Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
OVERVIEW
I'd like to test some Django websites using random data on a production server using real domain names, but these websites will be simple tests with possible duplicated data (quite probable not following Google rules). I know usually for this you use a development/staging/virtual box for such a task, but I do want to use directly the production box with the real DNS.
Now, I'm kind of new on website development and SEO, and I wouldn't like to mess with SEO and Google.
What'd be the right way to proceed here? Should I try to avoid being indexed/crawled by Google somehow? Any other advices?
You can disallow the complete indexing of your page and then later (when you're done with coding) activate it again.
Thats probably the best way because google is not going to crawl "bad pages" (for example when your website still is in development) and thus you will not get a Ranking so far (called Page Ranking if you want to look it up).
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm working on a development road map for a django project. My choosen IDE is pycharm pro and mock up tool is bootstrap studio. One of my criteria is a calendar and I have discovered that none of the existing public projects will meet my needs so I will have to create one from scratch (no problem). My typical approach would have been that the UI and the django project would be done in near parallel periodically merging and diverging the two. However, given the ability of the two software tools, I'm starting to think that that a better approach may be to do the UI first in BSS, next import the templates into the django project and finally perform the django dev to meet the needs of the UI.
The specific calendar functionality is not the issue here, this is a methodology question. While I know that there is a subjective answer to this question (which is not the "answer" I'm looking for here), there also has to be an objective answer as to why this would not work, or be the incorrect approach.
Doing the UI first is fine if you already know exactly what you want it to do and can specify that. Doing the Django first lets you play around with a working rough version and get a better feel for what works best before fine tuning the look and feel. Like you suggest, working on them both together will let each inform the other.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I am building a mobile dating app and plan to leverage google's cloud infrastructure.
I'm trying to figure out whether the entire application should live in a single GCP project or not.
On reading the best practices documentation I can see they advise the following naming convention:
[company tag]-[group tag]-[system name]-[environment (dev, test, uat, stage, prod)]
So should I split all the core components of the application between different projects? For example one for the data science matching algorithm (fizz-ds-matching-dev) and one for the android application? Or should I jam it all in one project?
Looking to follow best practices...
You're asking for some heat here. What to call things is probably as confrontational as asking vim or emacs!
As an employee of a large company where I oversee like 50 GCP projects my advice would be pick a naming scheme that lets your i-dont-have-time-for-this-kubernetes-gke-yaml-shit developer/pm/boss man find the project they want in 8 key presses or less.
A scheme which has worked well for me is: org-app-environment which is fairly close to what google recommends. I imagine your ops, so dont try to be clever with your naming scheme. Even though your users are dev, they're still users. If it takes them more than 5 seconds to find their project, they will do whatever the equivalent of an Arab spring is in the software world.
You need to find the nirvana of if the new guy is using this, is it easy to filter and find and is it quick to identify wtf is running there.
I recommend org-app-environment. Drop the org if you only have one, otherwise keep it.
Gods speed ops man.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I have been learning the Django framework for the last few weeks and I need to create a simple website for a dentist. The site just needs to have a few pages with flat data.
I was wondering whether using Django for this sort of project is good?
I am also not sure whether I need any applications for this except a contact form, the site will mostly contain only views and templates.
I would strongly recommend to use frameworks like Django (RoR, Flask, Express), because it helps to make a web application easily (scaffolding).
You don't need to reinvent the wheel to make something simple.
By the way, for only-static content 2-3 pages I would recommend do not use programming tools. Use generators like Tilda / Wix or something similar to it.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I was searching for product recommendation system in shopping carts and saw, How does the Amazon Recommendation feature work?
and in many other sites there are several complex solutions were given and each method has some disadvantage in adoptation. Instead of using complex methods, is it not very easy to get user feedback like giving options for the users to choose why they ordered a particular product. Example, if a user purchases a book, he will be given options, 1)author 2) genre 3)price 4)publisher. By this system, one can get the exact reason for the sale of the product. Are there any disadvantages in implementing this method? Thanks
Users do no want extra interactions.
There is a reason why "one click shopping" is successful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Click
Most likely, they will be annoyed and not come to your site anymore, and prefer an online retailer that doesn't ask them this extra question. They may also just click random buttons to make the window go away, without caring. What is the incentive for them to answer correctly?
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am new to development of websites
I have query why does a website work on some browsers while not for others
I have designed a website which works on one browser IE and then it does not for other computers IE
it does not goes through hit .
What precautions should I TAKE SO THAT MY WEBSITE WORKS ON EVERY BROWSER
The warning which I got was as below
The code on this page disabled back and forward caching. For more information, see: go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=291337
but I did not understood Kindly explain and give some tips
Ok I think I got something wrong with my code or internet speed
I kept the code in Developers option and let it wait then the hit went through all the 4 states and I got a response
Am I missing something ... In normal mode the hit does not go through all the states
Set your mode as synchronous to true