I want to add two processes out from the same process. How to represent that in flowchart diagram accurately?
Here what I tried to do ..
Is it right?
Or should I connect the 2 arrows that output from (Teacher) rectangle?!
Related
Is it possible to run through several states in one statechart at the same time?
My simulation model is agent-based.
A) At the moment I consider my process as a continuous chain for simplicity. This means that only when the product is ejected from the machine can the process restart. The individual stations of the machine are represented as states.
B) Now I would like to represent the following: The machine should be able to run through several states simultaneously in one run. Example: If the manufactured product is just ejected from the machine, there is raw material in the filling station and in the pressing station at the same time. This means that more product is produced in the best possible time than when I look at the process as in A.
I would be glad about any help. :)
Three axioms that are always true, and you must make your logic follow them:
an agent can always only be in 1 state per state chart
While in 1 state, it can be part of a larger "composite state" (see help)
An agent can have several state charts running in parallel, for example one for "machine states" and one for "failure states"
Be careful with point 3, though. If you have several state charts in 1 agent type, they should be 100% mutually exclusive, i.e. represent very different things.
I am using the Weka GUI for classifying sensor data.
I have measures of 10 people, the data is sorted. So the first 10% correspond to participant 1, the second 10% to participant 2 etc.
I would like to use 10 fold cross validation to build a model on 9 participants and test it on the remaining participant. In my case I believe I could accomplish this by simply not randomizing the data splits.
How would I best go about doing this?
I don't know how to do this in the Explorer.
In the KnowledgeFlow GUI, there is a CrossValidationFoldMaker used to create cross-validation folds. This has an option to Preserve instances order, which says it preserves the order of instances rather than randomly shuffling.
There's a video describing the KnowledgeFlow interface here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHSgoVX9z-8&t=7s
If we have 5 cities and 5 ants. Does all ants have to start from the same city? What is the difference if they start from different cities.
I am placing the ants at different cities as starting points randomly.
I tried using both cases but my results are same. I want to know if it's correct or there is a problem with my code.
you can start from different nodes and will update the pheromone every time.
Everything I describe is currently occurring in a hydrologic model I am building.
I have some for loops that control the reading of input data across gridded data sets. The initial inputs can be anywhere from 100x100 to 3000x3000 cells. After reading in these inputs, I perform some initial calculations (5-10) across the grid. (See my question here for questions I have related to reading in the inputs: http://bit.ly/1AkyzWy). After the initial calculations, I enter a mode where I step "into" each cell and run 4-15 processes. Each cell has a different subset of roughly 15 processes - some of these cells are identical with others in terms of the processes that are run, and no cell runs a subset that doesn't exist elsewhere. A time step consists of one complete loop through all of the cells. I run anywhere from 30 to 15,000 time steps.
And no here's the important part, I think: Each cell depends on the results of the processes run in the neighboring cells, but not during each time step. Within a time step, when in a cell, the current running processes are referencing the results of the processes run in the neighboring cells during the previous timestep. Nothing within a cell depends on the processes run in a neighboring cell during the same timestep.
So, I think my program, which can take an hour or so to run 1500 time steps on 1000x10000 cells, is ripe for parallelization. I've done initial research into this, I'm worried about solutions affecting portability and performance on different end-users machines.
Does an easy to implement solution exist that doesn't affect portability and adapts to different users' number of computer cores?
I've got a GtkHBox with 2 items. Inside that, on the left, I have a GtkHBox with 4 items. The first two are GtkEventBox's, followed by a GtkHScale and finally a GtkLabel.
The two GtkEventBox's each contain a GtkVBox with two items, an image and a label (using the GtkEventBox so that I can catch click events on the image). Unfortunately, I can't seem to figure out how to set the width for them. Currently, it looks like this:
But I want the Select and Pan sections to be much narrower. Any suggestions?
Make sure to pack the event boxes into your GtkHBox with the expand and fill parameters set to false.