If #define is used without any assignment value, what will it do? - c++

#define TML_ID - No value is assigned to TML_ID. There's no problem in compilation or building executables. will this assign any default value like null to TML_ID or will TML_ID be considered undefined ?

This simply says that the macros is defined, so you can do this in main or any other function:
#ifdef TML_ID
printf("Defined!\n");
#else
printf("Undefined!\n");
#endif

#define doesn't assign a value to the macro. In fact, it's considered as a flag to tell the compiler that a specific macro has been defined.
You can imagine it as if you declare a variable without assigning any values. It will have a garbage value but it will reserve a space in the memory. But in case of a macro, the definition won't reserve a space. Only a hint for the compiler.

Without assigned a value, macros in this way are usually used to prevent including same .h file multiple times, this way:
#ifndef _FILENAME
#define _FILENAME
//declaration code
#endif
If some .cpp file includes, for example, two different .h files, which both include our .h file, then .cpp will have only one copy of declaration code, since second time _FILENAME macro will be DEFINED, and declaration code will be skipped.

#define MACRO
defines a macro named MACRO. It has no content, so if you wrote something like std::cout << MACRO you'd get an error because there's nothing there. This is often used to conditionally use new keywords:
#if CPP_VERSION_C11
#define NOEXCEPT noexcept
#else
#define NOEXCEPT
#endif
void f() NOEXCEPT {
// whatever
}
There are two other ways you can use such a macro. You can check whether it's defined:
#ifdef MACRO
// code for one branch
#else
// code for other branch
#endif
For that code, since MACRO has been defined, the preprocessor will look at the code in the first branch, and skip the code in the second branch. If MACRO had not been defined, it would skip the code in the first branch rather than the second. You can also do the same thing this way:
#if defined(MACRO)
or you can use it in a constant expression in a preprocessor directive:
#if MACRO
// code for one branch
#else
// code for other branch
#endif
here, MACRO gets the value 0, the #if sees the value 0, and the preprocessor skips the first branch. The same thing occurs in more complex expressions:
#if MACRO + 1 > 0
// code for one branch
#else
// code for other branch
#endif
Here, MACRO has the value 0, MACRO + 1 has the value 1, and the first branch will be selected.

Related

How can an #if directive have a constexpr input in C++?

Is there a way to define a constexpr before an #if compiler directive as its input?
In other words, can #if have inputs from constexpr? If not, does it mean #if directive is evaluated before the constexpr?
constexpr int enable_debug = true;
#if (enable_debug)
std::string debug_logs;
#endif
for(int i=0;i<10;i++) {
f(i);
#if (enable_debug)
debug_logs += std::to_string(i);
#endif
}
#if (enable_debug)
std::court << debug_logs;
#endif
This question has two objectives:
Is "directive time" or "pragma time" earlier than compile time?
I want to build some code only conditionally, but the code defined a variable, so I cannot use if constexpr().
No, there is no way to do this. Preprocessor commands are applied in an earlier phase of translation than the evaluation (or even full parsing) of variable definitions. #if can do normal integer arithmetic and comparisons, and can expand preprocessor macros which were created with #define, but it cannot inspect non-preprocessor code.
You'll either need to make enable_debug a preprocessor macro, or change from preprocessor conditionals to if or if constexpr (which, of course, have their own limitations).

Is there an elegant solution for checking whether a preprocessor symbol is defined or not

Since preprocessor don't report an error when checking value of preprocessor's symbol that isn't actually defined (usually due to the lack of #include "some_header.h"), I use this cumbersome three line construction with "defined":
#if !defined(SOME_SYMBOL)
#error "some symbol isn't defined"
#endif
#if SOME_SYMBOL == 1
// Here is my conditionally compiled code
#endif
And the way with "#ifndef" is the same.
Is there a more elegant way to perform this check?
In your construction you could use an else block to skip the check for defined:
#if SOME_SYMBOL == 1
// Here is my conditionally compiled code
#else
// error
#endif
But in principle the comments are right. #if !defined and the shorthand #ifndef are the two available versions.
Currently, you are checking if SOME_SYMBOL is equals to 1. Do you execute different code based on that value ?
If not, you could simply use:
#ifdef SOME_SYMBOL
// Here is my conditionally compiled code
#else
// error
#endif
And now it's a short step to the typical c++ include guards. Copying from that wikipedia link, here is a grandparent.h file:
#ifndef GRANDPARENT_H
#define GRANDPARENT_H
struct foo {
int member;
};
#endif /* GRANDPARENT_H */
Now, even if you end up including this header twice, it will only be executed once.

