I want to use the derived class B::display() and C::display(), but it uses A::display(). How do I change the code so that I can call the derived class' display() to display the id together with name?
Thanks in advance :)
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
class A
{
protected :
int id;
public:
A ( int id = 0 ) : id(id) {}
virtual void display() { cout << id << endl; }
};
class B : public A
{
string name;
public:
B ( int id = 0, string name = "-" ) : A(id), name(name) {}
void display() { cout << id << " " << name << endl; }
};
class C : public A
{
string name;
public:
C ( int id = 0, string name = "-" ) : A(id), name(name) {}
void display() { cout << id << " " << name << endl; }
};
int main()
{
vector< vector <A> > aa;
vector<A> bb ;
vector<A> cc ;
A *yy = new B(111, "Patrick");
A *zz = new C(222, "Peter");
bb.push_back(*yy);
cc.push_back(*zz);
aa.push_back(bb);
aa.push_back(cc);
for ( int i = 0; i < aa[0].size(); i++)
{
aa[0][i].display();
aa[1][i].display();
}
}
your problem his that you are declartion of the vector is of non pointer type , and on runtime you are losing the "point" to the subclass and you just stay with the super class.
all you have to do is change all of your vectors to pointer type , like that:
vector<A*> bb;
The issue here is in order for inheritance to work you need to use pointers. your vector is a vector<A> and not a vector<A*> so when you push-back the dereferences version of yy and zz you are pushing back the copy of their A data members not a copy of the B and C data members. The size of B and C is different then A so it will only do a copy of data members that will fit in the place of A object.
http://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/125-the-virtual-table/
You can't expect polymorphism to work without pointers.
Change your main part to
vector< vector <A*> > aa;
vector<A*> bb;
vector<A*> cc;
A* yy = new B(111, "Patrick");
A* zz = new C(222, "Peter");
bb.push_back(yy);
cc.push_back(zz);
aa.push_back(bb);
aa.push_back(cc);
for (int i = 0; i < aa[0].size(); i++)
{
aa[0][i]->display();
aa[1][i]->display();
}
Related
Haha, so I'm a little late to starting my homework and would enjoy having someone explain this to me, I read parts of my textbook so I understand the simple examples of base classes and derived classes but other than that I'm stumped. It doesn't seem to hard but I just need some help on where to start/look.
What is the output of the following C++ program?
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class baseClass {
public:
void print() const;
baseClass(string s = " ", int a = 0);
// Postcondition: str = s; x = a;
protected:
int x;
private:
string str;
};
class derivedClass : public baseClass {
public:
void print() const;
derivedClass(string s = "", int a = 0, int b = 0);
};
// Postcondition: str = s; x = a; y = b;private:int y;};
int main() {
baseClass baseObject("This is the base class", 2);
derivedClass derivedObject("DDDDDD", 3, 7);
baseObject.print();
derivedObject.print();
system("pause");
return 0;
}
void baseClass::print() const { cout << x << " " << str << endl; }
baseClass::baseClass(string s, int a) {
str = s;
x = a;
}
void derivedClass::print() const {
cout << "Derived class: " << y << endl;
baseClass::print();
}
derivedClass::derivedClass(string s, int a, int b)
: baseClass("Hello Base", a + b) {
y = b;
}
I haven't tried anything yet lol, just started my homework too late and it is due today and would love a quick explanation and help with the answer.
I am trying to make an object as a parameter for my add() function in this code:
class EnterInfo
{
protected:
string name;
int age;
string birthmonth;
public:
EnterInfo()
{
}
EnterInfo(string n, int a, string b)
{
name = n;
age = a;
birthmonth = b;
}
};
class CourseInfo
{
protected:
string title;
public:
CourseInfo()
{
}
CourseInfo(string t)
{
title = t;
}
void add()
{
}
};
int main()
{
EnterInfo s1;
CourseInfo c1;
s1 = EnterInfo("Sand", 20, "Jan");
c1 = CourseInfo(" x Records");
}
I want the add() function to gather all the data from the object "s1" and compact it into an array that I can access later. I could add, remove, or edit the data moving forward or even maybe make a new object "c2" which contains "y records" with the same s1 values ("sand", 20, "Jan"), however, I have no idea how to implement this in code.
