Electron how to add only few modules? - regex

I'm trying to build my Electron app with Electron-packager. The problem is my Electron app using node-notifier module. When the packaging, I'm using this command:
electron-packager . MahApp --ignore='node_modules|.sass-cache|src' --platform=darwin --arch=x64
but the problem is that command ignores all node modules. So I edited like this:
electron-packager . MahApp --ignore='node_modules\/(?!node-notifier).+|.sass-cache|src' --platform=darwin --arch=x64
It seems working because only 'node_modules/node-notifier' is inside of resources/app. But it won't work because node-notifier module itself has extra node modules under the node_modules directory like this:
./MahApp/node_modules/node-notifier/node_modules/...
So it didn't work because any dependencies are not exists. My regex in --ignore_path also ignored inside of node_modules in node_notifier. I don't know what should I do now. I tried to specify the relative path like this:
--ignore='./node_modules\/(?!node-notifier).+|...'
but it wasn't work.

Do you actually need the node-notifier module? If not, you can npm uninstall node-notifier --save, or alternatively, put it only in dev-dependencies and run it with --prune option

Related

How can I rebuild an edited perl6 module that I've downloaded?

I've installed Time::Duration and it failed most of its tests. I want to be able to rebuild the module - with my edits - from the locally stored module.
I edited the file that contains the module (that corresponds to Duration.pm6):
~/.perl6/sources/D00C101A0157E3EAC494310C9961F299240423E7
And then try building via it's json file:
zef --debug build ~/.perl6/dist/83839D8D315EEDEDFEAF211EE42E8D936ACE29CB
This returns:
===> # SKIP: No need to build Time::Duration:ver<2.00>
!!!> Build failure: ~/.perl6/dist/83839D8D315EEDEDFEAF211EE42E8D936ACE29CB at ~/.perl6/dist
I was hoping that this would rebuild the module with the change I made to the source.
Have I done this wrong, or am I going about this entirely wrong?
As it has been noted already you should not modify installed files. However, the workflow for testing changes of some module is pretty straight forward.
First:
# Fetch and extract the distribution, then change into its directory.
# If the distribution is still in zef's local file cache then it will
# skip the fetch and extraction steps.
zef look Time::Duration
Then:
At this point you can edit any of the files you wish.
Finally:
# test your changes without reinstalling (assumes all dependencies are installed)
zef test .
# Reinstall the modified version of Time::Duration using one of the following:
zef install . --force-install
zef uninstall Time::Duration && zef install .
You should git clone the code or download the zip package, edit the code you want, then zef install . if the current directory have a META6.json file.

Using createJS in typescript?

I am attempting to incorporate createJS into a typescript project (a powerbi visual) that I am building.
I have done the following:
1) Installed createJS and typings file using:
npm install createjs --save and npm install --save #types/createjs
2) Added this line to the the externalJS array in pbiviz.json : "node_modules/createjs/builds/1.0.0/createjs.min.js"
3) Added the path to the typings file to the files array in my tsconfig.ts file:
"node_modules/#types/createjs/index.d.ts".
Something didn't go right, I'm seeing the following error in my console:
This was without actually calling the namespace in my code, if I attempt to use the namespace then it simply breaks my code without any warnings. My IDE's auto-suggest offers createjsimplying to me that it was imported properly but still something isn't right.
I think its related to this thread but I don't understand how to implement the solution it typescript. Can anyone help?
My project structure:
It appears that the issue is an internal issue. I found a solution that I will not pretend to fully understand.
Starting from scratch, instead of installing the createjs package with the --save option I ran
npm install createjs-module --save and
npm install --save #types/createjs
which is apparently a webpack.
After this I "node_modules/createjs-module/createjs.js" in to my externalJS array, as well as the appropriate typings file to my tsconfig.json.
Credit to tsveti_iko
see also:
this
There are 2 methods to import createjs(not createjs specific)
This is what I use in my ts classes. For this you have to set compiler options module to system in tsconfig.json. This is what I use. I seems it's not the recommended one. It like an import statement(or maybe more like an include script)
tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"module": "system",
.ts files using createjs:
/// <reference path="../lib/createjs.d.ts"/>
The other method is to use import statements along with commonjs. This is the recommended one. I was not able to make it work but didn't try too much because the first method is working.
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html

How can NPM scripts use my current working directory (when in nested subfolder)

