Is there any way in Celery to remove all previous task results via command line? Everything I can find references purge, but that doesn't seem to be for task results. Other solutions I have found include using a Celery beat which periodically removes it, but I'm looking for a one-off command line solution.
I use Celery 4.3.0.
Here's what you're looking for I think:
https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/4656
referencing
https://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/userguide/configuration.html#std:setting-result_expires
I set this up as follows:
RESULT_EXPIRE_TIME = 60 * 60 * 4 # keep tasks around for four hours
...
celery = celery.Celery('tasks',
broker=Config.BROKER_URL,
backend=Config.CELERY_RESULTS_BACKEND,
include=['tasks.definitions'],
result_expires=RESULT_EXPIRE_TIME)
So based on this answer: How do I delete everything in Redis?
With redis-cli:
FLUSHDB - Removes data from your connection's CURRENT database.
FLUSHALL - Removes data from ALL databases.
Redis documentation:
flushdb
flushall
For example, in your shell:
redis-cli flushall
and try to purge celery as well.
From celery doc: http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/faq.html?highlight=purge#how-do-i-purge-all-waiting-tasks
I have set up a django project on an EC2 instance with SQS as broker for celery, running through Supervisord. The problem started when I updated the parameter arguments for a task. On calling the task, I get an error on Sentry which clearly shows that the task is running the old code. How do I update it?
I have tried supervisorctl restart all but still there are issues. The strange thing is that for some arguments, the updated code runs while for some it does not.
I checked the logs for the celery worker and it doesn't receive the tasks which give me the error. I am running -P solo so there is only one worker (Ran ps auxww | grep 'celery worker' to check). Then who else is processing those tasks?
Any kind of help is appreciated.
P.S. I use RabbitMQ for local development and it works totally fine
Never use the same queue in different environments.
I am running Django + Celery + RabbitMQ. After modifying some task names I started getting "unregistered task" KeyErrors, even after removing tasks with this key from the Periodic tasks table in Django Celery Beat and restarting the Celery worker.
It turns out Celery / RabbitMQ tasks are persistent. I eventually resolved the issue by reimplementing the legacy tasks as dummy methods.
In future, I'd prefer not to purge the queue, restart the worker or reimplement legacy methods. Instead I'd like to inspect the queue and individually delete any legacy tasks. Is this possible? (Preferably in the context of the Django admin interface.)
Celery inspect may help
To view active queues:
celery -A proj inspect active_queues
To terminate a process:
celery -A proj control invoke process_id
To see all availble inspect options:
celery inspect --help
In my Django project, I use Celery and Rabbitmq to run tasks in background.
I am using celery beat scheduler to run periodic tasks.
How can i check if celery beat is up and running, programmatically?
Make a task to HTTP requests to a Ping URL at regular intervals. When the URL is not pinged on time, the URL monitor will send you an alert.
import requests
from yourapp.celery_config import app
#app.task
def ping():
print '[healthcheck] pinging alive status...'
# healthchecks.io works for me:
requests.post("https://hchk.io/6466681c-7708-4423-adf0-XXXXXXXXX")
This celery periodic task is scheduled to run every minute, if it doesn't hit the ping, your beat service is down*, the monitor will kick in your mail (or webhook so you can zapier it to get mobile push notifications as well).
celery -A yourapp.celery_config beat -S djcelery.schedulers.DatabaseScheduler
*or overwhelmed, you should track tasks saturation, this is a nightmare with Celery and should be detected and addressed properly, happens frequently when the workers are busy with blocking tasks that would need optimization
Are you use upstart or supervison or something else to run celery workers + celery beat as a background tasks? In production you should use one of them to run celery workers + celery beat in background.
Simplest way to check celery beat is running: ps aux | grep -i '[c]elerybeat'. If you get text string with pid it's running. Also you can make output of this command more pretty: ps aux | grep -i '[c]elerybeat' | awk '{print $2}'. If you get number - it's working, if you get nothing - it's not working.
