1 to dim(rankvars);)
%str(ranks(idx + i) = rankvars(i);)
%str(end;)
Here is the generated code:
MPRINT(RANK): * option 2: create arrays and calculate index into array * by group number and variable number;
MPRINT(RANK): array ranks(*) firstvar_age_rank firstvar_height_rank secondvar_age_rank secondvar_height_rank thirdvar_age_rank
thirdvar_height_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): array rankvars(*) age_rank height_rank;
MPRINT(RANK): idx = dim(rankvars) * (group - 1);
MPRINT(RANK): do i = 1 to dim(rankvars);
MPRINT(RANK): ranks(idx + i) = rankvars(i);
MPRINT(RANK): end;
It takes a minute to understand the array option, but once you do, it is preferable over generating if statments. As the number of variables increases, the code generated by the array option is the same and operates more efficiently.
I need to perform the same operation on many different periods. In my sample data for two periods: 402 and 403.
I cannot understand the concept of how I can make a loop that will do it for me.
At the end, I'd like to have final1 for period 402, final2 for period 403 etc.
Sample data that I use for testing:
data one;
input period $ a $ b $ c $ d e;
cards;
402 a . a 1 3
402 . b . 2 4
402 a a a . 5
402 . . b 3 5
403 a a a . 6
403 a a a . 7
403 a a a 2 8
;
run;
This is how I manually choose one period of one data:
data new;
set one;
where period='402';
run;
This is how I calculate different things for the given period e.g. number of missing data, non-missing, total:
1 - For numeric variables:
proc iml;
use new;
read all var _NUM_ into x[colname=nNames];
n = countn(x,"col");
nmiss = countmiss(x,"col");
ntotal = n + nmiss;
2 - and similarly for char variables:
read all var _CHAR_ into x[colname=cNames];
close nww;
c = countn(x,"col");
cmiss = countmiss(x,"col");
ctotal = c + cmiss;
Save numeric and char results:
create cnt1Data var {nNames n nmiss ntotal};
append;
close cnt1Data;
create cnt2Data var {cNames c cmiss ctotal};
append;
close cnt2Data;
Rename columns to be the same:
data cnt1Datatemp;
set cnt1Data;
rename nNames = Name n = nonMissing nmiss = missing ntotal = total;
run;
data cnt2Datatemp;
set cnt2Data;
rename cNames = Name c = nonMissing cmiss = missing ctotal = total;
run;
and merge data into the final set:
data final;
set cnt1Datatemp cnt2Datatemp;
run;
Final data for period 402 should look like:
a b c d e
2 2 1 1 0 - missing
2 2 3 3 4 - non-missing
4 4 4 4 4 - total
and respectively for period 403:
a b c d e
0 0 0 2 0 - missing
3 3 3 1 3 - non-missing
3 3 3 3 3 - total
You can make something similar with simple SQL query.
create table miss_count as select period
, sum(missing(A)) as A
, sum(missing(B)) as B
...
from have
group by period
;
Results:
period a b c d e
402 2 2 1 1 0
403 0 0 0 2 0
It you add in
, count(*) as nobs
then you have all the information you need to calculate all of the counts you wanted.
If the number of variables is short enough you can even generate the code into a macro variable (limit of 64K bytes in a macro variable)
proc sql noprint;
select catx(' ','sum(missing(',nliteral(name),')) as',nliteral(name))
into :varlist separated by ','
from dictionary.columns
where libname='WORK' and memname='ONE' and lowcase(name) ne 'period'
;
create table miss_count as select period,count(*) as nobs,&varlist
from one
group by period
;
quit;
Results:
period nobs a b c d e
402 4 2 2 1 1 0
403 3 0 0 0 2 0
It is much easier to find this information in sql;
proc sql;
select sum(a is not missing) as fil_a
, sum(a is missing) as mis_a
, count(*) as tot_a
from one
where period eq 402;
quit;
You can even 0handle all periods at once using group by.
