readAll() from QSerialPort doesn't include the last response sent - c++

I'm using Qt to control a serial device. If I send a command to my serial device, I do something like serial->write("command \r\n"). I made a push button which changes the text inside a plain text widget to the response of the serial port. To get the response of the serial port, I'm using serial->readAll(). The problem is it shows the 2nd to last response rather than the one I was expecting. Does Qt have some sort of buffer which is keeping hold of this response?
EDIT
I botched it by using recursion and compared the strings recieved

You might be calling readAll before the response is available. You should hook your code to the readyRead signal to be notified each time new chunk of data is ready to be read. Keep in mind that readyRead can be emitted with any number of bytes available to read - at a minimum, it'll be just one byte. You can't expect the data to be chunked/blocked in any particular way, since the serial port doesn't act as a message-based communication device. Your receiver code must be able to piece the data together from small chunks and act accordingly when it got all the data it needs.
For example, suppose that the device responses have a fixed, known length. You'd only want to react when a complete response has arrived. E.g.:
class Protocol : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
QBasicTimer m_timer;
QPointer<QIODevice> m_port;
int m_responseLength = 0;
int m_read = 0;
void timerEvent(QTimerEvent * ev) override {
if (ev->timerId() != m_timer.timerId()) return;
m_timer.stop();
emit timedOut();
}
void onData() {
m_read += m_port->bytesAvailable();
if (m_read < m_responseLength)
return;
m_timer.stop();
emit gotResponse(m_port->read(m_responseLength));
m_read -= m_responseLength;
m_responseLength = 0;
}
public:
Q_SIGNAL void gotResponse(const QByteArray &);
Q_SIGNAL void timedOut();
Q_SLOT void sendCommand(const QByteArray & cmd, int responseLength, int cmdTimeout) {
m_responseLength = responseLength;
m_port->write(cmd);
m_timer.start(cmdTimeout, this);
}
explicit Protocol(QIODevice * port, QObject * parent = nullptr) :
QObject(parent), m_port(port) {
connect(m_port, &QIODevice::readyRead, this, &Protocol::onData);
}
};
...
Protocol protocol(0,0);
protocol.sendCommand({"foo"}, 10, 500);
QMetaObject::Connection cmd1;
cmd1 = QObject::connect(&protocol, &Protocol::gotResponse, [&]{
QObject::disconnect(cmd1);
qDebug() << "got response to foo";
});
QObject::connect(&protocol, &Protocol::timedOut, []{ qDebug() << "timed out :("; });

Related

Qt signal slots and memory alocation

I have an application which communicates with an external application and this controls a devices. When new data have arrived in this device, my application should send an "answer" to this device. The communication with the external application is done with some callback functions and I use signals/slot to deliver the correct message to the callback.
My problem is that after the original signal returns, the application crashes with SIGSEGV error. As far as I know this error refers to failure in memory. As the external application could dealocate /destroy/corrupt the original data, could you please tell me if this a safe way to use signal/slot mechanism? Or this could have caused a SIGSEGV? Bellow, I am posting a code snippet as example:
MyClass::MyClass()
{
notifierData = new QWinEventNotifier(HandleData);
objectItem = new ObjectItem();
connect(notifierData,SIGNAL(activated(HANDLE)),SLOT(newDataSlot(HANDLE)));
QObject::connect(this, SIGNAL(objectData(int, QByteArray)), objectItem, SLOT(dataChangedSlot(int, QByteArray)), Qt::QueuedConnection) ;
}
void MyClass::newDataSlot(HANDLE)
{
DataType data;
GetDataFromExternalCallback(&data);
QByteArray bytearrayData(data.str);
emit objectData(data.TC_Index, bytearrayData);
}
void ObjectItem::dataChangedSlot(int index, QByteArray data)
{
emit dataChanged(index, data);
}
DeviceInterface::DeviceInterface()
{
Init(Line1);
}
void SetObjectItem(ObjectItem *anObjectItem)
{
objectItem = anObjectItem;
if(objectItem != NULL)
connect(objectItem, SIGNAL(dataChanged(int, QByteArray)), this, SLOT(newDataRecevied(int, QByteArray)), Qt::QueuedConnection);
}
void DeviceInterface::newDataRecevied(int index, QByteArray data)
{
QString messageToDisplay = "Reply Answer";
if(objectItem != NULL)
{
objectItem->updateDeviceDisplay(index, messageToDisplay);
}
}
bool DeviceInterface::updateDeviceDisplay(int index, QString text)
{
//Line1 is class member: char Line1[20]
sprintf_s(Line1, 20, "%s", UnicodeToCodePage(1253,text.toStdWString().c_str()));
SendDataWithExternalCallback(&Line1);
return true;
}

How to correctly use QSerialPort to write and read data constantly? [duplicate]

I have to update firmware and settings on a device connected to a serial port.