c1.add(s1); // assume s1 (EnterInfo): Sand 20 Jan
c1.add(s2); // assume s2 (EnterInfo): Paul 23 Aug
this is the code I want to work with. I don't know how to make it work though. The end game would be this
c1.print();
output:
x records
Sand 20 Jan
Paul 23 Aug
create a vector of EnterInfo objects and put it in CourceInfo class. The code below does what you need:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
class EnterInfo
{
public:
string name;
int age;
string birthmonth;
EnterInfo()
{
name = "";
age = 0;
birthmonth = "";
}
EnterInfo(string n, int a, string b)
{
name = n;
age = a;
birthmonth = b;
}
};
class CourseInfo
{
protected:
string title;
vector<EnterInfo> info_vec;
public:
CourseInfo()
{
title = "";
}
CourseInfo(string t)
{
title = t;
}
void add(const EnterInfo enterInfo)
{
this->info_vec.push_back(enterInfo);
}
void print() {
cout << this->title << endl;
for (const auto& it : this->info_vec) {
cout << it.name << " " << it.age << " " << it.birthmonth << endl;
}
}
};
int main()
{
EnterInfo s1("Sand", 20, "Jan");
EnterInfo s2("Arash", 21, "Feb");
CourseInfo c1(" x Records");
c1.add(s1);
c1.add(s2);
c1.print();
}
Side notes:
1- It's better to assign default values to the members of your class in the constructor.
2- I changed the access level of your EnterIndo members into public in order to use them in add function but the standard way is to set them to private and create getters and setters for them.
Research about std::vector and get/setters if you are not familiar with them.
Question in short:
class B has a ptr to class C, which has a class D having a ptr to class B
assign class B to an array in class A by copying, expecting to see to ptr points to new instance in the array not original instance, but failed.
I am already able to do some workaround, but I want to know why my original approach fails.
More detailed explainations are as follows, and the code to reproduce the problem is posted as well
Anyone who is able to explain what is going on is appreciated.
There are 6 classes:
class CastInfo //contains a Character*
class Skill //abstract class, contains CastInfo
class Movvement : public Skill
class Move1 : public Movement
class Character //contains a Movement*, which will be Move1* in practice
class Squad //contains an array of Character
with the following relationships:
Character* in CastInfo should point to the Character who owns the Skill which
is the owner of CastInfo
when assigning the Skill to Character, the Character* in CastInfo points to that Character
the Character in Squad's array should be copied, so there will be 2 instances and the Character* in CastInfo should also point to Character in Squad's array not original instance
The expecting result is:
move1 != ch1.move1 != squad.ch[0].move1 (this is already satisfied)
ch1.move1->cast_info.caster == &ch1 != squad.ch[0].move1->caster_info.caster (this is the problem)
There are 2 cases (tried) of the output:
In the Squad's constructor,:
if using
characters_[i] = characters[i];
the character is correctly copied, but the skill is at same address
move1: 00000270E6093500
ch1: 000000BC6DCFF378
ch1.move1: 00000270E6093E60
ch1.move1->cast_info.caster: 000000BC6DCFF378
squad.ch[0]: 000000BC6DCFF3E0
squad.ch[0].move1: 00000270E6093E60
squad.ch[0].move1->cast_info.caster: 000000BC6DCFF378
if using
characters_[i] = Character(characters[i]);
the character is correctly copied, but the skill is missing (pointing to some weird location)
move1: 00000230FDCEF080
ch1: 00000058A11DF548
ch1.move1: 00000230FDCEF260
ch1.move1->cast_info.caster: 00000058A11DF548
squad.ch[0]: 00000058A11DF5B0
squad.ch[0].move1: 00000230FDCEF0E0
squad.ch[0].move1->cast_info.caster: 00000058A11DF378
In the first case, I guess it is probably because I did not overload operator=, so only address is copied. I tried to overload it but it caused more problem. (Such as when using Builder.Build() )
In the second case, I expect it first call copy constructor, which triggers SetMove1(), which calls SetCaster(). move1 is cloned as shown, but I cannot understand why caster is not updated correctly. (Though is calls operator= after construnction, the address should remain the same.)
