Strange workflow in WSO2 application publisher - wso2

I have three roles in EMM. They are admin, developer, and user. The developer should be able to submit applications for review in the APP Publisher and the admin should approve such submitted. After that, developer will publish the app and let the user download it in the APP Store.
However, everything works fine but the APP Publisher allows the developer to approve the app by itself.
I can provide the EMM role permission. There is on Create, Delete, Install, Publish and Update. Using this, I can grant the Publish permission to the developer. It can do all: submit for review, approve and publish together. If I don't, developer can't even submit the application for review.
Is there any way to do what I want?

Related

Django Microsoft Graph Authentication

I'd like users to be able to login to my Django app using their Microsoft personal, work or school account.
I have no interest in any profile or other data from the user's account. I just want authentication.
I've been playing with django-allauth and and Azure portal and have successfully set things up so I can log in with my personal outlook.com account. I've set the AD tenants up to allow for personal and institutional accounts.
I've successfully served the .wellknown json and was able to verify the app in Azure.
I run into trouble when I try to log in with a Microsoft 365 work or school account.
The consent form shows the app as "unverified" and indicates that the app wants profile information and to store data.
I ended up in a rabbit hole of Microsoft AD documentation about MPN IDs and such.
Before I go further I want to know if I what I want to do is even possible.
Keeping in mind that I'm not interested in profile information, can I achieve authentication in Django with a users Microsoft Work or School account?
If so, what do I have to do?

RingCentral phone application login report

We are using RC desktop phone app for communicating.
We have different extensions and users in those extensions who are using the app and login into it.
Where can I get those login in and out generated report for audit in the application or admin portal?
We can check users login activity
This feature is not there in RingCentral as I can see a feature request in Idea portal:
https://ideas.ringcentral.com/ideas/CUSTCOM-I-1909
This feature request will be reviewed by RingCentral and hopefully implement in future version

Google API OAuth When User Gives Approval From App Access Control

I'm currently building a web application that works with the Gmail API. I'm waiting for approval from Google's security team to have a proper OAuth connection, but I noticed that users can pre-approve your application by searching within the API Controls settings by your App ID.
This setting is located in the Google Account via: Admin Panel > Security > API Controls > App Access Control.
I noticed that if a user does this before they try to connect your app it doesn't go against your 100 account limit within Google Developer Console while in beta.
My question is, could you have this as permanent solution to get around the Google OAuth application if Google never approves you? Of course, through this method the user is still giving permission, just curious if this has been done by anyone before.
Yes, this is allowed when all your users are Google Workspace users, and is listed under exceptions to verification requirements here: https://support.google.com/cloud/answer/9110914?hl=en. If your application is meant for a broad set of users, completing app verification is necessary.
Yes, this is allowed when all your users are Google Workspace users, and is listed under exceptions to verification requirements here: https://support.google.com/cloud/answer/9110914?hl=en. If your application is meant for a broad set of users, completing app verification is necessary.
Help

Facebook API page feed didn't send information to my webhook?

I'm admin of my test app, and my test page.
Now I'm doing a function get page's feed realtime by webhook, just only on development mode.
When I click test button on App's Dashboard, It has been sent to my webhook. But when I comment or like ... the post, facebook doesn't send even though I subscribed feed webhook.
With Messages, it has been sent successfully, but Feed doesn't.
I ask facebook support, so they said that:
"Applications will only be able to receive test webhooks sent from the
app dashboard while they are in development. No production data,
including that of app admins, developers, and testers, will be
delivered unless the app is live. In order to receive feed webhooks,
your app needs to be live and has to go through app review for
necessary permissions."
I understand that I can not get data from facebook even though it is under development mode.
So how can I get data returned by facebook to develop, test... apps in development mode.
Thanks so much.
It is not possible to run this service without an app review, since it is not possible to add the 'mange_pages' permission to a (test-)user within a development app. At the same time it is not possible to turn a testapp into live-mode. As the same is true vice versa the only solution is the app review to get information from a specific (test-)page.
For live testing i suggest to create a testuser and subscribe for information about the "user" to test your webhook.
You can check with GET graph.facebook.com/app-id/subscriptions, if your app is successfully subscribed to "page information". Graph API Documentation
As you already mentioned you can also send "page information" test calls to your endpoint.
UPDATE 18th Nov 2018
If you go to Webhook -> pages in your App Dashboard on https://developers.facebook.com you are able to notice, that Webhooks in dev mode do not work.
I've submitted a Bug report to Facebook for this issue, as there is no proper solution.
You can check it at : https://developers.facebook.com/support/bugs/1570460936387604/
I also don't get the fact that you can't test webhooks in dev mode, and you can't do the app review because you can't develop your app and show them for review.
Just a chicken and egg issue.

SharePoint 2013 workflow and User Profile Service

This is another question about SharePoint 2013 workflows and the use of the User Profile Service.
At this moment, I've developed some workflows which function properly. However I've been trying to get the User Profile Service disabled, because I don't need it. After reading a lot of topics, I'm aware that the UPS is used by the Workflow Manager, and thus disabling the UPS will break the workflows; authentication errors are thrown when trying to execute a workflow.
I was wondering if it possible to disable this authentication, and thus to be able to run a SharePoint 2013 workflow without having the UPS enabled. I'm asking this because we can't sync User Profiles with our AD, as we aren't granted the permission to replicate from the AD. This causes to have blank User Profiles.
Anyone can help?
Having the User Profile Service enabled doesn't mean that user profiles will be sync'd from Active Directory. User Profile Service and User Profile Synchronisation service are two different services.
Sync will occur only if you enable the sync service, configure the sync by configuring the connection etc.