I've been trying to build chromium on Windows 10, but I am getting weird errors on runtime, which appear to be caused by that pattern:
void CheckFreeLibrary(HMODULE module) {
BOOL result = ::FreeLibrary(module);
DCHECK(result);
}
The first errors are displayed after a few seconds after Chromium is started. Here's what it says:
[5904:9192:0726/025753:FATAL:module_list.cc(18)] Check failed: result.
Backtrace:
base:debug:StackTrace:StackTrace [0x0000....] (e:\projects\clones\chromium\src\base\debug\stack_trace.cc) ...
Since I couldn't copy paste the whole stack, I will join a screenshot of what it all feels like:
I am successful in building the last revision, or at least, it appears to be successful since no errors are showing up when compiling with the toolchain recommended in Building instructions.
Luckily, the first errors aren't modal and it is possible to browse a little bit afterwards. Then, if I put the application into heavy loading (such as Facebook newsfeed), it will suddently stop responding in a silent way. Mouse hovering effects will not show anymore and reloading the page will result in infinite loading. This behavior is also reproductible when right-clicking on some pages (e.g.: google's home page does it sometimes).
What could be an explanation of this not working "out of the box" with default configuration? How to fix this?
P.S.: This question is complementary to this question:
Windows chromium-browser fresh build stacktrace and anonymous fatal errors on runtime, if it can help getting the big picture of the question.
P.S.2.: I am currently trying to rebuild from start again with this slight change to see if it works out better. I will be able to see it after about 10 hours, though (yes, the build is painful on my current setup).
void CheckFreeLibrary(HMODULE module) {
BOOL result = ::FreeLibrary(module);
if (!result) {
result = ::UnmapViewOfFile(module);
}
DCHECK(result);
}
Update - 2016/07/29
Test with CheckFreeLibrary still failed in debug, but I finally found a way to resolve the issues in a build. See update 3 in superuser question. What I did was configuring the build into release mode via gn args. This is, obviously, almost impossible to debug with, so a solution / explanation is yet to be found about why it fails in debug mode. This is quite close now, though.
Update 2 - 2016/08/13
Started all over again to have a debug version again with the latest version in the repositories, and this time I was sure enough to find something. In fact, after I've run through the usual procedure to update, generate and build, I noticed that some win-core-* DLL libraries located in the Windows Kit debugger weren't copied src folder but one of those was assumed to be there during the link process. As a precaution, I've simply copied them all to be sure that any delay-load or build dependency was there. The first time chromium has launched, the errors didn't show up and thought it was resolving the issue. However, right-clicking on the Google Homepage had the same effect (no response, then browser not showing pages anymore). After closing and reopening it, errors are beginning to show up.
Is there anyone that had experienced that? I would be very happy with something like "do it on linux, it works better on this platform". I am not willing to do it without knowing it will work any better, though.
So
BOOL result = ::FreeLibrary(module);
fails in debug builds see if you have a
DWORD WINAPI GetLastError(void);
to get the real error.
I could guess
module not loaded
module is NULL
Perhaps some DEBUG statement is changing the value of module?
Related
I've just updated a major C++ project from VS2010 to VS2019, and I'm having problems getting Edit and Continue to work like it used to, specifically in relation to the 'Require source files to exactly match the original version' setting (which I will refer to as the 'require match' setting, because it's shorter).
I'm used to running my program, making changes to the source code while it's running, then setting a breakpoint to catch the running application just before the changed code. When the breakpoint is hit, I could hit F5 to rebuild and continue.
In VS2019, it seems that Edit and Continue will not work without the 'require match' setting, but setting breakpoints in existing code cannot be done with 'require match' once any changes are made.
There's a couple of workarounds, but none are ideal. It's possible to turn on "require match" to build and run the program, then after some code changes are made, turn it off to set the breakpoint, then turn it back on again for the rebuild and continue. That's a huge pain. It's possible to use pause and continue to force a rebuild of any edits, but this only works if the code change is complete enough to build. If I want to break to inspect a variable, this doesn't work. Once or twice I did manage to set a breakpoint on changed code, and it automatically went to the stale code, which is acceptable, but I can't get this to happen now. Also, now I have breakpoints that are showing as valid on edited code that has been rebuilt and I know is running, but the breakpoints are not being hit.
