Rails Pundit Authorization not performed - ruby-on-rails-4

I'm getting an "Pundit::PolicyScopingNotPerformedError" when calling a GET request to the show method of this controller. Any help appreciated.
Controller:
class DashboardsController < ApplicationController
before_action :authorize_dashboard_for_customer, only: :show
after_action :verify_authorized, except: :index
after_action :verify_policy_scoped, only: :show
expose(:dashboards) {
Customer.find(params[:customer_id]).dashboards
}
expose(:dashboard) {
Dashboard.find(params[:id])
}
expose(:customer) {
Customer.find(params[:customer_id])
}
def index
end
def show
end
private
def authorize_dashboard_for_customer
authorize dashboard, :show?
end
end
Here is the Pundit Policy:
class DashboardPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def index?
show?
end
def show?
customer = user.try(:customer)
return false if customer.blank?
#record.customers.present? && #record.customers.include?(customer) || user.role == 'admin'
end
end
I've read other posts about this, but still not seeing what I'm doing wrong here. I'm still fuzzy on what resolving a policy scope is doing, but in this case I can see from debug statements that it's hitting the policy, so I'm not sure what the issue is.

In your controller you're checking to make sure the policy scope is called with after_action :verify_policy_scoped, only: :show but you aren't calling anything for the scope in your action.
You can use Scopes to restrict the results based on the logged in users permissions. For instance an admin user on an index screen would likely see all the results, but a non-admin could maybe only see certain records. IMO you shouldn't need scopes on a show so you should be able to remove the verify_policy_scoped.

Related

Ruby on Rails Pundit's current_user is nil in integration test

I'm using the gems pundit and devise. I have a delete link that only shows up if you are an admin. I have an integration test that I would like to verify that the delete link only shows up for admins.
test 'comment delete link shows when it should' do
log_in_as #admin
get movie_path(#movie)
assert_select 'a[href=?]', movie_comment_path(comments(:one), #movie.id)
end
My test_helper.rb looks like this:
...
class ActiveSupport::TestCase
...
def log_in_as(user, options = {})
password = options[:password] || 'password'
if integration_test?
post user_session_path, 'user[email]' => user.email, 'user[password]' => user.password
else
Devise::TestHelpers.sign_in user
end
end
private
# Returns true inside an integration test.
def integration_test?
defined?(post_via_redirect)
end
end
The response.body looks all right, but indeed there is no delete link. There is one when I run the development server and visit the page myself. I've narrowed this down to the current_user that pundit uses in the policies is being passed in with a value of nil. This is my comment_policy.rb:
class CommentPolicy
attr_reader :current_user, :comment
def initialize(current_user, model)
#current_user = current_user
#comment = model
end
def create?
if #current_user
#current_user.member? or #current_user.content_creator? or #current_user.moderator? or #current_user.admin?
end
end
def destroy?
if #current_user
#current_user == #comment.user or #current_user.moderator? or #current_user.admin?
end
end
end
As a closing remark, I've heard that Rails 5 has opted for integration tests instead of controller tests as we know them from Rails 4 for the default type of tests to be generated for our controllers. If this is the case, devise would be a heck of a lot more useful out of the box when using Rails 5 if the sign_in/sign_out helpers that work in controller tests were made to work in integration tests as well. But would I still have this issue of pundit not knowing what current_user is? I'm assuming this all works fine in controller tests because the current_user is scoped to controllers? Any and all light shed on this topic is much appreciated, but I would really like to figure out how to get integration tests to work with this setup because I have about a billion I want to write right now.
Not that it totally matters, but does it need to be using current_user in the policy or can it just use user in the policy. By this I mean according to the elabs/pundit README on Github I would just use #user and user everywhere instead of current_user. Read the README if I confused you.
Additionally the nil for current_user typically occurs when you don't have a valid CSRF token for your request. When you do this on the website manually by going to localhost:3000 or w/e you are first performing a get on the login path before doing the post on the login path with your credentials. In your integration test I don't seem to see where you are performing that get in order to get the CSRF for your session.
Hope this helps!!!

