I have a strange problem linking c++ with Leptonica. Normal function invocation works fine, but I need functions from the library which were originally not exposed in the .so library. So I have searched for the two interesting functions in the source, removed the static keyword, so they look similar to exposed ones. I have remade the full library after a make clean. The .so file looks OK:
nm liblept.so.5.0.0
...
000000000009d010 T dewarpGetMeanVerticals
000000000009d160 T dewarpGetTextlineCenters
000000000009d8f0 T dewarpIsLineCoverageValid
Compiling to .o file and observing it:
g++ -c -std=c++11 -I../leptonica/src/src/ preproc.cpp -L../leptonica/src/.libs/ -llept -o preproc
nm preproc
...
U dewarpGetMeanVerticals
U dewarpIsLineCoverageValid
While the same compiling without -c flag results in
/tmp/ccCPqS1R.o: In function `_dewarpGetTextlineCenters(Pix*, int)':
preproc.cpp:(.text+0x3d5): undefined reference to `dewarpGetMeanVerticals'
/tmp/ccCPqS1R.o: In function `_dewarpBuildPageModel(L_Dewarp*, char const*)':
preproc.cpp:(.text+0x81d): undefined reference to `dewarpIsLineCoverageValid'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
What do I do wrong?
Thank you in advance: Balázs
I think you may need the extern "C" keywords around those functions if you want to expose them in the so. Since the names don't appear to be mangled by the C++ compiler in the .so this is probably not the case.
I notice that you're showing us what's in liblept.so.5.0.0 and linking against liblept.so. Is it possible that you need to update a symbolic link so that you're linking against the correct .so file?
Related
I have a cpp code in which I have included tcl.h library. I am trying to compile it using the gcc compiler. but I'm getting the following error :
gcc -o top.o -std=c99 top.c
top.c:12: warning: return type defaults to 'int'
/tmp/ccDOTTZQ.o: In function `main':
top.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `Tcl_CreateInterp'
top.c:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `Tcl_EvalFile'
top.c:(.text+0x3d): undefined reference to `Tcl_GetVar2Ex'
top.c:(.text+0x75): undefined reference to `Tcl_ListObjGetElements'
top.c:(.text+0xb1): undefined reference to `Tcl_GetString'
top.c:(.text+0xcc): undefined reference to `Tcl_GetInt'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Its not able to find the Cpp-tcl APIs. Kindly help me with this.
Your code is not linking to the Tcl library, so obviously it can't find the implementations of those functions. (In C and C++, the linking to the implementations of functions is a separate stage from the use of the declarations of those functions, which is what the header files provide.)
Except that you're actually calling gcc wrong. You need to use two steps, first with -c to compile the source code to an object file:
gcc -c -o top.o -std=c99 top.c
Then like this to link the result and make an executable:
gcc -o top.exe -std=c99 top.o -ltcl
With the first, you might need to additionally specify an appropriate -I option to locate the include files (if they're not in the standard locations). With the second, you might need to specify an appropriate -L option to locate the library files (libtcl.so). Depending on the system, you might also need to specify some version numbers (e.g., -ltcl86 or -ltcl8.6 instead of -ltcl). These are all options that depend on your build system configuration, so they're hard to predict exactly here.
I found a number of similar questions (e.g. this, that or this), but none of them helped me solve my problem. I have a *.so file (from the core of gnss-sdr) that, as indicated by:
$nm libgnss_system_parameters_dyn.so | c++filt |grep Gps_Eph
contains the symbol Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris(), which is supposed to be a constructor.
I've written some minimal code:
#include <iostream>
#include <core/system_parameters/gps_ephemeris.h>
int main(int argc,const char* argv[])
{
Gps_Ephemeris ge;
return 0;
}
which I compile with:
g++ main.cpp -std=c++0x -I some_include_path -L some_lib_path -l gnss_system_parameters_dyn`
The linker then complains:
/tmp/ccHCvldG.o: In function `main':
main.cpp:(.text+0x33): undefined reference to `Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I also tried cmake, but the line it generated was similar to that (it just added -rdynamic before linking), and it still generated the exact same linker error.
Note that both the library and my minimal code are being compiled with the same compiler (g++-5), with the exact same flags and the same c++0x standard.
Addressing the answer by Maxim Egorushkin, the line:
nm --demangle --defined-only --extern-only libgnss_system_parameters.so |grep Gps_Eph
doesn't output anything. However, the symbol is defined in the static library (i.e. the *.a library):
00000000000006b0 T Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()
00000000000006b0 T Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()
Knowing that both are generated by cmake, in the following way:
add_library(lib_name SHARED ${sources_etc}) #for the *.so
add_library(lib_name_2 ${sources_etc}) #for the *.a
there should be no difference in symbols contained/defined in those libraries, right? I didn't notice anything in cmake's documentation on add_library. Am I missing something obvious?