There are a few ways to make this work for all variables in a dataset (except for some group by variables). For instance:
%macro count_missing();
proc sql;
select count(*), name
into :no_var, :var_list separated by ' '
from sasHelp.vcolumn
where libName eq 'WORK' and memName eq 'ONE' and upcase(name) ne 'PERIOD';
create view count_missing as
select count(*) as total
%do var_nr = 1 %to &no_var;
%let var = %scan(&var_list, &var_nr);
, sum(&var is missing) as mis_&var
%end;
from work.one
group by period;
quit;
data report_missing;
set count_missing;
format count_of $32.;
count_of = 'missing';
%do var_nr = 1 %to &no_var;
%let var = %scan(&var_list, &var_nr);
&var = mis_&var;
%end;
output;
count_of = 'non missing';
%do var_nr = 1 %to &no_var;
%let var = %scan(&var_list, &var_nr);
&var = total - mis_&var;
%end;
output;
count_of = 'total';
%do var_nr = 1 %to &no_var;
%let var = %scan(&var_list, &var_nr);
&var = total;
%end;
output;
end;
%mend;
%count_missing();
You don't need iml to summarize data over observations. You can do that with a retain statement too. Moreover, using by processing with first and last, you can process all periods in one go.
data final;
set one;
by period;
if first.period then do;
mis_a = 0;
total = 0;
end;
retain mis_a;
if missing(a) then mis_a +=1; else fil_a += 1;
total += 1;
if last.period;
fil_a = total - mis_a;
end;
This is by far the fastest way to handle a big dataset if the data is sorted by period.
To make it work for a set of variables not known upfront, you can apply the same techniques as in my other solution.
I am matching files base on IDs numbers. I need to format a data set with the IDs to be matched, so that the same ID number is not repeated in column a (because column b's ID is the surviving ID after the match is completed). My list of IDs has over 1 million observations, and the same ID may be repeated multiple times in either/both columns.
Here is an example of what I've got/need:
Sample Data
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 1
1 7
5 8
The surviving IDs would be:
2
4
5
error - 1 no longer exists
error - 1 no longer exists
8
WHAT I NEED
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 5
5 7
7 8
I am, probably very obviously, a SAS novice, but here is what I have tried, re-running over and over again because I have some IDs that are repeated upward of 50 times or more.
Proc sort data=Have;
by ID1;
run;
This sort makes the repeated ID1 values consecutive, so the I could use LAG to replace the destroyed ID1s with the surviving ID2 from the line above.
Data Want;
set Have;
by ID1;
lagID1=LAG(ID1);
lagID2=LAG(ID2);
If NOT first. ID1 THEN DO;
If ID1=lagID1 THEN ID1=lagID2;
KEEP ID1 ID2;
IF ID1=ID2 then delete;
end;
run;
That sort of works, but I still end up with some that end up with duplicates that won't resolve no matter how many times I run (I would have looped it, but I don't know how), because they are just switching back and forth between IDs that have other duplicates (I can get down to about 2,000 of these).
I have figured out that instead of using LAG, I need replace all values after the current line with ID2 for each ID1 value, but I cannot figure out how to do that.
I want to read observation 1, find all later instances of the value of ID1, in both ID1 or ID2 columns, and replace that value with the current observation's ID2 value. Then I want to repeat that process with line 2 and so on.
For the example, I would want to look for any instances after line one of the value 1, and replace it with 2, since that is the surviving ID of that pair - 1 may appear further down multiple times in either of the columns, and I need all them to replaced. Line two would look for later values of 3 and replace them with 4, and so one. The end result should be that an ID number only appears once ever in the ID1 column (though it may appear multiple times in the ID2 column).
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 1
1 7
5 8
After first line has been read, data set would look as follows:
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 2
2 7
5 8
Reading observation two would make no changes since 3 does not appear again; after observation 3, the set would be:
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 5
5 7
5 8
Again, there would be not changes from observation four. but observation 5 would cause the final change:
ID1 ID2
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 5
5 7
7 8
I have tried using the following statement but I can't even tell if I am on the complete wrong track or if I just can't get the syntax figured out.
Data want;
Set have;
Do i=_n_;
ID=ID2;
Replace next var{EUID} where (EUID1=EUID1 AND EUID2=EUID1);
End;
Run;
Thanks for your help!
There is no need to work back and forth thru the data file. You just need to retain the replacement information so that you can process the file in a single pass.