Pundit::AuthorizationNotPerformedError attempting to adapt microposts to Devise/Pundit

I'm new to Rails and I'm working through Michael Hartl's excellent Rails Tutorial for a second time, this time I'm trying to adapt the chapter 11 and chapter 12 microposts to a simple Devise/Pundit application I'm working on. I am able to create microposts through the seed file and display them, but I'm getting an authorization error with Pundit when I actually try to create a new post through the site. The error I'm getting is:
Pundit::AuthorizationNotPerformedError in MicropostsController#create
My Microposts Controller looks like this:
class MicropostsController < ApplicationController
before_action :authenticate_user!
after_action :verify_authorized
def create
#micropost = current_user.microposts.build(micropost_params)
if #micropost.save
flash[:success] = "Micropost created!"
redirect_to current_user
else
#feed_items = []
flash[:danger] = "Unable to create micropost!"
end
end
def destroy
end
private
def micropost_params
params.require(:micropost).permit(:content)
end
end
I'm thinking that do not have the authorization set up properly for the 'create' action, but I'm not sure exactly how it should be set. I do not have a policy for Pundit for Microposts. I tried adding a simple one but it didn't change anything. I'm learning to put all these pieces together, would someone point me in the right direction?
There is one after action filter verify_authorized because of which you are getting this error. If you have created a policy for the create action then use that to get rid of the error.

Rails4: disable edit, delete in dashboard/backend

I want to show my work to clients. Clients could access the front-end and back-end/dashboard but I do not want them to change anything as multiple clients may visit the site. Only user with role 'admin' can access the back-end (user_type!='admin'). It works fine but I cannot disable create,edit,update actions at backend. Not sure why ? I want to keep to the RESTful routes.
Application controller
def authorize_to_backend
if (!current_user or current_user.user_type!='admin')
#login_dashboard is defined in router.rb
redirect_to login_dashboard_url, notice: "Please login"
end
end
i.e Brands controller
class BrandsController < ApplicationController
layout :set_layout
before_action :authorize_to_backend, only: [:create,:edit,:update]
def index
...
end
...
..
end
Added another checking in controller and it works :)
before_action :authorize_to_backend,:redirect_user, only: [:create,:update,:destroy]
private
def redirect_user
redirect_to request.referrer
end

undefined method `model_name' for #<User:XXXXXXXX>

I have a dashboard containing 2 partials. One partial works fine and does what its suppose to (bill). The other partial is setup similar to bill but wont work(request). When I look at my log it shows that the tenant(user) is being queried, also, the 1st partial is queried but the 2nd partial doesn't query. when I went to my dashboard controller and changed the instance of the partial to (Request.new) it works but I can't seem to get it to work right thru the controller. I don't want to have the method in the model. I am using mongoid.
SO here is my render in the dashboard...
<%= render partial: "request", locals: {request: #request} %>
In the partial I have...
<%= form_for [:tenants, request] do |f| %>
And on the dashboard controller I have...
def show
#dashboard = current_tenant
#bill = current_tenant.bill || current_tenant.build_bill
#request = current_tenant.request || current_tenant.build_request
end
(if I change #request = Request.new it works fine but I know that's not right)
The bill partial works and the dashboard finds the tenant but I keep getting
"undefined method `request' for #
Any idea of what I am missing? I compared the bill controller to the request controller and I cant find any differences. When I put the Model.new into the dashboard controller it works but I know this isn't right, its as if the app wont recognize the Request controller...
The error is saying it doesn't recognize "request" method.
Also here is my controller for request...
class Tenants::RequestsController < ApplicationController
before_filter :authenticate_tenant!
def index
#requests = Request.all
end
def show
#request = Request.find(params[:id])
end
def create
if #request = current_tenant.create_request(authorization_params)
redirect_to tenants_dashboard_path, :notice => "#{request.manager_name} has been Authorized!"
else
redirect_to tenants_dashboard_path, :error => "#{request.manager_name} has NOT been Authorized, please try again."
end
end
def edit
end
def update
if current_tenant.request.update_attributes(authorization_params)
redirect_to tenants_dashboard_path, :notice => "You have approved #{request.manager_name} to review your report"
else
redirect_to tenants_dashboard_path, :notice => "#{request.manager_name} is NOT allowed to review your report"
end
end
def destroy
#request = Request.find(params[:request_id])
name = #request.name
if #request.destroy
flash[:notice] = "\"#{name}\" was successfully removed from your profile."
redirect_to #dashboard
else
flash[:error] = "There was an error deleting this managers access."
render :show
end
end
Well it looks like
current_tenant.request has an issue. That means that the method is not available. Assuming you're not trying to access the http request , then you have an issue with the request method.
So your issue is with how you defined the request method (maybe in your model). e.g. is it a class method or a instance method etc.
Without knowing your goal, that's the general answer I can give you. Creating a Request.new could be right depending on your goal, but if your goal is to call the request method, you must make it available to current_tenant
One controller shouldn't be calling your other controller as you have suggested...

