I'm trying to save compare view for few projects, to avoid clicking through to get it for all of them over and over again. Can this be done? Freshly pulled SonarQube, 5.6.1.
Documentation and my own research so far proved fruitless to point to any way of doing that, so I keep recreating same project comparison. Any pointers are welcome.
EDIT:
Attaching two screenshots.
Nope, you cannot save configurations on the Compare page. It's a known limitation that won't be fixed, see SONAR-4479. As per ticket, note that this Compare functionally is planned to be removed in 6.x series.
Related
I am using the latest swiftui and would like to know if it is possible to create drag & drop boundaries based on color?
I already created a drag & drop with rotation, pinching, etc. But would like to be able to create regions where you can drop into.
Thanks
Yes it is! It's a great idea, and I think you should pursue it.
As it stands there's a hundred different ways to go about things. Spend some time thinking about how you would want it to work, then just take baby steps. You've already covered a lot of the ground work by implementing rotation and pinching.
Write some code (in a playground so you get instant feedback) that does some simple drag and drop work. Add in a line of code that turns the background a different color or changes its opacity when you let go/lift your finger.
Those types of incremental changes are well documented and you will be able to google them quickly. I think it's a great sign that you haven't found ready made examples. It means you are thinking outside the box.
This is an opportunity for you to think like a developer and a designer. If you post your results somewhere or release a project on GitHub at some point, others will be able to find your work using the same search criteria you used when you didn't find any results.
If you get stuck, post the code the code that has you baffled, and I'm sure you get help on this site. Best of luck 🍀
I have a number of user-defined metrics in Google Stackdriver. Then I edit one of them using "Edit metric", edit the filter, and click Save.
When I look at a different user-defined metric via "Edit metric", my previous change seems to show up here too. Wtf?!?
Does anyone else have this problem? Am I doing something obviously wrong?
It's us, not you—this is a known issue with that piece of UI at the moment. We're working on getting it fixed and it should be addressed soon. Direct API access is unaffected and is a workaround for the immediate future.
By the way, if you use the feedback widget in the speech balloon in the top toolbar when you see issues like this, it captures a detailed report including things like browser version/platform/etc. that can help us track issues down. We don't need it in this case (this one is well in hand), but that may be a good course of action for the future.
Thanks for trying out Stackdriver, and for your patience with beta issues. =)
I've been wondering if anybody knows why the Presentation Details (stored in the Renderings field) are shared across all languages and versions by default?
I had confirmed this was the intended behaviour of 'shared' field with these links:
This SO post:
In Sitecore, when adding a field to a template, there's a checkbox called "shared". What's it for?
And this SDN resource:
http://sdn.sitecore.net/sdn5/reference/sitecore%205,-d-,3/field%20reference/field%20properties/data%20properties.aspx
The situation
As an author, I have created a new page and pushed it through workflow approval. Everything is great, and the page is published. The next day, I want to make some changes so I open up Page Editor, a new version is created, and I start adding and removing components on the page.
The problem
As soon as I hit save, the approved and published version of my page is also affected. The history of my previous layout is gone. As soon as a Site Publish is executed by somebody (or a scheduled PublishAgent executes) my page in the Web database will be updated.
Sure, the datasource of my new components that I added may not be published yet, but what if I added an existing datasource that was already approved? My removals also are immediate.
The desired goal
I'd like to be able to version these changes, and changing the field to no longer be shared seems like the right way to go. In my case, with a unilingual site, this won't impact the multilingual aspect of it.
Does anybody know why this field is shared across versions? If I unshare it, am I completely breaking the upgrade path?
I've just been "having a chat" with Sitecore support on this very issue. The concensus seems to be - paraphrasing what they said a bit - "We think it'll be fine if you change it. You should test it thoroughly, rendering deltas, page editor Work and so on".
I can add a few comments of my own; unchecking "shared" on __renderings, does appear to Work. At least at the initial glance. I've heard about this being done in solutions before and I've never heard any ill effects come from it.
And yet; whenever you mention it; you get a LOT of nervous responses and comments like "you really shouldn't be messing with Sitecore standard setup". And while a valid point indeed, I'd like to add a point of my own to this debate:
Given that, from an API perspective, there is very few things that are different when reading a field value from a "shared" field as opposed to a versioned one - I also believe there are very few potential cases where "unsharing" it would pose a problem.
Or in other words - I consider it low risk. But I've never had a real life solution running in a live environment either, with this setting changed :-)
I'm sorry, but I don't have a direct answer to your question - WHY Sitecore set it up like this, I belive to be part of Sitecore's heritage: The idea that multiple language versions of a site should be just "layered" versions of the exact same pages and therefore presentation details might as well be shared - presumably for some performance gain. I am not entirely convinced this vision still quite holds today - where editors daily "page edit up" new components on new versions, and set up special sale banners and related content weeks in advance.
I completely agree with and am thankful for the Mark Cassidy March 3 2014 answer to this. Since then, in Sitecore 8.0 they added "Versioned Layouts".