It's good that I can run NPM scripts not only from the project root but also from the subfolders. However, with constraint that it can't tell my current working path ($PWD).
Let's say there's a command like this:
"scripts": {
...
"pwd": "echo $PWD"
}
If I run npm run pwd within a subfolder of the project root (e.g, $PROJECT_ROOT/src/nested/dir), instead of printing out my current path $PROJECT_ROOT/src/nested/dir, it always gives $PROJECT_ROOT back. Are there any way to tell NPM scripts to use my current working directory instead of resolving to where package.json resides?
Basically I want to pull a Yeoman generator into an existing project and use it through NPM scripts so that everyone can use the shared knowledge (e.g, npm run generator) instead of learning anything Yeoman specific (e.g npm i yo -g; yo generator). As the generator generates files based on current working path, while NPM scripts always resolves to the project root, I can't use the generator where it intend to be used.
If you want your script to use different behavior based on what subdirectory you’re in, you can use the INIT_CWD environment variable, which holds the full path you were in when you ran npm run.
Source: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/run-script
Use it like so:
"scripts": {
"start": "live-server $INIT_CWD/somedir --port=8080 --no-browser"
}
Update 2019-11-19
$INIT_CWD only works on *nix-like platforms. Windows would need %INIT_CWD%. Kind of disappointing that Node.js doesn't abstract this for us. Solution: use cross-env-shell live-server $INIT_CWD/somedir.... -> https://www.npmjs.com/package/cross-env
One known solution is through ENV variable injection.
For example:
Define scripts in package.json:
"pwd": "cd $VAR && echo $PWD"
Call it from anywhere sub directories:
VAR=$(pwd) npm run pwd
However, this looks really ugly, are there any cleaner/better solutions?
With node 8+ you can automate the ENV variable injection.
1.- In $HOME/.node_modules/ (a default node search path) create a file mystart with
process.env.ORIGPWD = process.env.PWD
2.- Then in your $HOME/.bashrc tell node to load mystart every time
export NODE_OPTIONS="-r mystart"
3.- Use $ORIGPWD in your scripts. That works for npm, yarn and others.

Python install module from repo v. locally

I am trying to install a homegrown package that will be used , but python package installation is still a bit of a quagmire for me, and I haven't gotten this to work.
I created a package using setup.py sdist, which I uploaded to a repository
I am trying to install my package on another machine. I tried three methods, each time on an entirely clean machine. But none are doing what I want them to.
Method 1
easy_install http://mysite/mypkg.zip
RESULT: mypkg.egg gets added to \Python27\Lib\site-packages. But none of my folder structure is there
Method 2
pip install http://mysite/mypkg.zip
RESULT: two folders, mypkg and mypkg-1.0-py2.7.egg-info, get added to Python27\Lib\site-packages. All of the files seem to be there. But when I got to import or run nosetests on the folder, I get all sorts of import errors that reference mypkg modules. I have played with PATH and PYTHONPATH to get all variations of including the folder, but nothing has worked.
Method 3
download .zip
extract locally
add folder to PATH
run easy_install . in the local dir
RESULT: unpacks pkg locally. When I run nosetests on this folder, everything runs as expected.
Thing is, I don't want each user to have to do all of the steps in Method 3. I will eventually be running nosetests in a .bat file that does various things with the output. I don't want every user to have to modify the .bat file to indicate where the testsuite is located. Which is why Python27\Lib\site-packages appealed to me.
Any insight as to why these three methods behave so differently would be very helpful!

Go build: "Cannot find package" (even though GOPATH is set)

