I have created a Talend job and deployed it as a Axis Web Service.
I am calling this Web Service from my Web Application.
My application and web service are deployed over Tomcat server.
For Valid Inputs:
Runs Perfectly.
For Invalid Inputs:
It throws Error/exceptions in Tomcat Server.
I want this Errors into my application. I didn't get any error related information in the Response sent by web service.
Error message on Tomcat Server
XML response of Web service
If I understand your question you are not so much asking how to fix this error, but how to get feedback about your error. There are several ways but here is a simple method.
Add a tLogCatcher to your job, and point its output to a tSendMail component. You can run the output thru a tMap do things like adding HTML formatting. You can also create a joblet with these two components and use the joblet in every job so you do not have to recreate it every time.
The diagram below shows a real simple case where I add tLogCatcher and tSendMail directly to the job. When there is an error it will send me an email with the details. You can use any of the columns in row11, I am only using job and message in my example.
This error : For input string "fabrik"
is generated by the tFileInputExcel component when encountering a non valid field (expected : integer ; given : string). You can't directly catch this error with the tFileInputExcel component (it's just printed out on the console).
However, you can use a tSchemaComplianceCheck component after your tFileInputExcelComponent : it will throw an error if a data is not valid for your schema. This component has a reject link to catch the error.
tFileInputExcel->tSchemaComplianceCheck->tMap->tMSOutput
If you use tLogCatcher component to catch the error then, at the end of the flow, you can add a tBufferOutput component. Keep the fields with the information you want for.
component configuration
The result will be like this (note that they are shown in the same order):
result
Related
I have a Integration Service that has 2 inbound fields (Login and Acao), both should be required, so I have created Business Object for each one, and at "Simple Type" section, I set the "Error Message" for these fields. When I ran the service by IBM BPM, and do not filled those field, the message is shown, but, if I call the service using SOAP UI, I just receive the error "Internal Server" and the message that I have set at "Error Message" is not showed.
I used "Error Intermediate Event" to catch the error and "Error end Event", but it still not work.
Whats is the best way to make a field required in a IBM BPM Service or how can I still throw an exception, but instead of "Internal Error" show specific message?
Kind regards
I'm not sure about your current IBM BPM version or edition and I'm assuming you are using only Process Designer.
I think it is not possible to throw an error the way you want. You may probably need to implement your Web Service (I'm assuming a WS is used to expose the IS) using IBM Integration Designer (IID), which is a little bit more complex but has a lot of flexibility.
In case that is not an option (only available in Advanced Edition), you can add an additional output variable to your current service to return (throw) the error:
Add a variable output as a String or any desired complex type
Use the regular End Event instead of your Error End Event
Include a script between the Error Intermediate Event and the End Event to map the error description to the new output variable
I have a simple service (C# web service) that accepts an integer and returns an integer, i have tested it using Storm it is working properly.
Now i am calling this service in a for loop in a file with around 2000 records approx, this service is failing giving the above error with some records. If i run the error file it goes through as if nothing was wrong, what might be the problem please help.
The error doesn't seem related to it being a web service call: it seems to indicate you either tried to GetEntity and passed in a zero/NullIdentifier() (not a valid Id), or maybe you tried an CreateEntity and that entity has a foreign key that is not filled in (i.e. zero/NullIdentifier() again).
I would start by checking the logic inside the WS method for those action calls and the inputs you are using there.
I created a service consumer through the wizard, based on a WSDL. Proxy object is generated, all structures and methods are found. Then, I add a logical port through SOAMANAGER - all fine, it pings and the connection works.
I populate the input structure, call my method and get an error: Error during proxy processing (PART UNKNOWN (NULL)). This is a very useless error message to me.
So, I activate all manners of tracing, so I can see what's going on calling and retrieving data. I can see that
My proxy is called correctly
The payload sent TO the service looks correct
The payload received FROM the service is correct. I know this because it's identical to the XML I get back calling the service through other means.
The transformation is empty
Here a screen of (the start of) the returned XML. getRecordsResult set is what I need:
This is the second response, after "conversion":
Nothing about this service has been customized: it's generated straight up through the wizard. I have already deleted and recreated it but no results.
Anyone got any advice on what to do next?
I get the error below when I try to access the Amazon SQS WSDL:
http://queue.amazonaws.com/doc/2012-11-05/QueueService.wsdl
Cannot access the WSDL or the WSDL file is invalid.
I believe I have .NET 4 SDK installed and I have tried downloading the WSDL file to a local drive and pointing the proxy wizard to it. Still the same error.
Can someone try to use it and let me know your outcomes?
Try running the .Net WSDL utility directly on the WSDL. That utility reports back error information. It's also what PowerBuilder is calling under the covers, but is not sharing the error information back to you.
When I do that, I get this result:
Error: Unable to import binding 'SimpleQueueServicePostBinding' from namespace '
http://queue.amazonaws.com/doc/2012-11-05/'.
- The operation 'GetQueueUrl' on portType 'SimpleQueueServicePortType' from na
mespace 'http://queue.amazonaws.com/doc/2012-11-05/' had the following syntax error:
The operation has no matching binding. Check if the operation, input and
output names in the Binding section match with the corresponding names in the PortType section.