Any solutions here, or does Edit and Continue simply not work as well as it used to?
Here's some pictures...
Firstly, while my program is running, I made some change to surfdraw_panels.cpp, then went to add a breakpoint. It shows the following message...
Then loads up a [stale] version of the code, with the breakpoint set in the stale code...
Other times, when I make a change, I get a different result, and it won't allow me to set a breakpoint at all... In VS2010, it was possible to turn off the 'require match' setting and still use 'Edit and continue', but VS2019 will not allow this, even though it is still the recommended 'solution' in the message!
Github project that shows the issue is below. It's a simple MFC app, dialog based, created by the new project wizard in VS2019. There is a single button on the dialog, and some simple code to do something in the button. To recreate the problem, start the app in the debugger, then make a change to OnBnClickedButton1(), and then try to set a breakpoint.
https://github.com/surfdabbler/MFCApplication1
Not quite understand your specific situation and operation, because there are not some pictures and code to explain the issue in detail.
But this function which I used could break into the changed code during debugging with require match option. You should move your cursor back to the changed code and then Debug the below code step by step. And when you move the cursor back to the changed code, vc++ project will rebuild the changed code automatically and you do not have to stop debugging and restart build.
Update 1
I also faced the same behavior in my side. And since we could not handle the issue here any more, I reported the issue on our DC Forum.
You can vote it and add any comments if I did not describe the issue in detail so that it will get more Microsoft's attention. And I hope the Team will give you a satisfactory reply.
TLDR
When one of my applications executes _CrtDbgBreak() it just writes a .dmp file and exits. On any other application _CrtDbgBreak() causes the app.exe has stopped working -dialog where I can chose to break into my debugger (VS 2013).
This is my desired behavior.
Background
A few weeks ago I experimented with Windows Error Reporting to find out if/how the WER Dialog could be suppressed. Apparently I succeeded for my application and unfortunately I haven't found the way how to undo this.
In the meantime I have had to deal with a number of other things so that I no longer remember which steps I exactly took at the time. (Should have taken notes, I know.) Since it works for other applications, I am guessing a setting specific to my app needs to be reset.
I turned to the usual suspects on my machine but so far I haven't found anything:
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting
Policy Editor: Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Windows Error Reporting
Policy Editor: User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Windows Error Reporting
WER Service is running
I have even removed all occurrences of my executable's name from my entire registry but this hasn't made any difference. What else am I missing?
One possible reason is your app/exe is added to the WER's exclusion list. See 'ExcludedApplications' at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/wer/wer-settings.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/Werapi/nf-werapi-weraddexcludedapplication
Check registry at: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\ExcludedApplications
If your app/exe name is found there, remove it.
Maybe you'd set the process error mode, like so
SetErrorMode(SEM_NOGPFAULTERRORBOX);
(see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/errhandlingapi/nf-errhandlingapi-seterrormode)
[yes - the question is dated, but it's not marked as answered, and this alternative solution may help future readers]
I've experienced this with every version of Visual Studio starting from 2012 (2012, 2013, 2015 Preview), on multiple computers and multiple projects, but I haven't figured out how to fix it:
Whenever I'm debugging a 64-bit(?) C++ console program, after a few minutes and seemingly completely randomly (when I'm not clicking or typing anything), the console window for the program spontaneously closes and I can no longer debug or step through the program with Visual Studio. When I press Stop and attempt to restart debugging, I usually get ERROR_NETWORK_UNREACHABLE:
// MessageId: ERROR_NETWORK_UNREACHABLE
// MessageText:
// The network location cannot be reached. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
#define ERROR_NETWORK_UNREACHABLE 1231L
If I try to attach to the process manually I get the error:
Unable to attach to the process.
The only fix I've found for this is to restart Visual Studio. I can't find any other way to fix it, and I've tried running Process Monitor but haven't found anything.
What causes this problem and how can I fix it?
(?) Upon further checking it seems that this only happens in 64-bit mode, but I'm not 100% sure.
Ok, this is just so wrong
I also have issues with this bug, and in my case it occurred every other debug session. Which meant debug -> stop -> debug -> bug -> restart visual studio -> go to start (repeat every minute during the whole day).
Needless to say I was driven to find a solution. So yesterday I tried procmon, spend hours looking at API monitor differences, looked at plugins, netstat, etc, etc, etc. And found nothing. I gave up.
