I want to match 2 digits like (30:02:40) resulted from file index.txt, but i am stuck on if condition, i don't know how to compare the result and do something.
index.txt
<tr><td>device</td> <td>10.10.10.1</td> <td>64232</td> <td>1</td> <td bgcolor=Red>30:02:40</td><tr>
script.sh
#!/bin/bash
output=$(cat index.txt | sed -e 's/>/ /g;s/</ /g'| awk '{print $16}')
if [ $output == '[0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9]' ]; then
echo "successful"
else
echo "$output"
fi
tx
You have two issues:
Single square bracket tests are not able to handle those kinds of wildcards, but you can use the extended test command with double brackets.
Single-quote marks means that your wildcards are ignored and the string is treated as being verbatim.
With these two tweaks it works:
if [[ $output == [0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9] ]]; then
echo "successful"
else
echo "$output"
fi
xmlstarlet/xmllint are the right tools for manipulating XML/HTML data.
(For xmlstarlet : the only requirement is that your content should be a valid HTML/XML document/fragment):
xmlstarlet sel -t -v "//tr/td[#bgcolor='Red']" -n \
<(sed -E 's/([^[:space:]=<>]+=)([^[:space:]=<>]+)/\1"\2"/g; s/<tr>$/<\/tr>/' index.txt)
The output:
30:02:40
xmllint approach:
xmllint --html --xpath "//tr/td[#bgcolor='Red']/text()" index.txt
30:02:40
why not do the matcing in awk, instead of just {print $16}
... | awk '$16~/^[0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9]$/{print "successful"; exit} {print $16}'
you can also incorporate the first sed into this by just setting the right delimiters, but need to know the structure better to pinpoint the required field.
Yes some html parser would be better, but a pure bash solution might be:
grep -oP "\d+:\d+:\d+" index.txt
In bash, I have the following:
#!/bin/bash
curl $1 | tac | tac | perl -e '/(\d\d(?=:\d\d))/g; print $1' > $2
All I want is to the first match from the output of curl and print it to the output file. I run the script with ./scriptname url outputfile.txt but nothing is printed. My regex is valid on http://regexr.com, so I'm sure it's something I don't know about Perl. What am I doing wrong? Thanks.
You can use the following:
#!/bin/bash
curl "$1" | perl -nle'print for /\d\d(?=:\d\d)/g' > "$2"
If you change the match to /script/g, you can see it working with something like
./scriptname http://www.ucsd.edu outputfile.txt
I suppose this means perl -ne is reading the input line by line. Is there a simple way to have perl return only the first result?
Consider using sed:
... | sed '/^.*\([[:digit:]]\{2\}\):[[:digit:]]\{2\}.*/{s//\1/;q};d'
In Perl, that would be:
... | perl -nle 'if (s/^.*(\d\d):\d\d.*/$1/) { print; exit }'
And with GNU Grep compiled with --perl-regexp:
... | grep -m1 -Po '\d\d(?=:\d\d)'
There are a few problems:
You never read from STDIN.
You don't stop trying to match after the first match.
You print unconditionally.
If you want all matches (as per your original question):
perl -nle'print for /\d\d(?=:\d\d)/g'
If you want the first match (as per your comment):
perl -nle'if (/\d\d(?=:\d\d)/) { print $&; exit }'
perl -nle'if (/(\d\d):\d\d/) { print $1; exit }'
grep -Pom1 '\d\d(?=:\d\d)'
Notes:
-n wraps the code with a loop that reads from STDIN.
I'm trying to process my text.
For example i got:
asdf asdf get.this random random get.that
get.it this.no also.this.no
My desired output is:
get.this get.that
get.it
So regexp should catch only this pattern (get.\w), but it has to do it recursively because of multiple occurences in one line, so easiest way with sed
sed 's/.*(REGEX).*/\1/'
does not work (it shows only first occurence).
Probably the good way is to use grep -o, but i have old version of grep and -o flag is not available.