How to use pundit scopes?

I have just made the switch to Pundit from CanCan. I am unsure about a couple of things, and how Pundit is best used.
For example:
If you have a resource that can have multiple parent objects, for instance lets say a Goal belongs to a student and instructor. Therefor, a student can have many goals and an instructor can have many goals. In a controller index action you might do:
if params[:student_id].present?
#account = Student.find(params[:student_id])
#goals = #account.goals
elsif params[:instructor_id].present?
#account Instructor.find(params[:instructor_id])
#goals = #account.goals
end
params are not usable inside policies, so the logic needs to be done here. I think. For what I can tell, if you skip the policy_scope you will get an unauthorized error when viewing the index page for goals.
Would you:
#goals = policy_scope(#account.goals)
OR
#goals = policy_scope(Goal.scoped).where( account_id: #account.id)
What happens when you throw a bunch of includes in the mix?
#example = policy_scoped(#school.courses.includes(:account => :user, :teacher ))
Or when needed to order...is this correct?
policy_scope(Issue.scoped).order("created_at desc")
When using scopes: What is :scope here? Is :scope an instance of the model being evaluated? I've tried accessing its attributes via :scope, but didn't work.
class Scope < Struct.new(:user, :scope)
Reading through this from a security perspective I can see a couple things that bear mentioning. For example, if you are allowing users to specify the student_id and instructor_id param fields, what's to stop them from passing in an ID for someone other than themselves? You don't ever want to let a user specify who they are, especially when you are basing policies on the users type.
For starters, I would implement Devise and add an additional boolean field called instructor that would be true when the user was an instructor but default to false for students.
Then your Users would automatically have an instructor? method defined, which will return true if the value in the instructor column is true.
You could then add a helper for students:
def student?
!instructor?
end
Now using Devise (which gives us access to a current_user variable) we can do things like current_user.instructor? which will return true if they are an instructor.
Now on to the policy itself. I just started using Pundit a few weeks ago, but this is what I'd do in your situation:
class GoalPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
class Scope < GoalPolicy
attr_reader :user, :scope
def initialize(user, scope)
#user = user
#scope = scope
end
def resolve
#scope.where(user: #user)
end
end
end
Then your (I'm assuming GoalsController class and index method) method can look like:
def index
policy_scope(Goal) # To answer your question, Goal is the scope
end
If you wanted to order you could also do
def index
policy_scope(Goal).order(:created_at)
end
I just realized that you asked this question half a year ago, but hey! Maybe it'll answer some questions other people have and maybe I'll get some feedback on my own budding Pundit skills.
Follow #Saul's recommendation on adding devise or other means of authentication.
Then you'll want to do this (Entity is Goal in your case):
#entities = policy_scope(Entity).where(...)
In entity_policy.rb:
class EntityPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
class Scope < ApplicationPolicy::Scope
def resolve
# Here you have access to `scope == Entity` and `user == current_user`
scope.where(entity: user.entity)
end
end
end
You might wonder why is where duplicated. The answer is (and here is the answer to your question): they serve different purposes. Although currently they are identical, but consider this:
You now have an admin user who has access to everything. Your policy changes:
class EntityPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
class Scope < ApplicationPolicy::Scope
def resolve
if user.admin?
scope.all
else
scope.where(entity: user.entity)
end
end
end
end
If you have organizations with goals and the following restful endpoint:
/organizations/:organization_id/goals
When a user visits /organizations/1/goals you want to make sure the user is only allowed access to goals when the user is part of the organization:
scope.where(organization: user.organization) in the policy
And you also want to make sure that when an admin visits they can only see the goals related to that organization:
policy_scope(Goal).where(organization_id: params[:organization_id]) in the controller.