Since this is done by a sequence of commands, I send a command and wait until I recive an answer. Inside the answere (many lines) I search for a string that indicates if the operation is finished successfully.
Serial->write(“boot”, 1000);
Serial->waitForKeyword(“boot successful”);
Serial->sendFile(“image.dat”);
…
So I’ve created a new Thread for this blocking read/write method. Inside the thread I make use of the waitForX() functions.
If I call watiForKeyword() it will call readLines() until it detects the keyword or timesout
bool waitForKeyword(const QString &keyword)
{
QString str;
// read all lines
while(serial->readLines(10000))
{
// check each line
while((str = serial->getLine()) != "")
{
// found!
if(str.contains(keyword))
return true;
}
}
// timeout
return false;
}
readLines() reads everything available and separates it into lines , each line is placed inside a QStringList and to get a string I call getLine() which returns the first string in the list and deletes it.
bool SerialPort::readLines(int waitTimeout)
{
if(!waitForReadyRead(waitTimeout))
{
qDebug() << "Timeout reading" << endl;
return false;
}
QByteArray data = readAll();
while (waitForReadyRead(100))
data += readAll();
char* begin = data.data();
char* ptr = strstr(data, "\r\n");
while(ptr != NULL)
{
ptr+=2;
buffer.append(begin, ptr - begin);
emit readyReadLine(buffer);
lineBuffer.append(QString(buffer)); // store line in Qstringlist
buffer.clear();
begin = ptr;
ptr = strstr(begin, "\r\n");
}
// rest
buffer.append(begin, -1);
return true;
}
The problem is if I send a file via terminal to test the app readLines() will only read a smale part of the file ( 5 Lines or so). Since these lines do not contain the keyword. the function will run once again, but this time it dosnt wait for timeout, readLines just return false immediately.
Whats wrong ?
Also I'm not shure if this is the right approach... Does anyone know how to send a sequenze of commands and wait for a response each time?
Let's use QStateMachine to make this simple. Let's recall how you wished such code would look:
Serial->write("boot", 1000);
Serial->waitForKeyword("boot successful");
Serial->sendFile("image.dat");
Let's put it in a class that has explicit state members for each state the programmer could be in. We'll also have action generators send, expect, etc. that attach given actions to states.
// https://github.com/KubaO/stackoverflown/tree/master/questions/comm-commands-32486198
#include <QtWidgets>
#include <private/qringbuffer_p.h>
#include <type_traits>
[...]
class Programmer : public StatefulObject {
Q_OBJECT
AppPipe m_port { nullptr, QIODevice::ReadWrite, this };
State s_boot { &m_mach, "s_boot" },
s_send { &m_mach, "s_send" };
FinalState s_ok { &m_mach, "s_ok" },
s_failed { &m_mach, "s_failed" };
public:
Programmer(QObject * parent = 0) : StatefulObject(parent) {
connectSignals();
m_mach.setInitialState(&s_boot);
send (&s_boot, &m_port, "boot\n");
expect(&s_boot, &m_port, "boot successful", &s_send, 1000, &s_failed);
send (&s_send, &m_port, ":HULLOTHERE\n:00000001FF\n");
expect(&s_send, &m_port, "load successful", &s_ok, 1000, &s_failed);
}
AppPipe & pipe() { return m_port; }
};
This is fully functional, complete code for the programmer! Completely asynchronous, non-blocking, and it handles timeouts, too.
It's possible to have infrastructure that generates the states on-the-fly, so that you don't have to manually create all the states. The code is much smaller and IMHO easier to comperehend if you have explicit states. Only for complex communication protocols with 50-100+ states would it make sense to get rid of explicit named states.
The AppPipe is a simple intra-process bidirectional pipe that can be used as a stand-in for a real serial port:
// See http://stackoverflow.com/a/32317276/1329652
/// A simple point-to-point intra-process pipe. The other endpoint can live in any
/// thread.
class AppPipe : public QIODevice {
[...]
