Is it possible to "pin" a Type Hierarchy view like with Search view?
No, this is not currently possible.
You're welcome to file an enhancement request in Eclipse CDT's issue tracker.
Related
Does WebStorm have a design view like Dreamweaver?
I have been searching for it for a while but no clear answer found.
If not, can you please suggest an alternative to Dreamweaver that has a design view?
I use Hype on Mac. It seems to do a good job of the wysiwyg anytime I need to wireframe or run a quick UX design sequence. Whenever I sit down to code however it's visual code.
I use GlueGriffon WYSIWYG to edit HTML pages that I create in WebStorm
Its difficult to give more details as I haven't even found a clue in OBEO Designer Community to model OCL constraints.
Anyone has a idea how to do this?
Thanks
You should be able to add Validation rules with a constraint expressed in AQL -- Acceleo Query Language (a flavor of OCL) directly in the .odesign file.
See thecorresponding part of the tutorial.
I have tons of json schema for node.js project. Can I use them in any way for:
Accessing them as jsdoc types from ".js" code files to increase webstorm intellisense accuracy
Or for creating jsdoc type definitions automatically
?
I had the same question before and some time in 2017 created a json-schema-to-jsdoc utility in GitHub.
You can find it now in npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/json-schema-to-jsdoc
The closest I have seen to what you suggest is VSCode's support for JSON Schema with regard to editing JSON files.
I would expect given they have started to support JSON Schema, that it would certainly be worth logging an issue with them regarding extending the capabilities of such support. If you did and let me know I would certainly support it!
We're using django-admin interface for the backoffice of our own apps, but it we do expose it to our clients.
I'm considering going with either django-admin-tools or grappelli, to conveniently add modules and additional interactivity to the dashboard and data views.
What are your experiences?
django-admin-tools seems to be less intrusive. When I checked it, Grappelli broke some of admin-site extensions or widgets. Maybe they fixed it, but I'm alredy using DAT on my projects.
If I had to summarize: DAT is more about functionality; Grappelli is a more about style. So whatever fits you, best, go with it. Being a design-driven company, we ended up going with Grappelli.
My company did this analysis when we decided to use Django admin as a client-facing backend for a CMS Product. DAT offers some interesting functionality, some of which is duplicated in grappelli and some of which is not. Grappelli offers a few interesting additions of its own. In the end, we went with grappelli because of the really nice styling. My recommendation is to try both. Early on, we included both in the project, set up their respective dashboards, and it took about 30 seconds to switch between the two.
The commenter is right about grappelli needing to be in sync with django. I made the mistake of upgrading django without checking with grappelli, and it broke several things. The latest version of grappelli supports Django 1.4 and we'll be upgrading them together.
You will need to keep Django and grappelli in sync... The current version of Django is 1.4, but the current version grappelli supports 1.3. There is a branch that supports 1.4 however. If you are willing to support the minor hassle of managing this, grappelli offers some nice enhancements and a slicker look - starting with being able to set the title to the admin interface without copying and editing the admin template.
Depending on what you are doing, nice DateTime pickers (with "Today" and "Now" buttons) as well as sortable inlines can be very convenient.
Here is a little more up to date answer:
I have been using both but now am slowly moving towards grapelli, especially for new projects. Grapelli has for the most part caught up with django admin tools in terms of creating custom dashboards and menus. I still haven't seen all the features like draggable panels. Grapelli has better support and this can be seen by the repository activity. It was first to support Django 1.7 and at the time of me writing this, DAT did not offer that support yet. The reported bugs also do not get patched very often. I am also liking the way Grapelli looks and it is used in Mezzanine, my favourite cms.
Here are the two repositories if you wish to look:
https://bitbucket.org/izi/django-admin-tools/overview
https://github.com/sehmaschine/django-grappelli
Hope this helps.
We are Redmine as a Project management tool. It has been working great and we are happy with it. We now have a new requirement now. Our management wants to see a report showing each project's delivery date, manager, start date, total issues, open issues, closed issues. I searched at several places for quite some time and did not get a solution. I appreciate if someone can offer help.
This is, for me personally, the single thing JIRA is better at :)
Anyway, that being said, you can get a summary of all open versions on your "my page", eh, page, by using this plugin:
https://github.com/bradbeattie/redmine-my-widgets-plugin
And you can also add custom queries to "my page".
You can get much of what you want in the issue report. Click the Summary button in the sidebar of the issues page in each project. Example
Create one generic top level project. Calendar, gantt charts, issues, etc, for the top level project will show everything for every project that's nested underneath.
If you are properly adding roadmaps/milestones to all the projects, you can use My Roadmaps plugin to get a consolidated visibility:
http://www.redmine.org/plugins/my_roadmaps
It works fine with 1.2 and 1.4 versions.