The following code should reproduce the problem:
motion.h
#pragma once
class Character;
struct CastInfo
{
Character* caster;
int coeff;
};
class Skill
{
public:
CastInfo cast_info;
Skill() {};
~Skill() {};
virtual void DoSomething() = 0;
};
class Movement : public Skill
{
public:
Movement();
~Movement();
virtual void DoSomething() { ; }
virtual Movement* Clone() const { return new Movement(*this); }
};
class Move1 : public Movement
{
public:
Move1() { cast_info.coeff = 123; }
void DoSomething() { ; }
virtual Move1* Clone() const { return new Move1(*this); }
};
class Move2 : public Movement
{
public:
void DoSomething() { ; }
};
motion.cpp:
#include "motion.h"
Movement::Movement() { }
Movement::~Movement() { }
test.h:
#pragma once
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include "motion.h"
#define SQUAD_SIZE 6
extern Movement* null_movement;
class Character
{
public:
class Builder;
Character();
~Character();
Character(const Character& character);
Character& SetMove1(Movement* skill);
public:
int id_;
Movement* move1_ = null_movement;
Movement* move2_ = null_movement;
Character(int id) : id_(id) { ; }
void SetCaster();
};
class Character::Builder : public Character
{
public:
Builder& SetId(int i) { id_ = i; return *this; }
Character Build() { return Character(id_); }
};
class Squad
{
public:
class Builder;
Squad() { }
Squad(const Squad& squad);
~Squad() { }
public:
Character characters_[SQUAD_SIZE];
Squad(Character* characters);
};
class Squad::Builder :public Squad
{
public:
Builder& SetCharacter(const Character& character, const int position) { characters_[position] = character; return *this; }
Squad Build() { return Squad(characters_); }
};
test.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "test.h"
Movement* null_movement = new Move2();
Character::Character() : id_(0) { }
Character::~Character() {}
Character::Character(const Character& character) {
id_ = character.id_;
SetMove1(character.move1_);
}
Character& Character::SetMove1(Movement* move1) {
if (!move1) return *this;
move1_ = move1->Clone();
SetCaster();
return *this;
}
void Character::SetCaster() {
if (move1_ != NULL) move1_->cast_info.caster = this;
}
Squad::Squad(const Squad& squad) {
*this = squad;
}
Squad::Squad(Character* characters) {
for (int i = 0; i < SQUAD_SIZE; i++) {
//characters_[i] = characters[i]; //character copied, skill same address
characters_[i] = Character(characters[i]); //character copied, skill missing
}
}
main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "test.h"
#include "motion.h"
int main() {
Move1* move1 = new Move1();
std::cout << "move1: " << move1 << std::endl;
Character ch1 = Character::Builder().SetId(1).Build();
Character ch2 = Character::Builder().SetId(2).Build();
ch1.SetMove1(move1);
std::cout << "ch1: " << &ch1 << std::endl;
std::cout << "ch1.move1: " << (ch1.move1_) << std::endl;
std::cout << "ch1.move1->cast_info.caster: " << (ch1.move1_->cast_info.caster) << std::endl;
Squad squad = Squad::Builder().SetCharacter(ch1, 0).SetCharacter(ch2, 1).Build();
std::cout << "squad.ch[0]: " << &(squad.characters_[0]) << std::endl;
std::cout << "squad.ch[0].move1: " << (squad.characters_[0].move1_) << std::endl;
std::cout << "squad.ch[0].move1->cast_info.caster: " << (squad.characters_[0].move1_->cast_info.caster) << std::endl;
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
As previously mentioned, I have a workaround to reach my goal:
By creating another method, which iterates through the array in Squad, and call each Character's SetCaster() method.
void Squad::SetCaster() {
for (int i = 0; i < SQUAD_SIZE; i++) {
characters_[i].SetCaster();
}
}
But I think this is dirty because every time after Builder::Builder(), SetCaster() must be called, which is unintuitive and error-prone.
I think I found the problem, as illustrated below:
The problem is in
Squad::Squad(Character* characters) {
for (int i = 0; i < SQUAD_SIZE; i++) {
//characters_[i] = characters[i]; //character copied, skill same address
characters_[i] = Character(characters[i]); //character copied, skill missing
}
}
As mentioned in question, using the commented line is just copying the values, which is incorrect.
What
characters_[i] = Character(characters[i]); //character copied, skill missing
does is as follows:
create a Character, by calling Character's constructer, this object is at address A. SetMove1() is called, SetCaster() is called. The pointer in cast_info is pointing at A correctly.
assign the object to characters_[i], whose address is at address B because the address of characters_ is assigned when Squad is created. As I did not overload Character::operator=, the pointer is still pointing to address A
Constructor done, Squad returned.
This is the reason
std::cout << "squad.ch[0].move1->cast_info.caster: " << (squad.characters_[0].move1_->cast_info.caster) << std::endl;
shows a third address (address A) which is neither &(character[0]) (address B) nor &ch1 (original character's address)
The solution is either to overload operator= or put my "workaround" (Squad::SetCaster()) in constructor right after the for loop.
Please correct me if there is anything wrong, or if there is any better solution.
Here I have a very simple program. My aim is to let b equal c, that is to copy all the content of c into b. But I don't know how. The getdata() function returns a pointer pointing to array of objects c, but how can it be used to put c into b?