Today
Until today.
To track down a stupid bug in my program today, I launched appverifier. For my application, I ran the 'basics' tests and clicked save. After a few hours this led me to the bug in my program, which was something like this (extremely simplified version):
void* dst = _aligned_malloc(4096, 32);
memcpy(dst, src, 8192);
Obviously this is a bug and obviously it needed fixing. I noticed the error after putting a breakpoint on the memcpy line, which was not executed.
After a stop and 'debug' again I was surprised to find that I could actually debug the program for the second time. And now, several hours later, this annoying bug here hasn't re-emerged.
So what appears to be going on
So... apparently data from my program is bleeding through into the data or execution space of the debugger, which in turn appears to generate the bug.
I see you thinking: No, this shouldn't happen... you're right; but apparently it does.
So how to fix it? Basically fixing your program (more particular: heap corruption issues) seems to make the VS debugger bug go away. Using appverifier.exe (It's in Debugging tools for Windows) will give you a head start.
Why this works
Since VS2012, VC++ uses a different way to manage the heap. Hans Passant explains it here: Does msvcrt uses a different heap for allocations since (vs2012/2010/2013) .
What basically happens is that heap corruption will break your debugger. The AppVerifier basic settings will ensure that a breakpoint is triggered just before the application does something to corrupt the heap.
So, what happens now is that before the process will break the heap, a breakpoint will trigger instead, which usually means you will terminate the process. The net effect is that the heap will still be in-tact before you terminate your program, which means that your debugger will still function.
"Test"
Before using appverifier -- bug triggered every 2 minutes
While using appverifier -- VS debugger has been stable for 5 days (and counting)
This is an environmental problem of course. Always hard to troubleshoot, SysInternals' utilities like Process Monitor and Process Explorer are your primary weapons of choice. Some non-intuitive ways that a network error can be generated while debugging:
Starting with VS2012, the C runtime library had a pretty drastic modification that can cause very hard to diagnose mis-behavior if your program corrupts the heap. Much like #atlaste describes. Since time memorial, the CRT always created its own heap, underlying call was HeapCreate(). No more, it now uses GetProcessHeap(). This is very convenient, much easier now to deal with DLLs that were built with /MT. But with a pretty sharp edge, you can now easily corrupt the memory owned by Microsoft code. Not strongly indicated if you can't reattach a 64-bit program, you'd have to kill msvsmon.exe to clear up the corruption.
The Microsoft Symbol Server supplies PDBs for Microsoft executables. They normally have their source+line-number info stripped, but not all of them. Notably not for the CRT for example. Those PDBs were built on a build server owned by DevDiv in Redmond that had the source code on the F: drive. A few around that were built from the E: drive, Patterns+Practices uses that (unlikely in a C++ program). Your debugger will go look there to try to find source code. That usually ends well, it gives up quickly, but not if your machine uses those drive letters as well. Diagnose by clearing the symbol cache and disabling the symbol server with Tools + Options, Debugging, Symbols.
The winapi suffers from two nasty viral infections it inherited from another OS that add global state to any process. The PATH environmental variable and the default working directory. Use Control Panel + System + Advanced + Environment to have a look at PATH, copy/paste the content of the intentionally small textboxes into a text editor. Make sure it is squeaky clean, some paralysis at the usual mess is normal btw. Take no prisoners. Having trouble with the default directory is much harder to troubleshoot. Both should pop out when you use Process Monitor.
No slamdunk explanations, it is a tough problem, but dark corners you can look in.
I have the same problem. Thought it was related to 64 bit console apps, where it is very easily triggered with almost any debug session. But, it also happens on 64 bit windows apps too. Now I am seeing it on 32 bit windows apps. I am running Windows 8.1 pro on a single desktop with the latest version of vs 2013 and no remote debugging. My (added) extensions are Visual Assist, Advanced Installer, ClangFormat, Code Alignment, Code Compare, Duplicate Selection, Productivity Power Tools 2013, and Visual SVN.
I discovered that the "Visual Studio 2013\Settings\CurrentSettings.vssettings" file gets corrupted. You can delete this file and recreate it by restarting VS or you can try to edit the XML. I then keep a copy of a good settings file that I use to replace when it gets corrupted again.