What use cases necessitate #define without a token-string?

I have encountered the #define pre-processor directive before while learning C, and then also encountered it in some code I read. But apart from using it to definite substitutions for constants and to define macros, I've not really understook the special case where it is used without a "body" or token-string.
Take for example this line:
#define OCSTR(X)
Just like that! What could be the use of this or better, when is this use of #define necessary?
This is used in two cases. The first and most frequent involves
conditional compilation:
#ifndef XYZ
#define XYZ
// ...
#endif
You've surely used this yourself for include guards, but it can also be
used for things like system dependencies:
#ifdef WIN32
// Windows specific code here...
#endif
(In this case, WIN32 is more likely defined on the command line, but it
could also be defined in a "config.hpp" file.) This would normally
only involve object-like macros (without an argument list or
parentheses).
The second would be a result of conditional compilation. Something
like:
#ifdef DEBUG
#define TEST(X) text(X)
#else
#define TEST(X)
#endif
That allows writing things like:
TEST(X);
which will call the function if DEBUG is defined, and do nothing if it
isn't.
Such macro usually appears in pair and inside conditional #ifdef as:
#ifdef _DEBUG
#define OCSTR(X)
#else
#define OCSTR(X) SOME_TOKENS_HERE
#endif
Another example,
#ifdef __cplusplus
#define NAMESPACE_BEGIN(X) namespace X {
#define NAMESPACE_END }
#else
#define NAMESPACE_BEGIN(X)
#define NAMESPACE_END
#endif
One odd case that I recently dug up to answer a question turned out to be simply commentary in nature. The code in question looked like:
void CLASS functionName(){
//
//
//
}
I discovered it was just an empty #define, which the author had chosen to document that the function accessed global variables in the project:
C++ syntax: void CLASS functionName()?
So not really that different from if it said /* CLASS */, except not allowing typos like /* CLAAS */...some other small benefits perhaps (?)
I agree with every answer, but I'd like to point out a small trivial thing.
Being a C purist I've grown up with the assertion that EACH AND EVERY #define should be an expression, so, even if it's common practice using:
#define WHATEVER
and test it with
#ifdef WHATEVER
I think it's always better writing:
#define WHATEVER (1)
also #debug macros shall be expressions:
#define DEBUG (xxx) (whatever you want for debugging, value)
In this way, you are completely safe from misuse of #macros and prevents nasty problems (especially in a 10 million line C project)
This can be used when you may want to silent some function. For example in debug mode you want to print some debug statements and in production code you want to omit them:
#ifdef DEBUG
#define PRINT(X) printf("%s", X)
#else
#define PRINT(X) // <----- silently removed
#endif
Usage:
void foo ()
{
PRINT("foo() starts\n");
...
}
#define macros are simply replaced, literally, by their replacement text during preprocessing. If there is no replacement text, then ... they're replaced by nothing! So this source code:
#define FOO(x)
print(FOO(hello world));
will be preprocessed into just this:
print();
This can be useful to get rid of things you don't want, like, say, assert(). It's mainly useful in conditional situations, where under some conditions there's a non-empty body, though.
As you can see in the above responses, it can be useful when debugging your code.
#ifdef DEBUG
#define debug(msg) fputs(__FILE__ ":" (__LINE__) " - " msg, stderr)
#else
#define debug(msg)
#endif
So, when you are debugging, the function will print the line number and file name so you know if there is an error. And if you are not debugging, it will just produce no output
There are many uses for such a thing.
For example, one is for the macro to have different behavior in different builds. For example, if you want debug messages, you could have something like this:
#ifdef _DEBUG
#define DEBUG_LOG(X, ...) however_you_want_to_print_it
#else
#define DEBUG_LOG(X, ...) // nothing
#endif
Another use could be to customize your header file based on your system. This is from my mesa-implemented OpenGL header in linux:
#if !defined(OPENSTEP) && (defined(__WIN32__) && !defined(__CYGWIN__))
# if defined(__MINGW32__) && defined(GL_NO_STDCALL) || defined(UNDER_CE) /* The generated DLLs by MingW with STDCALL are not compatible with the ones done by Microsoft's compilers */
# define GLAPIENTRY
# else
# define GLAPIENTRY __stdcall
# endif
#elif defined(__CYGWIN__) && defined(USE_OPENGL32) /* use native windows opengl32 */
# define GLAPIENTRY __stdcall
#elif defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ * 100 + __GNUC_MINOR__) >= 303
# define GLAPIENTRY
#endif /* WIN32 && !CYGWIN */
#ifndef GLAPIENTRY
#define GLAPIENTRY
#endif
And used in header declarations like:
GLAPI void GLAPIENTRY glClearIndex( GLfloat c );
GLAPI void GLAPIENTRY glClearColor( GLclampf red, GLclampf green, GLclampf blue, GLclampf alpha );
GLAPI void GLAPIENTRY glClear( GLbitfield mask );
...
(I removed the part for GLAPI)
So you get the picture, a macro that is used in some cases and not used in other cases could be defined to something on those cases and nothing to those other cases.
Other cases could be as follows:
If the macro doesn't take parameters, it could be just to declare some case. A famous example is to guard header files. Another example would be something like this
#define USING_SOME_LIB
and later could be used like this:
#ifdef USING_SOME_LIB
...
#else
...
#endif
Could be that the macro was used at some stage to do something (for example log), but then on release the owner decided the log is not useful anymore and simply removed the contents of the macro so it becomes empty. This is not recommended though, use the method I mentioned in the very beginning of the answer.
Finally, it could be there just for more explanation, for example you can say
#define DONT_CALL_IF_LIB_NOT_INITIALIZED
and you write functions like:
void init(void);
void do_something(int x) DONT_CALL_IF_LIB_NOT_INITIALIZED;
Although this last case is a bit absurd, but it would make sense in such a case:
#define IN
#define OUT
void function(IN char *a, OUT char *b);

