Java 8 Stream with 2 Lists - list

I want to build a JSON from two lists. I need to use the corresponding elements from both lists to create a single JSON object.
My problem could be solved with ordinary loop like this:
List<Class1> items = baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class1.class, "Class1.findAll", new Object[]{});
for(int i=0 ; i<items.size();i++){
List<Class2> items2 = baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class2.class, "Class2.findByCreatedBy" ,new Object[] {items.get(i).getCreatedBy()});
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
JsonObjectBuilder jpb = Json.createObjectBuilder()
.add("createdBy",items.get(i).getCreatedBy())
.add("phone",items2.get(0).getPhone())
groupsBuilder.add(jpb);
}
Is it possible to solve it using Java 8 Stream API?

There are still some things unclear. Like why you are insisting on creating that SimpleDateFormat instance that you are not using anywhere. Or whether there is a significance in calling getCreatedBy() multiple times. Assuming that it is not necessary, the following code is equivalent
baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class1.class, "Class1.findAll", new Object[]{})
.stream()
.map(item -> item.getCreatedBy())
.map(createdBy -> Json.createObjectBuilder()
.add("createdBy", createdBy)
.add("phone", baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(
Class2.class, "Class2.findByCreatedBy", new Object[] {createdBy})
.get(0).getPhone())
)
.forEach(jpb -> groupsBuilder.add(jpb));
It’s still unclear to me whether (or why) findObjectsByNamedQuery is not a varargs method. It would be quite natural to be a varargs method, not requiring these explicit new Object[] { … } allocations.

With pure Java8 Stream API:
public void convertItemsToJSon(List<Item> items) {
...
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
Map<Item, List<Class2>> sqlItems = items
.stream()
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Function.identity(), (item) -> baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class2.class, "Class2.findByCratedBy", new Object[]{item.getCreatedBy()})));
sqlItems.entrySet()
.stream()
.map(sqlItem -> buildJson(sqlItem.getKey(), sqlItem.getValue()))
.forEach(groupsBuilder::add);
...
}
private JsonObjectBuilder buildJson(Item item, List<Class2> class2Items) {
return Json.createObjectBuilder().add("createdBy", item.getCreatedBy());
}
With StreamEx library
public void convertItemsToJSonStreamEx(List<Item> items) {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
...
StreamEx.of(items)
.cross(item -> baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class2.class, "Class2.findByCratedBy", new Object[]{item.getCreatedBy()}).stream())
.mapKeys(item -> Json.createObjectBuilder().add("createdBy", item.getCreatedBy()))
.mapKeyValue(this::addField)
.forEach(groupsBuilder::add);
...
}
private JsonObjectBuilder addField(JsonObjectBuilder json, Class2 class2) {
// You logic how to convert class2 to field in JSON
return json;
}

Thanks for your help and solution. Most helpful was the first response from Vlad Bochenin The code is here:
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
items.stream().map(item -> {
List<Class2> items2 = baseManager.findObjectsByNamedQuery(Class2.class, "Class2.findByCreatedBy", new Object[]{item.getCreatedBy()});
JsonObjectBuilder jpb = Json.createObjectBuilder()
.add("createdBy", item.getCreatedBy())
.add("phone", items2.get(0).getPhone())
return jpb;
}).forEach(groupsBuilder::add);

Related

How to add an item to a list in Kotlin?