The pedantically correct way to check that a .so exports a symbol is nm --demangle --dynamic --defined-only --extern-only <lib.so> | grep <symbol>.
Without --defined-only your command also shows undefined symbols.
Without --extern-only it also shows symbols with internal linkage which are unavailable for linking.
It looks like you need to link another library because Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephermeris() is not resolved by linking libgnss_system_parameters_dyn.so. A good way to start is that library's documentation and examples.
I have found in the past that this type of error is caused by the lack of proper extern "C" { ... } bracketing in an include file.
I'm currently learning OpenCL. Now, when I want to compile my program, I get an error with this command:
g++ -Wall -l OpenCL main.cpp -o main
The errors are mostly undefined references, because the library is not linked, I think (nevertheless I will post the error code at the end).
But with this command everything works fine:
g++ -Wall main.cpp -o main -l OpenCL
So my question is, what do I have to do, to use the -l Flag in front of the command?
(The Background is: I want to use Netbeans to compile my programm and when i add the flag under -> properties -> build -> C++ Compiler -> additional options, it will put in in the Position, shown in the first command)
Thanks in advance for your help
Here's the error code:
/tmp/ccmKP4oI.o: In function `cl::detail::ReferenceHandler<_cl_context*>::release(_cl_context*)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN2cl6detail16ReferenceHandlerIP11_cl_contextE7releaseES3_[_ZN2cl6detail16ReferenceHandlerIP11_cl_contextE7releaseES3_]+0x14): undefined reference to `clReleaseContext'
/tmp/ccmKP4oI.o: In function `cl::detail::ReferenceHandler<_cl_command_queue*>::release(_cl_command_queue*)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN2cl6detail16ReferenceHandlerIP17_cl_command_queueE7releaseES3_[_ZN2cl6detail16ReferenceHandlerIP17_cl_command_queueE7releaseES3_]+0x14): undefined reference to `clReleaseCommandQueue'
/tmp/ccmKP4oI.o: In function `cl::Platform::getInfo(unsigned int, std::string*) const':
main.cpp:(.text._ZNK2cl8Platform7getInfoEjPSs[_ZNK2cl8Platform7getInfoEjPSs]+0x22): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformInfo'
/tmp/ccmKP4oI.o: In function `cl::Platform::get(std::vector<cl::Platform, std::allocator<cl::Platform> >*)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN2cl8Platform3getEPSt6vectorIS0_SaIS0_EE[_ZN2cl8Platform3getEPSt6vectorIS0_SaIS0_EE]+0x41): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformIDs'
main.cpp:(.text._ZN2cl8Platform3getEPSt6vectorIS0_SaIS0_EE[_ZN2cl8Platform3getEPSt6vectorIS0_SaIS0_EE]+0xb4): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformIDs'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Order of [most] arguments to g++ is very important.
Libraries should go last (at least after source and object files). You can't really change that.
The -l should preferably be glued to the library name:
g++ -Wall main.cpp -o main -lOpenCL
# ^^^ glue the -l to the library name
You probably want to also pass -g (in addition of -Wall) to the compiler to get a debuggable binary. Use the gdb debugger.
As James Kanze commented, you might want to replace -g with -ggdb if using specifically gdb.
With g++ (and generally under Unix), -l specifies a source of
input (either a .a or a .so), and input is processed in
order. When the input is a static library (a .a file), it
will be scanned for objects which resolve undefined references;
if it is a .so, there aren't any object files in it, but it
will still only be taken into consideration if it resolves some
undefined symbol.
When you put the -l before any object files, there are no
undefined symbols yet, so nothing will be incorporated into the
program.
