A little background: I would like to build my API in Chapel as a docker container on Azure (or AppEngine) using a Crate.io database and ODBC drivers.
Is there an HTTP server I can use with Chapel?
Currently, there is no official HTTP server support in Chapel, but the Chapel
team does plan to work on this in the future.
The project "Write a web server in Chapel" is listed as a suggested
project idea on Chapel's Google Summer of Code (GSoC) page. For GSoC 2016, Chapel had several applicants for this specific project, one of
which even coded up a toy web server in Chapel. However, this project was not
selected for GSoC 2016.
Hopefully this is a project that will get more attention in the near future.
We are working in an simple http server (based on libevent2) at https://github.com/marcoscleison/chapel-http .
The project is in inital commits but you can see and have an idea how to create an http server.
One more note - see https://github.com/briangu/chearch/ for an example program that rolls its own server in Chapel. Also, note that ZeroMQ support is in progress in this pull request: https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/3592. Hopefully you can find alternative solutions from one of those resources, although I don't think there's really anything wrong with using stdout and CGI.
Related
Is it possible to write C++ code to interface with a server, but to be executed on client side, but on the browser instead of native?
Like, for example, imagine using open source classes so that you produce a file.
But because you don't want all this work to be done on the server, you run it on the browser.
So that the client gives a file or two or more as inputs, then the code runs on his machine, the final result is produced, then this file is uploaded to database on the server.
please see google native client project. http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/
This is strange question.
You can prepare binaries that do task that you want done on client side and make server send proper binary to client when asked for it. Client then runs this binary and returns results to server.
It is possible if you know configurations of client machines (binaries must work on them). Also it have to be some security layer implemented - you don't want to allow every binary run on client (imagine man-in-the-middle attack when some malicious code is run on client).
I think your request contradicts with the idea behind server-side programming. The main purpose in using server-side programs is to make use of infrastructural components like database, network, etc. in a controlled manner. (The most typical usage of server-side applications are web sites with server side coding like JSP and ASP.)
Since servers are machines that are to be kept secure, a remote application should not be permitted to make changes or access filesystem freely. If you want to do changes on a server like doing database operations or reading/writing files, you should use applications that run on the server or provide interfaces like web services or web sites to remote client applications.
So there are a couple solutions when if you want to do work on the browser, then have the results posted in a server database.
First of all, you must set up your server ready for database work. I have done this using the MEAN stack, set up a MongoDB and interfaced it with the Mongoose API.
Now, for the meat of the question, there are many examples of browsers doing intensive work. The majority of these applications thought is not C++, but it is Javascript.
If you really want to focus on C++ (like i did in the past, in the time i asked this question, wanting to make something big for college), then you could do one of the following:
*Use Google Native Client (NaCl). This is a sandbox for running compiled C and C++ code in the browser efficiently and securely, independent of the user’s operating system.
*Maybe you should want to check out Emscripten, which is a framwork for translating C and C++ code to jaascript. This way, you can have your C or C++ binaries that worked, and have them translated to Javascript, in order to have them work in the browser too.
I have a couple of Android and iOS native mobile application that I wrote which connect directly to an XMPP server that I host. They push and pull realtime data through XMPP. I also use some of the XMPP XEP extensions. For other operations, I have a django application running on the same server which all the mobile applications consume through an HTTP REST interface. I use Celery and Redis for the django side to do some operations asynchronously (like doing heavy batched writes to my db).
This all works fine and dandy. Yay.
But now I want to write a web front-end to all of this, so I started researching my options and well - there are so many ways to skin the cat that I wanted to check with the SO community first.
The idea to have a js library that gives me a unified API for socket communications (i.e try different implementations of web sockets or fall back to flash) appeals to me hence why I mention Socket IO. The idea of having to run a nodejs server, well, not so much (one more thing to learn), but if I have to, I definitely will. I know that some people use gevent as a replacement of the node server. Others, decide to write a small nodejs which they connect to the rest of their stack. I would probably do this.