#include<iostream>
#include<stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
A(int i,int j):length(i),high(j){}
int length,high;
};
class B
{
private:
A c[3] = {A(9,9),A(9,9),A(9,9)};
public:
A* getdata()
{
return c;
}
};
int main()
{
A b[3]={A(0,0),A(0,0),A(0,0)};
B *x = new B();
cout<< x->getdata() <<endl;
cout << b[1].length<<endl;
return 0;
}
In modern C++, make yourself a favor and use a convenient container class to store your arrays, like STL std::vector (instead of using raw C-like arrays).
Among other features, std::vector defines an overload of operator=(), which makes it possible to copy a source vector to a destination vector using a simple b=c; syntax.
#include <vector> // for STL vector
....
std::vector<A> v; // define a vector of A's
// use vector::push_back() method or .emplace_back()
// or brace init syntax to add content in vector...
std::vector<A> w = v; // duplicate v's content in w
That's a possible partial modification of your code, using std::vector (live here on codepad):
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
A(int l, int h) : length(l), high(h) {}
int length, high;
};
class B
{
private:
vector<A> c;
public:
const vector<A>& getData() const
{
return c;
}
void setData(const vector<A>& sourceData)
{
c = sourceData;
}
};
int main()
{
vector<A> data;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) // fill with some test data...
data.push_back(A(i,i));
B b;
b.setData(data);
const vector<A>& x = b.getData();
for (size_t i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) // feel free to use range-for with C++11 compilers
cout << "A(" << x[i].length << ", " << x[i].high << ")\n";
}
Instead of creating an array of A i.e. 'b' in main, create a pointer to A. And then initialize it by calling the getdata().
A *b;
B *x = new B();
b = x->getdata();
Here is an example
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
class A
{
public:
A( int i, int j ) : length( i ), high( j ){}
int length, high;
};
class B
{
private:
A c[3] = {A(9,9),A(9,9),A(9,9)};
public:
A* getdata()
{
return c;
}
};
int main()
{
A b[3] = { A(0,0), A(0,0), A(0,0) };
B *x = new B();
A *c = x->getdata();
std::copy( c, c + 3, b );
for ( const A &a : b ) std::cout << a.length << '\t' << a.high << std::endl;
delete []x;
return 0;
}
The output is
9 9
9 9
9 9
Instead of standard algorithm std::copy you may use an ordinary loop. For example
for ( size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++ ) b[i] = c[i];
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
My first question is: I am having a lot of trouble figuring out why the Example class is being constructed greater than the others. Below is a short app using a Template counter to track how many times the constructor/destructor/copy constructor is called for each class. There are a total of three classes: Example, Deep, Child. Each has a copy constructor... ugh.
Also, my second question, is what would be the correct way to define the copy constructor for the Child class?
In the printStatus(), it displays:
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER = 60
COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER = 50
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 90
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 80
Example count = 10
Deep count = 0
Child count = 0
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class COUNTERS
{
public:
static int NEW_COUNTER;
static int DELETE_COUNTER;
static int CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER;
static int DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER;
};
int COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 0;
/* template used for counting constructors/destructors to debug memory leaks */
template <typename T>
class Countable
{
static unsigned cs_count_;
public:
Countable() { ++cs_count_; }
Countable( Countable const& ) { ++cs_count_; }
virtual ~Countable() { --cs_count_;}
static unsigned count() { return cs_count_; }
};
template <typename T>
unsigned Countable<T>::cs_count_ = 0;
class Example : public Countable<Example>
{
public:
string a;
int b;
Example() {
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
a = "exampleString";
b = 5;
}
virtual ~Example() {
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
// copy constructor
Example(const Example& e) {
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
this->a = e.a;
this->b = e.b;
}
};
class Deep : public Countable<Deep>
{
public:
int a;
string b;
Example* e;
Deep()
{
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
a = 3;
b = "deepString";
e = new Example();
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;
}
virtual ~Deep() {
if(e != NULL) {
delete e;
COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER++;
}
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
// copy constructor
Deep(const Deep& x)
{
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
this->a = x.a;
this->b = x.b;
this->e = new Example();
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;
this->e->a = x.e->a;
this->e->b = x.e->b;
};
};
class Child : public Countable<Child>
{
public:
Deep d;
string name;
int age;
Example* e;
vector<Example> list;
vector<Deep> deep_list;
void init()
{
Deep* var = new Deep(); COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;
deep_list.push_back(*var);
delete var; COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER++;
}
Child() {
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
name = "a";
age = 10;
d.a = 1;
d.b = "deep";
d.e = NULL;
e = new Example();
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;
list.push_back(*e);
init();
}
virtual ~Child() {
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
if(e != NULL) {
delete e;
COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER++;
}
}
// copy constructor
Child(const Child& c)
{
}
};
void myChildFunction(){
Child* c = new Child();
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;
delete c;
COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER++;
}
void printStatus(){
cout << "COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "Example count = " << Example::count() << endl;
cout << "Deep count = " << Deep::count() << endl;
cout << "Child count = " << Child::count() << endl;
}
int main()
{
for(unsigned int i=0 ; i < 10; i++)
myChildFunction();
printStatus();
return 0;
}
You are missing out on deleting some Example objects because of this line:
d.e = NULL;
in Child::Child().