Even though I have GOPATH properly set, I still can't get "go build" or "go run" to find my own packages. What am I doing wrong?
$ echo $GOROOT
/usr/local/go
$ echo $GOPATH
/home/mitchell/go
$ cat ~/main.go
package main
import "foobar"
func main() { }
$ cat /home/mitchell/go/src/foobar.go
package foobar
$ go build main.go
main.go:3:8: import "foobar": cannot find package
It does not work because your foobar.go source file is not in a directory called foobar. go build and go install try to match directories, not source files.
Set $GOPATH to a valid directory, e.g. export GOPATH="$HOME/go"
Move foobar.go to $GOPATH/src/foobar/foobar.go and building should work just fine.
Additional recommended steps:
Add $GOPATH/bin to your $PATH by: PATH="$GOPATH/bin:$PATH"
Move main.go to a subfolder of $GOPATH/src, e.g. $GOPATH/src/test
go install test should now create an executable in $GOPATH/bin that can be called by typing test into your terminal.
Although the accepted answer is still correct about needing to match directories with package names, you really need to migrate to using Go modules instead of using GOPATH. New users who encounter this problem may be confused about the mentions of using GOPATH (as was I), which are now outdated. So, I will try to clear up this issue and provide guidance associated with preventing this issue when using Go modules.
If you're already familiar with Go modules and are experiencing this issue, skip down to my more specific sections below that cover some of the Go conventions that are easy to overlook or forget.
This guide teaches about Go modules: https://golang.org/doc/code.html
Project organization with Go modules
Once you migrate to Go modules, as mentioned in that article, organize the project code as described:
A repository contains one or more modules. A module is a collection of
related Go packages that are released together. A Go repository
typically contains only one module, located at the root of the
repository. A file named go.mod there declares the module path: the
import path prefix for all packages within the module. The module
contains the packages in the directory containing its go.mod file as
well as subdirectories of that directory, up to the next subdirectory
containing another go.mod file (if any).
Each module's path not only serves as an import path prefix for its
packages, but also indicates where the go command should look to
download it. For example, in order to download the module
golang.org/x/tools, the go command would consult the repository
indicated by https://golang.org/x/tools (described more here).
An import path is a string used to import a package. A package's
import path is its module path joined with its subdirectory within the
module. For example, the module github.com/google/go-cmp contains a
package in the directory cmp/. That package's import path is
github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp. Packages in the standard library do not
have a module path prefix.
You can initialize your module like this:
$ go mod init github.com/mitchell/foo-app
Your code doesn't need to be located on github.com for it to build. However, it's a best practice to structure your modules as if they will eventually be published.
Understanding what happens when trying to get a package
There's a great article here that talks about what happens when you try to get a package or module: https://medium.com/rungo/anatomy-of-modules-in-go-c8274d215c16
It discusses where the package is stored and will help you understand why you might be getting this error if you're already using Go modules.
Ensure the imported function has been exported
Note that if you're having trouble accessing a function from another file, you need to ensure that you've exported your function. As described in the first link I provided, a function must begin with an upper-case letter to be exported and made available for importing into other packages.
Names of directories
Another critical detail (as was mentioned in the accepted answer) is that names of directories are what define the names of your packages. (Your package names need to match their directory names.) You can see examples of this here: https://medium.com/rungo/everything-you-need-to-know-about-packages-in-go-b8bac62b74cc
With that said, the file containing your main method (i.e., the entry point of your application) is sort of exempt from this requirement.
As an example, I had problems with my imports when using a structure like this:
/my-app
├── go.mod
├── /src
├── main.go
└── /utils
└── utils.go
I was unable to import the code in utils into my main package.
However, once I put main.go into its own subdirectory, as shown below, my imports worked just fine:
/my-app
├── go.mod
├── /src
├── /app
| └── main.go
└── /utils
└── utils.go
In that example, my go.mod file looks like this:
module git.mydomain.com/path/to/repo/my-app
go 1.14
When I saved main.go after adding a reference to utils.MyFunction(), my IDE automatically pulled in the reference to my package like this:
import "git.mydomain.com/path/to/repo/my-app/src/my-app"
(I'm using VS Code with the Golang extension.)
Notice that the import path included the subdirectory to the package.
Dealing with a private repo
If the code is part of a private repo, you need to run a git command to enable access. Otherwise, you can encounter other errors This article mentions how to do that for private Github, BitBucket, and GitLab repos: https://medium.com/cloud-native-the-gathering/go-modules-with-private-git-repositories-dfe795068db4
This issue is also discussed here: What's the proper way to "go get" a private repository?
I solved this problem by set my go env GO111MODULE to off
go env -w GO111MODULE=off
Note: setting GO111MODULE=off will turn off the latest GO Modules feature.
Reference: Why is GO111MODULE everywhere, and everything about Go Modules (updated with Go 1.17)
GO111MODULE with Go 1.16
As of Go 1.16, the default behavior is GO111MODULE=on, meaning that if
you want to keep using the old GOPATH way, you will have to force Go
not to use the Go Modules feature:
export GO111MODULE=off