In my case, the corrupted line begins with
</ToolsOptionsSubCategory><ToolsOptionsSubCategory name="XAML" RegisteredName="XAML"
... and it is extremely long (I think this is why it is prone to corruption).
I just disabled in the Menu
Tools > Options
Debugging > Edit and Continue
Native-only options > Enable native Edit and Continue
and now it does not give the that stupid error which was preventing the starting of the debuggee application.
I also had the same problem with VS2015. It was so frustrating that a simple Hello World program gave this error when I ran debugger for the second time. Tried uninstall and reinstall and didn't work.
Finally, the solution mentioned in https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/8dce0952-234f-4c18-a71a-1d614b44f256/visual-studios-2012-cannot-findlaunch-project-exe?forum=vsdebug
worked. Reset all visual studio settings using Tools->Import and Export settings. Now the issue is not occurring.
I've been trying to get a program that worked on Windows 2000 to work on Windows 2003. Everything I've had to do so far to get the program to work on Windows 2003 has had to do with incorrect configuration. Right now, this piece of code:
chr = pAdapterEnvPtr.CreateInstance(__uuidof(PFADAPTERMNGLib::PFAdapterEnv));
is returning:
0x8007007E
or in other words:
The specified module could not be found.
I have two other programs and another .dll and I can successfully create instances of those classes. But this seems to fail.
I have used Procmon to try to figure out what the program can't find, but Procmon did not display anything that could indicate that the program could not find something.
In OleView, if I try to create an instance of the class, I see the following image:
If you look on the left side of the image, trying to create an instance of PFComgMng gives me the same error. (PFAdapterEnv and PFCompMng use the same process, PFAdapterMng.exe.) However, PFMQMonitor, PFSend, and PFTrace all work correctly. (Which use PFMQListen.exe, PFSend.dll, and PFTraceService.exe.)
Another thing that I wanted to note is that the following piece of code:
hr = pPFCompMng.CreateInstance(__uuidof(PFADAPTERMNGLib::PFCompMng));
works perfectly fine when it gets called earlier from PFAdapterMng.exe. So it seems like PFAdapterMng.exe can successfully find the module and create the instance, but any other processes that try to create either of the instances of the classes within PFAdapterMng.exe can't find the module, resulting in this error.
Since Procmon isn't helping with this specific case, does anyone know what I could do to figure out what's keeping other processes from finding the module?
UPDATE:
I can't run Dependency Walker with profiling because PFAdapterMng.exe and PFTraceService.exe must be run as services. I tried to run Dependency Walker while profiling OleView and tried to create instances of PFAdapterEnv and PFCompMng to try to find out why I was getting the Module not found message box. Unfortunately, Dependency Walker didn't show that anything was missing.
UPDATE2:
Maybe I missed something in the Procmon log, so I created a new log by capturing events right before I stepped over the call to CreateInstance and right after the call. Maybe someone else could take a look and tell me if i missed it? I simply can't find any indications that PFMQListen.exe could not find something..
Here's a link to a zipped folder with a Procmon file, a .csv file, and a .xml file.
http://www.mediafire.com/?07jq8zj7emmpsvd
UPDATE3:
So, I managed to get Dependency Walker running under Profile mode to create an instance of PFAdapterEnv. Dependency Walker did not find any missing .dll's.
So, Procmon doesn't show anything, and neither does Dependency Walker. I was stepping through the code at the assembly level with ollydbg, and I noticed that the error was created in the function NdrClientCall2. I don't know if this means anything.
Any ideas as to what else I can try? Do people need more information to help me solve this problem? If so, please ask.
UPDATE4:
I tried using /RegServer to register the applications, and it worked. I tried using /RegServer previously, where I just unregistered everything using /UnregServer. This time, I also deleted the component from Component Services which I needed to have because I wanted to run PFAdapterMng under another identity.
So, it seems like everything works when running on /RegServer and double-clicking the applications. However, I would like everything to run under a different configuration.
How do I configure everything to get the applications to work as follows:
PFAdapterMng.exe - Register as /Service and run under another identity through services.msc
PFTraceServer.exe - Register as /Service and run under another identity through services.msc
PFMQListen.exe - Register as /RegServer which will be started by PFAdapterMng
PFMQSend.dll - Registered with Regsvr32 and loaded by PFAdapterMng
Thanks,
Krzys
My guess is that it is related to the search path of some DLL dependencies of the executable.
