I want to count the distinct values of a variable grouped by MEMBER_ID and a rolling date range of 5 years. I have seen a similar post.
How to Count Distinct for SAS PROC SQL with Rolling Date Window?
When I change h2.DATE BETWEEN h.DATE - 180 AND h.DATE to h2.year BETWEEN h.year-5 AND h.year, should it give me the correct distinct count within the last 5 years? Thank you in advance.
data have;
input permno year Cand_ID$;
datalines;
1 2000 1
1 2001 2
1 2002 3
1 2003 1
1 2004 3
1 2005 1
2 2000 1
2 2001 3
2 2002 1
2 2003 2
2 2004 2
2 2005 2
2 2006 1
2 2007 1
3 2001 3
3 2002 3
3 2003 3
3 2004 1
3 2005 1
;
run;
Here's how you can do it with a data step. This assumes you have values for all years. If you do not, fill it in with zeros.
Keep a rolling list of the last 5 years by using the lag function. If we keep a rolling sorted array list of the last 5 years using lag, we can count the distinct values for each row to get a rolling 5-year count.
In other words, we're going to create and count a list that looks like this:
permno year id1 id2 id3 id4 id5
1 2000 . . . . 1
1 2001 . . . 1 2
1 2002 . . 1 2 3
1 2003 . 1 1 2 3
Code:
data want;
set have;
by permno year;
array lagid[4] $;
array id[5] $;
id1 = cand_id;
lagid1 = lag1(cand_id);
lagid2 = lag2(cand_id);
lagid3 = lag3(cand_id);
lagid4 = lag4(cand_id);
/* Reset the counter for the first group */
if(first.permno) then n = 0;
/* Count the number of rows within a group */
n+1;
/* Save the last 5 years by using the lag function,
but do not get lags from previous groups
*/
do i = 1 to 4;
if(i < n) then id[i+1] = lagid[i];
end;
/* Sort the array of IDs into ascending order */
call sortc(of id:);
/* Count the number of distinct IDs in the array. Do not count
missing values.
*/
n_distinct = 1;
do i = 2 to dim(id);
if(id[i] > id[i-1] AND NOT missing(id[i-1]) ) then n_distinct+1;
end;
drop lag: n i;
run;
Output (without id: dropped):
permno year Cand_ID id1 id2 id3 id4 id5 n_distinct
1 2000 1 . . . . 1 1
1 2001 2 . . . 1 2 2
1 2002 3 . . 1 2 3 3
1 2003 1 . 1 1 2 3 3
1 2004 3 1 1 2 3 3 3
1 2005 1 1 1 2 3 3 3
I have a variable with IDs:
clear
input ID
1
.
2
1
.
3
4
5
4
4
6
end
How can I create separate categorical variables with ID as a name and values of 1 and 2 (the latter if the generated variable matches the ID)?
For example, variable _ID_1 should look as follows:
2
.
1
2
.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Any ideas?
Another way to do it:
clear
input ID
1
.
2
1
.
3
4
5
4
4
6
end
forvalues j = 1/6 {
generate ID_`j' = 1 + (ID == `j') if ID != .
}
list
1) A new variable should be created for each unique observation listed in variable sku, which contains repeated values.
2) These newly created variables should be assigned the value of own product's price at the store/week level, as long as observations' sku value is in the same subcategory (subc) as the variable itself. For example, in eta2,3, observations in line 3, 4, and 5 have the same value because they all belong to the same subcategory as sku #3. [eta2,3 indicates sku 3, subc 2.]
3) x indicates that this is the original value for the product/subcategory that is currently being replicated.
4) If an observation doesn't belong to the same subcategory, it should reflect "0".
Orange is the given data. In green are the values from the steps 1, 2, and 3. White cells are step 4.
I am unable to offer a solution of my own, as searching for a
way to generate a variable using existing observations hasn't given me results.
I also understand that it must be a combination of forvalues, foreach, and levelsof commands?
clear
input units price sku week store subc
3 4.3 1 1 1 1
2 3 2 1 1 1
1 2.5 3 1 1 2
4 12 5 1 1 2
5 12 6 1 1 3
35 4.3 1 1 2 1
23 3 2 1 2 1
12 2.5 3 1 2 2
35 12 5 1 2 2
35 12 6 1 2 3
3 20 1 2 1 1
2 30 2 2 1 1
4 40 3 2 2 2
1 50 4 2 2 2
9 10 5 2 2 2
2 90 6 2 2 3
end
UPDATE
Based on Nick Cox' feedback, this is the final code that gives the result I have been looking for:
clear
input units price sku week store subc
35 4.3 1 1 1 1
23 3 2 1 1 1
12 2.5 3 1 1 2
10 1 4 1 1 2
35 12 5 1 1 2
35 12 6 1 1 3
35 5.3 1 2 1 1
23 4 2 2 1 1
12 3.5 3 2 1 2
10 2 4 2 1 2
35 13 5 2 1 2
35 13 6 2 1 3
end
egen joint = group(subc sku), label
bysort store week : gen freq = _N
su freq, meanonly
local jmax = r(max)
drop freq
tostring subc sku, replace
gen new = subc + "_"+sku
su joint, meanonly
forval j = 1/`r(max)'{
local J = new[`j']
gen eta`J' = .