This grep may give what you need:
grep -o "get[^ ]*" file
Try awk:
awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){if($i~/get\.\w+/){print $i}}}' file.txt
You might need to tweak the regex between the slashes for your specific issue. Sample output:
$ awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){if($i~/get\.\w+/){print $i}}}' file.txt
get.this
get.that
get.it
With awk:
awk -v patt="^get" '{
for (i=1; i<=NF; i++)
if ($i ~ patt)
printf "%s%s", $i, OFS;
print ""
}' <<< "$text"
bash
while read -a words; do
for word in "${words[#]}"; do
if [[ $word == get* ]]; then
echo -n "$word "
fi
done
echo
done <<< "$text"
perl
perl -lane 'print join " ", grep {$_ =~ /^get/} #F' <<< "$text"
This might work for you (GNU sed):
sed -r '/\bget\.\S+/{s//\n&\n/g;s/[^\n]*\n([^\n]*)\n[^\n]*/\1 /g;s/ $//}' file
or if you want one per line:
sed -r '/\n/!s/\bget\.\S+/\n&\n/g;/^get/P;D' file
I need to scan each line of a file looking for any characters above hex \x7E. The file has several million rows, so improving efficiency would be great. So far, reading each line in a while loop, this works and finds lines with invalid characters:
echo "$line" | grep -P "[\x7F-\xFF]" > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then...
But this doesn't:
if [[ "$line" =~ [\x7F-\xFF] ]]; then...
I'm assuming it would be more efficient the second way, if I could get it to work. What am I missing?
If you're interested in efficiency, you shouldn't write your loop in bash. You should rethink your program in terms of pipes and use efficient tools.
That said, you can do this with
LC_CTYPE=C LC_COLLATE=C
if [[ "$line" =~ [$'\x7f'-$'\xff'] ]]
then
echo "It contains bytes \x7F or up"
fi
I basically have to split the file. Valid records go to one file, invalid records go to another.
sed -n '/[^\x0-\x7e]/w badrecords
//! w goodrecords'
If you're already using Perl regular expressions, you might as well use perl for the task:
perl -ne '
if (/[\x7F-\xFF]/) {print STDERR $_} else {print}
' file > valid 2> invalid
I'd bet that's faster than a bash loop.
I suspect this would be more efficient, even though it processes the file twice:
grep -P "[\x7F-\xFF]" file > invalid
grep -vP "[\x7F-\xFF]" file > valid
You'd want to write your grep code as
if grep -qP "[\x7F-\xFF]" <<< "$line"; then...
I am trying to use grep to match lines that contain two different strings. I have tried the following but this matches lines that contain either string1 or string2 which not what I want.
grep 'string1\|string2' filename
So how do I match with grep only the lines that contain both strings?
You can use
grep 'string1' filename | grep 'string2'
Or
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename
I think this is what you were looking for:
grep -E "string1|string2" filename
I think that answers like this:
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename
only match the case where both are present, not one or the other or both.
To search for files containing all the words in any order anywhere:
grep -ril \'action\' | xargs grep -il \'model\' | xargs grep -il \'view_type\'
The first grep kicks off a recursive search (r), ignoring case (i) and listing (printing out) the name of the files that are matching (l) for one term ('action' with the single quotes) occurring anywhere in the file.
The subsequent greps search for the other terms, retaining case insensitivity and listing out the matching files.
The final list of files that you will get will the ones that contain these terms, in any order anywhere in the file.
If you have a grep with a -P option for a limited perl regex, you can use
grep -P '(?=.*string1)(?=.*string2)'
which has the advantage of working with overlapping strings. It's somewhat more straightforward using perl as grep, because you can specify the and logic more directly:
perl -ne 'print if /string1/ && /string2/'
Your method was almost good, only missing the -w
grep -w 'string1\|string2' filename
You could try something like this:
(pattern1.*pattern2|pattern2.*pattern1)
The | operator in a regular expression means or. That is to say either string1 or string2 will match. You could do:
grep 'string1' filename | grep 'string2'
which will pipe the results from the first command into the second grep. That should give you only lines that match both.