};
The StatefulObject holds a state machine, some basic signals useful for monitoring the state machine's progress, and the connectSignals method used to connect the signals with the states:
class StatefulObject : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
Q_PROPERTY (bool running READ isRunning NOTIFY runningChanged)
protected:
QStateMachine m_mach { this };
StatefulObject(QObject * parent = 0) : QObject(parent) {}
void connectSignals() {
connect(&m_mach, &QStateMachine::runningChanged, this, &StatefulObject::runningChanged);
for (auto state : m_mach.findChildren<QAbstractState*>())
QObject::connect(state, &QState::entered, this, [this, state]{
emit stateChanged(state->objectName());
});
}
public:
Q_SLOT void start() { m_mach.start(); }
Q_SIGNAL void runningChanged(bool);
Q_SIGNAL void stateChanged(const QString &);
bool isRunning() const { return m_mach.isRunning(); }
};
The State and FinalState are simple named state wrappers in the style of Qt 3. They allow us to declare the state and give it a name in one go.
template <class S> struct NamedState : S {
NamedState(QState * parent, const char * name) : S(parent) {
this->setObjectName(QLatin1String(name));
}
};
typedef NamedState<QState> State;
typedef NamedState<QFinalState> FinalState;
The action generators are quite simple, too. The meaning of an action generator is "do something when a given state is entered". The state to act on is always given as the first argument. The second and subsequent arguments are specific to the given action. Sometimes, an action might need a target state as well, e.g. if it succeeds or fails.
void send(QAbstractState * src, QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & data) {
QObject::connect(src, &QState::entered, dev, [dev, data]{
dev->write(data);
});
}
QTimer * delay(QState * src, int ms, QAbstractState * dst) {
auto timer = new QTimer(src);
timer->setSingleShot(true);
timer->setInterval(ms);
QObject::connect(src, &QState::entered, timer, static_cast<void (QTimer::*)()>(&QTimer::start));
QObject::connect(src, &QState::exited, timer, &QTimer::stop);
src->addTransition(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), dst);
return timer;
}
void expect(QState * src, QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & data, QAbstractState * dst,
int timeout = 0, QAbstractState * dstTimeout = nullptr)
{
addTransition(src, dst, dev, SIGNAL(readyRead()), [dev, data]{
return hasLine(dev, data);
});
if (timeout) delay(src, timeout, dstTimeout);
}
The hasLine test simply checks all lines that can be read from the device for a given needle. This works fine for this simple communications protocol. You'd need more complex machinery if your communications were more involved. It is necessary to read all the lines, even if you find your needle. That's because this test is invoked from the readyRead signal, and in that signal you must read all the data that fulfills a chosen criterion. Here, the criterion is that the data forms a full line.
static bool hasLine(QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & needle) {
auto result = false;
while (dev->canReadLine()) {
auto line = dev->readLine();
if (line.contains(needle)) result = true;
}
return result;
}
Adding guarded transitions to states is a bit cumbersome with the default API, so we will wrap it to make it easier to use, and to keep the action generators above readable:
template <typename F>
class GuardedSignalTransition : public QSignalTransition {
F m_guard;
protected:
bool eventTest(QEvent * ev) Q_DECL_OVERRIDE {
return QSignalTransition::eventTest(ev) && m_guard();
}
public:
GuardedSignalTransition(const QObject * sender, const char * signal, F && guard) :
QSignalTransition(sender, signal), m_guard(std::move(guard)) {}
GuardedSignalTransition(const QObject * sender, const char * signal, const F & guard) :
QSignalTransition(sender, signal), m_guard(guard) {}
};
template <typename F> static GuardedSignalTransition<F> *
addTransition(QState * src, QAbstractState *target,
const QObject * sender, const char * signal, F && guard) {
auto t = new GuardedSignalTransition<typename std::decay<F>::type>
(sender, signal, std::forward<F>(guard));
t->setTargetState(target);
src->addTransition(t);
return t;
}
That's about it - if you had a real device, that's all you need. Since I don't have your device, I'll create another StatefulObject to emulate the presumed device behavior:
class Device : public StatefulObject {
Q_OBJECT
AppPipe m_dev { nullptr, QIODevice::ReadWrite, this };
State s_init { &m_mach, "s_init" },
s_booting { &m_mach, "s_booting" },
s_firmware { &m_mach, "s_firmware" };
FinalState s_loaded { &m_mach, "s_loaded" };
public:
Device(QObject * parent = 0) : StatefulObject(parent) {
connectSignals();
m_mach.setInitialState(&s_init);
