The line that I am trying to run is
aws s3 sync s3://sourcebucket.publicfiles s3://mybucket
I have been looking through multiple question like this and I have tried about everything.
I have changed my IAM policy to give full access
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "VisualEditor0",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListStorageLensConfigurations",
"s3:ListAccessPointsForObjectLambda",
"s3:GetAccessPoint",
"s3:PutAccountPublicAccessBlock",
"s3:GetAccountPublicAccessBlock",
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"s3:ListAccessPoints",
"s3:ListJobs",
"s3:PutStorageLensConfiguration",
"s3:ListMultiRegionAccessPoints",
"s3:CreateJob"
],
"Resource": "*"
},
{
"Sid": "VisualEditor1",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3::ID:accesspoint/*"
},
{
"Sid": "VisualEditor2",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket",
"arn:aws:s3:*:ID:accesspoint/*",
"arn:aws:s3:us-west-2:ID:async-request/mrap/*/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::*/*",
"arn:aws:s3:*:938745241482:storage-lens/*",
"arn:aws:s3:*:938745241482:job/*",
"arn:aws:s3-object-lambda:*:ID:accesspoint/*"
]
}
]
}
As well as the bucket policy
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Id": "Policy",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "statement",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::ID:root"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"
]
}
]
}
At this point I have tried making my bucket public as well as
aws s3 cp s3://sourcebucket.publicfiles/file s3://mybucket/file --acl bucket-owner-full-control
for the specific files that are not working but it gives me the same error.
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the GetObjectTagging operation: Access Denied
Since this is a public bucket I do not have access to its policies.
I am not sure what else to try so I would really appreciate any insight
PS This is my first post here so if there is a better way to format question/ any more info I should give I am sorry
The error is saying that you do not have permission to call GetObjectTagging. This indicates that the Copy operation is attempting to retrieve Tags from the object so that it can then apply the same tags to the copied object, but you do not have permission to request the tags on the source object.
An article Troubleshoot issues copying an object between S3 buckets says:
You must have s3:GetObjectTagging permission for the source object and s3:PutObjectTagging permission for objects in the destination bucket.
Therefore, if the source bucket is not granting you GetObjectTagging permission, then you cannot use aws s3 sync or aws s3 cp. Instead, you will need to copy each object individually using aws s3api copy-object. For example:
aws s3api copy-object --copy-source bucket-1/test.txt --key test.txt --bucket bucket-2
(If I need to copy multiple objects individually, I make a list of objects in an Excel spreadsheet and then make a formula to create the above copy-object command. I use 'Copy Down' to create commands for all files, then paste all the commands into the command line.)
I have two accounts, account ACCOUNTAAAA, and ACCOUNTBBBB. A bucket (BUCKETAAAA) exists in account ACCOUNTAAAA and an instance with a role (ROLEBBBB) in ACCOUNTBBBB needs to be able to read from it.
I have adding the following permissions to the bucket:
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNTBBBB:role/ROLEBBBB"
},
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA/*"
}
I have the following permissions on the role in ACOUNTBBBB:
"Sid": "",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA/",
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA/*"
]
}
My assumption is I should be able to run aws s3 ls s3://BUCKETAAAA on the EC2 instance with the IAM role attached, and see the contants of BUCKETAAAA. When I try this, I get An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjects operation: Access Denied.
What am I missing here?
To reproduce your situation, I did the following:
Created Role-B in Account-B with EC2 as the Trusted Entity ("Allows EC2 instances to call AWS services on your behalf") and a policy granting access to Bucket-A
Created Bucket-A in Account-A
Added a Bucket Policy to Bucket-A, which grants access to Role-B
Assigned Role-B to an Amazon EC2 instance
The Bucket Policy on Bucket-A was:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "AddPerm",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account>:role/role-b"
},
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-a",
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-a/*"
]
}
]
}
The permissions on Role-B were:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "BucketA",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-a",
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-a/*"
]
}
]
}
I was able to successfully use aws s3 ls s3://bucket-a and was able to copy files to Bucket-A.
The main difference I see with your attempt was that your Bucket Policy only granted permissions for:
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA/*"
This means "anything within Bucket-A" but does not include Bucket-A itself. The command aws s3 ls s3://BUCKETAAAA operates on the bucket, for which the role has no permissions.