In the recent go versions from 1.14 onwards, we have to do go mod vendor before building or running, since by default go appends -mod=vendor to the go commands.
So after doing go mod vendor, if we try to build, we won't face this issue.
Edit: since you meant GOPATH, see fasmat's answer (upvoted)
As mentioned in "How do I make go find my package?", you need to put a package xxx in a directory xxx.
See the Go language spec:
package math
A set of files sharing the same PackageName form the implementation of a package.
An implementation may require that all source files for a package inhabit the same directory.
The Code organization mentions:
When building a program that imports the package "widget" the go command looks for src/pkg/widget inside the Go root, and then—if the package source isn't found there—it searches for src/widget inside each workspace in order.
(a "workspace" is a path entry in your GOPATH: that variable can reference multiple paths for your 'src, bin, pkg' to be)
(Original answer)
You also should set GOPATH to ~/go, not GOROOT, as illustrated in "How to Write Go Code".
The Go path is used to resolve import statements. It is implemented by and documented in the go/build package.
The GOPATH environment variable lists places to look for Go code.
On Unix, the value is a colon-separated string.
On Windows, the value is a semicolon-separated string.
On Plan 9, the value is a list.
That is different from GOROOT:
The Go binary distributions assume they will be installed in /usr/local/go (or c:\Go under Windows), but it is possible to install them in a different location.
If you do this, you will need to set the GOROOT environment variable to that directory when using the Go tools.
TL;DR: Follow Go conventions! (lesson learned the hard way), check for old go versions and remove them. Install latest.
For me the solution was different. I worked on a shared Linux server and after verifying my GOPATH and other environment variables several times it still didn't work. I encountered several errors including 'Cannot find package' and 'unrecognized import path'. After trying to reinstall with this solution by the instructions on golang.org (including the uninstall part) still encountered problems.
Took me some time to realize that there's still an old version that hasn't been uninstalled (running go version then which go again... DAHH) which got me to this question and finally solved.
Running go env -w GO111MODULE=auto worked for me
Without editing GOPATH or anything, in my case just worked the following:
/app
├── main.go
├── /utils
└── utils.go
Import packages where needed. This can be unintuitive, because it isn't relative to the app path. You need to add the app in the package path too:
main.go:
package main
import(
"app/util"
)
Being in app directory, run:
go mod init app
go get <package/xxx>
go build main.go / go run main.go
You should be good to go.
GOPATH = /home/go
appPath = /home/projects/app
Create a proper go.mod and go.sum with go mod init app (delete old before)
After that resolve all dependencies like missing packages with go get github.com/example/package.
In simple words you can solve the import problem even with GO111MODULE=on with the following syntax for import:
import <your_module_name>/<package_name>
your_module_name -> module name which can be found in the go.mod file of the module as the first line.
example: github.com/nikhilg-hub/todo/ToDoBackend
package_name -> Path to your package within module.
example: orm
So the import statement would look like:
import "github.com/nikhilg-hub/todo/ToDoBackend/orm"
According to me we need to specify the module name + package name because we may need a same package name in two or more different modules.
Note: If you are importing a package from same module still you need to specify the full import path like above.
If you have a valid $GOROOT and $GOPATH but are developing outside of them, you might get this error if the package (yours or someone else's) hasn't been downloaded.
If that's the case, try go get -d (-d flag prevents installation) to ensure the package is downloaded before you run, build or install.
GOROOT should be set to your installation directory (/usr/local/go).
GOPATH should be set to your working directory (something like /home/username/project_folder).
GOPATH should not be set to GOROOT as your own project may need to install packages, and it's not recommended to have those packages in the Go installation folder. Check out this link for more.
For me none of the above solutions worked. But my go version was not the latest one. I have downloaded the latest version and replaced the older version in my mac os after that it worked perfectly.
I had a similar problem when building a docker file:
[1/3] STEP 9/9: RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go build -a -o manager main.go
api/v1alpha1/XXX.go:5:2: cannot find package "." in:
/workspace/client/YYY/YYY.go
This only appeared when building the Dockerfile, building locally worked fine.
The problem turned out to be a missing statement in my Dockerfile:
COPY client/ client/
I do not understand why this happens, we must be able to import from wherever our file is in its nest, since I have discovered that if we have more than one nest this will throw an error.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"indexer/source/testPackage3" // this will be show a GOROOT error.
"indexer/testPackage"
"indexer/testPackage2"
)
func main() {
fmt.Println("Agile content indexer -")
fmt.Println(testPackage.Greeting())
fmt.Println(testPackage2.Greeting())
fmt.Println(testPackage3.Greeting())
}
├── testPackage2
│ ├── entry2.go
│ └── source
│ └── entry3.go
To conclude, I just want to tell you, the entry3.go file will not work when imported into my main file, which in this case is (main.go), I do not understand why, therefore, I have simply chosen to use a depth folder in the packages I need to export.
entry.go, entry2.go will work perfectly when imported, but entry3.go will not work..
In addition, both the directory and the name of the package must be the same so that they work properly when importing them.
Have you tried adding the absolute directory of go to your 'path'?
export PATH=$PATH:/directory/to/go/