How do I temporarily disable a macro expansion in C/C++?

For some reason I need to temporarily disable some macros in a header file and the #undef MACRONAME will make the code compile but it will undef the existing macro.
Is there a way of just disabling it?
I should mention that you do not really know the values of the macros and that I'm looking for a cross compiler solution (should work at least in GCC and MSVC).
In MSVC you could use push_macro pragma, GCC supports it for compatibility with Microsoft Windows compilers.
#pragma push_macro("MACRONAME")
#undef MACRONAME
// some actions
#pragma pop_macro("MACRONAME")
Using just the facilities defined by Standard C (C89, C99 or C11), the only 'disable' mechanism is #undef.
The problem is there is no 're-enable' mechanism.
As others have pointed out, if the header file containing the macro definitions is structured so that it does not contain any typedef or enum declarations (these cannot be repeated; function and variable declarations can be repeated), then you could #undef the macro, do what you need without the macro in effect, and then re-include the header, possibly after undefining its protection against reinclusion.
If the macros are not defined in a header, of course, you are stuck until you refactor the code so that they are in a header.
One other trick is available - if the macros are function-like macros and not object-like macros.
#define nonsense(a, b) b /\= a
int (nonsense)(int a, int b)
{
return (a > b) ? a : b;
}
The function nonsense() is defined fine, despite the macro immediately before it. This is because a macro invocation - for a function-like macro - must be immediately followed by an open parenthesis (give or take white space, possibly including comments). In the function definition line, the token after 'nonsense' is a close parenthesis, so it is not an invocation of the nonsense macro.
Had the macro been an argument-less object-like macro, the trick would not work:
#define nonsense min
int (nonsense)(int a, int b)
{
// Think about it - what is the function really called?
return (a > b) ? a : b;
}
This code defines a bogus function that's called min and is nonsensical. And there's no protection from the macro.
This is one of the reasons why the standard is careful to define which namespaces are reserved for 'The Implementation'. The Implementation is allowed to define macros for any purpose it desires or needs, of any type (function-like or object-like) it desires or needs, provided those names are reserved to the implementation. If you as a consumer of the services of The Implementation try to use or define a name reserved to the implementation, you must be aware that your code will probably break sooner or later, and that it will be your fault, not the fault of The Implementation.
Macros make my knees go weak, but wouldn't the most universal solution be to restructure your code so that you wouldn't need to reenable the macro again in the same source file? Wouldn't it be possible to extract some code into a separate function and a separate source file where you can undef the offending macro.
The macros come from some header file, so you should have access to their values. You can then do something like
#include <foo.h> // declares macro FOO
// Do things with FOO
#undef FOO
// do things without FOO
#include <foo.h> // reenable FOO
Your header should then be designed along these lines
#ifndef FOO
#define FOO do_something(x,y)
#endif
EDIT:
You may think that it's that easy:
#ifdef macro
#define DISABLED_macro macro
#undef macro
#endif
// do what you want with macro
#ifdef DISABLED_macro
#define macro DISABLED_macro
#endif
But it's not (like the following example demonstrates)!
#include <iostream>
#include <limits>
#include <windows.h>
#ifdef max
#define DISABLED_max max
#undef max
#endif
int main()
{
std::cout << std::numeric_limits<unsigned long>::max() << std::endl;
#ifdef DISABLED_max
#define max DISABLED_max
#endif
std::cout << max(15,3) << std::endl; // error C3861: "max": identifier not found
return 0;
}
Using #undef on the macro and re-including the original header is also not likely to work, because of the header guards.
So what's left is using the push_macro/pop_macro #pragma directives.
#pragma push_macro("MACRO")
#undef MACRO
// do what you want
#pragma pop_macro("MACRO")
There are specific rules for function-like macroses invokation in C/C++ language.
The function-like macroses have to be invoked in the following way:
Macros-name
Left parethesis
One token for each argument separated by commas
Each token in this list can be separared from another by whitespaces (i.e. actual whitespaces and commas)
With one trick you "disable preprocessor mechanism" with breaking rules for function-like macro invokation, but be still within a rules of function calling mechanism...
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
inline const char* WHAT(){return "Hello from function";}
#define WHAT() "Hello from macro"
int main()
{
cout << (*WHAT)() << "\n"; // use function
cout << (WHAT)() << "\n"; // use function
cout << WHAT () << "\n"; // use macro
return 0;
}