One way to do that is to make a temporary array using the values of the ID variables as the index. That is easy to do for your simple example with small ID values.
So for example if all of the ID values are integers between 1 and 1000 then this step will do the job.
data want ;
set have ;
array xx (1000) _temporary_;
do while (not missing(xx(id1))); id1=xx(id1); end;
do while (not missing(xx(id2))); id2=xx(id2); end;
output;
xx(id1)=id2;
run;
You probably need to add a test to prevent cycles (1 -> 2 -> 1).
For a more general solution you should replace the array with a hash object instead. So something like this:
data want ;
if _n_=1 then do;
declare hash h();
h.definekey('old');
h.definedata('new');
h.definedone();
call missing(new,old);
end;
set have ;
do while (not h.find(key:id1)); id1=new; end;
do while (not h.find(key:id2)); id2=new; end;
output;
h.add(key: id1,data: id2);
drop old new;
run;
Here's an implementation of the algorithm you've suggested, using a modify statement to load and rewrite each row one at a time. It works with your trivial example but with messier data you might get duplicate values in ID1.
data have;
input ID1 ID2 ;
datalines;
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 1
1 7
5 8
;
run;
title "Before making replacements";
proc print data = have;
run;
/*Optional - should improve performance at cost of increased memory usage*/
sasfile have load;
data have;
do i = 1 to nobs;
do j = i to nobs;
modify have point = j nobs = nobs;
/* Make copies of target and replacement value for this pass */
if j = i then do;
id1_ = id1;
id2_ = id2;
end;
else do;
flag = 0; /* Keep track of whether we made a change */
if id1 = id1_ then do;
id1 = id2_;
flag = 1;
end;
if id2 = id1_ then do;
id2 = id2_;
flag = 1;
end;
if flag then replace; /* Only rewrite the row if we made a change */
end;
end;
end;
stop;
run;
sasfile have close;
title "After making replacements";
proc print data = have;
run;
Please bear in mind that as this modifies the dataset in place, interrupting the data step while it is running could result in data loss. Make sure you have a backup first in case you need to roll your changes back.
Seems like this should do the trick and is fairly straight forward. Let me know if it is what you are looking for:
data have;
input id1 id2;
datalines;
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 1
1 7
5 8
;
run;
%macro test();
proc sql noprint;
select count(*) into: cnt
from have;
quit;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt;
proc sql noprint;
select id1,id2 into: id1, :id2
from have
where monotonic() = &i;quit;
data have;
set have;
if (_n_ > input("&i",8.))then do;
if (id1 = input("&id1",8.))then id1 = input("&id2",8.);
if (id2 = input("&id1",8.))then id2 = input("&id2",8.);
end;
run;
%end;
%mend test;
%test();
this might be a little faster:
data have2;
input id1 id2;
datalines;
1 2
3 4
2 5
6 1
1 7
5 8
;
run;
%macro test2();
proc sql noprint;
select count(*) into: cnt
from have2;
quit;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt;
proc sql noprint;
select id1,id2 into: id1, :id2
from have2
where monotonic() = &i;
update have2 set id1 = &id2
where monotonic() > &i
and id1 = &id1;
quit;
proc sql noprint;
update have2 set id2 = &id2
where monotonic() > &i
and id2 = &id1;
quit;
%end;
%mend test2;
%test2();
I would like to turn the following long dataset:
data test;
input Id Injury $;
datalines;
1 Ankle
1 Shoulder
2 Ankle
2 Head
3 Head
3 Shoulder
;
run;
Into a wide dataset that looks like this:
ID Ankle Shoulder Head
1 1 1 0
2 1 0 1
3 0 1 1'
This answer seemed the most relevant but was falling over at the proc freq stage (my real dataset is around 1 million records, and has around 30 injury types):
Creating dummy variables from multiple strings in the same row
Additional help: https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Statistical-Procedures/Possible-to-create-dummy-variables-with-proc-transpose/td-p/235140
Thanks for the help!
Here's a basic method that should work easily, even with several million records.