expect(&s_init, &m_dev, "boot", &s_booting);
delay (&s_booting, 500, &s_firmware);
send (&s_firmware, &m_dev, "boot successful\n");
expect(&s_firmware, &m_dev, ":00000001FF", &s_loaded);
send (&s_loaded, &m_dev, "load successful\n");
}
Q_SLOT void stop() { m_mach.stop(); }
AppPipe & pipe() { return m_dev; }
};
Now let's make it all nicely visualized. We'll have a window with a text browser showing the contents of the communications. Below it will be buttons to start/stop the programmer or the device, and labels indicating the state of the emulated device and the programmer:
int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
using Q = QObject;
QApplication app{argc, argv};
Device dev;
Programmer prog;
QWidget w;
QGridLayout grid{&w};
QTextBrowser comms;
QPushButton devStart{"Start Device"}, devStop{"Stop Device"},
progStart{"Start Programmer"};
QLabel devState, progState;
grid.addWidget(&comms, 0, 0, 1, 3);
grid.addWidget(&devState, 1, 0, 1, 2);
grid.addWidget(&progState, 1, 2);
grid.addWidget(&devStart, 2, 0);
grid.addWidget(&devStop, 2, 1);
grid.addWidget(&progStart, 2, 2);
devStop.setDisabled(true);
w.show();
We'll connect the device's and programmer's AppPipes. We'll also visualize what the programmer is sending and receiving:
dev.pipe().addOther(&prog.pipe());
prog.pipe().addOther(&dev.pipe());
Q::connect(&prog.pipe(), &AppPipe::hasOutgoing, &comms, [&](const QByteArray & data){
comms.append(formatData(">", "blue", data));
});
Q::connect(&prog.pipe(), &AppPipe::hasIncoming, &comms, [&](const QByteArray & data){
comms.append(formatData("<", "green", data));
});
Finally, we'll connect the buttons and labels:
Q::connect(&devStart, &QPushButton::clicked, &dev, &Device::start);
Q::connect(&devStop, &QPushButton::clicked, &dev, &Device::stop);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::runningChanged, &devStart, &QPushButton::setDisabled);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::runningChanged, &devStop, &QPushButton::setEnabled);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::stateChanged, &devState, &QLabel::setText);
Q::connect(&progStart, &QPushButton::clicked, &prog, &Programmer::start);
Q::connect(&prog, &Programmer::runningChanged, &progStart, &QPushButton::setDisabled);
Q::connect(&prog, &Programmer::stateChanged, &progState, &QLabel::setText);
return app.exec();
}
#include "main.moc"
The Programmer and Device could live in any thread. I've left them in the main thread since there's no reason to move them out, but you could put both into a dedicated thread, or each into its own thread, or into threads shared with other objects, etc. It's completely transparent since AppPipe supports communications across the threads. This would also be the case if QSerialPort was used instead of AppPipe. All that matters is that each instance of a QIODevice is used from one thread only. Everything else happens via signal/slot connections.
E.g. if you wanted the Programmer to live in a dedicated thread, you'd add the following somewhere in main:
// fix QThread brokenness
struct Thread : QThread { ~Thread() { quit(); wait(); } };
Thread progThread;
prog.moveToThread(&progThread);
progThread.start();
A little helper formats the data to make it easier to read:
static QString formatData(const char * prefix, const char * color, const QByteArray & data) {
auto text = QString::fromLatin1(data).toHtmlEscaped();
if (text.endsWith('\n')) text.truncate(text.size() - 1);
text.replace(QLatin1Char('\n'), QString::fromLatin1("<br/>%1 ").arg(QLatin1String(prefix)));
return QString::fromLatin1("<font color=\"%1\">%2 %3</font><br/>")
.arg(QLatin1String(color)).arg(QLatin1String(prefix)).arg(text);
}
I'm not sure indeed this is the right approach.
You're polling with waitForReadyRead(). But since the serial port is a QIODevice, it will emit a void QIODevice::readyRead() signal when something will arrive on the serial port. Why not connect this signal to your input parsing code? No need for waitForReadyRead().
Also/on the other hand: "...this time it doesn't wait for timeout, readLines just return false immediately. Whats wrong ?"
Quoting the documentation:
If waitForReadyRead() returns false, the connection has been
closed or an error has occurred.
(emphasis mine)
From my experience as an embedded developer, it is not impossible that you put the device into kind of a "firmware upgrade" mode, and that by doing so the device rebooted into a special boot mode (not running the firmware you're about to update) and thus closed the connection. No way to tell unless it's documented/you have contact with the device developers. Not so obvious to check using a serial terminal to type your commands and witness that, I use minicom daily connected to my devices and it's pretty resilient across reboot - good for me.