Another option, is to use an js XMPP library like Strophe which I don't think has a flash fallback. Also, I would need to research what this means for my server.
I have read several of the Stackoverflow answer on how to do comet and django - hence why it seems that there are several options.
The question is:
If I want to have the advantage of Socket IO behavior (with the fallbacks) and I want to push realtime data to the web client (which is being fed to the server through XMPP), and use Django what is my best option?
Update: The XMPP server that I use is ejabberd, which also supports BOSH. I realize that I could use Strophe.js and thus my communication would go over a type of long polling http connection instead of websockets. As far as I can tell, there are some XMPP over Websockets open source library, but AFAIK the community is not as active as the SocketIO one.
Update 2: Browsers that I need to support are only modern browsers. I guess this means that Flash fallback will not be that important, which is leaning me towards strophe.js.
I think once you get your hands dirty with some node you'll find that straying from Node for socket.io is going to be much harder. There are very easy to use xmpp modules in node ready to go (see https://github.com/astro/node-xmpp). Remember, node is all javascript, so you're probably familiar with programming in it already.
Personally, I've had some memory leak issues using node 0.6 or higher. Node 0.4 worked without those issues. If you are new to github (as I was before playing with Node) here is how you would get going with a node server.
Getting Node
Login to your linux box and favorite directory (I'll assume /)
git clone https://github.com/joyent/node.git
cd /node
git tag -l (this will list all available version of node)
git checkout v0.6.16 (this will checkout 0.6.16 version of node, you could replace that with v0.4.12 for example if you have memory issues)
./configure
make
make install
You'll need certain development tools to build it such as g++, but at this point you'll have a working node command.
Installing Node Modules like xmpp
Node has a nice amount of modules where most things have already been written for you. There is a search facility at http://search.npmjs.org or you can access all modules directly from your shell by using the npm command. NPM is nodes tool for installing and managing node modules. You can type npm search xmpp to search for all xmpp modules, for instance. To install a basic xmpp library for node you would do npm install node-xmpp. By the way, most github node module pages will include instructions on the front page readme file.
Keeping Node Running in Production
This threw me when I first started out. If you have any errors that are not caught node will simply die. So, you can either
1. Make sure there are no errors whatsoever or they are all caught (unlikely because even Node itself will error)
2. Use the uncaughtException handler to catch these problems. You would use code like this in your program
process.addListener("uncaughtException", function (err) {
util.log("Uncaught exception: " + err);
console.log(err.stack);
console.log(typeof(this));
// maybe email me?
});
Be Extra Safe and Use Forever
Even with the uncaughtException issue your program in production might die. Memory running out, segfaults, who knows what. That's where it pays to use something like the wonderful Node module called "Forever" (see https://github.com/nodejitsu/forever). You can type npm install forever -g to install forever. Note the -g option which puts forever in the GLOBAL node module directory. Without -g it puts the node module in the current working directory. You'll then be able to type something like (assuming your node program was called my_program.js) forever start my_program.js and then the Forever program will make sure that if it dies it gets restarted.
Not sure why you'd need Flash fallback if you're going to do BOSH (XEP-0124, XEP-0206), which is what strophe.js does. If you don't need to support IE7, you can do CORS from strophe.js, and you don't even need a proxy for same-origin. IE6 will work because it's insecure, and IE8+ support a just-barely-working form of CORS.
To get information from django through XMPP to your client, make a component connection (XEP-0114) to your server using your favorite Python XMPP library, such as SleekXMPP from your Django app. Arrange for that connection to be relatively long-lived, for performance (i.e. don't create a new one for each client connection). Send protocol as needed.
You didn't mention what XMPP server you're using. XMPP servers that don't support BOSH are getting rare, but if you've got one, you might need Punjab as a BOSH-to-XMPP proxy, or you might want to switch to a newer server, such as Prosody.