You are allocating memory for e in the constructor of Deep. After executing the above line, that memory is leaked.
You can resolve that problem by:
Removing that line (or commenting it out),
Deleting d.e before making it NULL, or
Doing something else that prevents the memory leak.
Update, in response to comment
Copy constructor for Child:
Child(const Child& c) : d(c.d),
name(c.name),
age(c.age),
e(new Example(*c.e)),
list(c.list),
deep_list(c.deep_list)
{
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++; // This is for Child
COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++; // This is for new Example
}
I removed all information that cluttered your code.
When using templates, constructors and copy constructors NEED the following: Example < eltType >(void);
in the class definition. All objects that inherit from Countables are known as derived classes. They also may call a derived class a child, and the class in which it is derived from is called the parent. I added the COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNT to add clarification to the data which is being presented on the console/command prompt. Usually when trying to preform a task, large or small, doing it incrementally and by providing methods, for each task, saves you time and a headache. I removed the new_count and delete_count from the equation, because I felt that it was not needed.
You will notice that I added : Countable( * ((Countable < eltType > *)&e))
This is a requirement when designing a program that involves inheritance, which introduces the
topic of Polymorphism :D
What that bit of code does is that it gets a pointer of a Countable, which will point to the address of object e, which then allows access to all super classes of this class, but not including e's class.
NOTE: Since e is a derived class of Countable, this is valid statement.
For you second question, all of your data members are public, you can use an iterator to copy your data stored in you vectors.
As a concern from one programmer to another, I hope your code in practice is well documented, and all methods declared in your class are defined in a .cpp file.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class COUNTERS
{
public:
static int NEW_COUNTER;
static int DELETE_COUNTER;
static int CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER;
static int DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER;
static int COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER;
};
int COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 0;
int COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = 0;
/* template used for counting constructors/destructors to debug memory leaks */
template <typename T>
class Countable
{
public:
Countable<T>()
{
incrementObjectCount();
};
Countable<T>(Countable const&)
{
incrementObjectCount();
};
virtual ~Countable()
{
decrementObjectCount();
};
static unsigned count()
{
return cs_count_;
};
protected:
static unsigned cs_count_;
////////////////////////////////////ADDED////////////////////////////////////
protected:
void incrementObjectCount(void){ ++cs_count_; };
void decrementObjectCount(void){ --cs_count_; };
void incrementDeconstructorCounter(void){ ++COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER; };
/////////////////////////////////////ADDED////////////////////////////////////
};
template <typename T>
unsigned Countable<T>::cs_count_ = 0;
class Example : public Countable<Example>
{
public:
Example() : Countable<Example>()
{
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
virtual ~Example()
{
incrementDeconstructorCounter();
}
// copy constructor
Example(const Example& e) : Countable<Example>(*((Countable<Example>*)&e))
{
// COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++; This is copy constructor, you addmitted this from "Child" class CCstr
++COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER; // For even more information added this
}
};
class Deep : public Countable<Deep>
{
public:
Deep() : Countable<Deep>()
{
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
virtual ~Deep()
{
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
// copy constructor
Deep(const Deep& x) : Countable<Deep>(*((Countable<Deep>*)&x))
{
//COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
++COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER; // For even more information added this
};
};
class Child : public Countable<Child>
{
public:
vector<Example> list;
vector<Deep> deep_list;
void init()
{
deep_list.push_back(Deep());
list.push_back(Example());
}
Child() : Countable<Child>()
{
COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
init();
}
virtual ~Child()
{
COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER++;
}
// copy constructor
Child(const Child& c) : Countable<Child>(*((Countable<Child>*)&c))
{
++COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER; // For even more information added this
}
};
void myChildFunction(){
Child* c = new Child();
//COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER++;not needed
delete c;
//COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER++; not need
}
void printStatus(){
cout << "COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::NEW_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::DELETE_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::DESTRUCTOR_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER = " << COUNTERS::COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_COUNTER << endl;
cout << "Example count = " << Example::count() << endl;
cout << "Deep count = " << Deep::count() << endl;
cout << "Child count = " << Child::count() << endl;
}
int main()
{
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
myChildFunction();
printStatus();
system("pause");
return 0;
}