}
sort subc week store sku
egen joint1 = group(subc week store), label
gen long id = _n
su joint1, meanonly
quietly forval i = 1/`r(max)' {
su id if joint1 == `i', meanonly
local jmin = r(min)
local jmax = r(max)
forval j = `jmin'/`jmax' {
local subc = subc[`j']
local sku = sku[`j']
replace eta`subc'_`sku' = price[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
replace eta`subc'_`sku' = 0 in `j'/`j'
}
}
I worry on your behalf that in a dataset of any size what you ask for would mean many, many extra variables. I wonder on your behalf whether you need all of them any way for whatever you want to do with them.
That aside, this seems to be what you want. Naturally your column headers in your spreadsheet view aren't legal variable names. Disclosure: despite being the original author of levelsof I wouldn't prefer its use here.
clear
input units price sku week store subc
35 4.3 1 1 1 1
23 3 2 1 1 1
12 2.5 3 1 1 2
10 1 4 1 1 2
35 12 5 1 1 2
35 12 6 1 1 3
end
sort subc sku
* subc identifiers guaranteed to be integers 1 up
egen subc_id = group(subc), label
* observation numbers in a variable
gen long id = _n
* how many subc? loop over the range
su subc_id, meanonly
forval i = 1/`r(max)' {
* which subc is this one? look it up using -summarize-
* assuming that subc is numeric!
su subc if subc_id == `i', meanonly
local I = r(min)
* which observation numbers for this subc?
* given the prior sort, they are all contiguous
su id if subc_id == `i', meanonly
* for each observation in the subc, find out the sku and copy its price
* to all observations in that subc
forval j = `r(min)'/`r(max)' {
local J = sku[`j']
gen eta_`I'_`J' = cond(subc_id == `i', price[`j'], 0)
}
}
list subc eta*, sepby(subc)
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| subc eta_1_1 eta_1_2 eta_2_3 eta_2_4 eta_2_5 eta_3_6 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 4.3 3 0 0 0 0 |
2. | 1 4.3 3 0 0 0 0 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
3. | 2 0 0 2.5 1 12 0 |
4. | 2 0 0 2.5 1 12 0 |
5. | 2 0 0 2.5 1 12 0 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Notes:
N1. In your example, subc is numbered 1, 2, etc. My extra variable subc_id ensures that to be true even if in your real data the identifiers are not so clean.
N2. The expression
cond(subc_id == `i', price[`j'], 0)
could also be
(subc_id == `i') * price[`j']
N3. It seems possible that a different data structure would be much more efficient.
EDIT: Here is code and results for another data structure.
clear
input units price sku week store subc
35 4.3 1 1 1 1
23 3 2 1 1 1
12 2.5 3 1 1 2
10 1 4 1 1 2
35 12 5 1 1 2
35 12 6 1 1 3
end
sort subc sku
egen subc_id = group(subc), label
bysort subc : gen freq = _N
su freq, meanonly
local jmax = r(max)
drop freq
forval j = 1/`jmax' {
gen eta`j' = .
gen which`j' = .
}
gen long id = _n
su subc_id, meanonly
quietly forval i = 1/`r(max)' {
su id if subc_id == `i', meanonly
local jmin = r(min)
local jmax = r(max)
local k = 1
forval j = `jmin'/`jmax' {
replace which`k' = sku[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
replace eta`k' = price[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
local ++k
}
}
list subc sku *1 *2 *3 , sepby(subc)
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| subc sku eta1 which1 eta2 which2 eta3 which3 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 4.3 1 3 2 . . |
2. | 1 2 4.3 1 3 2 . . |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
3. | 2 3 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
4. | 2 4 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
5. | 2 5 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 3 6 12 6 . . . . |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
I am adding another answer that tackles combinations of subc and week. Previous discussion establishes that what you are trying to do would add an extra variable for every observation. This can't be a good idea! At best, you might just have many new variables, mostly zeros. At worst, you will run into Stata's limits.