Thus, you should also add permissions for the bucket itself:
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA",
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKETAAAA/*"
I am trying to limit a deny a specific user list, read, and write access to a specific folder in my bucket. I am able to allow the user to see other folders, but on adding a deny policy to the account (added through groups), I get an access denied message.
This is what I have for the deny access:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Deny",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::myBucket",
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": "Admin/*"
}
}
}
]
}
In theory, I would like to limit a certain user to not be able to do the above regarding the Admin folder, however they still need to be able to view the bucket for other folders.
I have also tried:
{
"Id": "Policy",
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1516743098844",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Effect": "Deny",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/Admin/*",
"Principal": {
"AWS": [
"arn:aws:iam::11111111:user/Jenny"
]
}
}
]
}
Both of the above JSON statements were created using the Policy Generator for S3 Bucket Policy and IAM Policy.
Any clue on how to deny list access to a folder but allow viewing the bucket?
Your first statement works perfectly fine for me!
$ aws s3 ls s3://my-bucket/
PRE Admin/
PRE other/
2018-01-23 16:33:07 15091 cat.jpg
$ aws s3 ls s3://my-bucket/other/
2018-01-23 16:34:02 91 foo
$ aws s3 ls s3://my-bucket/Admin/
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjects operation: Access Denied
I have the following policy:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "StmtXXX",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::MYBUCKET"
]
}
]
}
(yes, I intend to scope back the s3:* when I get it working)
The following list bucket operation works OK:
$ aws s3 ls s3://MYBUCKET/test --profile MYPROFILE --region eu-west-1
2016-11-30 15:21:13 16712119 test
But a PUT won't work
$ aws s3 cp /tmp/test2 s3://MYBUCKET/test2 --profile MYPROFILE --region eu-west-1
upload failed: ../../../../tmp/test2 to s3://MYBUCKET/test2
A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
Parameter validation failed:
Invalid type for parameter UploadId, value: None, type: <type 'NoneType'>, valid types: <type 'basestring'>
I've tried this in the IAM Policy Simulator and it seems like it should work. I've verified that the keys correspond to the correct user.
(I've also tried with my own credentials and the operations work fine, so I don't think it's a syntax error)
Should this work? Any ideas why it isn't?
You need to enter the bucket contents as a resource separately from the bucket itself if you are specifying the bucket and object actions in the same statement
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "StmtXXX",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::MYBUCKET",
"arn:aws:s3:::MYBUCKET/*"
]
}
]
}
The answer to this seems to be that the IAM policy can take some time to propagate. This went from not working, to being intermittent, to working.
So if you face an inexplicable situation, wait a few minutes.
I am getting:
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjects operation: Access Denied
When I try to get folder from my S3 bucket.
Using this command:
aws s3 cp s3://bucket-name/data/all-data/ . --recursive
The IAM permissions for the bucket look like this:
{
"Version": "version_id",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "some_id",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname/*"
]
}
] }
What do I need to change to be able to copy and ls successfully?
You have given permission to perform commands on objects inside the S3 bucket, but you have not given permission to perform any actions on the bucket itself.
Slightly modifying your policy would look like this:
{
"Version": "version_id",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "some_id",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname",
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname/*"
]
}
]
}
However, that probably gives more permission than is needed. Following the AWS IAM best practice of Granting Least Privilege would look something like this:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname/*"
]
}
]
}
If you wanted to copy all s3 bucket objects using the command "aws s3 cp s3://bucket-name/data/all-data/ . --recursive" as you mentioned, here is a safe and minimal policy to do that:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name"
],
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": "data/all-data/*"
}
}
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name/data/all-data/*"
]
}
]
}
The first statement in this policy allows for listing objects inside a specific bucket's sub directory. The resource needs to be the arn of the S3 bucket, and to limit listing to only a sub-directory in that bucket you can edit the "s3:prefix" value.
The second statement in this policy allows for getting objects inside of the bucket at a specific sub-directory. This means that anything inside the "s3://bucket-name/data/all-data/" path you will be able to copy. Be aware that this doesn't allow you to copy from parent paths such as "s3://bucket-name/data/".
This solution is specific to limiting use for AWS CLI commands; if you need to limit S3 access through the AWS console or API, then more policies will be needed. I suggest taking a look here: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/writing-iam-policies-grant-access-to-user-specific-folders-in-an-amazon-s3-bucket/.
A similar issue to this can be found here which led me to the solution I am giving.
https://github.com/aws/aws-cli/issues/2408
Hope this helps!