Also you can check celery workers status: celery -A projectname status.
If you intrested in advanced celery monitoring you can read official documentation monitoring guide.
If you have daemonized celery following the tutorial of the celery doc, checking if it's running or not can be done through
sudo /etc/init.d/celeryd status
sudo /etc/init.d/celerybeat status
You can use the return of such commands in a python module.
You can probably look up supervisor.
It provides a celerybeat conf which logs everything related to beat in /var/log/celery/beat.log.
Another way of going about this is to use Flower. You can set it up for your server (make sure its password protected), it somewhat becomes easier to notice in the GUI the tasks which are being queued and what time they are queued thus verifying if your beat is running fine.
I have recently used a solution similar to what #panchicore suggested, for the same problem.
Problem in my workplace was an important system working with celery beat, and once in a while, either due to RabbitMQ outage, or some connectivity issue between our servers and RabbitMQ server, due to which celery beat just stopped triggering crons anymore, unless restarted.
As we didn't have any tool handy, to monitor keep alive calls sent over HTTP, we have used statsd for the same purpose. There's a counter incremented on statsd server every minute(done by a celery task), and then we setup email & slack channel alerts on the grafana metrics. (no updates for 10 minutes == outage)
I understand it's not purely a programatic approach, but any production level monitoring/alerting isn't complete without a separate monitoring entity.
The programming part is as simple as it can be. A tiny celery task running every minute.
#periodic_task(run_every=timedelta(minutes=1))
def update_keep_alive(self):
logger.info("running keep alive task")
statsd.incr(statsd_tags.CELERY_BEAT_ALIVE)
A problem that I have faced with this approach, is due to STATSD packet losses over UDP. So use TCP connection to STATSD for this purpose, if possible.
You can check scheduler running or not by the following command
python manage.py celery worker --beat
While working on a project recently, I used this:
HEALTHCHECK CMD ["stat celerybeat.pid || exit 1"]
Essentially, the beat process writes a pid file under some location (usually the home location), all you have to do is to get some stats to check if the file is there.
Note: This worked while launching a standalone celery beta process in a Docker container
The goal of liveness for celery beat/scheduler is to check if the celery beat/scheduler is able to send the job to the message broker so that it can be picked up by the respective consumer. [Is it still working or in a hung state]. The celery worker and celery scheduler/beat may or may not be running in the same pod or instance.
To handle such scenarios, we can create a method update_scheduler_liveness with decorator #after_task_publish.connect which will be called every time when the scheduler successfully publishes the message/task to the message broker.
The method update_scheduler_liveness will update the current timestamp to a file every time when the task is published successfully.
In Liveness probe, we need to check the last updated timestamp of the file either using:
stat --printf="%Y" celery_beat_schedule_liveness.stat command
or we can explicitly try to read the file (read mode) and extract the timestamp and compare if the the timestamp is recent or not based on the liveness probe criteria.
In this approach, the more minute liveness criteria you need, the more frequent a job must be triggered from the celery beat. So, for those cases, where the frequency between jobs is pretty huge, a custom/dedicated liveness heartbeat job can be scheduled every 2-5 mins and the consumer can just process it. #after_task_publish.connect decorator provides multiple arguments that can be also used for filtering of liveness specific job that were triggered
If we don't want to go for file based approach, then we can rely on Redis like data-source with instance specific redis key as well which needs to be implemented on the same lines.
I want to configure celery worker to consume only from a particular queue,
I saw in celery docs that control add_consumer does exactly that.
Problem is when I try :
celery control -A [App_name] add_consumer [queue_name] worker1.h%
it gives me error :
Error: No nodes replied within time constraint
Any help is really appreciated.
Is there any other way I can make my worker consume from a specific queue?
Note : celery -A [App_name] worker1.h%
starts the celery worker, and everything works fine just that is works on all my queues. I want to dedicate a worker to consume from specific queue.
Broker used: rabbitmq
I would just run a separate worker
celery -A app_name -Q queue_name --concurrency=1