QSerialPort readyread() SIGNAL

I have a problem when receiving bytes from RS232 in QByteArray. I connected readyread() signal to call my serialport method and inside it I am reading bytes with readAll() to an QByteArray. Whenever data is available it rewrites QByteArray, but I want to receive it all, and then use data, but now I cannot because it is in parts. What to do?
Simply append to the array. You'll also need some criterion to determine when you've received all the data you wished. This can be, e.g. a given number of bytes:
class Communicator {
int expect;
QSerialPort port;
QByteArray reply;
void processReply() {
...
}
public:
Communicator() {
QObject::connect(&port, &QIODevice::readyRead, [this]{
reply += port.readAll();
if (expect && reply.size() >= expect) {
processReply();
reply.clear();
expect = 0;
}
});
...
};

Sending a sequence of commands and wait for response

I have to update firmware and settings on a device connected to a serial port.
Since this is done by a sequence of commands, I send a command and wait until I recive an answer. Inside the answere (many lines) I search for a string that indicates if the operation is finished successfully.
Serial->write(“boot”, 1000);
Serial->waitForKeyword(“boot successful”);
Serial->sendFile(“image.dat”);
…
So I’ve created a new Thread for this blocking read/write method. Inside the thread I make use of the waitForX() functions.
If I call watiForKeyword() it will call readLines() until it detects the keyword or timesout
bool waitForKeyword(const QString &keyword)
{
QString str;
// read all lines
while(serial->readLines(10000))
{
// check each line
while((str = serial->getLine()) != "")
{
// found!
if(str.contains(keyword))
return true;
}
}
// timeout
return false;
}
readLines() reads everything available and separates it into lines , each line is placed inside a QStringList and to get a string I call getLine() which returns the first string in the list and deletes it.
bool SerialPort::readLines(int waitTimeout)
{
if(!waitForReadyRead(waitTimeout))
{
qDebug() << "Timeout reading" << endl;
return false;
}
QByteArray data = readAll();
while (waitForReadyRead(100))
data += readAll();
char* begin = data.data();
char* ptr = strstr(data, "\r\n");
while(ptr != NULL)
{
ptr+=2;
buffer.append(begin, ptr - begin);
emit readyReadLine(buffer);
lineBuffer.append(QString(buffer)); // store line in Qstringlist
buffer.clear();
begin = ptr;
ptr = strstr(begin, "\r\n");
}
// rest
buffer.append(begin, -1);
return true;
}
The problem is if I send a file via terminal to test the app readLines() will only read a smale part of the file ( 5 Lines or so). Since these lines do not contain the keyword. the function will run once again, but this time it dosnt wait for timeout, readLines just return false immediately.
Whats wrong ?
Also I'm not shure if this is the right approach... Does anyone know how to send a sequenze of commands and wait for a response each time?
Let's use QStateMachine to make this simple. Let's recall how you wished such code would look:
Serial->write("boot", 1000);
Serial->waitForKeyword("boot successful");
Serial->sendFile("image.dat");
Let's put it in a class that has explicit state members for each state the programmer could be in. We'll also have action generators send, expect, etc. that attach given actions to states.
// https://github.com/KubaO/stackoverflown/tree/master/questions/comm-commands-32486198
#include <QtWidgets>
#include <private/qringbuffer_p.h>
#include <type_traits>
[...]
class Programmer : public StatefulObject {
Q_OBJECT
AppPipe m_port { nullptr, QIODevice::ReadWrite, this };
State s_boot { &m_mach, "s_boot" },
s_send { &m_mach, "s_send" };
FinalState s_ok { &m_mach, "s_ok" },
s_failed { &m_mach, "s_failed" };
public:
Programmer(QObject * parent = 0) : StatefulObject(parent) {
connectSignals();
m_mach.setInitialState(&s_boot);
send (&s_boot, &m_port, "boot\n");
expect(&s_boot, &m_port, "boot successful", &s_send, 1000, &s_failed);
send (&s_send, &m_port, ":HULLOTHERE\n:00000001FF\n");
expect(&s_send, &m_port, "load successful", &s_ok, 1000, &s_failed);
}
AppPipe & pipe() { return m_port; }
};
This is fully functional, complete code for the programmer! Completely asynchronous, non-blocking, and it handles timeouts, too.