I have two simple files:
runner.cpp:
#define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK
#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE Main
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
and test1.cpp:
#define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK
#ifdef STAND_ALONE
# define BOOST_TEST_MODULE Main
#endif
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE( Foo)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( TestSomething )
{
BOOST_CHECK( true );
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
To compile, I'm using:
$ g++ -I/e/code/boost_1_52_0 -o runner -lboost_unit_test_framework runner.cpp test1.cpp
I get the following error:
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text+0x8c): multiple definition of `main'
c:/pdev/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.7.2/../../../libboost_unit_test_framework.a(unit_test_main.o):unit_test_main.cpp:(.text.startup+0x0): first defined here
c:/pdev/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.7.2/../../../libboost_unit_test_framework.a(unit_test_main.o):unit_test_main.cpp:(.text.startup+0x14): undefined reference to `init_unit_test_suite(int, char**)'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text+0x52): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9framework17master_test_suiteEv'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text+0xb0): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test14unit_test_mainEPFbvEiPPc'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text$_ZN5boost9unit_test13test_observerD2Ev[__ZN5boost9unit_test13test_observerD2Ev]+0xe): undefined reference to `_imp___ZTVN5boost9unit_test13test_observerE'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text$_ZN5boost9unit_test13test_observerC2Ev[__ZN5boost9unit_test13test_observerC2Ev]+0xe): undefined reference to `_imp___ZTVN5boost9unit_test13test_observerE'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\ccU0cDSz.o:runner.cpp:(.text$_ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tC1Ev[__ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tC1Ev]+0x22): undefined reference to `_imp___ZTVN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tE'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_t14set_checkpointENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEEjS4_'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text+0x136): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools9tt_detail10check_implERKNS0_16predicate_resultERKNS_9unit_test12lazy_ostreamENS5_13basic_cstringIKcEEjNS1_10tool_levelENS1_10check_typeEjz'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text+0x21d): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24auto_test_unit_registrarC1ENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text+0x284): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24auto_test_unit_registrarC1EPNS0_9test_caseEm'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text+0x2a4): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24auto_test_unit_registrarC1Ei'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text$_ZN5boost9unit_test14make_test_caseERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE[__ZN5boost9unit_test14make_test_caseERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE]+0x1d): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24normalize_test_case_nameENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE'
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\cciSdkmB.o:test1.cpp:(.text$_ZN5boost9unit_test14make_test_caseERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE[__ZN5boost9unit_test14make_test_caseERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE]+0x5b): undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9test_caseC1ENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEE'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I'm using g++ 4.7.2 on MinGW, with boost 1.52.0.
I get the same errors when only trying to compile test1.cpp - except the "multiple main definition" one.
I perused the official documentation for quite a while, but its scarce on details regarding linking options. When I compiled the boost libs, besides unit_test_framework, I also got prg_exec_monitor and test_exec_monitor; perhaps I should link these somehow ? I tried many combinations, but all resulted in some kind of undefined reference linker error.
Complete list of boost generated libraries - I have them all in the project root:
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-1_52.a
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-1_52.dll
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-1_52.dll.a
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.a
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.dll
libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.dll.a
libboost_test_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-1_52.a
libboost_test_exec_monitor-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.a
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-1_52.a
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-1_52.dll
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-1_52.dll.a
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.a
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.dll
libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-d-1_52.dll.a
With help from #llonesmiz, a number of issues were identified.
1. Libraries need to be specified after objects and sources which use them.
As described here:
The traditional behavior of linkers is to search for external functions from
left to right in the libraries specified on the command line. This means that a
library containing the definition of a function should appear after any source
files or object files which use it. This includes libraries specified with the
short-cut -l option, as shown in the following command:
$ gcc -Wall calc.c -lm -o calc (correct order)
With some linkers the opposite ordering (placing the -lm option before the file
which uses it) would result in an error,
$ cc -Wall -lm calc.c -o calc (incorrect order)
main.o: In function 'main':
main.o(.text+0xf): undefined reference to 'sqrt'
because there is no library or object file containing sqrt after ‘calc.c’. The
option -lm should appear after the file ‘calc.c’
2. Library paths should be explicitly specified.
If no lib paths are specified, the linker might look for the libs in a series
of default folders, thus loading a different library then intended. This is what
happened in my case - I wanted to link boost_unit_test_framework, but did not
specify a path because I assumed the linker would look in the current folder.
That's what happens at runtime, after all - if the dll is in the same folder
with the exe, it will find it.
I found it a little bit strange the linker would find the lib, since it was
named ibboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-1_52.dll. When I tried to link to
a non-existing lib, the linker complained though, so I assumed this isn't an
issue, and MinGW 's linker ignores those suffixes.
After some more research, I found this article about MinGW library paths.
The folders MinGW searches for libs can be found in the output of gcc -print-search-dirs.
The article also contains some bash magic to make sense of that output:
gcc -print-search-dirs | sed '/^lib/b 1;d;:1;s,/[^/.][^/]*/\.\./,/,;t 1;s,:[^=]*=,:;,;s,;,; ,g' | tr \; \\012 | grep -v '^ */'
This will print a nice list of those folders. gcc will not, by default,
look in the current directory for libs. I looked in each of them, and found the
lib that was being loaded - libboost_unit_test_framework.a, a static lib.
This brings into light another issue worth mentioning:
3. Static versus dynamic linking
I did not specify whether I want boost_unit_test_framework linked statically or dynamically.
In this case, gcc prefers dynamic linking:
Because of these advantages gcc compiles programs to use shared libraries by
default on most systems, if they are available. Whenever a static library
‘libNAME.a’ would be used for linking with the option -lNAME the compiler
first checks for an alternative shared library with the same name and a ‘.so’
extension.