First of all, full disclosure: I work for a company called PubNub, which I'm going to mention shortly.
There are a whole range of hosted bidirectional messaging services (sometimes called IaaS - Infrastructure as a Service) that I think are worth considering. They are Pusher, Firebase, Flotype, PubNub, and others. I'm reasonably confident you could use any of them for what you want to accomplish. Firebase has a built-in database that ties right into their service, which is a pretty cool feature, but probably not useful for your particular use case (I assume you already have a database on your backend).
I can't speak too heavily about our competitors, but as far as you wanting a JavaScript library on the frontend that communicates with your Python backend, we (PubNub) provide a very similar api in both languages and that communicate on the same databus in the cloud. So you can send messages with Python and catch them with JavaScript, or vice-versa. We even wrote a PubNub-hosted version of socket.io, which you could use instead of our vanilla JavaScript api, and would still tie into your Django backend in about 10 lines of code.
Finally, the nice thing about using an IaaS (or at least us; again I'm not certain about the others) is that we handle that tricky scaling problem for you. If you reach the point of a million simultaneous users and need to push something to them in real-time, you'll find that's no problem.
We are using real-time push as well with Django and Celery. When I first created the architecture, I also researched my options. Eventually, I decided that I'd rather focus on getting the app just right rather then on fiddling around with devops work. There are several services out there that offer hosted real-time push technology that can be easily integrated with any app.
I chose PubNub and I couldn't be happier. They support socket.io for the client side and have a Python lib I use from Django and Celery workers. They also have SDKs you could use from native mobile apps.
I know, you already have a working setup in place. But I'm betting that the time it will take you to replace your current setup with such a hosted solution would be less than the time it will take you to find a good solution for what you're looking for and implement it. Also keep in mind maintenance costs down the road (esp if you opt for a lib which is not well maintained).
True, you will be paying for the service, but they price is very reasonable and you will be getting a solid service with nice perks like colocation.
I'm not affiliated with that company, just a happy customer. There are other similar services out there.
Here is my scenario: I have an iPhone app (written in Monotouch but that has nothing to do with the design) that has consumables. I give 25 free consumables when the app is installed. If the user deletes the app and re-installs it, he now gets the same 25 free consumables. I need a way to prevent this.
So I came up with the idea of a database on a server (my website host?), which would have a list of UDIDs. If the user's UDID is in the database (that means he has already installed the app) a response is sent back to the app to set the consumable count to zero. If the UDID is not in the d/b, then it is added and the response is so indicated (new app).
I am thinking of using REST (simpler) and a Linux host for the server side. My questions are:
Is there a better way of doing this?
What is the language of choice on the server?
What about sqlREST? (looks very good to me, but will it work in the above scenario?)
Well, I can tell you what MY language of choice would be: ASP.NET/C# in combination with an SQL Server DB. I have my website running at a hoster which offers this combination for just a few bucks per month.
You don't even need webservices. You could just setup an ASPX page on your server and call it using NSString.FromUrl (or whatever the method is called): "mycounter.aspx?udid=1234". Everytime the page gets called, it increases the count of the passed in device ID and the only thing it ever outputs is the number of remaining requests.
Your client parses that response to integer and if it is zero, informs the user.
You should proably add some hashing to make sure that evil Krumelur won't go to your URL and call it for random device IDs, rendering them unusable. :-)
René
The answer really depends on your web host. And what they support. That probably depends on your transaction volume and so on.
Since you are using Monotouch I'm going to assume you are comfortable in .net/c# world.
I would look at a WCF web service written in c#. This in turn would use SQL server for storage. Of course you could just go straight to a SQL server stored procedure.
sqlREST looks interesting but at a glance it looks like you need to be running the Appache + Tomcat stack for that to work.
if you just want the lowest possible bar to get it working then I agree with the other poster... ASP.NET + SQL server would get it done too.