I'm trying to add an element list to the list of string, but I found Kotlin does not have an add function like java so please help me out how to add the items to the list.
class RetrofitKotlin : AppCompatActivity() {
var listofVechile:List<Message>?=null
var listofVechileName:List<String>?=null
var listview:ListView?=null
var progressBar:ProgressBar?=null
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContentView(R.layout.activity_retrofit_kotlin)
listview=findViewById<ListView>(R.id.mlist)
var apiInterfacee=ApiClass.client.create(ApiInterfacee::class.java)
val call=apiInterfacee.getTaxiType()
call.enqueue(object : Callback<TaxiTypeResponse> {
override fun onResponse(call: Call<TaxiTypeResponse>, response: Response<TaxiTypeResponse>) {
listofVechile=response.body()?.message!!
println("Sixze is here listofVechile ${listofVechile!!.size}")
if (listofVechile!=null) {
for (i in 0..listofVechile!!.size-1) {
//how to add the name only listofVechileName list
}
}
//println("Sixze is here ${listofVechileName!!.size}")
val arrayadapter=ArrayAdapter<String>(this#RetrofitKotlin,android.R.layout.simple_expandable_list_item_1,listofVechileName)
listview!!.adapter=arrayadapter
}
override fun onFailure(call: Call<TaxiTypeResponse>, t: Throwable) {
}
})
}
}
A more idiomatic approach would be to use MutableList instead of specifically ArrayList. You can declare:
val listOfVehicleNames: MutableList<String> = mutableListOf()
And add to it that way. Alternatively, you may wish to prefer immutability, and declare it as:
var listOfVehicleNames: List<String> = emptyList()
And in your completion block, simply reassign it:
listOfVehicleNames = response.body()?.message()?.orEmpty()
.map { it.name() /* assumes name() function exists */ }
Talking about an idiomatic approach... 🙄
When you can get away with only using immutable lists (which means usually in Kotlin), simply use + or plus. It returns a new list
with all elements of the original list plus the newly added one:
val original = listOf("orange", "apple")
val modified = original + "lemon" // [orange, apple, lemon]
original.plus("lemon") yields the same result as original + "lemon". Slightly more verbose but might come in handy when combining several collection operations:
return getFruit()
.plus("lemon")
.distinct()
Besides adding a single element, you can use plus to concatenate a whole collection too:
val original = listOf("orange", "apple")
val other = listOf("banana", "strawberry")
val newList = original + other // [orange, apple, banana, strawberry]
Disclaimer: this doesn't directly answer OP's question, but I feel that in a question titled "How to add an item to a list in Kotlin?", which is a top Google hit for this topic, plus must be mentioned.
If you don't want or can't use array list directly use this code for add item
itemsList.toMutableList().add(item)
itemlist : list of your items
item : item you want to add
instead of using a regular list which is immutable just use an arrayListof which is mutable
so your regular list will become
var listofVehicleNames = arrayListOf("list items here")
then you can use the add function
listOfVehicleNames.add("what you want to add")
you should use a MutableList like ArrayList
var listofVechileName:List<String>?=null
becomes
var listofVechileName:ArrayList<String>?=null
and with that you can use the method add
https://kotlinlang.org/api/latest/jvm/stdlib/kotlin.collections/-mutable-list/add.html
For any specific class, the following may help
var newSearchData = List<FIRListValuesFromServer>()
for (i in 0 until this.singleton.firListFromServer.size) {
if (searchText.equals(this.singleton.firListFromServer.get(i).FIR_SRNO)) {
newSearchData.toMutableList().add(this.singleton.firListFromServer.get(i))
}
}
val listofVechile = mutableListOf<String>()
Declare mutable list like that and you will be able to add elements to list :
listofVechile.add("car")
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/collections-overview.html