It's possible to have infrastructure that generates the states on-the-fly, so that you don't have to manually create all the states. The code is much smaller and IMHO easier to comperehend if you have explicit states. Only for complex communication protocols with 50-100+ states would it make sense to get rid of explicit named states.
The AppPipe is a simple intra-process bidirectional pipe that can be used as a stand-in for a real serial port:
// See http://stackoverflow.com/a/32317276/1329652
/// A simple point-to-point intra-process pipe. The other endpoint can live in any
/// thread.
class AppPipe : public QIODevice {
[...]
};
The StatefulObject holds a state machine, some basic signals useful for monitoring the state machine's progress, and the connectSignals method used to connect the signals with the states:
class StatefulObject : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
Q_PROPERTY (bool running READ isRunning NOTIFY runningChanged)
protected:
QStateMachine m_mach { this };
StatefulObject(QObject * parent = 0) : QObject(parent) {}
void connectSignals() {
connect(&m_mach, &QStateMachine::runningChanged, this, &StatefulObject::runningChanged);
for (auto state : m_mach.findChildren<QAbstractState*>())
QObject::connect(state, &QState::entered, this, [this, state]{
emit stateChanged(state->objectName());
});
}
public:
Q_SLOT void start() { m_mach.start(); }
Q_SIGNAL void runningChanged(bool);
Q_SIGNAL void stateChanged(const QString &);
bool isRunning() const { return m_mach.isRunning(); }
};
The State and FinalState are simple named state wrappers in the style of Qt 3. They allow us to declare the state and give it a name in one go.
template <class S> struct NamedState : S {
NamedState(QState * parent, const char * name) : S(parent) {
this->setObjectName(QLatin1String(name));
}
};
typedef NamedState<QState> State;
typedef NamedState<QFinalState> FinalState;
The action generators are quite simple, too. The meaning of an action generator is "do something when a given state is entered". The state to act on is always given as the first argument. The second and subsequent arguments are specific to the given action. Sometimes, an action might need a target state as well, e.g. if it succeeds or fails.
void send(QAbstractState * src, QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & data) {
QObject::connect(src, &QState::entered, dev, [dev, data]{
dev->write(data);
});
}
QTimer * delay(QState * src, int ms, QAbstractState * dst) {
auto timer = new QTimer(src);
timer->setSingleShot(true);
timer->setInterval(ms);
QObject::connect(src, &QState::entered, timer, static_cast<void (QTimer::*)()>(&QTimer::start));
QObject::connect(src, &QState::exited, timer, &QTimer::stop);
src->addTransition(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), dst);
return timer;
}
void expect(QState * src, QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & data, QAbstractState * dst,
int timeout = 0, QAbstractState * dstTimeout = nullptr)
{
addTransition(src, dst, dev, SIGNAL(readyRead()), [dev, data]{
return hasLine(dev, data);
});
if (timeout) delay(src, timeout, dstTimeout);
}
The hasLine test simply checks all lines that can be read from the device for a given needle. This works fine for this simple communications protocol. You'd need more complex machinery if your communications were more involved. It is necessary to read all the lines, even if you find your needle. That's because this test is invoked from the readyRead signal, and in that signal you must read all the data that fulfills a chosen criterion. Here, the criterion is that the data forms a full line.