Hence I won't support your endeavour to go further down the same road, but show how the second data structure I discuss in my previous answer can be produced. Indeed, you haven't indicated (a) why you want all these variables, which are just the existing data redistributed; (b) what your strategy is for dealing with them; (c) why rangestat (SSC) or some other program could not remove the need to create them in the first place.
clear
input units price sku week store subc
35 4.3 1 1 1 1
23 3 2 1 1 1
12 2.5 3 1 1 2
10 1 4 1 1 2
35 12 5 1 1 2
35 12 6 1 1 3
35 5.3 1 2 1 1
23 4 2 2 1 1
12 3.5 3 2 1 2
10 2 4 2 1 2
35 13 5 2 1 2
35 13 6 2 1 3
end
sort subc week sku
egen joint = group(subc week), label
bysort joint : gen freq = _N
su freq, meanonly
local jmax = r(max)
drop freq
forval j = 1/`jmax' {
gen eta`j' = .
gen which`j' = .
}
gen long id = _n
su joint, meanonly
quietly forval i = 1/`r(max)' {
su id if joint == `i', meanonly
local jmin = r(min)
local jmax = r(max)
local k = 1
forval j = `jmin'/`jmax' {
replace which`k' = sku[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
replace eta`k' = price[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
local ++k
}
}
list subc week sku *1 *2 *3 , sepby(subc week)
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| subc week sku eta1 which1 eta2 which2 eta3 which3 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 4.3 1 3 2 . . |
2. | 1 1 2 4.3 1 3 2 . . |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
3. | 1 2 1 5.3 1 4 2 . . |
4. | 1 2 2 5.3 1 4 2 . . |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
5. | 2 1 3 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
6. | 2 1 4 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
7. | 2 1 5 2.5 3 1 4 12 5 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
8. | 2 2 3 3.5 3 2 4 13 5 |
9. | 2 2 4 3.5 3 2 4 13 5 |
10. | 2 2 5 3.5 3 2 4 13 5 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
11. | 3 1 6 12 6 . . . . |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
12. | 3 2 6 13 6 . . . . |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
clear
input units price sku week store subc
35 4.3 1 1 1 1
23 3 2 1 1 1
12 2.5 3 1 1 2
10 1 4 1 1 2
35 12 5 1 1 2
35 12 6 1 1 3
35 5.3 1 2 1 1
23 4 2 2 1 1
12 3.5 3 2 1 2
10 2 4 2 1 2
35 13 5 2 1 2
35 13 6 2 1 3
end
egen joint = group(subc sku), label
bysort store week : gen freq = _N
su freq, meanonly
local jmax = r(max)
drop freq
tostring subc sku, replace
gen new = subc + "_"+sku
su joint, meanonly
forval j = 1/`r(max)'{
local J = new[`j']
gen eta`J' = .
}
sort subc week store sku
egen joint1 = group(subc week store), label
gen long id = _n
su joint1, meanonly
quietly forval i = 1/`r(max)' {
su id if joint1 == `i', meanonly
local jmin = r(min)
local jmax = r(max)
forval j = `jmin'/`jmax' {
local subc = subc[`j']
local sku = sku[`j']
replace eta`subc'_`sku' = price[`j'] in `jmin'/`jmax'
replace eta`subc'_`sku' = 0 in `j'/`j'
}
}
list subc sku store week eta*, sepby(subc)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| store week subc sku eta1_1 eta1_2 eta2_3 eta2_4 eta2_5 eta3_6 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 2 4.3 0 . . . . |
2. | 1 1 1 1 0 3 . . . . |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
3. | 1 1 2 4 . . 2.5 0 12 . |
4. | 1 1 2 3 . . 0 1 12 . |
5. | 1 1 2 5 . . 2.5 1 0 . |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 1 1 3 6 . . . . . 0 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
7. | 1 2 1 2 5.3 0 . . . . |
8. | 1 2 1 1 0 4 . . . . |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
9. | 1 2 2 3 . . 0 2 13 . |
10. | 1 2 2 5 . . 3.5 2 0 . |
11. | 1 2 2 4 . . 3.5 0 13 . |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
12. | 1 2 3 6 . . . . . 0 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
I'm relatively new to Stata and am trying to count the number of active cases an employee has open over time in my dataset (see link below for example). I tried writing a loop using forvalues based on an example I found online, but keep getting
invalid syntax
For each EmpID I want to count the number of cases that employee had open when a new case was added to the queue. So if a case is added with an OpenDate of 03/15/2015 and the EmpID has two other cases open at the time, the code would assign a value of 2 to NumActiveWhenOpened field. A case is considered active if (1) its OpenDate is less then the new case's OpenDate & (2) its CloseDate is greater than the new case's OpenDate.
The link below provides an example. I'm trying to write a loop that creates the NumActiveWhenOpened column. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
http://i.stack.imgur.com/z4iyR.jpg
EDIT
Here is the code that is not working. I'm sure there are several things wrong with it and I'm not sure how to store the count in the [NumActiveWhenOpen] field.
by EmpID: generate CaseNum = _n
egen group = group(EmpID)
su group, meanonly
gen NumActiveWhenOpen = 0
forvalues i = 1/ 'r(max)' {
forvalues x = 1/CaseNum if group == `i'{
count if OpenDate[_n] > OpenDate[_n-x] & CloseDate[_n-x] > OpenDate[_n]
}
}
This sounds like a problem discussed in http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0068 but let's try to be self-contained. I am not sure that I understand the definitions, but this may help.