(so is the extension for dynamic libraries on Unix - on Windows, the equivalent is dll.)
So, what happened is that gcc looked for libboost_unit_test_framework.dll
in all it's default folders, but couldn't find it. Then it looked for
libboost_unit_test_framework.a, and statically linked that. This resulted in
linking errors because the sources have #define BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK, and
therefore expect to have the lib dynamically linked.
To enforce static or dynamic linking, the -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic
linker options come into play, described here.
If I tell the linker that I want dynamic linking:
$ g++ -I/e/code/boost_1_52_0 runner.cpp test1.cpp -o runner -Wl,Bdynamic -lboost_unit_test_framework
This will fail, because the linker will not be able to find the dll.
4.Summary
The issues were:
libraries where specified before the sources which used them
the lib path wasn't specified
the type of linking wasn't specified
the name of the library was not correct
Final, working command:
$ g++ -I/e/code/boost_1_52_0 -o runner runner.cpp test1.cpp -L. -Wl,-Bdynamic -lboost_unit_test_framework-mgw47-mt-1_52
Ok, newb question here.
I'm trying to compile simple_xy_wr.f90 -- a netCDF example program -- using gfortran on Ubuntu, and I must be doing something pretty silly; I don't have much experince compiling Fortran.
First, I've got the libnetcdf-dev package installed, which includes files like
/usr/lib/libnetcdf.a
/usr/lib/libnetcdff.a
/usr/include/netcdf.mod
So, I've tried to compile the code with (various command like)
f95 -o xy -I/usr/include/ -L/usr/lib/ -lnetcdff -lnetcdf simple_xy_wr.f90
and I get the following output
/tmp/ccE6g7sr.o: In function `check.1847':
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x72): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror'
/tmp/ccE6g7sr.o: In function `MAIN__':
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x284): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_create'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x2b6): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_dim'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_dim'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x432): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_var_manydims'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x468): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_enddef'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x4aa): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_put_var_2d_fourbyteint'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x4cb): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_close'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I think that I'm including the right libraries. E.g. it seems that __netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror should be there:
$ nm /usr/lib/libnetcdff.a | grep __netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror
000000000004a100 T __netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror
What am I doing wrong?
(FWIW, a few relevant references I've looked at are below.
undefined reference using netcdf library
Compiling problems with gfortran and NETCDF
Compiling and Running Fortran Programs - a basic guide
)
Ordering of object files and archives on the linker command line is very important on Unix systems since the default linker behaviour is to search for symbol definitions only in archives that follow the object file or archive, where an unresolved reference was found, referred to single pass linking.
This means that if your code references __netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror, then the archive that contains the definition of this symbol (libnetcdff.a) must appear after the list of object files from your program. libnetcdff.a itself references symbols from the C library libnetcdf.a, hence it must be linked after libnetcdff.a. So the correct link order is:
/tmp/ccE6g7sr.o libnetcdff.a libnetcdf.a
where /tmp/ccE6g7sr.o is the temporary object file that the assembler produces from the compiled source file. The correct command line to compile your code is then:
f95 -o xy -I/usr/include/ simple_xy_wr.f90 -lnetcdff -lnetcdf
In this case the linker is not called directly, rather the compiler does it. GCC compilers pass all link-related things in the same order to an intermediate utility called collect2 which then calls the actual linker ld.
Note that if shared object versions of the netCDF library archives are also present (i.e. there are libnetcdff.so and libnetcdf.so), then the linker would prefer them to the static archives (unless static linking is enabled with the -static option) and the final link phase would be handled to the run-time link editor (RTLD) (/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 on Ubuntu). In this case the same command line as in your question would actually succeed without link errors, despite the fact that both libraries are positioned before the code that references them, as the missing symbol references would be resolved by the RTLD while it is loading the executable file.
In Ubuntu 12.10, the order of the libraries is the trick (as Hristo suggested):
angelv#palas:~$ gfortran -o xy -I/usr/include/ -L/usr/lib/ -lnetcdf -lnetcdff simple_xy_wr.f90
/tmp/ccj95anF.o: In function `check.1847':
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x72): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_strerror'
/tmp/ccj95anF.o: In function `MAIN__':
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x284): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_create'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x2b6): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_dim'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_dim'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x432): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_def_var_manydims'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x468): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_enddef'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x4aa): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_put_var_2d_fourbyteint'
simple_xy_wr.f90:(.text+0x4cb): undefined reference to `__netcdf_MOD_nf90_close'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
angelv#palas:~$ gfortran -o xy -I/usr/include/ simple_xy_wr.f90 -L/usr/lib/ -lnetcdf -lnetcdff
angelv#palas:~$ ./xy
0 12 24 36
*** SUCCESS writing example file simple_xy.nc!