First you sort the data, then add in a count to create the 1 variable. Next you use PROC TRANSPOSE to flip the data from long to wide. Then fill in the missing values with a 0. This is a fully dynamic method, it doesn't matter how many different Injury types you have or how many records per person. There are other methods that are probably shorter code, but I think this is simple and easy to understand and modify if required.
data test;
input Id Injury $;
datalines;
1 Ankle
1 Shoulder
2 Ankle
2 Head
3 Head
3 Shoulder
;
run;
proc sort data=test;
by id injury;
run;
data test2;
set test;
count=1;
run;
proc transpose data=test2 out=want prefix=Injury_;
by id;
var count;
id injury;
idlabel injury;
run;
data want;
set want;
array inj(*) injury_:;
do i=1 to dim(inj);
if inj(i)=. then inj(i) = 0;
end;
drop _name_ i;
run;
Here's a solution involving only two steps... Just make sure your data is sorted by id first (the injury column doesn't need to be sorted).
First, create a macro variable containing the list of injuries
proc sql noprint;
select distinct injury
into :injuries separated by " "
from have
order by injury;
quit;
Then, let RETAIN do the magic -- no transposition needed!
data want(drop=i injury);
set have;
by id;
format &injuries 1.;
retain &injuries;
array injuries(*) &injuries;
if first.id then do i = 1 to dim(injuries);
injuries(i) = 0;
end;
do i = 1 to dim(injuries);
if injury = scan("&injuries",i) then injuries(i) = 1;
end;
if last.id then output;
run;
EDIT
Following OP's question in the comments, here's how we could use codes and labels for injuries. It could be done directly in the last data step with a label statement, but to minimize hard-coding, I'll assume the labels are entered into a sas dataset.
1 - Define Labels:
data myLabels;
infile datalines dlm="|" truncover;
informat injury $12. labl $24.;
input injury labl;
datalines;
S460|Acute meniscal tear, medial
S520|Head trauma
;
2 - Add a new query to the existing proc sql step to prepare the label assignment.
proc sql noprint;
/* Existing query */
select distinct injury
into :injuries separated by " "
from have
order by injury;
/* New query */
select catx("=",injury,quote(trim(labl)))
into :labls separated by " "
from myLabels;
quit;
3 - Then, at the end of the data want step, just add a label statement.
data want(drop=i injury);
set have;
by id;
/* ...same as before... */
* Add labels;
label &labls;
run;
And that should do it!
Sorry for the vauge title.
My data set looks essentially like this:
ID X
18 1
18 1
18 2
18 1
18 2
369 2
369 3
369 3
361 1
what I want is to find the max value of x for each ID. In this dataset, that would be 2 for ID=18 and 3 for ID=361.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Proc Means with a class statement (so you don't have to sort) and requesting the max statistic is probably the most straightforward approach (untested):
data sample;
input id x;
datalines;
18 1
18 1
18 2
18 1
18 2
369 2
369 3
369 3
361 1
;
run;
proc means data=sample noprint max nway missing;
class id;
var x;
output out=sample_max (drop=_type_ _freq_) max=;
run;
Check out the online SAS documentation for more details on Proc Means (http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp).
I don't quite understand your example. I can't imagine that the input data set really has all the values in one observation. Do you instead mean something like this?
data sample;
input myid myvalue;
datalines;
18 1
18 1
18 2
18 1
18 2
369 2
369 3
369 3
361 1
;
proc sort data=sample;
by myid myvalue;
run;
data result;
set sample;
by myid;
if last.myid then output;
run;
proc print data=result;
run;
This would give you this result:
Obs myid myvalue
1 18 2
2 361 1
3 369 3
If you want to keep both all records and the max value of X by id, I would use either the PROC MEANS aproach followed by a merge statement, or you can sort the data by Id and DESCENDING X first, and then use the RETAIN statement to create the max_value directly in the datastep:
PROC SORT DATA=A; BY ID DESCENDING X; RUN;
DATA B; SET A;
BY ID;
RETAIN X_MAX;
IF FIRST.ID THEN X_MAX = X;
ELSE X_MAX = X_MAX;
RUN;
You could try this:
PROC SQL;
CREATE TABLE CHCK AS SELECT MYID, MAX(MYVALUE) FROM SAMPLE
GROUP BY 1;
QUIT;
A couple of more over-engineered options that might be of interest for anyone who needs to do this with a really big dataset, where performance is more of a concern:
If your dataset is already sorted by ID, but not by X within each ID, you can still do this in a single data step without any sorting, using a retained max within each by group. Alternatively, you can use proc means (as per the top answer) but with a by statement rather than a class statement - this reduces the memory usage.