Running BeamSql WithoutCoder or Making Coder Dynamic

I am reading data from file and converting it to BeamRecord But While i am Doing Query on that it Show Error-:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.beam.sdk.coders.SerializableCoder cannot be cast to org.apache.beam.sdk.coders.BeamRecordCoder
at org.apache.beam.sdk.extensions.sql.BeamSql$QueryTransform.registerTables(BeamSql.java:173)
at org.apache.beam.sdk.extensions.sql.BeamSql$QueryTransform.expand(BeamSql.java:153)
at org.apache.beam.sdk.extensions.sql.BeamSql$QueryTransform.expand(BeamSql.java:116)
at org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.applyInternal(Pipeline.java:533)
at org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.applyTransform(Pipeline.java:465)
at org.apache.beam.sdk.values.PCollectionTuple.apply(PCollectionTuple.java:160)
at TestingClass.main(TestingClass.java:75)
But When I am Providing it a Coder Then It Runs Perfectly.
I am little confused that if I am reading data from a file the file data schema changes on every run because I am using templates so is there any way I can use Default Coder or Without Coder, i can Run the Query.
For Reference Code is Below Please Check.
PCollection<String> ReadFile1 = PBegin.in(p).apply(TextIO.read().from("gs://Bucket_Name/FileName.csv"));
PCollection<BeamRecord> File1_BeamRecord = ReadFile1.apply(new StringToBeamRecord()).setCoder(new Temp().test().getRecordCoder());
PCollection<String> ReadFile2= p.apply(TextIO.read().from("gs://Bucket_Name/FileName.csv"));
PCollection<BeamRecord> File2_Beam_Record = ReadFile2.apply(new StringToBeamRecord()).setCoder(new Temp().test1().getRecordCoder());
new Temp().test1().getRecordCoder() --> Returning HardCoded BeamRecordCoder Values Which I need to fetch at runtime
Conversion From PColletion<String> to PCollection<TableRow> is Below-:
Public class StringToBeamRecord extends PTransform<PCollection<String>,PCollection<BeamRecord>> {
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(StringToBeamRecord.class);
#Override
public PCollection<BeamRecord> expand(PCollection<String> arg0) {
return arg0.apply("Conversion",ParDo.of(new ConversionOfData()));
}
static class ConversionOfData extends DoFn<String,BeamRecord> implements Serializable{
#ProcessElement
public void processElement(ProcessContext c){
String Data = c.element().replaceAll(",,",",blank,");
String[] array = Data.split(",");
List<String> fieldNames = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> fieldTypes = new ArrayList<>();
List<Object> Data_Conversion = new ArrayList<>();
int Count = 0;
for(int i = 0 ; i < array.length;i++){
fieldNames.add(new String("R"+Count).toString());
Count++;
fieldTypes.add(Types.VARCHAR); //Using Schema I can Set it
Data_Conversion.add(array[i].toString());
}
LOG.info("The Size is : "+Data_Conversion.size());
BeamRecordSqlType type = BeamRecordSqlType.create(fieldNames, fieldTypes);
c.output(new BeamRecord(type,Data_Conversion));
}
}
}
Query is -:
PCollectionTuple test = PCollectionTuple.of(
new TupleTag<BeamRecord>("File1_BeamRecord"),File1_BeamRecord)
.and(new TupleTag<BeamRecord>("File2_BeamRecord"), File2_BeamRecord);
PCollection<BeamRecord> output = test.apply(BeamSql.queryMulti(
"Select * From File1_BeamRecord JOIN File2_BeamRecord "));
Is thier anyway i can make Coder Dynamic or I can Run Query with Default Coder.

Amazon AWS DynamoDB converting List of Map to ArrayList of objects

I am trying to learn DynamoDB from Amazon AWS,and have been able to retrieve data with success, however I am having a hard time converting it to usable form.
My goal is to convert the result to an ArrayList of my Data data type, which is a ValueObject class with attributes, getters and setters.
Thanks!
Map<String,String> expressionAttributesNames = new HashMap<>();
expressionAttributesNames.put("#network_asset_code","network_asset_code");
expressionAttributesNames.put("#temperature","temperature");
Map<String,AttributeValue> expressionAttributeValues = new HashMap<>();
expressionAttributeValues.put(":network_asset_codeValue", new AttributeValue().withS("17AB05"));
expressionAttributeValues.put(":temperature", new AttributeValue().withN("21"));
ScanRequest scanRequest = new ScanRequest()
.withTableName("things")
.withFilterExpression("#network_asset_code = :network_asset_codeValue and #temperature = :temperature")
.withExpressionAttributeNames(expressionAttributesNames)
.withExpressionAttributeValues(expressionAttributeValues);
ScanResult scanResult = client.scan(scanRequest);
List<Map<String,AttributeValue>> attributeValues = scanResult.getItems();
ArrayList<Data> dataArray = new ArrayList<>();
for (Map map: attributeValues) {
Data d = map.values();
dataArray.add(d);
}
You can use DynamoDBMapper to automagically convert DynamoDB items to Java objects (POJO) using annotations.
After a while I could get it right:
for (Map map: attributeValues) {
AttributeValue attr = (AttributeValue) map.get("network_asset_code");
Data d = new Data();
d.network_asset_code = attr.getS();
dataArray.add(d);
}