We're making a product which requires a web service to hook up to an existing database used by one of our other products. Owing to time constraints we need to get this thing up and running pretty quickly. Our web server is Apache on a Linux machine, and the client software for the new product is constrained to communication on Port 80. Our dilemma is that we can't just get a new server in time (Apache can't share port 80) and so the plan is to route requests through the existing Apache server.
I know we can hook Apache up to Tomcat using mod_jk, but what I want to do is overlay Apache Axis on Tomcat to make use of SOAP. I'm currently downloading everything I need to test this out, but not having used Axis before, I'm just curious as to whether anybody has actually tried this before and if so, does it / can it work? If there are going to be any roadblocks stopping me from doing this then a heads-up would be much appreciated.
I can't seem to find anything which says this particular setup will or won't work, apart from a posting on the Ubuntu forums which looks similar to what I'm attempting to do but on closer inspection appears to be different.
So to summarise, what I'm curious about is whether accessing a SOAP Web Service through Apache web server, connected to an Axis / Tomcat combo would work?
I'm assuming for now that with a little jiggery-pokery it should be ok, but I'll admit I'm in unfamiliar territory here so any advice / information would be a big help.
Thanks,
Tom
Having just installed and configured all of the necessary components, it appears that this does work. I'm yet to test whether it allows a web service to work from a client machine properly yet, but all signs look good so far!
I worked on a product that had exactly this setup about a year ago. I'm afraid the details are a bit fuzzy, but I don't remember having any problems with the software stack. If you find you need help, comment back here and I'll try to dig up some more info.
I develop industrial client/server application (C++) with strong real time requirements.
I feel it is time to change the look of the client interface - which is developed in MFC - but I am wondering which would be the right choice.
If I go for a web client is there any way to exchange data between C++ and javascript other than AJAX <-> Web service <-> COM ?
Requirements for the web client are: Quick statuses refresh, user commands, tables
My team had to make that same decision a few months ago...
The cool thing about making it a web application would be that it would be very easy to modify later on. Even the user of the interface (with a little know-how) could modify it to suit his/her needs. Custom software becomes just that much easier.
We went with a web interface and ajax seems the way to go, it was quite responsive.
On the other hand, depending on how strong your real time requirements are, it might prove difficult. We had the challenge of plotting real time data through a browser, we ended up going with a firefox plugin to draw the plot. If you're simply trying to display real time text data, it shouldn't be as big an issue.
Run some tests for your specific application and see what it looks like.
Something else to consider, if you are having a web page be an interface to your server, keep in mind you will need to figure a way to update one client when another changes the state of the server if you plan on allowing multiple interfaces to your server.
I usually build my applications 2-folded :
Have the real heavy-duty application CLI-only. The protocol used is usually text-only based, composed of requests and answers.
Wrap a GUI around as another process that talks to the CLI back-end.
The web interface is then just another GUI to wrap around. It is also much easier to wrap a REST/JSON based API on the CLI interface (just automatically translate the messages).
The debugging is also quite easy to do, since you can just dump the requests between the 2 elements and reproduce the bugs much more easily.
Write an HTTP server in your server to handle the AJAX feedback. If you don't want to serve files, create your server on a non-standard port (eg. 8081) and use a regular web server for the actual web page delivery. Now have your AJAX engine communicate with the server on the Bizarro port instead of port 80.
But it's not that hard to write the file server part, also. If you do that, you also get to generate web pages on-the-fly with your data pre-filled, if you want.
Google Desktop Search does this now. When I search my desktop for 'foobar', the URL that opens is this:
http://127.0.0.1:4664/search?q=foobar&flags=68&num=10
In this case, the 4664 is the Bizarro port. (GoogleDesktop serves all the data here; it only uses the Bizarro port to avoid conflicts with any web server I might be running.)
You may want to consider where your data lives. If your application feeds a back-end database, you could write a web app leaving your c++ code in tact -- the web application would be independent and offer up pages to web users and talk directly to the database -- In this case you have as many options, and more, as you have indicated.