static bool hasLine(QIODevice * dev, const QByteArray & needle) {
auto result = false;
while (dev->canReadLine()) {
auto line = dev->readLine();
if (line.contains(needle)) result = true;
}
return result;
}
Adding guarded transitions to states is a bit cumbersome with the default API, so we will wrap it to make it easier to use, and to keep the action generators above readable:
template <typename F>
class GuardedSignalTransition : public QSignalTransition {
F m_guard;
protected:
bool eventTest(QEvent * ev) Q_DECL_OVERRIDE {
return QSignalTransition::eventTest(ev) && m_guard();
}
public:
GuardedSignalTransition(const QObject * sender, const char * signal, F && guard) :
QSignalTransition(sender, signal), m_guard(std::move(guard)) {}
GuardedSignalTransition(const QObject * sender, const char * signal, const F & guard) :
QSignalTransition(sender, signal), m_guard(guard) {}
};
template <typename F> static GuardedSignalTransition<F> *
addTransition(QState * src, QAbstractState *target,
const QObject * sender, const char * signal, F && guard) {
auto t = new GuardedSignalTransition<typename std::decay<F>::type>
(sender, signal, std::forward<F>(guard));
t->setTargetState(target);
src->addTransition(t);
return t;
}
That's about it - if you had a real device, that's all you need. Since I don't have your device, I'll create another StatefulObject to emulate the presumed device behavior:
class Device : public StatefulObject {
Q_OBJECT
AppPipe m_dev { nullptr, QIODevice::ReadWrite, this };
State s_init { &m_mach, "s_init" },
s_booting { &m_mach, "s_booting" },
s_firmware { &m_mach, "s_firmware" };
FinalState s_loaded { &m_mach, "s_loaded" };
public:
Device(QObject * parent = 0) : StatefulObject(parent) {
connectSignals();
m_mach.setInitialState(&s_init);
expect(&s_init, &m_dev, "boot", &s_booting);
delay (&s_booting, 500, &s_firmware);
send (&s_firmware, &m_dev, "boot successful\n");
expect(&s_firmware, &m_dev, ":00000001FF", &s_loaded);
send (&s_loaded, &m_dev, "load successful\n");
}
Q_SLOT void stop() { m_mach.stop(); }
AppPipe & pipe() { return m_dev; }
};
Now let's make it all nicely visualized. We'll have a window with a text browser showing the contents of the communications. Below it will be buttons to start/stop the programmer or the device, and labels indicating the state of the emulated device and the programmer:
int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
using Q = QObject;
QApplication app{argc, argv};
Device dev;
Programmer prog;
QWidget w;
QGridLayout grid{&w};
QTextBrowser comms;
QPushButton devStart{"Start Device"}, devStop{"Stop Device"},
progStart{"Start Programmer"};
QLabel devState, progState;
grid.addWidget(&comms, 0, 0, 1, 3);
grid.addWidget(&devState, 1, 0, 1, 2);
grid.addWidget(&progState, 1, 2);
grid.addWidget(&devStart, 2, 0);
grid.addWidget(&devStop, 2, 1);
grid.addWidget(&progStart, 2, 2);
devStop.setDisabled(true);
w.show();
We'll connect the device's and programmer's AppPipes. We'll also visualize what the programmer is sending and receiving:
dev.pipe().addOther(&prog.pipe());
prog.pipe().addOther(&dev.pipe());
Q::connect(&prog.pipe(), &AppPipe::hasOutgoing, &comms, [&](const QByteArray & data){
comms.append(formatData(">", "blue", data));
});
Q::connect(&prog.pipe(), &AppPipe::hasIncoming, &comms, [&](const QByteArray & data){
comms.append(formatData("<", "green", data));
});
Finally, we'll connect the buttons and labels:
Q::connect(&devStart, &QPushButton::clicked, &dev, &Device::start);
Q::connect(&devStop, &QPushButton::clicked, &dev, &Device::stop);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::runningChanged, &devStart, &QPushButton::setDisabled);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::runningChanged, &devStop, &QPushButton::setEnabled);
Q::connect(&dev, &Device::stateChanged, &devState, &QLabel::setText);
Q::connect(&progStart, &QPushButton::clicked, &prog, &Programmer::start);
Q::connect(&prog, &Programmer::runningChanged, &progStart, &QPushButton::setDisabled);
Q::connect(&prog, &Programmer::stateChanged, &progState, &QLabel::setText);
return app.exec();
}
#include "main.moc"
The Programmer and Device could live in any thread. I've left them in the main thread since there's no reason to move them out, but you could put both into a dedicated thread, or each into its own thread, or into threads shared with other objects, etc. It's completely transparent since AppPipe supports communications across the threads. This would also be the case if QSerialPort was used instead of AppPipe. All that matters is that each instance of a QIODevice is used from one thread only. Everything else happens via signal/slot connections.
E.g. if you wanted the Programmer to live in a dedicated thread, you'd add the following somewhere in main:
// fix QThread brokenness
struct Thread : QThread { ~Thread() { quit(); wait(); } };
Thread progThread;
prog.moveToThread(&progThread);
progThread.start();
A little helper formats the data to make it easier to read:
static QString formatData(const char * prefix, const char * color, const QByteArray & data) {
auto text = QString::fromLatin1(data).toHtmlEscaped();
if (text.endsWith('\n')) text.truncate(text.size() - 1);
text.replace(QLatin1Char('\n'), QString::fromLatin1("<br/>%1 ").arg(QLatin1String(prefix)));
return QString::fromLatin1("<font color=\"%1\">%2 %3</font><br/>")
.arg(QLatin1String(color)).arg(QLatin1String(prefix)).arg(text);
}
I'm not sure indeed this is the right approach.