I'll steal part of Roberto Ferrer's sandbox.
clear
set more off
input ///
caseid str15(open close) empid
1 "1/1/2010" "3/1/2010" 1
2 "2/5/2010" "" 1
3 "2/15/2010" "4/7/2010" 1
4 "3/5/2010" "" 1
5 "3/15/2010" "6/15/2010" 1
6 "3/24/2010" "3/24/2010" 1
1 "1/1/2010" "3/1/2010" 2
2 "2/5/2010" "" 2
3 "2/15/2010" "4/7/2010" 2
4 "3/5/2010" "" 2
5 "3/15/2010" "6/15/2010" 2
end
gen d1 = date(open, "MDY")
gen d2 = date(close, "MDY")
format %td d1 d2
drop open close
reshape long d, i(empid caseid) j(status)
replace status = -1 if status == 2
replace status = . if missing(d)
bysort empid (d) : gen nopen = sum(status)
bysort empid d : replace nopen = nopen[_N]
l
The idea is to reshape so that each pair of dates becomes two observations. Then if we code each opening by 1 and each closing by -1 the total number of active cases is their cumulative sum. That's all. Here are the results:
. l, sepby(empid)
+---------------------------------------------+
| empid caseid status d nopen |
|---------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 01jan2010 1 |
2. | 1 2 1 05feb2010 2 |
3. | 1 3 1 15feb2010 3 |
4. | 1 1 -1 01mar2010 2 |
5. | 1 4 1 05mar2010 3 |
6. | 1 5 1 15mar2010 4 |
7. | 1 6 1 24mar2010 4 |
8. | 1 6 -1 24mar2010 4 |
9. | 1 3 -1 07apr2010 3 |
10. | 1 5 -1 15jun2010 2 |
11. | 1 2 . . 2 |
12. | 1 4 . . 2 |
|---------------------------------------------|
13. | 2 1 1 01jan2010 1 |
14. | 2 2 1 05feb2010 2 |
15. | 2 3 1 15feb2010 3 |
16. | 2 1 -1 01mar2010 2 |
17. | 2 4 1 05mar2010 3 |
18. | 2 5 1 15mar2010 4 |
19. | 2 3 -1 07apr2010 3 |
20. | 2 5 -1 15jun2010 2 |
21. | 2 4 . . 2 |
22. | 2 2 . . 2 |
+---------------------------------------------+
The bottom line is no loops needed, but by: helps mightily. A detail useful here is that the cumulative sum function sum() ignores missings.
Try something along the lines of
clear
set more off
*----- example data -----
input ///
caseid str15(open close) empid numact
1 "1/1/2010" "3/1/2010" 1 0
2 "2/5/2010" "" 1 1
3 "2/15/2010" "4/7/2010" 1 2
4 "3/5/2010" "" 1 2
5 "3/15/2010" "6/15/2010" 1 3
6 "3/24/2010" "3/24/2010" 1 .
1 "1/1/2010" "3/1/2010" 2 0
2 "2/5/2010" "" 2 1
3 "2/15/2010" "4/7/2010" 2 2
4 "3/5/2010" "" 2 2
5 "3/15/2010" "6/15/2010" 2 3
end
gen opend = date(open, "MDY")
gen closed = date(close, "MDY")
format %td opend closed
drop open close
order empid
list, sepby(empid)
*----- what you want -----
gen numact2 = .
sort empid caseid
forvalues i = 1/`=_N' {
count if empid[`i'] == empid & /// a different count for each employee
opend[`i'] <= closed /// the date condition
in 1/`i' // no need to look at cases that have not yet occurred
replace numact2 = r(N) - 1 in `i'
}
list, sepby(empid)
This is resource intensive so if you have a large data set, it will take some time. The reason is it loops over observations checking conditions. See help stored results and help return for an explanation of r(N).
A good read is
Stata tip 51: Events in intervals, The Stata Journal, by Nicholas J. Cox.
Note how I provided an example data set within the code (see help input). That is how I recommend you do it for future questions. This will save other people's time and increase the probabilities of you getting an answer.
Given the following variables (id and partner) in Stata, I would like to create a new variable (pid) that is simply the consecutive partner counter within id (as you can see, partner is not consecutive). Here is a MWE:
clear
input id partner pid
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 3 2
1 3 2
2 2 1
2 3 2
2 3 2
2 3 2
2 5 3
2 5 3
end
// create example data
clear
input id partner
1 1
1 1
1 3
1 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 5
2 5
end
// create pid
bysort id partner : gen pid = _n == 1
by id : replace pid = sum(pid)
// admire the result
list, sepby(id)