Use #ifdefs and #define to optionally turn a function call into a comment

Is it possible to do something like this
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo //
#else
#define foo MyFunction
#endif
The idea is that if SOMETHING is defined, then calls to foo(...) become comments (or something that doesn't get evaluated or compiled), otherwise it becomes a call to MyFunction.
I've seen __noop used, but I don't believe I can use that.
EDIT(s):
I don't think I can really use a macro here, because MyFunction takes a variable number of arguments.
Also, I'd like to make it so the arguments are NOT evaluated! (So doing something like commenting out the body of MyFunction doesn't really give me what I need, as the arguments will still be evaluated)
Try this:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo(x)
#else
#define foo(x) MyFunction(x)
#endif
If your function has several arguments, then:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo(x,y,z)
#else
#define foo(x,y,z) MyFunction(x,y,z)
#endif
If your function has a variable number of arguments, then your compiler may support so-called "variadic macros", like this:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo(...)
#else
#define foo(...) MyFunction(__VA_ARGS__)
#endif
The reason which I've seen this kind of thing used in practice is to get rid of logging functions from a release build. However, see also Separate 'debug' and 'release' builds? in which people question whether you should even have different builds.
Alternatively, instead of redefining the function call as nothing, Jonathan's comment to this answer suggested doing something like the following:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo(...) do { if (false) MyFunction(__VA_ARGS__) } while (0)
#else
#define foo(...) do { if (true) MyFunction(__VA_ARGS__) } while (0)
#endif
The reasoning for doing this is so that the function call is always compiled (so it won't be left with gratuitous errors like references to deleted variables), but only called when needed: see Kernighan & Pike The Practice of Programming and also the Goddard Space Flight Center programming standards.
From a debug.h file (originating from 1990, and therefore not using __VA_ARGS__):
/*
** Usage: TRACE((level, fmt, ...))
** "level" is the debugging level which must be operational for the output
** to appear. "fmt" is a printf format string. "..." is whatever extra
** arguments fmt requires (possibly nothing).
** The non-debug macro means that the code is validated but never called.
** -- See chapter 8 of 'The Practice of Programming', by Kernighan and Pike.
*/
#ifdef DEBUG
#define TRACE(x) db_print x
#else
#define TRACE(x) do { if (0) db_print x; } while (0)
#endif /* DEBUG */
With C99, there's no longer a need for the double parentheses trick. New code should not use it unless C89 compatibility is an issue.
Maybe an easier way to do this would be to conditionally omit the body of the function?
void MyFunction() {
#ifndef SOMETHING
<body of function>
#endif
}
Unless you specifically don't want a function call to be made at all, this seems like a clean way to achieve your goal.
Unfortunately the current C++ version doesn't support variadic macros.
However, you can do this:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo
#else
#define foo(args) MyFunction args
#endif
// you call it with double parens:
foo((a, b, c));
If, in the case you don't want foo called, you define it as:
void foo() {}
any calls to foo() should be optimized way.
What about something along these lines:
#ifdef NDEBUG
#define DEBUG(STATEMENT) ((void)0)
#else
#define DEBUG(STATEMENT) (STATEMENT)
#endif
You would use it like this to log debugging messages:
DEBUG(puts("compile with -DNDEBUG and I'm gone"));
A non-generic version for formatted output with additional debugging information using C99 variadic macros and the __func__ identifier could look like this:
#ifdef NDEBUG
#define Dprintf(FORMAT, ...) ((void)0)
#define Dputs(MSG) ((void)0)
#else
#define Dprintf(FORMAT, ...) \