You're polling with waitForReadyRead(). But since the serial port is a QIODevice, it will emit a void QIODevice::readyRead() signal when something will arrive on the serial port. Why not connect this signal to your input parsing code? No need for waitForReadyRead().
Also/on the other hand: "...this time it doesn't wait for timeout, readLines just return false immediately. Whats wrong ?"
Quoting the documentation:
If waitForReadyRead() returns false, the connection has been
closed or an error has occurred.
(emphasis mine)
From my experience as an embedded developer, it is not impossible that you put the device into kind of a "firmware upgrade" mode, and that by doing so the device rebooted into a special boot mode (not running the firmware you're about to update) and thus closed the connection. No way to tell unless it's documented/you have contact with the device developers. Not so obvious to check using a serial terminal to type your commands and witness that, I use minicom daily connected to my devices and it's pretty resilient across reboot - good for me.

Qt C++ Console Server, Wait for socket connection & accept input at same time?

I am writing a server as a Qt console application. I have the server set up to wait for a socket connection, but I also need to allow a user to input commands into the server for managing it. Both are working independently. However, the problem I ran into is that when I'm in a while loop accepting and processing input commands, the server doesn't accept connections.
I have a Socket class, and in its constructor, I have:
connect(server,SIGNAL(newConnection()),this, SLOT(newConnection()));
Right under that in the constructor, I call a function that has a more in-depth version of this for getting commands from the user:
QTextStream qin(stdin, QIODevice::ReadOnly);
QString usrCmd;
while(usrCmd != "exit" && usrCmd != "EXIT") {
//Get command input and process here
}
Inside newConnection(), I just accept the next connection and then use the socket.
QTcpSocket *serverSocket = server->nextPendingConnection();
How can I make it so the socket can wait for connections and wait for user-inputed commands at the same time?
Problem with your code is because you are blocking event loop with your while loop. So, the solution to your problem is to read from stdin asynchronously. On Linux (and on Mac, I guess), you can use QSocketNotifier to notify when the data is arrived on stdin, and to read it manually), as per various internet sources.
As I am using Windows, I would suggest you to do it in this way (which should work on all platforms):
Open the thread for reading data from stdin
Once you get some data (perhaps line?) you can use Qt signal-slot mechanism to pass the data to main thread for processing without blocking the event loop.
So, this is the pseudocode. MainAppClass should your existing server class, just edit the constructor to create new thread, and add new slot for processing the data.
class Reader: public QThread
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
Reader(QObject * parent = 0 ): QThread(parent){}
void run(void)
{
forever{
std::string data;
std::getline (std::cin, data);
if(data == "exit")
{
emit exitServer();
return;
}
emit dataReady(QString::fromStdString(data));
}
}
signals:
void dataReady(QString data);
void exitServer();
};
class MainAppClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
MainAppClass()
{
Reader * tr = new Reader(this);
connect(tr, SIGNAL(dataReady(QString)), this, SLOT(processData(QString)));
connect(tr, SIGNAL(exitServer()), this, SLOT(exitServer()));
tr->start();
}
public slots:
void processData(QString data)
{
std::cout << "Command: " << data.toStdString() << std::endl;
}
void exitServer()
{
std::cout << "Exiting..." << std::endl;
}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication app(argc, argv);
MainAppClass myapp; //your server
app.exec();
return 0;
}
Since I wrote simple guidelines how to use QTcpSocket, here is the brief
When you get client QTcpSocket, connect readyRead() signal to some slot, and read data from sender() object. You don't need to read anything in the constructor.
For reading you can use standard QIODevice functions.
Note: this is pseudo code, and you may need to change few things (check the state of the stream on reading, save pointer to sockets in some list, subscribe to disconnected() signal, call listen() in constructor, check if QTcpServer is listening, etc).
So, you need to have slot onReadyRead() in your class which will have the following code:
void Server::readyReadSlot()
{
QTcpSocket *client = (QTcpSocket*)sender(); // get socket which emited the signal
while(client->canReadLine()) // read all lines!
// If there is not any lines received (you may not always receive
// whole line as TCP is stream based protocol),
// you will not leave data in the buffer for later processing.
{
QString line = client->readLine();
processLine(line); // or emit new signal if you like
}
}
Inside newConnection() you need to connect readyRead() signal with your slot.
void Server::newConnection()
{
QTcpSocket *clientSocket = server->nextPendingConnection();
connect(clientSocket, SIGNAL(readyRead()), this, SLOT(readyReadSlot()));
}