data sample;
input id x;
datalines;
18 1
18 1
18 2
18 1
18 2
369 2
369 3
369 3
361 1
;
run;
data want;
do until(last.ID);
set sample;
by ID;
xmax = max(x, xmax);
end;
x = xmax;
drop xmax;
run;
Even if your dataset is not sorted by ID, you can still do this in one data step, without sorting it, by using a hash object to keep track of the maximum x value you've found for each ID as you go along. This will be a little faster than proc means and will typically use less memory, as proc means does various calculations in the background which are not needed in the output dataset.
data _null_;
set sample end = eof;
if _n_ = 1 then do;
call missing(xmax);
declare hash h(ordered:'a');
rc = h.definekey('ID');
rc = h.definedata('ID','xmax');
rc = h.definedone();
end;
rc = h.find();
if rc = 0 then do;
if x > xmax then do;
xmax = x;
rc = h.replace();
end;
end;
else do;
xmax = x;
rc = h.add();
end;
if eof then rc = h.output(dataset:'want2');
run;
In this example, on my PC, the hash approach used this much memory:
memory 966.15k
OS Memory 27292.00k
vs. this much for an equivalent proc summary:
memory 8706.90k
OS Memory 35760.00k
Not a bad saving if you really need it to scale up!
Use an appropriate proc with the by statement. For instance,
data sample;
input myid myvalue;
datalines;
18 1
18 1
18 2
18 1
18 2
369 2
369 3
369 3
361 1
;
run;
proc sort data=sample;
by myid;
run;
proc means data=sample;
var myvalue;
by myid;
run;
I would just sort by x and id putting the highest value for each ID at the top.
NODUPKEY removes every duplicate below.
proc sort data=yourstacked_data out=yourstacked_data_sorted;
by DECENDING x id;
run;
proc sort data=yourstacked_data NODUPKEY out=top_value_only;
by id;
run;
A multidata hash should be used if you want the result to show each id at max value. That is, for the cases when more than one id is found having a max value
Example code:
Find the ids associated with the max value of 40 different numeric variables.
The code is Proc DS2 data program.
data have;
call streaminit(123);
do id = 1 to 1e5; %* 10,000 rows;
array v v1-v40; %* 40 different variables;
do over v; v=ceil(rand('uniform', 2e5)); end;
output;
end;
run;
proc ds2;
data _null_;
declare char(32) _name_ ; %* global declarations;
declare double value id;
declare package hash result();
vararray double v[*] v:; %* variable based array, limit yourself to 1,000;
declare double max[1000]; %* temporary array for holding the vars maximum values;
method init();
declare package sqlstmt s('drop table want'); %* DS2 version of `delete`;
s.execute();
result.keys([_name_]); %* instantiate a multidata hash;
result.data([_name_ value id]);
result.multidata();
result.ordered('ascending');
result.defineDone();
end;
method term();
result.output('want'); %* write the results to a table;
end;
method run();
declare int index;
set have;
%* process each variable being examined for 'id at max';
do index = 1 to dim(v);
if v[index] > max[index] then do; %* new maximum for this variable ?
_name_ = vname(v[index]); %* retrieve variable name;
value = v[index]; %* move value into hash host variable;
if not missing (max[index]) then do;
result.removeall(); %* remove existing multidata items associated with the variable;
end;
result.add(); %* add new multidata item to hash;
max[index] = v[index]; %* track new maximum;
end;
else
if v[index] = max[index] then do; %* two or more ids have same max;
_name_ = vname(v[index]);
value = v[index];
result.add(); %* add id to the multidata item;
end;
end;
end;
enddata;
run;
quit;
%let syslast=want;
Reminder: Proc DS2 defaults are to not overwrite existing tables. To 'overwrite' a table you need to either:
Use table option overwrite=yes when syntax allows
The package hash .output() method does not recognize the table option
Drop the table before recreating it
The above code can be used in a Base SAS DATA step with minor modifications.