fprintf(stderr, "%s() in %s, line %i: " FORMAT "\n", \
__func__, __FILE__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
#define Dputs(MSG) Dprintf("%s", MSG)
#endif
Here's how you'd use these macros:
Dprintf("count = %i", count);
Dputs("checkpoint passed");
Likely, you don't want to do the simple "code removal" as suggested,
because your callers will be expecting the side effects of the
arguments to happen. Here are some troublesome caller snippets that
should get you thinking:
// pre/post increment inside method call:
MyFunction(i++);
// Function call (with side effects) used as method argument:
MyFunction( StoreNewUsernameIntoDatabase(username) );
If you were to disable MyFunction by simply saying:
#define MyFunction(x)
then the side effects that the callers were expecting would go away,
and their code would break, and be quite difficult to debug. I like
the "sizeof" suggestion above, and I also like the suggestion to just
disable the body of MyFunction() via #ifdef's, although that means
that all callers get the same version of MyFunction(). From your
problem statement, I presume that's not actually what you want.
If you really need to disable MyFunction() via preprocessor defines on
a per-source-file basis, then I'd do it like this:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define MyFunction(x) NoOp_MyFunction(x)
int NoOp_MyFunction(x) { }
#endif
You could even include the implementation of NoOp_MyFunction() inside
the source & headers for MyFunction(). You also have the flexibility
to add extra logging or debugging information in NoOp_MyFunction() as
well.
No, the C and C++ Standards say you cannot #define something to be a comment, so
#define foo //
won't work.
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo sizeof
#else
#define foo MyFunction
#endif
I'm assuming that foo is a printf style function? Anyways, this won't work with a zero parameter function, but if that were the case, you would already know what to do. If you really want to be anal you can use (void)sizeof but that's probably unnecessary.
I'm a little reluctant to post this answer because it's use of macro hackery can become the source of problems. However - if the calls to the function you want to have disappear are always used alone in a statement (ie., they are never part of a larger expression), then something like the following could work (and it handles varargs):
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo (1) ? ((void) 0) : (void)
#else
#define foo MyFunction
#endif
So if you have the line of code:
foo( "this is a %s - a++ is %d\n", "test", a++);
it will end up after the preprocessing step as either:
MyFunction( "this is a %s - a++ is %d\n", "test", a++);
or
(1) ? ((void) 0) : (void)( "this is a %s - a++ is %d\n", "test", a++);
which turns the pseudo-function's parameter list into a bunch of expressions separated by the comma operator that will never be evaluated, since the conditional always returns the ((void) 0) result.
A variant of this is something close to what ChriSW and Jonathan Leffler suggested:
#ifdef SOMETHING
#define foo if (0) MyFunction
#else
#define foo if (1) MyFunction
#endif
This is slightly different in that it does not require the compiler to support variadic macros (__VA_ARGS__).
I think this can be useful for eliminating debug trace function calls which are generally never combined into a larger expression, but beyond that I think it's a dangerous technique.
Note the potential for problems - especially if the parameters in the call produce side-effects (this is a general problem with macros - not just this hack). In the example, the a++ will be evaluated only if SOMETHING is defined in the build, otherwise it's not. So if code after the call depends on the value of a to be incremented, one of the builds has a bug.
If I remember correctly, you should be able to #define your macro to "nothing" and that will cause the compiler to ignore that call
#define foo()
foo(); // this will be ignored
What about surrounding each call to myFunction with
#ifdef SOMETHING
myFunction(...);
#endif
?