I got the same error when using policy as below, although i have "s3:ListBucket" for s3:ListObjects operation.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::*-bucket/*"
],
"Effect": "Allow"
}
]
}
Then i fixed it by adding one line
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname"
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>",
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::*-bucket/*"
],
"Effect": "Allow"
}
]
}
I tried the following:
aws s3 ls s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/{bucket name}
This gave me the error:
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjectsV2 operation: Access Denied
Using this form worked:
aws s3 ls {bucket name}
I was unable to access to S3 because
first I configured key access on the instance (it was impossible to attach role after the launch then)
forgot about it for a few months
attached role to instance
tried to access.
The configured key had higher priority than role, and access was denied because the user wasn't granted with necessary S3 permissions.
Solution: rm -rf .aws/credentials, then aws uses role.
I faced with the same issue. I just added credentials config:
aws_access_key_id = your_aws_access_key_id
aws_secret_access_key = your_aws_secret_access_key
into "~/.aws/credentials" + restart terminal for default profile.
In the case of multi profiles --profile arg needs to be added:
aws s3 sync ./localDir s3://bucketName --profile=${PROFILE_NAME}
where PROFILE_NAME:
.bash_profile ( or .bashrc) -> export PROFILE_NAME="yourProfileName"
More info about how to config credentials and multi profiles can be found here
For Amazon users who have enabled MFA, please use this:
aws s3 ls s3://bucket-name --profile mfa.
And prepare the profile mfa first by running
aws sts get-session-token --serial-number arn:aws:iam::123456789012:mfa/user-name --token-code 928371 --duration 129600. (replace 123456789012, user-name and 928371).
You have to specify Resource for the bucket via "arn:aws:s3:::bucketname" or "arn:aws:3:::bucketname*". The latter is preferred since it allows manipulations on the bucket's objects too. Notice there is no slash!
Listing objects is an operation on Bucket. Therefore, action "s3:ListBucket" is required.
Adding an object to the Bucket is an operation on Object. Therefore, action "s3:PutObject" is needed.
Certainly, you may want to add other actions as you require.
{
"Version": "version_id",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "some_id",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucketname*"
]
}
]
}
Okay for those who have done all the above and still getting this issue, try this:
Bucket Policy should look like this:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "AllowBucketSync",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObjectAcl",
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKET_NAME",
"arn:aws:s3:::BUCKET_NAME/*"
]
}
]
}
Then save and ensure your Instance or Lightsail is connected to the right profile on AWS Configure.
First:
try adding --recursive at the end, any luck? No okay try the one below.
Second:
Okay now try this instead: --no-sign-request
so it should look like this:
sudo aws s3 sync s3://BUCKET_NAME /yourpath/path/folder --no-sign-request
You're welcome 😂
I was thinking the error is due to "s3:ListObjects" action but I had to add the action "s3:ListBucket" to solve the issue "AccessDenied for ListObjects for S3 bucket"
I'm adding an answer with the same direction as the accepted answer but with small (important) differences and adding more details.
Consider the configuration below:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::<Bucket-Name>"]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::<Bucket-Name>/*"]
}
]
}
The policy grants programmatic write-delete access and is separated into two parts:
The ListBucket action provides permissions on the bucket level and the other PutObject/DeleteObject actions require permissions on the objects inside the bucket.
The first Resource element specifies arn:aws:s3:::<Bucket-Name> for the ListBucket action so that applications can list all objects in the bucket.
The second Resource element specifies arn:aws:s3:::<Bucket-Name>/* for the PutObject, and DeletObject actions so that applications can write or delete any objects in the bucket.
The separation into two different 'arns' is important from security reasons in order to specify bucket-level and object-level fine grained permissions.
Notice that if I would have specified just GetObject in the 2nd block what would happen is that in cases of programmatic access I would receive an error like:
Upload failed: <file-name> to <bucket-name>:<path-in-bucket> An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied.
To allow permissions in s3 bucket go to the permissions tab in s3 bucket and in bucket policy change the action to this which will allow all actions to be performed:
"Action":"*"
Here's the policy that worked for me.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name/*"
]
}
]
}
I had a similar problem while trying to sync an entire s3 bucket locally. For me MFA (Multi-factor authentication) was enforced on my account, which is required while making commands via AWS CLI.