See:
https://dev.sitecore.net/en/Downloads/Sitecore%20Experience%20Platform/8%200/Sitecore%20Experience%20Platform%208%200/Release%20Notes "Versioned layouts – a different presentation set on different versions of different languages for the same item".
nice post: http://jockstothecore.com/sitecore-8-versioned-layouts-mixed-feelings/
This is the default behavior of sitecore as you mentioned in the post. Its not always good practice to change that. This topic has been dicussed earlier which might help you
Setting __Renderings field not shared in Sitecore consequences?
Here is a blog post about considerations for doing this:
Unsharing the Layout field in Sitecore - a multi-language strategy
That said, I've worked on a project where our client went in and did this themselves. It caused problems. As I recall, they unshared the __renderings field and all prior versions lost their presentation settings. Also, other languages other than the selected one also lost their settings. We had to do a DB restore and get things back and told them never to do that again. If you are considering this, read the blog post about, and do some isolated dry runs as it may expose issues you weren't aware of (e.g. impacting other languages, old versions, etc.).
I am currently faced with the task of importing around 200K items from a custom CMS implementation into Sitecore. I have created a simple import page which connects to an external SQL database using Entity Framework and I have created all the required data templates.
During a test import of about 5K items I realized that I needed to find a way to make the import run a lot faster so I set about to find some information about optimizing Sitecore for this purpose. I have concluded that there is not much specific information out there so I'd like to share what I've found and open the floor for others to contribute further optimizations. My aim is to create some kind of maintenance mode for Sitecore that can be used when importing large columes of data.
The most useful information I found was on Mark Cassidy's blogpost http://intothecore.cassidy.dk/2009/04/migrating-data-into-sitecore.html. At the bottom of this post he provides a few tips for when you are running an import.
If migrating large quantities of data, try and disable as many Sitecore event handlers and whatever else you can get away with.
Use BulkUpdateContext()
Don't forget your target language
If you can, make the fields shared and unversioned. This should help migration execution speed.
The first thing I noticed out of this list was the BulkUpdateContext class as I had never heard of it. I quickly understood why as a search on the SND forum and in the PDF documentation returned no hits. So imagine my surprise when i actually tested it out and found that it improves item creation/deletes by at least ten fold!
The next thing I looked at was the first point where he basically suggests creating a version of web config that only has the bare essentials needed to perform the import. So far I have removed all events related to creating, saving and deleting items and versions. I have also removed the history engine and system index declarations from the master database element in web config as well as any custom events, schedules and search configurations. I expect that there are a lot of other things I could look to remove/disable in order to increase performance. Pipelines? Schedules?
What optimization tips do you have?
Incidentally, BulkUpdateContext() is a very misleading name - as it really improves item creation speed, not item updating speed. But as you also point out, it improves your import speed massively :-)
Since I wrote that post, I've added a few new things to my normal routines when doing imports.
Regularly shrink your databases. They tend to grow large and bulky. To do this; first go to Sitecore Control Panel -> Database and select "Clean Up Database". After this, do a regular ShrinkDB on your SQL server
Disable indexes, especially if importing into the "master" database. For reference, see http://intothecore.cassidy.dk/2010/09/disabling-lucene-indexes.html
Try not to import into "master" however.. you will usually find that imports into "web" is a lot faster, mostly because this database isn't (by default) connected to the HistoryManager or other gadgets
And if you're really adventureous, there's a thing you could try that I'd been considering trying out myself, but never got around to. They might work, but I can't guarantee that they will :-)
Try removing all your field types from App_Config/FieldTypes.config. The theory here is, that this should essentially disable all of Sitecore's special handling of the content of these fields (like updating the LinkDatabase and so on). You would need to manually trigger a rebuild of the LinkDatabase when done with the import, but that's a relatively small price to pay
Hope this helps a bit :-)
I'm guessing you've already hit this, but putting the code inside a SecurityDisabler() block may speed things up also.
I'd be a lot more worried about how Sitecore performs with this much data... assuming you only do the import once, who cares how long that process takes. Is this going to be a regular occurrence?
We are Redmine as a Project management tool. It has been working great and we are happy with it. We now have a new requirement now. Our management wants to see a report showing each project's delivery date, manager, start date, total issues, open issues, closed issues. I searched at several places for quite some time and did not get a solution. I appreciate if someone can offer help.
This is, for me personally, the single thing JIRA is better at :)
Anyway, that being said, you can get a summary of all open versions on your "my page", eh, page, by using this plugin:
https://github.com/bradbeattie/redmine-my-widgets-plugin
And you can also add custom queries to "my page".
You can get much of what you want in the issue report. Click the Summary button in the sidebar of the issues page in each project. Example
Create one generic top level project. Calendar, gantt charts, issues, etc, for the top level project will show everything for every project that's nested underneath.
If you are properly adding roadmaps/milestones to all the projects, you can use My Roadmaps plugin to get a consolidated visibility:
http://www.redmine.org/plugins/my_roadmaps
It works fine with 1.2 and 1.4 versions.