You can try the "Dependency Walker" on every module to see if all DLL are available: http://www.dependencywalker.com/
And update the search PATH if needed.
Alright, I presented this question on the MSDN forums but have yet to receive any kind of response so I figured I'd give StackOverflow a try.
I'm currently developing a DirectX application using VS2008 on Win7. I recently experienced a nasty memory corruption bug with a memory allocation class that grabbed byte aligned memory. During this bug I could still run the debug and release executables however it would crash due the instructions getting corrupted or whatever, but it would still execute for a bit until the crash.
I then stripped out the entire memory allocation class. The application runs perfectly in the IDE (release and debug builds) but I can't run any of the executables at all. They immediately crash with a non-responding/stop working error. And I don't think it is my environment because I get the same issue on another computer that wasn't having problems before either.
Dependency walker gives a "Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found. Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in a delay-load dependent module." error and indicates that GPSVC.dll and IESHIMS.DLL can't be found. I've read that this can be misleading and just indicates a potential problem somewhere. And Dependency walker wasn't giving me this error the day before.
I haven't tinkered with any of the configuration or project settings or added new code. Any idea of what could be causing this behavior?
Also another note, I installed the Windows 7.1 sdk the same day. Think this could be some kind of compiler related bug?
Just in case some useful information pops up on the MSDN post, here is the link
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-IE/vsdebug/thread/f692b394-8af2-4453-991c-aa6a443a9019
Thanks!
Edit -
Here is the last couple lines of Dependency Walker's profiling output
GetProcAddress(0x76CD0000 [c:\windows\syswow64\KERNEL32.DLL], "DecodePointer") called from "c:\windows\syswow64\NVWGF2UM.DLL" at address 0x6D8BAE4F and returned 0x77B59D65.
GetProcAddress(0x76CD0000 [c:\windows\syswow64\KERNEL32.DLL], "DecodePointer") called from "c:\windows\syswow64\NVWGF2UM.DLL" at address 0x6D8BAE4F and returned 0x77B59D65.
GetProcAddress(0x76CD0000 [c:\windows\syswow64\KERNEL32.DLL], "EncodePointer") called from "c:\windows\syswow64\NVWGF2UM.DLL" at address 0x6D8BAF60 and returned 0x77B60FDB.
GetProcAddress(0x76CD0000 [c:\windows\syswow64\KERNEL32.DLL], "DecodePointer") called from "c:\windows\syswow64\NVWGF2UM.DLL" at address 0x6D8BAF70 and returned 0x77B59D65.
Second chance exception 0xC0000005 (Access Violation) occurred in "c:\users\joel\desktop\DXAPP.EXE" at address 0x0110152E.
Exited "c:\users\joel\desktop\DXAPP.EXE" (process 0x27D8) with code 255 (0xFF).
Is this referring to a DLL grabbing a null pointer or to my actual instructions? Going to read up on how to use WinDbg real quick and I'll post it's output if this doesn't shed any immediate light on the issue.
Edit 2 -
Simply running the application and hitting debug to bring up Visual Studio consistently brought me to where I'm compiling my shaders. I'm assuming at the moment that the root of the problem lies around this. However, I still don't understand the change of behavior during execution between using the IDE and not.
Solution! -
I was so thrown off by the previous memory corruption bug that I didn't realize my shaders weren't in a local directory to the executables. This in turn was generating a null pointer that wasn't handled properly after calling D3DX11CompileFromFile().
Shoot, sorry I meant to post this as a comment...
I can only suggest more diagnostic attempts.
One would be to profile the app from within Depends, this will also show dynamic DLL loads and might show something new. Also it captures the debug output. It may behave differently than launching in the debugger itself and provide a clue. You don't mention actually profiling so I thought I'd suggest it in case you hadn't. Also, pay very close attention to the paths for the DLL's loaded - you might be surprised at a DLL loading from a location other than you intended.
Another suggestion is to try at attach to the stopped app after the crash (before dismissing the error dialog). See if you can get a stack trace or anything out of it.
Finally try attaching (or even launching from) WindDbg rather than the IDE. Like the Depends profile, the difference in debugger behavior and how it hooks the app may allow the crash to happen, while providing the clues you need.
Good Luck!