It looks like it might be a problem with the format of the WSDL. Not the first time that's happened, I've had to edit one of their other WSDL files by hand to correct an error in it.
If you choose to do that, you can download the file to your local machine, make the edits, and then run the PB proxy tool against the local file.
I have a legacy VB6 application that needs to make asynchronous calls to a web service. The web service provides a search method allows end-users to query a central database and view the results from within the application. I'm using the MSXML2.XMLHTTP to make the requests, and have written a SearchWebService class that encapsulates the web service call and code to handle the response asychronously.
Currently, the SearchWebService raises one of two events to the caller: SearchCompleted and SearchFailed. A SearchCompleted event is raised that contains the search results in a parameter to the event if the call completes successfully. A SearchFailed is raised when any type of failure is detected, which can be anything from an improperly-formatted URL (this is possible because the URL is user-configurable), to low-level network errors such as "Host not found", to HTTP errors such as internal server errors. It returns a error message string to the end-user (which is extracted from the web service response body, if present, or from the HTTP status code text if the response has no body, or translated from the network error code if a network error occurs).
Because of various security requirements, the calling application does not access the web service directly, but instead accesses it through a proxy web server running at the customer site, which in turn accesses the actual web service through via a VPN. However, the SearchWebService doesn't know that the calling application is accessing the web service through a proxy: it's just given a URL and told to make the request. The existence of the proxy is a application-level requirement.
The problem is that from an end-user perspective, it's important that the calling application be able to distinguish between low-level network errors versus HTTP errors from the web service, and to distinguish proxy errors from remote web server errors. For example, the application needs to know if a request failed because the proxy server is down, or because the remote web service that the proxy is accessing is down. An application-specific message needs to be presented to the end-user in each case, such as "Search web service proxy server appears to be down. The proxy server may need to be restarted" versus "The proxy is currently running but the remote web server appears to be unavailable. Please contact (name of person in charge of the remote web server)." I could handle this directly in the SearchWebService class, but it seems wrong to generate these application-specific error messages from such a generic class (and the class might be used in environments that don't require a proxy, where the error messages would no longer make sense).
This distinction is important for troubleshooting: a proxy server problem can usually be resolved by the customer, but a remote web server error has to handled by a third party.
I was thinking one way to handle this would be to have the SearchWebService class detect different types of errors and raise different events in each case. For example, instead of a single SearchFailed event, I could have a NetworkError event for low-level network errors (which would indicate a problem accessing the proxy server), a ConfigurationError event for invalid properties on the SearchWebService class (such as passing an improperly-formatted URL), and a ServiceError for errors that occur on the remote web server (implying that the proxy is working properly but the remote server returned an error).
Now that I think about it, there is also an additional error scenario: it could be possible that the proxy server is running properly, but the remote web server is down, or the proxy server has been misconfigured.
Is the approach of using multiple error events to classify different classes of error a reasonable solution to this problem? For the last scenario (the proxy is running but the remote server cannot be reached), I'm guessing I may have to set up the proxy to return a specific HTTP error code so that client can detect this situation (i.e. something more specific than a 500 response).
Originally I kept the single SearchFailed event and simply added an additional errorCode parameter to the event, but that got messy quickly, especially in cases where there wasn't a logical error code to use (such as if the VB6 raises a "real" error, i.e. if the XMLHTTP class isn't registered).
I think that some ideas I've used with Java exceptions may apply here.
Having a large number of different Exceptions gets pretty messy, yet we need to give enough detail to the user so we don't want to lose information.
Hence I have a small number of specific Exceptions, which I guess would correspond to your Events:
InvalidRequestEvent: Used when the user specifies bad information
TransientErrorEvent: used when there's infrastructure issues when a retry might work.
I tend to work in environments where we have clusters of servers so if a user request hits a dying server then if he resubmits he'll probably get a good one, hence from his perspective a simple retry often works. However sometimes the error is with a service such as the Network or Database and in which case the user needs diagnostic information to report to the helpdesk. Hence we need to decide on the extra information to put into the exception. This is (if I understand you correctly) your question.
In the case of InvalidRequestException we would bet giving some information about the problems with the input. It could be on the lines of "Mismatched parenthese" or "Unknown column CUTSOMER in table ORDER". In the case of TransientErrorException it could be "Proxy server is down".
Now depending upon your exact requirments you may not actually choose to put that text in the Exception, but rather an error number which the presentation layer converts to a locale-specific string (English, French ...).
So either Exception might contain something like this (sorry for that Java syntax, but I hope the idea is clear):
BaseException {
String ErrorText; // the error text itself
// OR if you want to allow for internationaliation
int ErrorCode; // my application specific code, corresponds to text held by the UI
String[] params; // specific parameters to be substitued in the error text
// CUTSOMER and ORDER in my example above
int SystemErrorCode; // If you have an underlying error code it goes here
String SystemErrorText; // any further diagnoistic you might need to give to
// the user so that they can report the problem to the
// help desk.
// OR instead of the text (this is something I've seen done)
int SystemErrorTag; // A unique id for this particular error problem.
// This server systems will label their message in the
// server logs. Users just tell the help desk this number
// they don't need to read detailed server error text.
}