Serializing List<MemoryStream> to a file using a standard .NET class

Writing a WP8 Silverlight app. Is there a standard .NET technique available in this environment I can use to serialize an object like this
private static List<MemoryStream> MemoryStreamList = new List<MemoryStream>();
to save it to a file and restore it later?
I tried to use DataContractJsonSerializer for this which is good to serialize a List of simple custom objects, but it fails for List (I get System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException).
I would suggest converting your list to a list of byte arrays before persisting and then you should be able to serialize. Of course this comes with some overhead at deserialization as well.
Serialization part:
byte[] bytes = null;
var newList = MemoryStreamList.Select(x => x.ToArray()).ToList();
XmlSerializer ser = new XmlSerializer(newList.GetType());
using (var ms = new MemoryStream())
{
ser.Serialize(ms, newList);
//if you want your result as a string, then uncomment to lines below
//ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
//using (var sr = new StreamReader(ms))
//{
//string serializedStuff = sr.ReadToEnd();
//}
//else you can call ms.ToArray() here and persist the byte[]
bytes = ms.ToArray();
}
Deserialization part:
using (var ms = new MemoryStream(bytes))
{
var result = ser.Deserialize(ms) as List<byte[]>;
}

VMWare VIM SDK. List all VM's working, but list all datasources does not. Am I missing something?

My goal is to get a listing of all the DataStores in a specific datacenter. I'm able to list all of the Hosts, and VM's, but not the Datastores, and I don't understand why (I'm still learning the API's). Any insight would be appreciated.
Here's the code for grabbing all of the VM's (this works as expected):
public List<VM> getVMsInDatacenter(String datacenter, IEnumerable<String> properties)
{
List<VM> VMs = null;
this.joinConnection((appUtil) =>
{
var svcUtil = appUtil.getServiceUtil();
var dcMoRef = svcUtil.GetDecendentMoRef(null, "Datacenter", datacenter);
var typeinfo = buildTypeInfo("VirtualMachine", properties.ToList());
VMs = buildVMsFromObjectContent(svcUtil.GetContentsRecursively(null, dcMoRef, typeinfo, true));
});
return VMs;
}
Here is the analogous code for the Datastore (which does not work as expected):
public List<DataStore> getDataStoresInDatacenter(String datacenter, IEnumerable<String> properties)
{
List<DataStore> DataStores = null;
this.joinConnection((appUtil) =>
{
var svcUtil = appUtil.getServiceUtil();
var dcMoRef = svcUtil.GetDecendentMoRef(null, "Datacenter", datacenter);
var typeinfo = buildTypeInfo("Datastore", properties.ToList());
DataStores = buildDataStoresFromObjectContent(svcUtil.GetContentsRecursively(null, dcMoRef, typeinfo, true));
});
return DataStores;
}
appUtil is an instantiation of the AppUtil class that came with the VIM SDK samples. It houses functionality for connecting, querying, etc.
joinConnection is a method for connecting, or re-using a connection if we've already connected.
If there are any other questions about the code, please let me know.
Also, if there's a better way, I'd like to know that too :)
Found the problem. The method getContentsRecursively is calling a method called 'buildFullTraversal' that builds a traversal/selection spec. This method was not adding a traversal for the datastore. I added one that like so:
TraversalSpec vmToDs = new TraversalSpec();
vmToDs.name = "vmToDs";
vmToDs.type = "VirtualMachine";
vmToDs.path = "datastore";
HToVm.skip = false;
HToVm.skipSpecified = true;
And then I modified the visitFolders traversal like so:
// Recurse through the folders
TraversalSpec visitFolders = new TraversalSpec();
visitFolders.name = "visitFolders";
visitFolders.type = "Folder";
visitFolders.path = "childEntity";
visitFolders.skip = false;
visitFolders.skipSpecified = true;
visitFolders.selectSet = new SelectionSpec[] { new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec(), new SelectionSpec() };
visitFolders.selectSet[0].name = "visitFolders";
visitFolders.selectSet[1].name = "dcToHf";
visitFolders.selectSet[2].name = "dcToVmf";
visitFolders.selectSet[3].name = "crToH";
visitFolders.selectSet[4].name = "crToRp";
visitFolders.selectSet[5].name = "HToVm";
visitFolders.selectSet[6].name = "rpToVm";
visitFolders.selectSet[7].name = "vmToDs";
return new SelectionSpec[] { visitFolders, dcToVmf, dcToHf, crToH, crToRp, rpToRp, HToVm, rpToVm, vmToDs };
Now, calls to getContentsRecursively will also include the datastores that belong to a VM, so the method in the question will works as expected.