And as people suggested perl and python, and convoluted shell scripts, here a simple awk approach:
awk '/string1/ && /string2/' filename
Having looked at the comments to the accepted answer: no, this doesn't do multi-line; but then that's also not what the author of the question asked for.
Don't try to use grep for this, use awk instead. To match 2 regexps R1 and R2 in grep you'd think it would be:
grep 'R1.*R2|R2.*R1'
while in awk it'd be:
awk '/R1/ && /R2/'
but what if R2 overlaps with or is a subset of R1? That grep command simply would not work while the awk command would. Lets say you want to find lines that contain the and heat:
$ echo 'theatre' | grep 'the.*heat|heat.*the'
$ echo 'theatre' | awk '/the/ && /heat/'
theatre
You'd have to use 2 greps and a pipe for that:
$ echo 'theatre' | grep 'the' | grep 'heat'
theatre
and of course if you had actually required them to be separate you can always write in awk the same regexp as you used in grep and there are alternative awk solutions that don't involve repeating the regexps in every possible sequence.
Putting that aside, what if you wanted to extend your solution to match 3 regexps R1, R2, and R3. In grep that'd be one of these poor choices:
grep 'R1.*R2.*R3|R1.*R3.*R2|R2.*R1.*R3|R2.*R3.*R1|R3.*R1.*R2|R3.*R2.*R1' file
grep R1 file | grep R2 | grep R3
while in awk it'd be the concise, obvious, simple, efficient:
awk '/R1/ && /R2/ && /R3/'
Now, what if you actually wanted to match literal strings S1 and S2 instead of regexps R1 and R2? You simply can't do that in one call to grep, you have to either write code to escape all RE metachars before calling grep:
S1=$(sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' <<< 'R1')
S2=$(sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' <<< 'R2')
grep 'S1.*S2|S2.*S1'
or again use 2 greps and a pipe:
grep -F 'S1' file | grep -F 'S2'
which again are poor choices whereas with awk you simply use a string operator instead of regexp operator:
awk 'index($0,S1) && index($0.S2)'
Now, what if you wanted to match 2 regexps in a paragraph rather than a line? Can't be done in grep, trivial in awk:
awk -v RS='' '/R1/ && /R2/'
How about across a whole file? Again can't be done in grep and trivial in awk (this time I'm using GNU awk for multi-char RS for conciseness but it's not much more code in any awk or you can pick a control-char you know won't be in the input for the RS to do the same):
awk -v RS='^$' '/R1/ && /R2/'
So - if you want to find multiple regexps or strings in a line or paragraph or file then don't use grep, use awk.
git grep
Here is the syntax using git grep with multiple patterns:
git grep --all-match --no-index -l -e string1 -e string2 -e string3 file
You may also combine patterns with Boolean expressions such as --and, --or and --not.
Check man git-grep for help.
--all-match When giving multiple pattern expressions, this flag is specified to limit the match to files that have lines to match all of them.
--no-index Search files in the current directory that is not managed by Git.
-l/--files-with-matches/--name-only Show only the names of files.
-e The next parameter is the pattern. Default is to use basic regexp.
Other params to consider:
--threads Number of grep worker threads to use.
-q/--quiet/--silent Do not output matched lines; exit with status 0 when there is a match.
To change the pattern type, you may also use -G/--basic-regexp (default), -F/--fixed-strings, -E/--extended-regexp, -P/--perl-regexp, -f file, and other.
Related:
How to grep for two words existing on the same line?
Check if all of multiple strings or regexes exist in a file
How to run grep with multiple AND patterns? & Match all patterns from file at once
For OR operation, see:
How do I grep for multiple patterns with pattern having a pipe character?
Grep: how to add an “OR” condition?
Found lines that only starts with 6 spaces and finished with:
cat my_file.txt | grep
-e '^ .*(\.c$|\.cpp$|\.h$|\.log$|\.out$)' # .c or .cpp or .h or .log or .out
-e '^ .*[0-9]\{5,9\}$' # numers between 5 and 9 digist
> nolog.txt
Let's say we need to find count of multiple words in a file testfile.