So the solution for me was - provide mfa credentials using a profile (mfa documentation) while using any AWS CLI commands.
Ran into a similar issues, for me the problem was that I had different AWS keys set in my bash_profile.
I answered a similar question here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57317494/11871462
If you have conflicting AWS keys in your bash_profile, AWS CLI defaults to these instead.
I had this issue
my requirement i wanted to allow user to write to specific path
{
"Sid": "raspiiotallowspecificBucket",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/scripts",
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/scripts/*"
]
},
and problem was solved with this change
{
"Sid": "raspiiotallowspecificBucket",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>",
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/*"
]
},
I like this better than any of the previous answers. It shows how to use the YAML format and lets you use a variable to specify the bucket.
- PolicyName: "AllowIncomingBucket"
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
- Effect: "Allow"
Action: "s3:*"
Resource:
- !Ref S3BucketArn
- !Join ["/", [!Ref S3BucketArn, '*']]
My issue was having set
env:
AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID: {{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }}
AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: {{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }}
again, under the aws-sync GitHub Action as environment variables. They were coming from my GitHub settings. Though in my case I had assumed a role in the previous step which would set me some new keys into those same name environment variables. So i was overwriting the good assumed keys with the bad GitHub basic keys.
Please take care of this if you're assuming roles.
I had the same issue. I had to provide the right resource and action, resource is your bucket's arn and action in your desired permission. Also please ensure you have your right user arn. Below is my solution.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Id": "Policy1546414123454",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1546414471931",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::123456789101:root"
},
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket", "s3:ListBucketVersions"],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name"
}
]
}
If you are suddenly getting this error on a new version of minio on buckets that used to work, the reason is that bucket access policy defaults were changed from version 2021 to 2022. Now in version 2022 by default all buckets (both newly created and existing ones) have Access Policy set to Private - it is not sufficient to provide server credentials to access them - you will still get errors such as these (here: returned to the python minio client):
S3Error: S3 operation failed; code: AccessDenied, message: Access Denied., resource: /dicts, request_id: 16FCBE6EC0E70439, host_id: 61486e5a-20be-42fc-bd5b-7f2093494367, bucket_name: dicts
To roll back to the previous security settings in version 2022, the quickest method is to change the bucket access Access Policy back to Public in the MinIO console (or via mc client).
This is not the best practice but this will unblock you.
Make sure for the user that's executing the command, it has the following policy attached to it under it's permission.
A. PowerUserAccess
B. AmazonS3FullAccess
I had faced same error "An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjectsV2 operation: Access Denied"
Note:
Bucket policy not a good solution.
In IAM service create new custom policy attached with respective user would be safer.
Solved by below procedure:
IAM Service > Policies > Create Policy > select JSON >
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:ListBucketVersions"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucket name>"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:ListBucketMultipartUploads",
"s3:ListMultipartUploadParts",
"s3:AbortMultipartUpload",
"s3:DeleteObjectVersion",
"s3:GetObjectVersion",
"s3:PutObjectACL",
"s3:ListBucketVersions"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<bucketname>/*"
]
}
]
}
Select Next Tag > Review Policy enter and create policy.
Select the newly created policy
Select the tab 'Policy Usage' in edit window of newly created policy window.
Select "Attach" select the user from the list and Save.
Now try in console with bucket name to list the objects, without bucket name it throws same error.
$aws s3 ls
A little late but might be helpful for someone. First thing first I am managing all access to s3 buckets using bucket policy.
My bucket policy to allow access to folder1 to IAM user: user1
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:user/user1"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::s3-bucket/folder1",
"arn:aws:s3:::s3-bucket/folder1/*"
]
}
]
}
Now when user1 tries to perform list operation they get an error. It may look weird as the user has s3 full access from the bucket policy.
aws s3 ls s3://s3-bucket/folder1
aws s3 ls s3://s3-bucket/folder1/
aws s3 ls s3://s3-bucket/folder1/*
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjectsV2
operation: Access Denied
Now let's take a look at the AWS documentation for ListBucket
Grants permission to list some or all of the objects in an Amazon S3
bucket (up to 1000)
To test that try to create a bucket policy and only provide the ListBucket permission for folder1 like this. Observe that you will get an error.
Conclusion
The ListBucket operation is only permitted for buckets and not for prefixes and hence if we want to provide list operation then it must be at the bucket level. Of course this will allow the user to list objects inside all other folders present in the bucket.