There are two ways to go about it
1) Use grep command with regex matching pattern
grep -c '\<\(DOG\|CAT\)\>' testfile
2) Use egrep command
egrep -c 'DOG|CAT' testfile
With egrep you need not to worry about expression and just separate words by a pipe separator.
grep ‘string1\|string2’ FILENAME
GNU grep version 3.1
Place the strings you want to grep for into a file
echo who > find.txt
echo Roger >> find.txt
echo [44][0-9]{9,} >> find.txt
Then search using -f
grep -f find.txt BIG_FILE_TO_SEARCH.txt
grep '(string1.*string2 | string2.*string1)' filename
will get line with string1 and string2 in any order
for multiline match:
echo -e "test1\ntest2\ntest3" |tr -d '\n' |grep "test1.*test3"
or
echo -e "test1\ntest5\ntest3" >tst.txt
cat tst.txt |tr -d '\n' |grep "test1.*test3\|test3.*test1"
we just need to remove the newline character and it works!
You should have grep like this:
$ grep 'string1' file | grep 'string2'
I often run into the same problem as yours, and I just wrote a piece of script:
function m() { # m means 'multi pattern grep'
function _usage() {
echo "usage: COMMAND [-inH] -p<pattern1> -p<pattern2> <filename>"
echo "-i : ignore case"
echo "-n : show line number"
echo "-H : show filename"
echo "-h : show header"
echo "-p : specify pattern"
}
declare -a patterns
# it is important to declare OPTIND as local
local ignorecase_flag filename linum header_flag colon result OPTIND
while getopts "iHhnp:" opt; do
case $opt in
i)
ignorecase_flag=true ;;
H)
filename="FILENAME," ;;
n)
linum="NR," ;;
p)
patterns+=( "$OPTARG" ) ;;
h)
header_flag=true ;;
\?)
_usage
return ;;
esac
done
if [[ -n $filename || -n $linum ]]; then
colon="\":\","
fi
shift $(( $OPTIND - 1 ))
if [[ $ignorecase_flag == true ]]; then
for s in "${patterns[#]}"; do
result+=" && s~/${s,,}/"
done
result=${result# && }
result="{s=tolower(\$0)} $result"
else
for s in "${patterns[#]}"; do
result="$result && /$s/"
done
result=${result# && }
fi
result+=" { print "$filename$linum$colon"\$0 }"
if [[ ! -t 0 ]]; then # pipe case
cat - | awk "${result}"
else
for f in "$#"; do
[[ $header_flag == true ]] && echo "########## $f ##########"
awk "${result}" $f
done
fi
}
Usage:
echo "a b c" | m -p A
echo "a b c" | m -i -p A # a b c
You can put it in .bashrc if you like.
grep -i -w 'string1\|string2' filename
This works for exact word match and matching case insensitive words ,for that -i is used
When the both strings are in sequence then put a pattern in between on grep command:
$ grep -E "string1(?.*)string2" file
Example if the following lines are contained in a file named Dockerfile:
FROM python:3.8 as build-python
FROM python:3.8-slim
To get the line that contains the strings: FROM python and as build-python then use:
$ grep -E "FROM python:(?.*) as build-python" Dockerfile
Then the output will show only the line that contain both strings:
FROM python:3.8 as build-python
If git is initialized and added to the branch then it is better to use git grep because it is super fast and it will search inside the whole directory.
git grep 'string1.*string2.*string3'
searching for two String and highlight only string1 and string2
grep -E 'string1.*string2|string2.*string1' filename | grep -E 'string1|string2'
or
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename | grep -E 'string1\|string2'
ripgrep
Here is the example using rg:
rg -N '(?P<p1>.*string1.*)(?P<p2>.*string2.*)' file.txt
It's one of the quickest grepping tools, since it's built on top of Rust's regex engine which uses finite automata, SIMD and aggressive literal optimizations to make searching very fast.
Use it, especially when you're working with a large data.
See also related feature request at GH-875.